Communist Rules for Revolution
To the best of our knowledge, these rules were first printed in the Bartlesville, Oklahoma, Examiner-Enterprise in 1919. It was reprinted again in 1946 in The new World News, after the Florida attorney general secured it from a known member of the communist party, who acknowledged that it was then still a part of the communist program.
In May 1919, at Dusseldorf, Germany, the Allied Forces obtained a copy of the “Communist rules for Revolution.” Nearly 80 years later, they have nearly succeeded in every area.
A). Corrupt the young; get them away from religion. Get them interested in sex. Make them superficial; destroy their ruggedness.
B). Get control of all means of publicity, thereby:
1). Get people’s minds off their government by focusing their attention on athletics, sexy books, plays and other trivialities.
2). Divide the people into hostile groups by
3). Destroy the people’s faith in their natural
4). Always preach true democracy, but seize power as fast and as ruthlessly as possible.
5). By encouraging government extravagance, destroy its credit, produce fear of inflation with rising prices and general discontent.
` 6). Incite unnecessary strikes in vital industries, encourage civil disorders and foster a lenient and soft attitude on the part of government toward such disorders.
7). By specious argument, cause the breakdown of the old moral virtues - honesty, sobriety, self-restraint, faith in the pledged word, ruggedness.
C). Cause the registration of ALL firearms on some pretext with a view to confiscate them and leave the population helpless.
Everyone of these rules are almost complete in the United States today.
Col. Edward Mandell House called for a meeting with European counterparts to form Institute of International Affairs. This was on May 30. In 1921 the United States branch was incorporated under the name Council on Foreign Relations.
1920: Frederick Charles Hicks, law librarian of Columbia University, published his book The New World Order.[15] He suggests in his book that a few of the Great Powers (of course the U.S.) Set the example to “cooperate here and there, piece by piece, in limiting the exercise of their sovereign rights.” He proceeded to quote League of Nations (forerunner of the United Nations) advocate A.L. Lowell as saying: “Vigorous objection has been made in the United States to partnership in a league that would have authority to order this country what to do in case of an attack against another member of the League. The objection is not without cogency...” Hicks further said: “it is contended, with very cogent arguments, that in the present, the League not only has the Council, and to a lesser degree the assembly, legislative and executive power, but judicial power also (see article 15)...We find in Article 8 what appears to be a statement of a new rule. ‘The members of the League recognize that the maintenance of peace requires the reduction of national armaments to the lowest point consistent with national safety and the enforcement by common action of international obligations.’”
The following is reported to be the program for the society of the future in a secret meeting of the conspirators: "Since it is absolutely necessary to fix the social order of the future now, at this very moment, since we are at last preparing to act, to avoid future uncertainty, I put forward my own system for a New World Order...I must first point out that my system is not yet completed, not yet entirely worked out. For I have got entangled in my own arguments: my final conclusion is diametrically opposed to my original idea. Although I started from the notion of unrestricted freedom, I arrived in the end at absolute despotism. I may add, however, that there can be no possible solution but mine...
Mr. Shigalëv has devoted himself too conscientiously to his task, and is also much too modest. I know his book. In it he proposes to divide mankind into two unequal parts. Only the smaller part, about a tenth of the whole, will enjoy personal freedom and unrestricted power over the other nine-tenths. These nine-tenths must entirely renounce all personality and become, so to speak, a herd, in order, through absolute obedience, by a series of regeneration, to regain their original innocence, almost like the old Garden of Eden, although, as may be remarked in passing, they will have to work. The measures proposed by the author for depriving nine-tenths of humanity of their personal will and for turning them into a herd by means of a new education during whole generations, are uncommonly remarkable, and are in addition based on the facts of nature and are highly logical...
One thing in his book is good, the idea of espionage. In his idea, every member of the society spies on the others, and is bound to inform against them when necessary. All are slaves and equal in their slavery...First of all, the level of education, science, and innate natural talents falls. A high intellectual level is possible only to superior talents; but we have no need of superior talents. Superior talents have always seized power for themselves and led to despotism. Men of talent cannot help becoming despots, they have always done more harm than good; therefore they are driven out or put to death...
Slaves must be equal: without despotism there has never yet been freedom or equality; but in the herd all must be equal, that's Shigalëvism! Does that seem extraordinary to you? I am for Shigalëvism... Listen, Stavrogin, to level mountains is a fine idea, not a ridiculous one. Education is not necessary and we have enough science. Even without science, we have material enough to last for a thousand years, but first we must enforce obedience. The thirst for education is an aristocratic impulse; with family and love, you have at once the desire for property. We will destroy this desire; we will spread drunkenness, slander, espionage; we'll spread incredible demoralization: we'll murder every genius in infancy.
Everything will be reduced to a common denominator, complete equality will be enforced ...Only the indispensable is indispensable; henceforth that is to be the motto of the universe. But it needs shocks: we'll provide for them, we the directors. Slaves must have directors. Complete obedience, complete impersonality; occasionally, however, every thirty years or so, Shigalëv will let them have a shock, and then they will all suddenly begin to devour each other, of course only up to a certain point, for the sole purpose of preventing boredom. Boredom is an aristocratic feeling; there will be no desires under Shigalëvism. Desire and suffering for us, Shigalëvism for the slaves!...
Oh, we shall convince them that they cannot be free till they renounce their freedom in our favor and submit to us...Too well, all too well, will they know the value of submission once and for all! Men will be unhappy till they grasp this...However, the flock will collect again and submit once more, and then it will be ever, for ever. We will give them a quiet modest happiness, the happiness of feeble creatures such as they were created. Oh, we shall convince them at last that they have no right to be proud...
Yes, we will force them to work, but in their free time we will make their life like a game with songs, choruses, and innocent dances. Oh, we will even permit them to sin, for they are weak and feeble, and they will love us like children because we allow them to sin. We shall not permit or forbid them to live with wives or lovers, to have or not to have children, according to whether they have been obedient or disobedient, and they will submit to us gladly and joyfully...And they will all be happy, all the millions, except the hundred thousand who rule over them. For we alone, we who guard the mystery, we alone shall be unhappy. There will be thousands of millions of happy children and only a hundred thousand martyrs, who have taken on themselves the curse of the knowledge of good and evil." [16]
1922: On March 26, 1922, New York City Mayor John Haylan stood very boldly when he spoke in Chicago concerning the state of the nation: The warning of Theodore Roosevelt has much timeliness today, for the real menace of our republic is the invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy length over city, state, and nation. Like the octopus of real life, it operates under cover of a self-created screen. It seizes in its long and powerful tentacles our executive officers, our legislative bodies, our schools, our courts, our newspapers, and Every agency created for the public protection. It squirms in the jaws of darkness and thus is the better able to clutch the reins of government secure enactment of the legislation favorable to corrupt business, violate the law with impunity, smother the press and reach into the courts. To depart from mere generalizations, let may say that At The Head of this octopus are the Rockefeller-Standard Oil interests [17] and a small group of powerful banking houses generally referred to as the (Jewish) International bankers. The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control Both parties, write political platforms, make catspaws of party leaders, use the leading men of private organizations, and resort to every device to place in nomination for high public office only such candidates as will be amenable to the dictates of corrupt big business. They connive at Centralization of Government on the theory that a small group of hand-picked, privately controlled individuals in power can be more easily handled than a larger group among whom there will most likely be men sincerely interested in public welfare. These international bankers and Rockefeller-Standard Oil interests control the majority of newspaper and magazines in this country. They use the columns of these papers to club into submission or drive out of office public officials who refuse to do the bidding of the powerful corrupt cliques which compose the invisible government.” [18]
This very long statement paralleled the former New York Times editor John Swinton’s comments that were written in his book A Momentous Question: The Respective Attitudes of Labor and Capital. He published it before the turn of the century. He said that “We know the powers that are defying the people...Our Government is in the hands of pirates. All the power of politics, and of Congress, and of the administration is under the control of the moneyed interests...The adversary has the force of capital, thousands of millions of which are in his hand...He will grasp the knife of law, which he has so often wielded in his interest. He will lay hold of his forces in the press, which are always waiting fro the wink, which is as good as a nod to a blind horse... Political rings are managed by skillful and unscrupulous political gamblers, who possess the ‘machine’ by which the populace are at once controlled and crushed.”
