https://theconservativetreehou
mark-meadows-take-action-to-ex
Jim Jordan, Doug Collins and Mark Meadows Take Action to Expose Ongoing DOJ
Institutional Fraud…
<https://theconservativetreeho
-mark-meadows-take-action-to-e
Posted on January 7, 2019
<https://theconservativetreeho
-mark-meadows-take-action-to-e
sundance <https://theconservativetreeho
“The efforts of Rosenstein, Wray, Bowditch, Boente et al, to cover-up the
institutional corruption extends far beyond their blocking activity of the
declassification requests; and shows up in the lack of substance behind the
Wolfe plea agreement
<https://www.scribd.com/docume
unt-Lying-to-FBI> when compared to the devastating evidence within the
original indictment
<https://www.scribd.com/docume
elligence-Committee-Leaker> .
There is a clear pattern. In addition to the disparity of outcome within
the Wolfe indictment/plea deal we exhibit: ♦redactions in material evidence
provided to congress; ♦refusal to release material to congress; ♦fighting
declassification of documents that would be damaging to the previous
officials; ♦refusal to discuss events with congress by officials who hide
behind the shield of the Mueller investigation; the list is long.”
House Judiciary Committee, ranking member Doug Collins, together with Jim
Jordan (ranking member Oversight), and Representative Mark Meadows, begin
questioning U.S. Attorney John Huber in their effort to expose the biggest
current DOJ con job.
In a letter to U.S. Attorney John Huber (full pdf below
<https://www.scribd.com/docume
Collins-Letter-to-US-Attorney-
the formal process to expose a widely believed fraud.
<https://theconservativetreeho
-meadows-letter-to-huber-1.jpg
A misinformation campaign has been waged to give the appearance of an
investigation that does not exist. There is ZERO factual evidence of any
investigative action underway by U.S. Attorney Huber, beyond speculation and
supposition.
Here is the full letter:
View this document on Scribd <http://www.scribd.com/doc/397
.
Last month investigative journalist Paul Sperry posted an interesting
report
<https://www.realclearinvestig
shing_savior_for_gop.html> at RCP-Investigations outlining numerous
interviews with DC politicians and would-be witnesses, if any actual DOJ
investigation of the FBI and DOJ misconduct was taking place.
What Sperry discovered is the year-long narrative around John Huber and
Michael Horowitz is factually false. [SEE HERE
<https://www.realclearinvestig
shing_savior_for_gop.html> ]
<https://theconservativetreeho
itz-huber-lausch.jpg>
Just like the false framework surrounding the long-forgotten U.S. Attorney
John Lausch; the guy who was supposedly hired to facilitate DOJ record
production but actually did nothing of the sort; Sperry discovered
<https://www.realclearinvestig
shing_savior_for_gop.html> the framework around U.S. Attorney John Huber
was manufactured by career officials inside the DOJ to tamp down problematic
demands for a second special counsel.
Worse still, and absolutely confirming information from our own contacts
within the OIG, Paul Sperry outlines how Michael Horowitz has not
interviewed key people who would be part of any authentic FISA abuse
inquiry. [READ HERE
<https://www.realclearinvestig
shing_savior_for_gop.html> ]
Unfortunately, this information is directly in-line with information
received by CTH in September of 2018. According to people with knowledge of
DOJ-OIG operations, and restrictions upon the IG imposed by chain-of-command
authority, Horowitz’s investigation has been limited by Mueller’s team.
According to our own independent sourcing, as a direct consequence of the
Sessions recusal issues, DAG Rosenstein was in charge of approving all OIG
investigative document production and DOJ/FBI scheduling for testimony.
Mueller’s team gave Rosenstein a list of restrictive lines of inquiry that
would be considered obstructing their own investigation and should thereby
be considered ‘out-of-bounds‘ for OIG review; those instructions broadly
created limits on what Horowitz could see, and who Horowitz could interview.
According to a person directly involved, an internal investigative
complaint was filed to the AG; however, due to recusal issues that complaint
was forwarded (by Sessions) to FBI chief-legal-counsel Dana Boente.
