Submitted by: Richard Cordero
Using your story of abuse of power by judges
to encourage university students and journalists
to expose the refusal of
the Biden Commission on the reform of the Supreme Court to hear abusees on
the practice of abuse by justices and judges
while hearing only professors on the theory of constitutional law; and
to hold the proposed
unprecedented citizens hearings
through which the national public will be
informed of, and outraged at, unaccountable judges’ riskless abuse of power, and
given the opportunity to collectively demand compensation
to expose the refusal of
the Biden Commission on the reform of the Supreme Court to hear abusees on
the practice of abuse by justices and judges
while hearing only professors on the theory of constitutional law; and
to hold the proposed
unprecedented citizens hearings
through which the national public will be
informed of, and outraged at, unaccountable judges’ riskless abuse of power, and
given the opportunity to collectively demand compensation
By
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@verizon
Dear Dr. P. McCullough, SCOTUSblog publisher T. Goldstein, editor J. Romoser, columnist for law students S. Wermiel, petitions intern M. Jagodinski, Journalists, Academics, and Advocates of Honest Judiciaries,
mcculloughperry44@gmail.com,
swermiel@scotusblog.com, mjag
swermiel@scotusblog.com, mjag
I thank all those Advocates who replied to my article on the two-phase method for writing in up to 500 words your story of the abuse by judges that you have suffered or witnessed, for instance, as a party or while clerking for judges or reporting on their courts and decisions.
Abstract: This article describes concrete, reasonable, and feasible steps that you can take toward the objective of enabling people to tell the national public their stories at a public meeting of the Biden Commission for the reform of the Supreme Court, and at the proposed unprecedented citizens hearings to be organized by university students, professors, and journalists and held all over the country at their university auditoriums, media stations, and via video conference.
Story pitch and its foundation: Also, I am pitching this story as well as a series of analytical pieces on judges and their judiciaries, which are already written and available for your evaluation(Appendix 6). I can write articles on commission. All are supported by my three-volume study on this subject based on professional law research and writing, and strategic thinking. The study is titled and downloadable thus:
Exposing Judges' Unaccountability and
Consequent Riskless Abuse of Power:
Pioneering the news and publishing field of
a. Many of my articles are posted to my website Judicial Discipline Reform at http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org. They have attracted so many webvisitors and the latter have reacted to them so positively that 39,249+ have become subscribers to the site as of August 6, 2021(App. 3).
1) How many law firms, never mind lawyers, do you know who have a website with so many subscribers?2) You can join the subscribers thus: go to http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org <left panel ↓Register or + New or Users >Add New.
A. Using your story of judicial abuse as the basis of a presentation and the formation of a chapter of Advocates
1. Your poignant story, Dr. McCullough, is particularly well-written and supported by relevant citations. Your high academic degrees afford you special access to your former law schools and current deans and professors as well as class presidents and other officers, and student associations. Likewise, the first-hand knowledge of judicial abuse that you gained during your dramatic experience gives you ‘standing’ to approach associations of public defenders, innocent program officers, and the unjustly incarcerated.
2. You and other Advocates of Honest Judiciaries who are willing to take action, as opposed to merely complain, can join forces to do what is so necessary to cause the greatest number of stories to be submitted to the members of the Biden Commission (see their email addresses in paragraph 55) and to promote the proposed unprecedented citizens hearings: form Tea Party-like local and video chapters.3. Many of such chapters spread across the U.S. –and subsequently abroad– can become the composite engine through which committed people advance the common cause of forming a national, single issue, apolitical, civic movement for judicial abuse of power exposure; compensation of abusees; and reform through transformative change –the judiciary that goes into change only after full exposure of the nature, extent, and gravity of its abuse will come out transformed into a new system of justice because reforms inconceivable today will be made irresistible by an informed and outraged national public–.4. You can be instrumental in forming a chapter constituted of the members of the entities mentioned in paragraph 1 above.5. It is true that due to the conflict of interests described in the article(OL3:1308§D) on the Biden Commission, law deans and professors are compromised and will likely be reluctant to expose judges’ abuse of power.6. By contrast, university students, e.g., those at law, journalism, business, and Information Technology schools, are still imbued with a sense of justice and the idealistic determination of using the rule of law, 'the Power of the News' and of numbers, and the force of the fourth industrial (the digital) revolution, to make the world a more just and fair place.7. The presentation can be offered also at other venues reasonably expected to be interested in enabling their members to tell their stories of the abuse by judges that they have suffered or witnessed.8. By contacting their class president and other officers -e.g., through the dean of students, their school and association website, and social media- you can offer to make a presentation on:
a. the nature, extent, and gravity of judges’ unaccountability and consequent riskless abuse of power for their gain and convenience(OL2:1125¶4); andb. how the students can appeal to the Biden Commission to expose unaccountable abusive judges. By so doing, they would be following the example of the students at Harvard, Yale, and other Ivy League law schools who contacted the Senate and journalists to manifest their opposition to the confirmation of Then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court(OL2:773; OL2:971).
