Submitted by: P McMillan
For posting and circulation:
by michael charles master (author of Save America Now, Rules for Conservatives, and the Birth Famine)
November 11, 2020 will be known as the day that the Supreme Court shirked its responsibility to defend and protect the Constitution of the United States. It ruled that the plaintive (Texas plus 19 other states) had no standing in the enforcement of the contract (the Constitution) concerning election procedures in 4 other states (Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania) even though all 50 states are the principles to that contract.
The Supreme Court punted its responsibility. It ignored Article 3, Section 2 of that contract that states: “The Judicial Power shall extend … to Controversies between two or more States;... In all Cases affecting …. those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction.”
“Original jurisdiction” allows the Supreme Court to look at all evidence instead of just the application of law as an appellate court. By using the lack of standing, the Supreme Court will not look at the evidence at all.
By its ruling, the Supreme Court and the rulings of lower courts refused to address election fraud in the 2020 election of:
- changes to election procedures in violation to the Constitution.
- ballot harvesting.
- ballot destruction.
- more votes than registered voters in several precincts.
- blatant vote switching by machine software.
- electronic and manual ballot box stuffing.
- simultaneous suspension of vote counting in the dead of night in 5 states controlled by Democrats in 3 different time zones when Trump was significantly ahead in each which resumed 3 hours later with Biden then ahead in each.
- acceptance of ballots that did not meet election requirements and co-mingling those ballots with other ballots so they could not be singled out for review.
- statistically unbelievable vote counts where Trump received fewer than 1% of the votes.
- back-dating ballot receipts.
The Supreme Court and lower courts rewarded the philosophies of the left, deep state, communists, and American oligarchs that might is right and that the end justifies the means.
The courts rewarded cheating, riots as extortion, mob rule, lies, news bias, and the use of the virus from China as justification to deviate from defined legislative election processes.
The ramifications of this will stretch well into the future… might is right and the end justifies the means. The rule of law is dead.
Those actions of election fraud were criminal, not just violations of the contract between the states. So who is investigating those criminal actions? Since the ones who committed the criminal acts are the ones who should be investigating them, who is doing the investigations?
The whole world is watching and now understands that the USA deep state interferes in elections, even its own elections, and that the USA does not have the resolve to fix it. That the USA courts are powerless to enforce the rule of law against American oligarchs and the deep state so they look for loop holes like “standing” to get them off the hook.
They are cowards at best, and part of the deep state at worst who cannot be trusted to “defend and protect” the interests of we the people in the Constitution.
No comments:
Post a Comment