On May 1, 1922 (May Day in Communism), the president of the American Federation of Labor, Samuel Gompers, was quoted in the New York Times as saying: “W.Z. Foster (head of the American Communist Party at that time) who had no money, went to Moscow and came back and announced that he was building a great secret machine to undermine the American labor movement and turn it over to the Red International owned by Lenin. He began publication of an expensive magazine and proclaimed ‘a thousand secret agents in a thousand communities.’” [19] In a 1944 Senate Subcommittee on Un-American Activities over 1000 people were named in Birmingham, Alabama, alone as one example of this penetration into our communities.
1926: Jan Christian Smuts published a book during this year entitled Holism and Evolution. In it he described “the foundations of a new order of the unvierse.” Smuts “holism” was based upon psychologist Alfred Adler’s writings. Adler’s granddaughter became an experienced priestess of a Wiccan coven. Smuts was responsible for drafting many of the Clauses for the League of Nations - the forerunner of the United Nations and its push for a communist one-world-government. He published his plan for the League of Nations in 1918 when he stated: “Europe is being liquidated and the League of Nations must be heir to this great estate.”
Smuts later became one of the drafters of the preamble for the United Nations. Alger Hiss, communist, adopted Smuts holistic approach. Smuts helped the World Health Organization of the Untied Nations to define health as not only physical and mental but social well-being as well. This is why judges and social workers blame everything upon society. This holistic approach later was used by the Supreme Court in the case Roe vs. Wade to distinguish between “human being” and “person” in the first abortion cases. The approach was also used in the 1973 Doe vs. Bolton decision that defined health also as “emotional well-being.” Smuts and Alfred Adler corresponded with one another and had discussed “fourteen basic assumptions” of which few were the freedom to choose, self-determination, self-realization, and self-actualization upon which Abraham Mallow, the founder of Humanistic or Third Force Psychology was based.
Frederick Perls, the founder of Gestalt therapy, was influenced by Smuts. Perls therapy of self-actualization placed emphasis on the here-and-now! No future as the Bible reveals. Perls went to Esalen Institute, which hosted Soviet leader Boris Yelstin many times. Perls founded “guided daydreams,” which is being introduced into schools under the term “guided imagery.” According to New York psychiatrist Dr. Milton Kline, this si nothing but hypnosis.
1927: "If there are those who think we are to jump immediately into a new world order, actuated by complete understanding and brotherly love, they are doomed to disappointment. If we are ever to approach that time, it will be after patient and persistent effort of long duration. The present international situation of mistrust and fear can only be corrected by a formula of equal status, continuously applied, to every phase of international contacts, until the cobwebs of the old order are brushed out of the minds of the people of all lands."[20]
1928: This was a good year for Fabian Socialist George Bernard Shaw but a bad year for the rest of the world. Shaw published The Intelligent Woman’s Guide to Socialism and Capitalism in 1928. He revealed that “...under Socialism you would not be allowed to be poor. You would be forcibly fed, clothed, lodged, taught, and employed whether you like it or not. If it were discovered that you had not character and industry enough to be worth all this trouble, you might possibly be executed in a kindly manner...”
It was during the 1920s that Lenin made his famous prediction concerning world domination. He stated: “First we will take Eastern Europe, then the masses of Asia. Then we will encircle the United States, which will be the last bastion of capitalism. We shall not have to attack. It (U.S.) Will fall like a ripe grapefruit into our hands.” Eastern Europe was given to the communists with the signature of Churchill, Roosevelt, and Stalin to the Russians. China fell in the 1950s when the U.S. State Department cut off all military aid to our staunch ally Chiang Kai-shek. Then followed Korea and Viet Nam with the domino effect from U.S. withdrawal. Stage two completed. Cuba fell. Nicaragua and San Salvador with communist insurgents in southern Mexico. Foreign troops in Mexico and Canada and they are training on American soil at this very moment.
1930s: Dimitry Manuilski was a Professor at the Lenin School of Political Warfare in Moscow. He announced a plan in case America resisted in the latter stages of world conquest. “War to the hilt between communism and capitalism is inevitable. Today, of course, we are not strong enough to attack. Our time will come in thirty to forty years. To win, we shall need the element of surprise. The western world will have to be put to sleep. So we shall begin by launching the most Spectacular Peace Movement on record,. There shall be electrifying overtures and unheard of concessions. The capitalist countries, stupid and decadent, will rejoice to cooperate in their own destruction. They will leap at another chance to be friends. As soon as their guard is down, we shall Smash Them With Our Clenched Fist.”
Have these “electrifying overtures” begun? What about tearing down the Berlin Wall? Did East and West Germany merge again as a single nation? Did Mikhail Gorbachev declare the satellite countries to be “free democracies?” When one satellite country believed they were free, the Russians went after them with a vengeance.
"What they are planning for us; sex, religion, money in the New World Order. Which is more corrupt? The liberal media or the multi-national corporations? Why truly big money wants your children to try drugs, even while they campaign to discourage these evils. How the brilliant scientists have come up with the proven methods to destroy your family. All you have to do is let your guard down." [21]
1934: Margaret Sanger founded Planned Parenthood along with the program “Baby Code” which allowed only the “fit” to reproduce children. This was only the follow up to a 1904 project funded by the Carnegie Institution to establish a biological experiment station at Cold Spring Harbor, New York. Years later President franklin D. Roosevelt “felt it in order to talk, jokingly, of dealing with Puerto Rico’s excessive birth rate by employing, in his own hands, ‘the methods which Hitler used effectively.’” [22]
In 1934 the Carnegie Corporation financed to the tune of $340,000 what became known as Conclusions and Recommendations of the Commission on Social Studies of the American Historical Association. This was overseen by philosopher of British socialism Professor Harold Laski. Laski later summarized the Commission’s report: “At bottom, and stripped of its carefully neutral phrases, the repot IS an educational program for a Socialist America.” [23]
The Carnegie Endowment is controlled by Internationalists working for world government. The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace publishes an annual Yearbook. In 1934 it stated that it “is becoming an unofficial instrument of international policy, taking up here and there the ends and threads of international problems and questions which governments find it difficult to handle, and through private initiative reaching conclusions which are not of a formal nature but which unofficially find their way into the policies of governments.”
1935: Just like the more modern, Richard Nixon, broke the U.S. down into 10 Federal Regions, Delbert Clark of The New York Times lays bare that many members of Congress, such as Senator Robert Wagner of New York would reorganize the U.S. into Nine Groups instead of the 48 states at that time.[24]
Mary Mundt, wife of former South Dakota Senator Mundt, wrote a letter in the 1960s which was published in the newsletter of the National Federation of Republican Women’s Clubs that could explain why these Congressmen reveal this plan to make the U.S. into “Nine Groups.” Her letter was reprinted in the newspaper. Notice what she revealed: “‘If I push this button, I can turn off all the lights in San Bernardino (CA); and if I push this one, I can turn off the water in Los Angeles.’
It was the operator in one of the control rooms at Hoover Dam speaking. ‘What would happen if the wring person should get in here some time and start pushing buttons?’ someone asked. ‘The operator shook his head. ‘The wrong person pushing buttons in here could play havoc with the entire West Coast area.’ he replied.
My (Mary Mundt’s) thoughts went back to a dimly lighted, musty room in Denver (CO) in 1934. My husband and I had infiltrated a meeting of the Communist Party which was presided over by a professor from the University of Colorado. He was presenting a Communist Plan for seizing control of the government of the United States. Several times during the evening, he repeated the phrase: ‘An invasion of this country may not be necessary. If we play our cards right, it can be taken from within.’
On the wall was a large map of the United States, but it looked strange - unfamiliar. All the boundary lines of the states had been erased, and the country was divided into sections controlled by river authorities similar to the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA).