9. The presentation will be the appropriate event in which to emphasize how students can set in motion the proposed unprecedented citizens hearings to:
a. earn academic credit for a semester-long public interest and/or judiciary auditing and evaluation course; a course on team journalism; or a degree thesis that applies statistics and fraud and forensic accounting (FFA) to expose the concealment of assets, tax evasion, and money laundering involved in judges’ bankruptcy fraud scheme; and their misleading mandatory annual financial disclosure reports(OL:102§a), which they file pro forma with fellow 'revising' judges, who are subject to the same reporting duty so that their interest lies in rubberstamping their approval;b. afford people the opportunity to tell their story of judicial abuse;
1) This constitutes a significant public service given that complaints against federal judges are dead on arrival: They are received, processed, and kept in secrecy after 100% of them are dismissed and 100% of petitions to review such dismissals are denied. In fact, not even the names of the complained-against judges are made public. By abusing the self-disciplining power entrusted to judges by Congress in the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act of 1980(28 USC §§351-364), they ensure for themselves ‘unequal protection from the law’ compared to malpractising lawyers and doctors, pedophilic priests, abusive police officers, election-rigging politicians, etc., whose names and the complaints against them are made public when they are sued(OL3:1305§1).2) Students’ public service would also pursue judicial transparency, accountability, and integrity. As a test case that can attract public attention, they can expose the abuse as principal and the cover up of abuse by fellow judges committed by former Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and current attorney general Merrick Garland.
c. make the national public the audience of the citizens hearings by broadcasting them on the Internet live and making them available on demand by recording them as podcasts;d. invite investigative journalists, court reporters (those who cover the courts and judges’ decisions), media outlets, and journalism professors and students to form part of the panels that hear people’s stories at the citizens hearings just as lawyers and judges are invited to play the role of moot court judges; produce jointly a report on the hearings; and present it at the first-ever conference on judicial unaccountability and consequent riskless abuse of power, to be held simultaneously at their schools and media outlets and made accessible to the national public through interactive multimedia broadcast;e. publish as a sequel to that citizens hearings report a joint students/journalists multidisciplinary Annual Report on Judicial Unaccountability and Riskless Abuse of Power, just as law students publish law reviews and journals, as do so many other student associations in their respective disciplines. Thereby students and journalists can become in effect the supervising entity whose creation by Congress judges have strenuously and consistently opposed: an inspector general for the Federal Judiciary; all this would set an example to be followed with respect to the state judiciaries;f. promote the creation of the Institute of Judicial Unaccountability and Reform Advocacy, attached to a top university or national news network or a consortium of them, just as The Associated Press “was founded as an independent news cooperative, whose members are U.S. newspapers and broadcasters”; and universities hosts a wide variety of centers that specialize in particular areas of book and laboratory research and field investigation for the advancement of public and commercial interests and top secret government projects. Among the Institute’s functions are that of a clearinghouse for past and current complaints against judges filed for free by anybody; and a research center for fee-paying clients to audit judges’ and lawyers’ writings, transcripts, and news by performing computers-assisted statistical, linguistic, and literary analysis in search of patterns(OL2:792§A), trends(OL2:455§§B, D), and schemes(OL2:614, 929) of abuse of power;g. participate in launching a generalized journalistic investigation of judges’ abuse, just as scandals force media outlets to jump on the investigative bandwagon on competitive grounds; andh. enhance the resumes that students will submit to potential employers when applying for summer or permanent jobs with the description of the public service that the unprecedented citizens hearings launched by them have rendered and the personal initiative and commitment to “Equal Justice Under Law” and an informed citizenry that they reveal.
