By: Devvy
March 10, 2014
NewsWithViews.com
March 10, 2014
NewsWithViews.com
Amid
all the meaningless dither and political theater for TV over CPAC polls
regarding the 2016 presidential election, nary a sound is heard about
four very important bills millions of Americans should be shouting to
get passed. Of course, there's the unlawfully seated U.S. Senate headed
up by a certifiable lunatic, Dirty Harry Reid, who no doubt will fight
against them. Since
the Oval office is empty, currently occupied by an impostor, there's
no legitimate president to sign any of them into law should they get
passed.
However,
we the people should still be demanding a floor vote in the House to
bring them to the forefront of ignorant voters so they can, hopefully,
begin to understand you can't solve a problem unless you know when and
how it came about.
H.R.
156: To provide for the withdrawal of the United States
from the North American Free Trade Agreement
NAFTA
(No American Factories Taking Applications) according to Soviet traitor,
CFR/Trilaterialst, Henry Kissinger: "What Congress will have before
it is not a conventional trade agreement but the architecture of a new
international system...a first step toward a new world order."
July 18, 1993
NAFTA
was the first in a long line of
unconstitutional treaties/agreements destroying nearly 10 million
good paying jobs; career, steady employment destroyed in furtherance
of world government. H.R.156 was introduced January 4, 2013. Bill sponsor:
Rep. Mike McIntyre [D-NC7]. To date it has ZERO cosponsors. Referred
to House
Ways & Means Committee where it is sitting.
H.R.
75: American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2013 - To end
membership of the United States in the United Nations. Bill
introduced January 3, 2013. Bill Sponsor: Rep. Paul Broun Jr. [R-GA10].
The bill has a whopping 8 cosponsors; all Republicans. Referred to House
Foreign Affairs Committee.
The
United Nothing has never kept peace anywhere in the world. The UN's
purpose is to act as law enforcement for one world government. Since
1945, we the people have been raped in hundreds of billions of dollars
in UN "dues" and related UN expenses. "You can expect
to see a one world government, Communist controlled, under the United
Nations.You will see the United Nations run up astronomical debts which
we, under the terms of the treaty, are bound to pay." Congressional
Record, House of Representatives, January 15, 1962, pg 215, Congressman
James B. Utt - who
gives the truth in his speech that day: None is So Blind as He Who
Will Not See.
Every
penny in UN "dues" is borrowed money - more unpayable debt
with the interest slapped on our backs. For what? In 1971, Rep. John
Rarick attempted to get us out of that evil body; I
highly encourage you read the information here. Besides Rarick's
bill, you'll find an action that might surprise many. Agenda 21 is a
key tool to destroy personal property rights and much more; See The
House That Evil Built. The diabolical "sustainable development"
was birthed by the United Nothing; it
must be killed once and for all.
H.R.129
- Latest Title: Return to Prudent Banking Act of 2013. Restore
Glass-Stegall - House Committee on Financial Services. Bill
introduced by Rep Kaptur, Marcy [OH-9], January 3, 2013. 79 cosponsors.
2 are Republican, the rest Democratic/Communist Party USA. Referred
to House
Committee on Financial Services
Repeal
of Glass-Steagall Caused the Financial Crisis
The repeal of the law separating commercial and investment banking caused the 2008 financial crisis.
The repeal of the law separating commercial and investment banking caused the 2008 financial crisis.
"The
Glass-Steagall Act of 1933, passed during the Great Depression, prevented
commercial banks from trading securities with their clients’ deposits
and created the FDIC as a guard against bank runs. Passed in 1933 as
the Banking Act, Glass-Steagall was chipped away over the years and
eventually repealed during the Clinton Administration with the Gramm-Leach-Bliley
Act of 1999. Some experts believe that the act's repeal contributed
to the 2008 financial crisis, and the law served as a basis for the
Volcker Rule of the 2009 Dodd-Frank reform bill."
In
truth, it wasn't just above, it is and will always be the unconstitutional
"Federal" Reserve Banking Act of 1913 - the head of the beast
with all it's tentacles like the
Basel Agreements. The destruction of the dollar. Inflation, hyperinflation,
deflation, booms and busts. Fiat currency - a subject not only unknown
by 200 million or so adults, but also
"qualified" incumbents and/or candidates who get elected
to the Outlaw Congress.
H.R.3894
- Senior Citizens Tax Elimination Act to do away with income
taxes on social security. Introduced by Rep. Thomas Massie
(R-Ky.), January 15, 2014. Referred
to House Committee on Ways & Means. It has a whopping 2 cosponsors.
“Seniors
have already paid tax on their Social Security contributions, so taxing
Social Security is double-taxing by the federal government,” Massie
said. DeSantis echoed Massie’s sentiments in their joint statement:
“[The bill] blows the whistle on the federal government for double-taxing
the Social Security benefits of senior citizens. Individuals already
pay taxes to support Social Security, so there is no reason why these
earned benefits should be taxed on the back end.”