The professor continued his lesson: ‘We can never hope to take over this country if we have 48 strong state governments to oppose. We must get the states to depend more and more on the Federal Government for their very existence.’ He turned to the map: ‘Here we have a picture of this country controlled by Nine river authorities - all of which are dominated by the Central Government. The TVA is now a reality, and I’m happy to tell you that we have some of Our Party Members Planted There. We must have more Valley Authorities. There must be an MVA and a CVA, and so on Until the nation’s light and power is controlled from a central force. We are not interested in cheaper power for the people. What we want is to get Our Member planted in vital spots where at a given signal by merely pushing a button or pulling a lever, they can Plunge The Country Into Darkness And Disaster.’” [25] The boundaries of almost all the states has since been removed, and the rest are being omitted even as you read this.
1939: "...when the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people...will hate the New World Order...and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful‑looking people." [26]
1940: The man recognized as the “father of American sociology,” Edward Alsworth Ross, wrote his book New Age Sociology. He said “If the agencies which for ages have been sifting out of the population the less hardy and resistant have largely been put out of action in the last half-century, then other means must be devised to give the fitter an advantage over the less fit in reproducing themselves.”
He certainly didn’t hold back in giving his opinion about church-state relations. He wrote: “In matters political or civic, one’s religious convictions or church affiliations ought not to figure at all.” As far as social control was concerned, he believed “the State may render its citizens so many vital services that it...becomes a center of social power.” he claimed that “under the guidance of its elite, society develops an apparatus of control designed to repress harmful conduct and to encourage desired conduct.” He wrote on: “So today the recourse of those aiming to control the machinery of government for their Own ends is to sway mass opinion by means of elaborate veiled propaganda and cunningly to suppress whatever may run counter to their design...New methods of winning support had to be devised and of these the most promising is Propaganda Plus Censorship.”
"The term Internationalism has been popularized in recent years to cover an interlocking financial, political, and economic world force for the purpose of establishing a World Government. Today Internationalism is heralded from pulpit and platform as a 'League of Nations' or a 'Federated Union' to which the United States must surrender a definite part of its National Sovereignty. The World Government plan is being advocated under such alluring names as the 'New International Order,' 'The New World Order,' 'World Union Now,' 'World Commonwealth of Nations,' 'World Community,' etc. All the terms have the same objective; however, the line of approach may be religious or political according to the taste or training of the individual."[27]
1941: Social philosopher Lewis Mumford and Catholic theologian Reinhold Niebuhr joined to publish The City of Man: A Declaration on World Democracy. Our forefathers at the Constitutional Convention deliberately rejected “democracy” as a vile form of government, yet Lenin claimed that democracy was a necessary step toward world communism. Mumford and Niebuhr wrote: “There is, indeed, no liberty but one: the right, which is a duty, of making oneself and others free through absolute allegiance to the final goal of man...Democracy must be redefined (as)) a harmony subordinated to a plan...a purposive organism. It is the plentitude of heart service to a highest religion embodying the essence of all higher religions. Democracy is nothing more and nothing less than Humanism in theocracy and rational theocracy in universal humanism.” So they began to substitute “democracy” in the place of “Republic.”
"If totalitarianism wins this conflict, the world will be ruled by tyrants, and individuals will be slaves. If democracy wins, the nations of the earth will be united in a commonwealth of free peoples, and individuals, wherever found, will be the sovereign units of the New World Order." [28]
1943: A book was published called One World by Wendell Wilkie. Elliott Roosevelt, FDR’s son, proclaimed the book “a classic study of global politics which has become the bible of those who believe in the necessity of world government - the so-called One-Worlders.”
1944: The National Education Association’s National Association of Secondary School Principals and National Council for Social Studies published a pamphlet entitled The American Way of Business. Two authors participated. One was Oscar Lange, who later renounced his American citizenship and became Communist Poland’s United Nations ambassador. The second author was Abba Lerner. This pamphlet advocated the nationalization of all banks, credit, insurance companies, and natural resources, and an economic court be set up and “given the power to repeal any rules of Congress, of legislatures, or of the municipal councils.” Who else but a grant from the Rockefeller General Education Board would pay for pure communism to be published and get away with it?
1945: On October 24, 1945, the United Nations Charter was ratified and became effective. On April 26, 1945, representatives of most of the civilized nations of the world met in San Francisco to create an organization of nations which would become a pattern for world government and, it was hoped by its sincere supporters, insure lasting peace to a world long weary of war. The conference was completed on June 26, 1945, with the adoption of the U.N. Charter.
Before the San Francisco convention, however, much groundwork had been done by various groups in the United States and elsewhere, designed to make the world organization acceptable to the United States, which had, after World War I, rejected membership in the League of Nations. For a period of approximately three years before the actual formation of the United Nations, there was conducted in the United States a full‑blown, expensive campaign to overcome the natural objections of a free and powerful nation to giving up of its national sovereignty.
In 1941, there was organized a group called the International Free World Association, and this group began publishing a magazine called Free World. The secretary of this group was Louis Dolivert, who was later identified in testimony before the Senate Internal Securities Subcommittee by Louis Bundez as a member of the Communist Party [29] Bundez was a high Communist Party functionary who defected and gave valuable testimony to the U.S. Government concerning communist spy networks in America.
The fact that the United Nations was envisioned by its planners as a world government, superseding the sovereignty of nations, was not hidden. On Aug. 6, 1946, the Chicago Triune published an article concerning the one‑world plans of the U.N., and headed it "Radicals, Rich United To Push World State; Fight Defenders of U.S. Sovereignty."
The Council on Foreign Relations, in conjunction with the U.S. State Department, played an important role in the "conditioning" of the U.S. Congress and public to accept the U.N. Charter and its restrictions on national sovereignty. This is set out in State Department Publication 3580 (1950) on p. 180. This Subcommittee on International Organization was headed by Sumner Wells, of the State Department. Proving the direct link between the old League of Nations and the United Nations, was the fact that two members of this subcommittee had also served on the staff of Col. E.M. House at the Paris Peace Conference in 1918, at the time of the founding of the League of Nations. They were Dr. James T. Shotwell and Isaiah Bowman.
Before the San Francisco Conference, preliminary meetings were held in Moscow, Russia, in October, 1943, to lay ground‑work for the United Nations. The Moscow Conference was attended by the top diplomats of the United States, Russia, Great Britain and by the Chinese Ambassador to Russia. This meeting was held under the cold, calculating eye of Joseph Stalin, and received his blessings.
Later, at Dumbarton Oaks, final plans for the United Nations organization were hammered out. "Dumbarton Oaks Conference, a conference held at Washington, D.C., Aug. 21 to Oct. 7, 1944, among the United States, the United Kingdom, the Soviet Union, and China, to formulate plans for an international organization. The conference was held at Dumbarton Oaks, the Georgetown estate formerly belonging to Robert Woods Bliss. Because the Soviet Union was not at that time at war with Japan, Soviet representatives participated only until Sep. 28, and the Chinese only from Sep. 29 on. Basing its work on the principles expressed in the Moscow Declaration of Oct. 30, 1943, the conference drew up plans for an organization to be called the United Nations, with a general assembly, security council, world court, secretariat, and other agencies.
These proposals were published at the end of the conference. The conference also provided for the calling of a later formal meeting of all peace‑loving nations to establish the proposed organization. Problems left unsettled at the Dumbarton Oaks Conference, particularly the veto power and the voting procedure, were decided at the Yalta Conference in February 1945 (See Yalta Conference). The Dumbarton Oaks proposals were considered and discussed in many nations during the months after their publication and, with many modifications, became the basis for the charter of the United Nations adopted at San Francisco in M16 1945." [30]
The chief planner at this conference, and later a top aide at the United Nations Convention, was Alger Hiss, who was later to be exposed as a Soviet spy working inside the U.S. Government. To fully understand the planning behind the United Nations prior to 1945, we should look more closely at the Free World Association, which had such close ties to our own State Department. The organization, through its publication, Free World, made no effort to hide the fact that they were planning a world organization, with powers to enforce international decrees, and that the sovereignty of nations could no longer be allowed to stand in the way of this lofty goal.