10. I offer to make the presentation if you cause the students to organize it. I can make it via video conference, and if they are willing to pay all my expenses, in person. To ascertain my capacity to present, watch my video and follow it on its
to encourage university students and journalists
to expose the refusal of
the Biden Commission on the reform of the Supreme Court to hear abusees on
the practice of abuse by justices and judges
while hearing only professors on the theory of constitutional law; and
to hold the proposed
unprecedented citizens hearings
through which the national public will be
informed of, and outraged at, unaccountable judges’ riskless abuse of power, and
given the opportunity to collectively demand compensation
to expose the refusal of
the Biden Commission on the reform of the Supreme Court to hear abusees on
the practice of abuse by justices and judges
while hearing only professors on the theory of constitutional law; and
to hold the proposed
unprecedented citizens hearings
through which the national public will be
informed of, and outraged at, unaccountable judges’ riskless abuse of power, and
given the opportunity to collectively demand compensation
By
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@verizon
Dear Dr. P. McCullough, SCOTUSblog publisher T. Goldstein, editor J. Romoser, columnist for law students S. Wermiel, petitions intern M. Jagodinski, Journalists, Academics, and Advocates of Honest Judiciaries,
mcculloughperry44@gmail.com,
swermiel@scotusblog.com, mjag
swermiel@scotusblog.com, mjag
I thank all those Advocates who replied to my article on the two-phase method for writing in up to 500 words your story of the abuse by judges that you have suffered or witnessed, for instance, as a party or while clerking for judges or reporting on their courts and decisions.
Abstract: This article describes concrete, reasonable, and feasible steps that you can take toward the objective of enabling people to tell the national public their stories at a public meeting of the Biden Commission for the reform of the Supreme Court, and at the proposed unprecedented citizens hearings to be organized by university students, professors, and journalists and held all over the country at their university auditoriums, media stations, and via video conference.
Story pitch and its foundation: Also, I am pitching this story as well as a series of analytical pieces on judges and their judiciaries, which are already written and available for your evaluation(Appendix 6). I can write articles on commission. All are supported by my three-volume study on this subject based on professional law research and writing, and strategic thinking. The study is titled and downloadable thus:
Exposing Judges' Unaccountability and
Consequent Riskless Abuse of Power:
Pioneering the news and publishing field of
a. Many of my articles are posted to my website Judicial Discipline Reform at http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org. They have attracted so many webvisitors and the latter have reacted to them so positively that 39,249+ have become subscribers to the site as of August 6, 2021(App. 3).
1) How many law firms, never mind lawyers, do you know who have a website with so many subscribers?2) You can join the subscribers thus: go to http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org <left panel ↓Register or + New or Users >Add New.
A. Using your story of judicial abuse as the basis of a presentation and the formation of a chapter of Advocates
1. Your poignant story, Dr. McCullough, is particularly well-written and supported by relevant citations. Your high academic degrees afford you special access to your former law schools and current deans and professors as well as class presidents and other officers, and student associations. Likewise, the first-hand knowledge of judicial abuse that you gained during your dramatic experience gives you ‘standing’ to approach associations of public defenders, innocent program officers, and the unjustly incarcerated.
2. You and other Advocates of Honest Judiciaries who are willing to take action, as opposed to merely complain, can join forces to do what is so necessary to cause the greatest number of stories to be submitted to the members of the Biden Commission (see their email addresses in paragraph 55) and to promote the proposed unprecedented citizens hearings: form Tea Party-like local and video chapters.3. Many of such chapters spread across the U.S. –and subsequently abroad– can become the composite engine through which committed people advance the common cause of forming a national, single issue, apolitical, civic movement for judicial abuse of power exposure; compensation of abusees; and reform through transformative change –the judiciary that goes into change only after full exposure of the nature, extent, and gravity of its abuse will come out transformed into a new system of justice because reforms inconceivable today will be made irresistible by an informed and outraged national public–.4. You can be instrumental in forming a chapter constituted of the members of the entities mentioned in paragraph 1 above.5. It is true that due to the conflict of interests described in the article(OL3:1308§D) on the Biden Commission, law deans and professors are compromised and will likely be reluctant to expose judges’ abuse of power.6. By contrast, university students, e.g., those at law, journalism, business, and Information Technology schools, are still imbued with a sense of justice and the idealistic determination of using the rule of law, 'the Power of the News' and of numbers, and the force of the fourth industrial (the digital) revolution, to make the world a more just and fair place.7. The presentation can be offered also at other venues reasonably expected to be interested in enabling their members to tell their stories of the abuse by judges that they have suffered or witnessed.8. By contacting their class president and other officers -e.g., through the dean of students, their school and association website, and social media- you can offer to make a presentation on:
a. the nature, extent, and gravity of judges’ unaccountability and consequent riskless abuse of power for their gain and convenience(OL2:1125¶4); andb. how the students can appeal to the Biden Commission to expose unaccountable abusive judges. By so doing, they would be following the example of the students at Harvard, Yale, and other Ivy League law schools who contacted the Senate and journalists to manifest their opposition to the confirmation of Then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court(OL2:773; OL2:971).