General Counsel Boente, hired by Christopher Wray, ultimately concurred
with Mueller and Rosenstein’s decision thereby blocking any internal
investigative efforts under the auspices of protecting the integrity of the
ongoing Mueller probe.
A bureaucratic catch-22.
As a result of team Mueller’s moves, multiple people including John Carlin,
Mary McCord, Bruce Ohr, Nellie Ohr, Carter Page and any other inside
official with knowledge of the FISA application and downstream issue, is
off-limits for DOJ-OIG questioning.
This decision was stunningly ironic considering that Dana Boente was the
ultimate arbiter inside the internal debate. Remember, Boente was “acting
AG” after Sally Yates was fired.
See the BS construct?
Sometime just after President Trump agreed to back-down from his
declassification request (9/21/18), under threat from Rosenstein
<https://theconservativetreeho
nstein-doj-threatens-obstructi
obstruction, around early October it was reported to us that INSD (FBI
inspection division) was planning to wait-out the Mueller probe and continue
the OIG investigation once the Mueller report was filed.
However, after the election it became obvious the small group, who make up
-and control- Mueller’s team, were going to expand their inquiry; and it was
unlikely the probe would end. The result of this bureaucratic mess and
tug-of-war is that Horowitz cannot see the information DAG Rosenstein
promised President Trump he would review.
<https://theconservativetreeho
classification-reversal.jpg>
CTH is told this outcome is entirely by design. DAG Rod Rosenstein knew
that Horowitz was being blocked by Mueller at the same time Rosenstein
promised President Trump the inspector general would review the FISA issues.
The internal complaint passed to Boente had already taken place prior to
September 21st when Trump met with Rosenstein.
In essence, DAG Rosenstein was lying to Trump about allowing Horowitz to
review the information behind the declassification….. well, sort of lying…
You see, here’s where Mueller and Rosenstein are Machievellian. IG
Horowitz will be allowed to see the material, but only *after* the Mueller
team is finished with their probe. So technically Rosenstein wasn’t lying
to the President – he just wasn’t being entirely forthcoming with the
timing. So long as the Mueller probe exists, the IG is blocked from review.
Read again slowly:
So long as the Mueller probe exists, Inspector General Michael Horowitz is
blocked from reviewing anything Team Mueller takes under their review.
The OIG has now been reviewing FBI and DOJ issues in/around FISA aspects
for over a year; yet the DOJ-OIG and internal inspection division unit
(INSD) has been blocked, by the Mueller probe, from reviewing the most
critical information needed.
Here’s where it gets interesting…. Remember, as you saw in December
<https://theconservativetreeho
house-declassification-review-
r/> from FBI Deputy Director David Bowditch, the ODNI (Coats), AG
(Whitaker/Barr), DAG (Rosenstein), FBI Director (Wray) and Deputy FBI
Director (Bowditch), along with Robert Mueller and/or any leadership member
of his team (Weissmann), can block or deny any declassification request.
However, they need an excuse to do so; Mueller is that excuse.
<https://theconservativetreeho
atements-redaction-request.jpg
None of these DOJ/FBI officials have any intention of declassifying
anything while the Mueller probe exists. Mueller’s team holds all the
power; arguably, by design.
Now, just pause and take this back to the beginning again, and be
intellectually honest with your review. If the Mueller probe can block
any/all investigative inquiry related to any matter they put under their
massive review…. then, even if you believe Huber is doing an investigation
of something (he’s not)…. what the heck could Huber investigate if access to
the evidence is controlled by team Mueller?
Think about it logically.
But wait, it gets worse…
If DOJ Inspector General Horowitz were to write an incomplete report,
obviously it would not be of value; but if he did, and it cited his
inability to review certain information – and/or conduct certain interviews
– that draft report (during the notification to principles phase) still has
to pass through DOJ channels who have the ultimately authority
<https://theconservativetreeho
st-today-but/> to remove any language concerning to their interests, and
transfer it into a classified appendix which no-one can legally discuss.
Thus, the Inspector General is not an autonomous official; Horowitz doesn’t
work without bosses.