"The
GOP representatives argue the purpose of Social Security is “to
provide people with financial support during retirement, not to be another
source of tax revenue for the federal government.” If the bill
passes, Social Security benefits would neither be taxable nor reportable
on individual tax returns, thus restoring the integrity of the program."
Association
of Mature American Citizens (AMAC) supports the bill. I could find
nothing on endorsement by the AARP, an organization I've never belonged
to and never will. They fully support the "Federal" Reserve.
I highly recommend this book, Trust
Betrayed: Inside the AARP. One reviewer hit it right on the head:
"As a former employee, all I can say is read it and find out some
of truth about this two-faced monster that rips off the old and sells
out the young." With over 40 million members, if AARP got behind
that bill, it would easily pass both houses.
Back
in 2009, former congressman Ron Paul introduced another bill that would
significantly help minimum wage earners, yet the Service Employees International
Union (SEIU), just another front for the Communist Party International,
never brought it to the attention of their 2.1 million members
to get it passed. The
Tax Free Tips Act would have exempted tips from federal income and
payroll taxes. How many Republicans in the Outlaw Congress chant ad
nauseum they want you to keep more of what you earn? Not one of them
became a cosponsor of Rep. Paul's bill. Doesn't that tell Republicans
anything? How about Pelosi and her bunch? There wasn't a single cosponsor
of that bill. Not one. Was your congress critter in office then?
Why
haven't they all signed on the bill to stop taxing social security?
The bill has been in committee three months; what are they waiting for?
Those
bills are important issues that should have been solved a long time
ago. Where has your congress critter been? Why hasn't he/she pushed
to get them passed? Do people expect change and problems solved
by reelecting the same incumbents who never got the job done in all
the years they've been in Congress? Apparently so here in Texas.
Right now the approval rating of the Outlaw Congress is 10-11%. According
to at least one poll, Americans are fed up with the lies, corruption
and bull manure coming out of the mouths of both parties:
"By
a 67-26 percent margin, voters would kick everybody on Capitol Hill
to the curb and replace them with new people. That includes two-thirds
of Democrats, Republicans and independents. The result is perhaps not
so surprising, given how voters feel about lawmakers these days: just
12 percent approve of the job Congress is doing, while 78 percent disapprove."
But,
voters said almost the same thing in 2010 and still reelected 92% of
congressional incumbents and expected change:
"If
American voters only had the following two choices on the Congressional
ballot -- keep all current lawmakers in office, or get rid of all incumbents
in Congress -- what would they do? A new Fox News poll asked that question,
and the answer could be bad news for incumbents this fall. Sixty-eight
percent of voters would oust all incumbents, while 20 percent would
keep all lawmakers in office."
Not
here in Texas. Our primary was March 4th and what did ignorant voters
do? Why, they voted against qualified challengers for Congress. They
voted to reelect the same incumbents who have destroyed this country.
That's right. Conservatives ignorant on the issues allowed themselves
to be herded in the right direction by organizations like The Conservative
Republicans of Texas who sent out a sample ballot to registered Republicans
telling them to reelect every incumbent. So-called
leadership leading the flock straight to the slaughterhouse.
Not
just congressional races, but also for important offices like Lt. Governor.
State Sen. Dan Patrick is as rotten as they come, yet foolish voters
gave him 41% of the vote forcing a run off against incumbent David Dewhurst.
My state rep is a dog who should register with the Democratic/Communist
Party USA, yet he allegedly beat a qualified tea party candidate, Shannon
Thomason. I say allegedly because, well, here's what I sent out primary
night to my email list: Congressional & state incumbents sweeping
primary
"I
should have turned this damn thing off, but thought I'd take a peek
at the "election" results. I want to throw up.
"Every
GOP incumbent I can see is creaming legitimate challengers. Same thing
that happened to me in 1996 even though I was only 7% behind the incumbent
right up to "election" night with all it's fraud in my race.
At one minute after the polls closed, Peter Jennings (deceased) called
all 52 house seats in California; none of the numbers changed when they
quit counting votes at 4:13 am - including my race. What a remarkable
feat.
"Incumbents
in most districts are so far ahead - by 40% to a challenger, it's not
likely it will turn around. Gee, isn't it strange the old 81% to 18%
for an incumbent popped up? I voted for Shannon Thomason to replace
the state rep shoved down our throats because of redistricting; he's
a real dog, Rep. Darby. I know Shannon from local community meetings.
He's allegedly losing 81 to 18.
"From
my Blind Loyalty booklet of nothing but vote fraud, check these winners/losers
that night (primary March 26, 1996): 85-15, 81-18, 85-15, 81-18, 85-15,
86-14, 87-13, 81-18 and 81-14 which was my race. Those were the results
for incumbents vs challengers for the U.S. House throughout the state.