One of those most active in the Free World Association was Carlo Emmanuel a Prato, who was a member of the International Editorial Board of Free World. For background on Mr. Prato, we quote from the Congressional Record, July 11, 1950, p. A5016: "Associated in the OWI Division under the control of Alan Cranston was an alleged Italian Communist, Carlo Emanuel a Prato, who had been expelled from Switzerland as a Soviet agent, entered the United States on a Czech passport issued to Milan Janota."
An ad in the Free World, August 1945, made the following statement: "This month marks the Free World's fourth anniversary. Its first objective, a charter for world organization, is realized. Now we move on toward broader world democracy."
The objectives of the Free World Organization was set out as early as October 1942, in its publication: "The creation of the machinery for a world government in which the United Nations will serve as a nucleus is a necessary task of the present in order to prepare in time the foundations for a future world order."
Following the formation of the United Nations, and continuing right up until today, numerous ultra liberal and "left" organizations have been organized around the promotion and defense of the United Nations. One of the earliest of these was United World Federalists, formed on Feb. 22, 1947, by merger of several other organizations interested in world government. These merged groups were Americans United for World Government; World Federalists; Massachusetts committee for World Federation; Student Federalists; World Citizens of Georgia, and World Republic. [31]
Their statement quoted at that time included the following: “...World peace can be created and maintained only under world law, universal and strong enough to prevent armed conflict between nations...Therefore, while endorsing the efforts of the United Nations to bring about a world community favorable to peace, we will work primarily to strengthen the United Nations into a world government of limited powers adequate to prevent a war and having direct jurisdiction over the individual."
1947: On July 9, 1947, Representative Richard Nixon introduced House Concurrent Resolution 68 asking “...that is the sense of Congress that the President of the Untied States should immediately take the initiative in calling a General Conference of the United Nations pursuant to (U.N.) Article 109 for the purpose of making the United Nations capable of enacting interpreting, and enforcing world law to prevent war.”
Many resolutions were introduced into Congress after World War II calling for world government. Albert Einstein, a member of the United World Federalist, made a radio broadcast on July 17, 1947, entitled “The Immediate Need for World Law.” In that broadcast he said that “...the resolutions aim at a fundamental alteration of the United Charter, with a view to an eventual transformation of the United Nations into a World Government.”
Philip Jessup, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and a World Court Justice and communist, wrote The International Problem of Governing Mankind in which he stated: “I agree that national sovereignty is the root of the Evil...The question of procedure remains. Can the root be pulled up by digging around it and cutting the rootless one by one? Jessup was a member of the Institute of Pacific Relations, which was cited as follows: “...the Institute of Pacific Relations was a vehicle used by the communist to orientate American far eastern policy toward communist objectives.” [32]
Jessup was cited as sponsor for the following communist front organizations: The National Emergency Conference, The American Law Students Association, National Emergency Conference for Democratic Rights, and American Russian Institute for Cultural Relations with the Soviet Union.[33]
Jessup also helped prepare the State Department’s infamous “White Paper” on China. This report lavishly praised the Reds and condemned our staunch anti-communist ally Nationalist China under Chiang Kai-shek. Later, Jessup became one of the early advocates for the admission of Red China to the United Nations.[34]
This is the year The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations was founded. The Institute began publishing its journal Human Relations. In 1947 also was founded The National Training laboratory in Group Development in the United States. This Laboratory was sponsored by the National Education Association’s Division of Adult Education Service and by the Research Center for Group Dynamics at the University of Michigan. The Research Center co-sponsored with Tavistock the first volumes of Human Relations. The Carnegie Corporation of New York provided $100,000 in support for the activities of the National Training Laboratory. Kenneth Benne, as president of the American Education Fellowship started by John Dewey, was on the National Training Laboratories Planning and Policy Committee. He wrote in the May 1949 edition of Progressive Education: “...teachers and school administrators (should) come to see themselves as Social Engineers. They must equip themselves as ‘change agents.’”
1948: Sir Julian Juxley, the first director-general of UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization), published UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy. In it he stated without apology: “The general philosophy of UNESCO should be a scientific world humanism, global in extent and evolutionary in background...In its education program it can stress the ultimate need for world political unity and familiarize all peoples with the implications of the transfer of full sovereignty From separate nations to a World organization...Political unification in some sort of world government will be required...Tasks for the media division of UNESCO (will be) to promote the growth of a Common outlook shared by all nations and cultures...to help the emergency of a single world culture...Even though it is quite true that any eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable.”
Fabian Socialist Huxley lifted excerpts from the above UNESCO literature for an article “A New World Vision.” [35] He stated that humanism’s “keynote, the central concept in which all its denials are related Is Evolution.”
Sir Julian Huxley, whose brother Aldous Huxley wrote Brave New World, mentioned on December 5, 1941, that his greatest wish was the America and Japan would be at war within a week. Japan sent planes to bomb Pearl Harbor on Sunday, December 7, 1941, just two days later,
1949: UNESCO continued to publish literature to subvert the United States. In a series of booklets with the title Toward World Understanding, it stated: “The kindergarten...has a significant part to play in the child’s education. Not only can it correct many of the errors of home training...it can prepare the child...for membership in the world society...The success of the teacher is bringing up his pupils to be good citizens of the world...As long as the child breathes the poisoned air of nationalism, education in World-Mindness can produce only precarious results.”
Now do you understand why the United States Government is attacking Constitutionalists, patriots, Second Amendment Advocates, Home Schoolers and etc.?
A Socialist superwork in propaganda was written by George Orwell, 1984. This book became required reading at least through the year 1959. 1984 had the theme of “Big Brother” and such concepts as “Newspeak” or “Doublespeak.”
On July 26, 1949, 18 U.S. Senators sponsored Resolution 56 that called for the United Nations to be restructured as a world federation.
1950: On April 24, 1950, a California District Court ruled that the United Nations Charter had become “the supreme Law of the Land: and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.” The decision was overturned by the California Supreme Court on April 17, 1952, only because the U.N. Charter provisions referred to in the a case were not “self-executing.” The Court quoted U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall in the 1829 case of Foster vs. Neilson that said a treated is “to be regarded in courts of justice as equivalent to an act of the Legislature, whenever it operates of itself, without the aid of any legislative provision.’
1951: the phrase “rock & roll” is created by disc jockey Alan Freed. This softer “rock” became the instrument through which “hard rock” would eventually emerge. Jefferson Airplane’s leading musician, Paul Cantor, admitted: “The new rock music is intended to broaden the generation gap, alienate parents from their children, and prepare young people for revolution.” Lead singer of the Mothers of Invention, Frank Zappa, said that “the loud sounds and the bright lights of today are tremendous indoctrination tools.”
1952: Aldous Huxley had the book The Devils of London published. Inside its covers, he wrote: “If exposed long enough to the tomtoms and the singing, every one of our philosophers would end by capering and howling with savages...Assemble a mob of men and women...treat them to amplified band music, bright lights...and in next to no time you can reduce them to a state of almost mindless subhumanity. Never before have so few been in a position to make fools, maniacs, or criminals of so many.”
On April 12, 1952, John Foster Dulles, Council on Foreign Relations member who became Secretary of State, began to perpetuate a Giant Lie because the U.S. Courts rejected the U.N. Charter as the supreme law of the land. In speaking before the American Bar Association in Louisville Kentucky, he said: “Treaty law can override the Constitution...Treaties can take powers away from Congress and give them to the President. They can take powers from the States and give them to the Federal Government or to some international body, and they can cut across the rights given To The People by their constitutional Bill of Rights.”
In the same year of 1952, The World Association of Parliamentarians for World Government drew up a map designed to illustrate how Foreign Troops would occupy and police the six regions into which the United States and Canada will be divided as part of their World Government Plan!!! Russians Would Occupy Texas!
1953: G.A. Borgese wrote the book Foundations of the World Republic. He was the chief consultant and writer of Preliminary Draft of a World Constitution that was published in 1948 and written by such other notable one-worlders as Robert M. Hutchins, Mortimer, and Rexford Tugwell.