With Paul Sperry’s reporting
<https://www.realclearinvestig
shing_savior_for_gop.html> as additional support, CTH continues to outline
the true motives and intents of Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller and his
team:
♦(1) Create an investigation – Just by creating the investigation it is
then used as a shield by any corrupt FBI/DOJ official who would find
himself/herself under downstream congressional investigation. Former
officials being deposed/questioned by IG Horowitz or Congress could then say
they are unable to answer those questions due to the ongoing special counsel
investigation. In this way Mueller provides cover for ideologically aligned
deep state officials.
♦(2) Use the investigation to keep any and all inquiry focused away from
the corrupt DOJ and FBI activity that took place in 2015, 2016, 2017. Keep
the media narrative looking somewhere, anywhere, other than directly at the
epicenter of the issues. In this way, Mueller provides distraction and
talking points against the Trump administration.
♦(3) Use the investigation to suck-up, absorb, any damaging investigative
material that might surface as a result of tangentially related inquiry.
Example: control the exposure of evidence against classified leak
participants like SSCI Director of Security, James Wolfe; and/or block IG
Horowitz from seeing material related to the FISA abuse scandal and
“spygate”. In this way Mueller provides cover for the institutions and the
administrative state.
In all of these objectives the Mueller special counsel has been stunningly
effective.
The efforts of Rosenstein, Wray, Bowditch, Boente et al, to cover-up the
institutional corruption extends far beyond their blocking activity of the
declassification requests; and shows up in the lack of substance behind the
Wolfe plea agreement
<https://www.scribd.com/docume
unt-Lying-to-FBI> when compared to the devastating evidence within the
original indictment
<https://www.scribd.com/docume
elligence-Committee-Leaker> .
There is a clear pattern. In addition to the disparity of outcome within
the Wolfe indictment/plea deal we exhibit: ♦redactions in material evidence
provided to congress; ♦refusal to release material to congress; ♦fighting
declassification of documents that would be damaging to the previous
officials; ♦refusal to discuss events with congress by officials who hide
behind the shield of the Mueller investigation; the list is long.
Additionally, the Mueller control agenda also extends into the two previous
IG reports submitted by DOJ Inspector Michael Horowitz.
With Robert Mueller in charge of an ongoing investigation, the two previous
IG reports (1. Investigation of McCabe and 2. Clinton email/FBI bias) could
not outline anything tangentially connected to the Mueller investigation
without first passing through his teams approval and review.
That level of Mueller influence kept the most severe elements of
investigative sunlight away from public review.
These officials defending the administrative state are still in place. We
know they are in place because their influential conduct is visible. Three
of them are inarguable:
(1) By redacting innocuous, albeit highly damaging information, within the
Lisa Page and Peter Strzok text messages and emails. Officials within the
agencies are hiding information and even eliminating the most damaging
material. Why did they redact the Page/Strzok text messages in the first
place?
(2) By controlling what records IG Horowitz has access to; in addition to
who he is interviewing. The IG is only as effective as the material he has
to review. Mueller, through people like Andrew Weissman is the one making
all the decision here.
<https://theconservativetreeho
issmann-pic.jpg>
(3) By shaping the executive summaries of the two previous IG reports to
ensure the specific material within the report is diluted as much as
possible in the summary and conclusions.
In essence, and against the understanding of how these officials
manipulated the recusal of AG Jeff Sessions; DAG Rod Rosenstein, FBI
Director Christopher Wray, Deputy FBI Director David Bowditch, FBI Chief
Legal Counsel Dana Boente, Special Counsel Robert Mueller and the affiliated
network of political operatives within the DOJ/FBI; this crew has held free
reign to shape everything in the past two years.
That is why there has been ZERO progress.
Everything past to present, has been a complete con-job by the officials
within the DOJ and FBI.
This is what Jordan, Meadows and Collins now hope to expose.
<https://theconservativetreeho
-meadows-letter-to-huber-1.jpg
<https://theconservativetreeho
a-court-fisc-corrupt.jpg>
No comments:
Post a Comment