Every incumbent voted for NAFTA, all challengers including me were opposed.
Wonder why we allegedly lost?
"Those
house seats were scattered all over the state of California. Unless
you're specifically looking at a particular race, in a state the size
of California or Texas, people don't put together the pattern, but it
sure as hell is there and I'm looking at it tonight. John
Kerry won the election against George Bush in 2004 because Bush
lost Ohio:
"Richard
Hayes Phillips, a former college professor, has written a new book titled,
Witness to a Crime: A Citizens' Audit of an American Election. This
monstrous undertaking covers the 2004 election results in the State
of Ohio. Remember, the chief executive for the biggest vote fraud machine
operation in this country said he would deliver Ohio to Bush. He did.
What makes Phillips investigation so compelling is the book is filled
with concrete proof that the voters of Ohio were robbed of their right
to fair and impartial elections. The amount of work that went into this
investigation is staggering: 30,0000 images of forensic evidence, then
personally examining 126,000 ballots, 127 poll books and 141 voter signature
books from 18 counties in Ohio. This is the definitive and documented
evidence of crimes that cannot, must not be ignored.
"One
thing that showed up in his findings was the same thing I wrote about
back in 1996: discrepancies in the numbers during the voting process
- where are they? If you click here and go to page seven of my findings,
you'll see what I'm talking about. I knew what happened: vote rigging
and it was done by the machines. We saw the same thing repeat itself
during this last phony primary season. A recount was paid for and done
in the State of New Hampshire. The so-called final audit of the numbers
did not agree with the results as recorded on primary night. Of course,
the numbers continue to change for weeks after a primary or election;
I've covered this in previous columns in detail."
"What
I'm seeing tonight is a tragedy. Certainly a lot of "conservatives"
would vote for Cornyn because they simply are ignorant of everything
I covered in my recent column. But, with Americans "so angry"
with Congress and with Congress' approval rating hovering at around
10-11%, how come all the incumbents are AGAIN sweeping the primary tonight?
Hmm?
"John
Conryn is an evil SOB; he's winning above 60%; allegedly. Looking at
the totals
as they come in is nothing but looking at the tv on "election"
night for over a decade. Same pattern. Cream the challengers so voters
think they have no good ideas, they aren't experienced, it's not my
incumbent, it's the Democrats! I guess the voters in Texas love having
their freedom and liberties destroyed, more endless undeclared wars,
more heavy taxation to pay for the GOP's reckless and mostly unconstitutional
spending by incumbents. If this trend continues in the other primaries
coming up, I can only say "we're in serious trouble" is the
understatement of the century. How do voters in Texas think things will
change by reelecting the same people who have brought this republic
to her knees?"
Texas
has 32 U.S. House seats in Congress. 18 of them had no challengers.
Unbelieveable. Of ten that did, every single incumbent won their primary.
There are 4 new districts because of redistricting; census based on
counting illegal aliens in this state. Since 18 districts had no one
challenge the incumbent, the people of those districts apparently
are happy with the job their congress critter is doing: Destroying this
country. Every one of those incumbents has refused to challenge
Barry Soetoro's (aka Obama) eligibility or even the felonies he's committed,
i.e., forged selective service registration card, wire fraud, election
fraud. Not to mention using a SSN that doesn't belong to him and, of
course, a forged birth certificate. That includes popular reps like
Louis Gohmert, Pete Sessions and Steve Stockman. Why haven't
they signed on to the bills above?
Low
information voters in Texas. If this trend continues in the rest of
the primaries and voters do the same thing they did in 2010 & 2012
by reelecting the same Republican incumbents (92% & 96%) back to
the U.S. House, nothing will change even if they take the senate because
those same incumbents never go after the solution, only more
Band Aids. Nothing will change in the District of Criminals,
it will only get worse while they play politics with the Democratic/Communist
Party USA and jab at the fraud in the White House.
Voter
turn out on primary night state wide here in Texas was 9.63%. Out of
over 13 million registered voters, a pathetic 9.63% of Texans eligible
to vote could find time to get to the polls. That's how much they care
for their children's future. Don't mess with Texas is nothing but empty
words.
Subscribe to NewsWithViews Daily E-Mail Alerts! |
Congressional
incumbents across the country are all out campaigning for their upcoming
primaries instead of addressing existing legislation that benefits Americans
like the four bills above. Those four bills die December 31st.
While
it may seem a waste of time, I hope you will take the time to call or
fax (no email) your U.S. House member and demand those four bills get
to a floor vote. If you can, do the same for each committee chairman
for the four bills. I provided the links, all you have to do is type
up a short letter and fax it or call the district office
- not the capitol in Washington where it falls into a black hole. If
each house members received tens of thousands of snail mail letters
or faxes, it will tell them what we the people want and their primary
might just be their last.
Link:
Defeatism
Insures Defea
No comments:
Post a Comment