John Dewey’s socialist/communist “progressive” educational philosophy by this time was taking over the schools. Lawrence Cremin wrote A History of Teachers College Columbia University in 1954. John Dewey had been the leader within Teachers College. Here is how Cremin’s book said it. “...the single most powerful education force int he world is at 120th Street and Broadway in New York City. Your children’s teachers go there for advanced training...With one hundred thousand alumni, Teachers College has managed to seat about one-third of the presidents and deans now (1953) in office at accredited U.S. teacher training schools. Its graduates make up about twenty percent of all our public school teachers. Over a fourth of the superintendents of schools in the one hundred sixty-eight U.S. cities with at least 50,000 population are Teachers college trained.”
The July 30, 1953, report of the Jenner Committee is probably the most comprehensive of the Congressional investigations undertaken by the Internal Security Subcommittee of the United States Senate. The Conclusions of the committee were stated in the report as follows: (1) The Soviet international organization has carried on a successful and important penetration of the United States Government and this penetration has not been fully exposed. (2) This penetration has extended from the lower ranks to top-level policy and operating positions in our government. (3) The agents of this penetration have operated in accordance with distinct design fashioned by their Soviet superiors. (4) Members of this conspiracy helped to get each other into government, helped each other to rise in government, and protected each other from exposure...(5) In general, the Communists who infiltrated our government worked behind the scenes; guiding research and preparing memoranda on which basic American policies were set, writing speeches for cabinet officers, influencing Congressional investigations, drafting laws, manipulating administrative reorganization - always serving the interests of their Soviet Superiors...(6) Policies and programs laid down by members of this Soviet Conspiracy are still in effect within our government, and constitute a continuing hazard to our national security.
1954: On February 23, 1954, U.S. Senator William Jenner of Indiana discussed before the Senate the Supreme Court’s Missouri vs. Holland 1920 ruling regarding treaties, and to the High Court’s Pink decision, while he is speaking in support of the Bricker Amendment which would prevent any treat from overriding the U.S. Constitution. The Bricker Amendment failed to pass by one vote. Senator Jenner then proceeded to say: “Today the path to total dictatorship in the United States can be laid by strictly legal means, unseen and unheard by Congress, the President, or the people...We have a well-organized political-action group in this country, determined to destroy our Constitution and establish a one-party state...(It has a) foothold within our government, and its own propaganda apparatus...One may call this group by many names. Some people call it socialism, some collectivism. I prefer to call it ‘democratic centralism.’...The important point to remember about this group is not its ideology but its organization. It is a dynamic, aggressive, elite corps, forcing its way through every opening, to make a breach for a Collectivist one-party state. It operates secretly, silently, continuously to transform our Government without our suspecting the change is under way...This secret revolutionary corps understands well the power to influence the people...by an elegant form of brainwashing...We see this, for example, in the innocent use of words like ‘democracy’ in place of ‘representative government’...It conducts tactical retreats but only the more surely to advance its own goal ...I know...of Alger Hisses who planned it that way...Dr. Wirt, of my State, told us in 1934 that the plan were all drawn, the timetable established ...The revolutionary cabal and its allies...designed the overall strategy. They broke the whole up into precisely measured parts and careful moves, which appeared to be wholly unrelated...They will use every ally, to prevent the American people from guessing how far the transformation had gone...”
Rene Wormser, general counsel for the U.S. House of Representatives Special Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt foundations, on April 5, 1954, wrote to Spruille Braden who was former assistant secretary of state and ambassador concerning the Carnegie Endowment, Rockefeller Foundation, Ford Foundation, and Rhodes Scholarship Trust. On April 10, 1954, Braden relied in writing: “I have the very definite feeling that these various foundations you mention very definitely do exercise both overt and convert influences on our foreign relations and that their influences are counter to the fundamental principles on which this nation was founded and which have made it great.”
An ultra-private group who became known as The Bilderbergers was formed by Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands. They first met at the Bilderberger Hotel, hence their name. Bernhard’s wife, Queen Juliana, later became one of the first to endorse “Planetary Citizens.” Many of the top statesmen in American politics have attended. A few examples are: Dean Acheson, Christian Herter, Dean Rusk, Robert McNamara, George Ball, Henry Kissinger, Gerald Ford, George Bush, Sr., Dan Quayle, Lloyd Bentsen, and Bill Clinton. The corporate giant CEO’s of course attend such as David Rockefeller, etc.
1955: “Socialism” had become a scare word by 1905. For the years between 1905 and 1955, the League for Industrial Democracy (socialist group) claimed among its members, advisors, cooperators, or recipients of awards, such nationally-known personalities as Ralph Bunche, George S. Counts, Clarence Darrow, Eugene V. Debs, John Dewey, Senator Paul H. Douglas, David Dubinski, Senator Hubert H. Humphrey, Max Lerner, Walter Lippmann, George Meany, Senator Wayne Morse, A.J. Muste, Reinhold Niebuhr, Harry A. Overstreet, Walter Reuther, Eleanor Roosevelt, William Shirer, Lincoln Steffens, James Wechsler, and hundreds of others.
It should be noted that All these persons occupied Key positions in the fields of government, education, religion, law, labor, communications and international diplomacy between the years of 1905 and 1955.
1957: Alice Bailey, who died before the publication of her book The Externalisation of the Hierarchy, had revealed through her “Master of Wisdom: known as D.K. crucial parts of the New Age Movement.” The Bible reveals these invisible Beings as demons in rebellion to their Creator God. Bailey wrote: “...the New World Order Must be built...(And) the three main channels through which the preparation for the new age is going on might be regarded as the Church, the Masonic Fraternity and the Educational Field...In all of these three movements, disciples of the Great Ones (Masters of Wisdom - Demons) are to be found and they are steadily gathering momentum and will before long enter upon their designated task...The Masonic Movement...will meet the needs of those who can, and should, wield power. It is the custodian of the law; it is the home of the Mysteries and the seat of initiation. It holds in its symbolism the ritual of Deity and the way of salvation is pictorially preserved in its work. The methods of Deity are demonstrated in its Temples, and under the All-seeing Eye the work can go forward. It is a far more occult organization than can be realized, and is intended to be the training school for the coming advanced occultists...”
"America: Submerged in a Sea of Zionism. Will history remember America merely as a major captive nation of Zionist world conquest, ignoring the lustrous ascendance and near triumph of the glorious potential of free man? Will Zionist scorched-earth shots to the heart of all that is wholesome buy them their long-sought victory for Babylonian humanism with its showy irreverence and the glorification of all that is sordid? Will all of the goodness, wholesomeness and productivity of our unique Christian Republic, which millions forfeited their lives to give us, be purged from the world, leaving man to enter the 21st century enslaved to the least of God's creations? Must Americans forever witness Zionist self-promotion and self-portrayal as our best and brightest, as our most deserving and selfless citizens suffering a society of lesser humans with intellectually inferior pursuits? Will God allow animal cunning, arrogance, greed and self-aggrandizement a final victory over humanity?
With 'political correctness' based upon Zionist fascism in the ascendance, with the American media system largely a Zionist tool, with Foundations and Zionist Political Action Committees spreading legislative dollars and providing selected candidates massive financial support, with two parties and political commentary dominated by the Zionist International, can traditional Americans hope to reverse the current course of history? Can we develop a formula to reclaim our Republic and the tools of a productive society, recapturing or rebuilding the essence of a nation one deservedly the noble and gracious leader of the world's nations?
Can we collectively observe that our governmental processes are captive to Zionist appointees at every level, that our State, Treasury and Commerce Departments as well as the Presidency are operated by Zionists who take their order from Zionism? Can we perceive that almost all of the national information-flow reaches us only through a Zionist filter and pro-Israel/Zionist propaganda machine? Have we not discovered the demise of education, the growth and development of crime, the decay of our cities and our rapid decline as a united people have happened concurrent with the intrusion of Zionists and Zionism into the American system? Have we not noticed that today it is increasingly difficult for ordinary people, Jew or Christian, White, Black, Yellow or Brown, to live together in 'live and let live' affection and respect, as the ADL the ACLU and the AIPAC attack society's pillars, move to destroy the Christian history of America and indoctrinate our children with ideas and philosophies that most of the world holds to be reprehensible, society-destructive, and beyond civility? Have we not noticed the fear in our church bodies, the manipulation of them to amend and mutate the teaching of Jesus' word to men?