9. The presentation will be the appropriate event in which to emphasize how students can set in motion the proposed unprecedented citizens hearings to:
a. earn academic credit for a semester-long public interest and/or judiciary auditing and evaluation course; a course on team journalism; or a degree thesis that applies statistics and fraud and forensic accounting (FFA) to expose the concealment of assets, tax evasion, and money laundering involved in judges’ bankruptcy fraud scheme; and their misleading mandatory annual financial disclosure reports(OL:102§a), which they file pro forma with fellow 'revising' judges, who are subject to the same reporting duty so that their interest lies in rubberstamping their approval;b. afford people the opportunity to tell their story of judicial abuse;
1) This constitutes a significant public service given that complaints against federal judges are dead on arrival: They are received, processed, and kept in secrecy after 100% of them are dismissed and 100% of petitions to review such dismissals are denied. In fact, not even the names of the complained-against judges are made public. By abusing the self-disciplining power entrusted to judges by Congress in the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act of 1980(28 USC §§351-364), they ensure for themselves ‘unequal protection from the law’ compared to malpractising lawyers and doctors, pedophilic priests, abusive police officers, election-rigging politicians, etc., whose names and the complaints against them are made public when they are sued(OL3:1305§1).2) Students’ public service would also pursue judicial transparency, accountability, and integrity. As a test case that can attract public attention, they can expose the abuse as principal and the cover up of abuse by fellow judges committed by former Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and current attorney general Merrick Garland.
c. make the national public the audience of the citizens hearings by broadcasting them on the Internet live and making them available on demand by recording them as podcasts;d. invite investigative journalists, court reporters (those who cover the courts and judges’ decisions), media outlets, and journalism professors and students to form part of the panels that hear people’s stories at the citizens hearings just as lawyers and judges are invited to play the role of moot court judges; produce jointly a report on the hearings; and present it at the first-ever conference on judicial unaccountability and consequent riskless abuse of power, to be held simultaneously at their schools and media outlets and made accessible to the national public through interactive multimedia broadcast;e. publish as a sequel to that citizens hearings report a joint students/journalists multidisciplinary Annual Report on Judicial Unaccountability and Riskless Abuse of Power, just as law students publish law reviews and journals, as do so many other student associations in their respective disciplines. Thereby students and journalists can become in effect the supervising entity whose creation by Congress judges have strenuously and consistently opposed: an inspector general for the Federal Judiciary; all this would set an example to be followed with respect to the state judiciaries;f. promote the creation of the Institute of Judicial Unaccountability and Reform Advocacy, attached to a top university or national news network or a consortium of them, just as The Associated Press “was founded as an independent news cooperative, whose members are U.S. newspapers and broadcasters”; and universities hosts a wide variety of centers that specialize in particular areas of book and laboratory research and field investigation for the advancement of public and commercial interests and top secret government projects. Among the Institute’s functions are that of a clearinghouse for past and current complaints against judges filed for free by anybody; and a research center for fee-paying clients to audit judges’ and lawyers’ writings, transcripts, and news by performing computers-assisted statistical, linguistic, and literary analysis in search of patterns(OL2:792§A), trends(OL2:455§§B, D), and schemes(OL2:614, 929) of abuse of power;g. participate in launching a generalized journalistic investigation of judges’ abuse, just as scandals force media outlets to jump on the investigative bandwagon on competitive grounds; andh. enhance the resumes that students will submit to potential employers when applying for summer or permanent jobs with the description of the public service that the unprecedented citizens hearings launched by them have rendered and the personal initiative and commitment to “Equal Justice Under Law” and an informed citizenry that they reveal.
10. I offer to make the presentation if you cause the students to organize it. I can make it via video conference, and if they are willing to pay all my expenses, in person. To ascertain my capacity to present, watch my video and follow it on its
No comments:
Post a Comment