Here we have history's master victimizers, representing themselves as the victims, as betrayed and sinned against, demeaned and tormented because of society's jealousy; a colony of Culicidae (insects such as mosquitoes and gnats) decrying the occasional angry slap by those that have been stung. We observe the creators of much of man's sordid and duplicitous record artfully and deceitfully altering, amending, abridging and censoring the record to point the finger of responsibility to others, begging society's pity and solace for pain suggested to have been shared by no other people and never publicly recognizing, though surely perceiving, that it has been their centuries-long manipulation of their fellow man and their self-ordination as gods that has cause the animosity they correctly sense.
Consider an alien system with such a firm hold on American policy mechanisms that they are capable of having American citizenship granted overnight to one of Zionism's most energetic employees and then have him named as American ambassador to his former employer nation and confirmed without a word from our 'illustrious Senate,' including that great defender of American interests, Mr. Jesse Helms? And consider a President's cabinet with 80% Jewish Zionist members and a President, himself a Rhodes Scholar (but unable to finish at Oxford) and a member of the Zionist International; a Trilateralist, Bilderberg secret communist.
Consider an alien philosophy carefully scheming to own and control America's newspaper and broadcasting systems, then combining its now massive propaganda and reinstructional capabilities with the movie, entertainment and documentary producers of Hollywood, in short order reducing life to drugs and sexual fantasies and living to a succession of mindless escapades and romps in the hay; surely and continuously changing Americans then America...finally creating such irresponsible and chaotic conditions in our lives that we then welcome massive regulation, police restraints and New World Order socialist oppression just to get order again; forget morality or social ethics, productivity or national focus.
Consider the raw source of energy and money for the pro-abortion and homosexual lifestyle movements, the illegal immigration madness, loss of personal heritage identity, multi-cultural disarray and the move to make our precious English subordinate to the first choice of everyone's original homeland language. These are funded, not by the grassroots but by single source money...given in every case to reduce our influential Christian nation to helplessness; Babylonians filled with hate for the Christian people who bade them welcome, spending enormous effort and endless dollars to destroy our once wholesome influence on an ugly world. Witness the altered state of church in America; intimidated, compromised, fearful and spiritless. Are they winning? Look and listen to the new mores of our changed society. Consider which nation is our number one recipient of 'loans' and aid. Note that they take what they want from our military arsenal and then without apology copy and sell it around the world, wherever money is to be made or counties subverted. Note their demand for U.N. (American) troops to clear away the enemy which surrounds their homeland and as stalking horses for their political influence thought the world. From the Pentagon, State, Presidency or the United Nations, their influence and numbers overwhelm any possible opposition and America increasingly does what they demand of us.
And then, dear friends, we have just witnessed once again their absolute mastery over our financial affairs. They own Banking, Investment Banking, the control of every major corporation, of course the 'Fed' and control of the Treasury of the United States. As we have just seen in Mexico, they do as they please, manipulating conditions, loaning then withdrawing support capital and grasping control of the resources of nations one by one, sometimes for profit but always for control. And then there is the depreciating dollar and Americans and the humble Mexicans are about to be enslaved by its demise.
When we add thought-control (political correctness) emanating from our college campuses and the continuous flow of Marxist ideas from Zionist professors to the 'hate crimes' laws and the massive effort to close down unwelcome publishers and Republican ideas, we can see that our Zionist fascist New World Order elitists have left no scheme destructive of Christian freedom left unutilized.
Consider then the 'we-are-in-charge' arrogance of the 'Justice' department's 92 Waco murders, followed by official lies and media cover-up, to be followed by massive raids on the citizens' militias that resulted...and national martial law, orchestrated and controlled by our Zionist fascist President in collaboration with the ADL.
Finally, we can watch with dismay as black-shirted, hooded world police power is deployed in America, computer programs are prepared for our personal control and prisons are readied for any who would underscore their First Amendment rights by using them. And huge funds of propaganda and money are expended to take from us our last hope of freedom; the Second Amendment and our guns.
And 90% of Americans haven't a hint, a clue. So brainwashed are they that when push comes to shove, most of them will unknowingly side with this enemy. So we who perceive must do the work of thousands." [36]
J. Edgar Hoover, then Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, delivered a speech to the National Convention of the American Legion where he warned: “To dismiss lightly the existence of the subversive threat in the United States is to deliberately commit national suicide. In some quarters we are doing exactly that.”
1958: Dr. J. Robert Oppenheimer, head of Princeton University’s Institute of Advanced Studies, was quoted as announcing: “I believe that only a world council of wise men can assure peace on a scientific basis.” [37]
Cleon Skousen, Assistant FBI Director, published a book called The Naked Communist.[38] From that book, certain parts were entered into the Congressional Record of the U.S. This was the basic program used to merge the United States and Russia into a World Government under the authority of the United nations. (1) LF Convince the U.S. to accept coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war. (2) Convince the U.S. to capitulate (give in) in preference to engaging in atomic war. (3) LF Develop the Illusion that total disarmament by the U.S. would be a demonstration of moral strength. (4) LF Permit free trade between All nations regardless of whether items could be used for war. (5) LF Extension of long-term loans to Russian and soviet satellites. Will never repay because they will “bury us.” (6) LF Provide U.S. “Foreign Aid” to all nations, thus draining the wealth of the U.S. Accomplish with the Foreign Aid Act of 1947. (7) LF Grant recognition of Red China with admission to the United Nations and oust Nationalist China, our ally. (8) LF Set up East and West Germany as separate states To Be Merged Later in a Great “Peace” Initiative. (9) LF Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the U.S. had agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations were in progress. (10) LF Allow All Soviet satellites representation in the United Nations. (11) LF Promote the United Nations as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world-government with its own independent armed forces. (12) LF Resist any effort to outlaw the Communist party. (13) LF Do away with loyalty oaths to the U.S. (14) LF Continue to give Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office. (15) LF Capture one or Both of the political parties in the U.S. (Now you can understand no matter which party goes into office, they continue toward socialism-communism). (16) LF Use technical decisions of the courts to Weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights. (17) LF Get control of the schools. Use them for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Get control of teacher’s associations. (18) LF Gain control of all student newspapers. (19) LF Use student riots to foment public protests against programs and organizations which are under communist attack. (20) LF Infiltrate the press. (21) LF Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures. Hollywood and Broadway Director Myron Fagan named before a stage audience and on radio the top 300 Hollywood stars that were Communists. (22) LF Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression - nude movies, books, perverted art, etc. (23) LF Control art critics and directors of art museums. “Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art.” (24) LF Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “Censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press. (25) LF Break down cultural (Christian) standards of morality by promoting pornography in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. (26) LF Present homosexuality, degeneracy, and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.” President Bill Clinton!!! (27) LF Infiltrate the churches and replace Revealed religion with “social” religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a “religious crutch.” (World and National Council of Churches front for a one-world-religion). (28) LF Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expressions in the schools. (29) LF Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate “out of step.” (30) LF Discredit the American founding fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the “common man.” (31) LF Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history. (32) LF Support all socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture - education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc. (33) LF Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus. (34) LF Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI. (35) eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities. (36) LF Infiltrate and gain control of more labor unions to destroy the economy. (37) LF Infiltrate and gain control of big business. Create a monopoly in the market place with them in control. (38) LF Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavior problems as psychiatric disorders. (39) LF Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals. (40) LF Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce. (41) LF Emphasize the need to rear children away from the legislative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices and mental blocks to suppressive influence of parents. (42) LF Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American Tradition; that students and special interest groups should rise up and use “united force” to solve problems. (43) LF Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self government. (44) LF Internationalize the Panama Canal. (45) LF Repeal the Connally Reservation so the U.S. cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction over domestic (Internal U.S.) Problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction over nations and individuals alike. This was accomplished on February 19, 1986, with the passage of the Genocide Convention Treaty with the United Nations.[39]
As you can see, almost every one of these points of Communist Agendas have been completed!
1959: John Foster Dulles, as Secretary of State and member of World Brotherhood, published a paper for the New York Bar Association entitled “Peace Through Law.” He showed their supposed “advanced enlightenment” by writing: “To accomplish peace through law will take patience and perseverance. It will require us at times to provide an example by accepting for ourselves standards of conduct more advanced than those generally accepted...There is no nobler mission that our nation could reform”
Norman Thomas, six times candidate for the President of the United States on the Socialist Party ticket said: “The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism, but under the name Liberalism they will adopt every Fragment of the socialist program until America will one day be a Socialist Nation Without Knowing How It Happened.”
The Council on Foreign Relations calls for a New International Order in their “Study No. 7,” that was issued on November 25, 1959.
James Warburg wrote The West in Crisis in which he mentioned: “We are living in a perilous period of transition from the era of the fully Sovereign Nation-State to the era of World Government... American children may best be educated into... responsible citizens not merely of the United States But of the World.”
1960: On February 18, 1960, Council on Foreign Relations member and Secretary of State Christian Herter gave a speech calling for complete disarmament “to the point where no single nation or group of nations could effectively oppose this enforcement of international law by international machinery.”
Walter Rostow, another member of the Council on Foreign Relations and later appointed as President Kennedy’s National Security Advisor, wrote his book called The United States in the World Arena. He admonished: “It is a legitimate American national Objective to see removed from all nations - including the United States - the right to use substantial military force to pursue their own interests. Since this residual right is the root of national sovereignty and the basis for the existence of an international area of power, it is, therefore, an American interest to see an End to Nationhood as it has been historically defined.”
1961: The State Department of the Kennedy Administration issued a plan to disarm all nations, including the U.S., and ARM the United Nations. It was issued as State Department Publication #7277 carrying the title The United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World. It details a three stage plan to disarm the world and build up the U.N. so no one could challenge its authority. “No state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force.”
An Editorial in the New York Times stated that “we must seek to discourage anti-communist revolts in order to avert bloodshed and war. We must, under our own principles, live with evil even if by doing so we help to stabilize tottering communist regimes, as in East Germany, and perhaps even expose citadels of freedom, like West Berlin, to slow death by strangulation.” [40]
The U.S. stood by and watched The Congo be overrun by Communist U.N. Troops because of their agreement on July 14, 1961 to a U.N. Resolution. Anti-communist Katanga leader Moise Tshombe was crushed by U.N. troops supporting Communist Patrice Lumumba.
1962: Council on Foreign Relations member Lincoln Bloomfield says: “...if the communist dynamic was greatly abated, the West might lose whatever incentive it has for world government.” In other words, If there were No communist threat, the peoples of the world would not seek nor want world government.
Nelson Rockefeller wrote in his book The Future of Federalism that “a New World Order” is necessary as the old order is crumbling and “a new and free order struggling to be born...led vigorously toward the true building of a new order.”
The National Training laboratories published Issues in Training where the authors wrote that “sensitivity training” “includes coercive persuasion in the form of thought reform or Brainwashing...” The book was full of information about being a “change-agent” and “unfreezing, changing and refreezing” attitudes. David Jenkins’ essay in the book stated that “the trainer has no alternative but to manipulate; his job is to plan and produce behavior in order to create changes in other people.”
A Newspaper Editorial stated: “That the National Education Association...advocates Federal aid has surprised us at times. But no longer - Real Control Over The Nation’s Children - is being shifted rapidly to the NEA. That organization has about completed the job of cartelizing public school education under its own cartel. It is doing so under an organization known as the National Council for Accreditation of Teachers Education, an agency whose governing council is tightly NEA controlled...The manner in which the NEA is Usurping Parental Prerogatives by determining the type of education offered...is...very simple: Control The Education and Hiring of Teachers...NEA has no apprehension regarding Federal control of public schools as a consequence of Federal aid. It has control itself. It is extending that control over colleges and universities. In the NEA scheme of things it will be a simple matter to extend control over whatever Washington agency handles the funds.” [41]
On October 10, 1962, Rep. John Asyhbrook put into the Congressional Record that he had introduced H.R. 10508 to stop abuses of testing programs in schools under NEA sponsorship. The Federal funded HEW counselors in schools started asking questions like: “is it wrong to deny the existence of God?” Newswatch Magazine’s for October/November 1987 and December 1987 Proved with absolute documentation that the NEA had become a Communist Front Organization to fulfill one of the Ten Planks of the Communist Manifesto.
Dr. Sterling McMurrin, then U.S. commissioner of education, resigned. Just before this resignation, he told head of the NEA William Carr: “You and I head up the biggest bureaucracies in Washington. NEA has all of the bureaucratic shortcomings and is in danger of moving toward national control of education, not by the Federal Government but by the NEA.” [42]
Gov. Nelson Rockefeller: "The United Nations, he told an audience at Harvard University, 'has not been able‑‑nor can it be able‑‑to shape a New World Order which events so compellingly demand.'...The new world order that will answer economic, military, and political problems, he said, 'urgently requires, I believe, that the United States take the leadership among all free peoples to make the underlying concepts and aspirations of national sovereignty truly meaningful through the federal approach.'" [43]
1963: North Carolina began the Governor’s School for the gifted and talented. [44] The school was funded by subversive Carnegie Corporation. Professor George Welsh of the Department of Psychology at the University of North Carolina wrote the Psychological Corporation of New York on May 6, 1963, explaining that at the Governor’s School “we are planning to administer an extensive test battery including measures of aptitude, interest, and personality” (which included 771 true-false statements such as ‘I believe in the worth of humanity, but not in God). Students would be presented with “a radically reformed Worldview... (including) all sorts of strange new moral and theological doctrines...” this was the exact type of Governor’s School started by President Bill Clinton when he was governor of Arkansas.
Former Council on Foreign Relations (Marxist organization) member and president of the United States in 1963, John F. Kennedy on September 30, 1963, spoke at a meeting of the International Monetary Fund: “Twenty years ago, when the architects of these institutions met to design an international banking structure, the economy life of the world was polarized in overwhelming, and even alarming measure, on the United States. So were the world’s monetary reserves...Sixty percent of the gold reserves of the world were here in the United States...There was a need for redistribution (Marxist) of the financial resources of the world...All this has come about. It did not come about by Chance but by Conscious and Deliberate and responsible Planning...We are now entering upon a new era of economic and financial Interdependence ...Our gold reserves are...(now) forty percent of the world’s holdings.” Note: Then President John Kennedy admitted that we had lost 25% of our gold reserves in just 20 years.
1964: William Fulbright was a Rhodes Scholar (subversive); he also happened to be a Senator. While Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Fulbright wrote Old Myths and New Realities. He stated: “Indeed, the concept of national sovereignty has become in our time a principle of international anarchy...The sovereign nation can No Longer serve as the ultimate unit of personal loyalty and responsibility.” Just one more statement of treason by elected high officials.
1965: The front page of The New York Times carried an article concerning statements by the “Black Pope” Father Pedro Arrupe. The writer of this article wrote: “The head of the powerful Jesuit Order charged today (September 27, 1965) that atheism constituted a Conspiracy that had infiltrated even the Roman Catholic Church and virtually controlled international organizations, finance, and mass communications...This new godless society operates in an extremely efficient manner, at least in its higher levels of leadership. It makes use of every possible means at its disposal, be they scientific, technical, social, or economic. It follows a perfectly mapped out strategy (Pedro Arrupe, is telling us that the plan has been drawn up for a long period of time). It holds almost complete sway in international organizations, in financial circles, in the field of mass communications: press, cinema, radio, and television. Father Arrupe, as head of the 36,000-member, Jesuit Order, is considered to be one of the half-dozen most influential churchmen in the world, as indicated by his informal title of ‘Black Pope.’” [45]
1966: An ultimate Insider Professor at Jesuit run Georgetown University, Dr. Carroll Quigley, published his book called Tragedy and Hope. Quigley explained that John Ruskin of Oxford University had a great impact upon Cecil Rhodes, who along with journalist William Stead “organized a secret society.”
They founded their secret society in 1891 with a “Circle of Initiates” which included Lord Alfred Milner and Lord Rothschild. It also had an “Association of Helpers.” Lord Milner later organized this into the round Table Group. Quigley quotes Stead as to the purpose of the Rhodes Scholarships: “...was that after thirty years there would be between two and three thousand men in the prime of life scattered all over the world, each one of whom, moreover, would have been specially; mathematically selected towards the Founder’s purposes ...”
Quigley revealed they created the Royal; Institute of International Affairs and the Council on Foreign Relations “and hoped to federate the various parts of the empire, then confederate the whole of it, with the United Kingdom, into a single organization. They also hoped to bring the United States into this organization to whatever degree possible...The chief backbone of this organization grew up along the already existing financial cooperation running from the Morgan Bank in New York to a group of international financiers in London led by Lazard Brothers...It was known that the CFR was a front for J.P. Morgan and Co., in association with the very small American Round Table Group...The board of the CFR have carried ever since the marks of their origin...Closely allied with this Morgan influence were a small group of Wall Street law firms, whose chief figures were Elihu Root, the Dulles brothers, (and) John J. McCloy...On this basis, there grew up in the twentieth century a power structure between London and New York which penetrated deeply into university of life, the press, and the practice of foreign policy...For example, it set up in Princeton a reasonable copy of the Round Table Groups’s Chief Oxford Headquarters. The copy was called the Institute for Advance Study and was organized by Abraham Flexner of the Carnegie Foundation and Rockefeller’s General Education Board. The plans were largely drawn by Tom Jones, one of the Round Table’s most active intriguers and foundation administrators. The American branch of this ‘English Establishment’ exerted much of its influence through five American newspapers [46]
Professor of psychology at the University of Michigan, Dr. James McConnell stated: “I teach a course called The Psychology of Influence., and I begin it by stating categorically that the time has come when, if you give me any normal human has come when, if you give me any normal human being and a couple of weeks...I can change his behavior from what it is not to whatever you want it to be, if it’s physically possible...I can turn him from a Christian into a communist and vice versa...Look, we can do these things. We can Control Behavior. Now, who’s going to decide what’s to be done?...”
1967: Richard Nixon makes a call for a “New World Order” while Robert Kennedy was calling for a “New World Society.”
1968: Richard Gardner, Council on Foreign Relations member and former U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of State, called for an end to national sovereignty, by using terms such as I”The Hard Road to World Order” and “house of world order,” while advocating “an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, likely to get us to world order faster than the old-fashioned frontal attack.”
The United States Disarmament Agency stated openly: “...the ultimate goal (is) Total Elimination of all armed forces and armaments except those needed to maintain internal order within states and to furnish the Untied Nations with peace forces...While reductions were taking place, a U.N. peace force would be established and developed, and, by the time the plan was completed, it would be so strong that no nation could challenge it.” [47]
On July 26, 1968, Nelson Rockefeller pledge support for a New World Order according to an Associated Press release.
1969: A document entitled “Marriage and the Family” published by the British Humanist Association stated that, “some opponents of humanism have accused us of wishing to Overthrow the traditional Christian Family. They are Right! That is exactly what we intend to do.”
On December 2, 1969, Congressman George W. Bush introduced the Atlantic Union Resolution, which included: “...a declaration that the Goal of their people is to transform their present alliance into a federal union.”
1970: The education al field and the mass media were to start promoting subtly the idea of World Order. An article “Thinking About A New World Order for the Decade 1990,” stated: “The World Law Fund has begun a worldwide research and educational program that will introduce a new, emerging discipline; world order, into educational curricula Throughout The world...and to concentrate some of its energies on bringing basic world order concepts into the mass media, again on a worldwide level.” [48]
Michael Springer wrote “Social Indicators, Social Reports and Social Accounts: Toward the Manage-ment of Society” that was funded by the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (HEW). He described how to manage society and “the overall guidance of our social order (implying that) we can, in the foreseeable future, develop macroscopic assess-ments of our social order, predict our future, and put social processes under control.” He also described the “emergency of a new ruling class,” managers of planned social changes, who will advise the “rulers” of society.
On April 22, 1970, council on Foreign Relations member and editor of Saturday Review, Norman Cousins, said on “Earth Day” that “humanity needs a world order. The fully sovereign nation is incapable of dealing with the poisoning of the environment...The management of the planet, therefore...requires a World Government.”
Zbigniew Brzezinski, Council on Foreign Relations member and the first Trilateral Commission director for International Banker David Rockefeller who also was former President Jimmy Carter’s National Security Advisor, wrote the book Between Two Ages. In it he wrote that: “In the technetronic society the trend seems to be toward...effectively exploiting the latest communication techniques to manipulate emotions and control reason...Human beings become increasingly manipulable and malleable...the increasing availability of biochemical means of human control...the possibility of extensive chemical mind control...A nations information grid that will integrate existing electronic data banks is already being developed...The projected world information grid, for which Japan, Western Europe, and the United States are most suited, could create the basis for a common education program, for the adoption of common academic standards...Today we are again witnessing the emergence of trans-national Elites...(whose) ties cut across national boundaries...It is likely that before long the social elites of the more advanced countries will be highly internationalist or globalist in spirit and outlook...The nation-state is gradually yielding its sovereignty...Further progress will require Greater American Sacrifices. More intensive efforts to shape a New World Monetary Structure will have to be undertaken, with some consequent risk to the present relatively favorable American position.”
The Trilateral Commission’s roots stem from Brzezinski’s book Between Two Ages. The following quotations from that book show how closely Brzezinski’s thinking parallels that of Council on Foreign Relations co-founder Marxist/Communist Col. Edward Mandell House: “Marxism is simultaneously a victory of the external, active man over the inner, passive man and a victory of reason over belief.” [49] “Marxism supplied the best available insight into contemporary reality.” [50]
Nowhere does Mr. Brzezinski tell his readers that the Marxism “in the form of Communism” has been responsible for the murder of approximately 160 million people in the Twentieth Century, has brought about the enslavement of over one-billion more, has caused want, privation and despair for all but the few who run the communist-dominated nations. After discussing America’s shortcomings, he writes: “America is undergoing a new revolution in which it unmasks its obsolescence.” [51] He proposes “deliberate management of the American future, (with the) planner as the key social legislator and manipulator.” [52] The central planning that he wants for our country is a cardinal underpinning of Communism and the very opposite of the way things are done in a Free country. Brzezinski suggests a piecemeal movement toward a community of nations... through a variety of indirect ties and already developing limitations on national sovereignty.” [53] This was the same proposal that Richard Gardner offered in the Council on Foreign Relations Journal Foreign Affairs. Brzezinski then calls for the forging of community links among the United States, Western Europe, and Japan; and the extension of these links to more advanced Communist countries. Finally, he lets us know that what he really wants is “the goal of world government.” [54]
1971: The Document: Declaration of Feminism was published that called for a “feminist-socialist revolution.” it stated: “We must go back to the matriarchies...to ancient female religions (witchcraft, Astorte, Queen of Heaven, etc.)...In order to break the tyranny of class oppression, it is necessary to establish a socialist order ...In the Final hours of capitalism we will dance on the grave of corporate America...Marriage is the key institution that has failed us and we Must Work To Destroy It...The nuclear family must be replaced with a new form of family where individuals live and work together to help meet the needs of all people in the society...With the destruction of the nuclear family must come a new way of looking at children. They must be seen as the responsibility of an entire society (now you know where Hillary Rodham Clinton go the idea for her book “It Takes A Village.”) rather than individual parents.”
The same women who published The Document also publish a newspaper called Gold Flower where they featured on the front cover of their December 1971/January 1972 issue a pregnant female as a crucified Christ.
1972: “He [President Nixon] spoke of the talks as a beginning, saying nothing more about the prospects for future contacts and merely reiterating the belief he brought to China that both nations share an interest in peace and building 'a New World Order.'"
No comments:
Post a Comment