Bertrand Daily Report The War For Our Mind & Soul Continues
Subject: Your Morning Intelligence Brief (February 20th, 2018)
Ed Note:
The push by the Communist Left to force President Trump to rollover on Gun Control legislation will be met with a modest change involving "background checks" and possibly a change to the "waiting period" and age requirement for buying an AR15 or AK47.
For me, I accept that as reasonable, but considering the shooting event in Florida, the change will have absolutely no effect on the NEXT school shooting unless the President moves forward with pro-active action to arm certain teachers and step-up security at all schools.
The Dems (of course) will say "that's not enough and is wreck-less" and does not remove the weapon off the streets.
School shootings are welcomed by those attempting to take-down Trump, guns, and the 2nd amendment entirely. They DO NOT care about the Pharmaceutical (weaponized) industrial complex being directly responsible for the many shootings involving those with mental issues. There is no doubt by anyone with any commonsense, a mentally deranged individual with extreme depression, anxiety attacks, and bullied by fellow students or employees, will find a weapon to kill others.
Even more disturbing is the fact that rogue elements within the CIA and FBI have a history of using these same individuals as a "patsy" for a political agenda. MK-Ultra brainwashing has advanced since the 1950's and is used to control the mind of individuals by using a "keyword" or phrase to trigger the person into action while being in a hypnotic trance. Hypnotism is just part of an MK-Ultra event and the "patsy" feels no remorse after a shooting or assassination.
"CBC News has learned that the federal government quietly reached an out-of-court settlement with Steel earlier this year, paying her $100,000 in exchange for dropping the legal action she launched in September 2015. [Steel became the victim of CIA-funded brainwashing experiments conducted by Dr. Ewen Cameron.]"
Look at the CCTV videos of the Florida shooter calmly walking away, after killing 17 students and injuring many others, is seen casually walking to a Subway and relaxes at a McDonalds. Don't you think that paranoia from the killings and/or the medication (if anything) would cause alarm by employees at Subway and McDonalds?
After shooting-up two or three floors, he dumped his AR-15 and backpack, casually mixed-in with other students vacating the school, and was identified by a female student of whom asked Cruz, "I thought it might have been you shooting !" and he replied...."Huh??"
Connect the dots...
---Dave Bertrand
Today's Featured Article / Report
Submitted by Arhata
What Liberals Don’t Understand: A Serious Attempt at Gun Confiscation Could Lead to Civil War
PJ Media ^ | 19 Feb 2018 | John Hawkins
PJ Media ^ | 19 Feb 2018 | John Hawkins
“From my cold, dead hands!” – Charlton Heston
Liberals love to fantasize about confiscating every gun in America. It may be their most beautiful dream. Liberals get control of the Supreme Court and ignore the Second Amendment; Washington makes gun ownership illegal; almost all the guns come pouring in or are destroyed; a few hapless Jim Bobs who won’t get in line get shot up by the cops and then the government is free to do anything it wants and if people don’t like it, well, what are they going to do about it without guns?
Let me suggest a less happy, but probably more accurate version of how an attempt at gun confiscation would likely go. Liberals get control of the Supreme Court and ignore the Second Amendment followed by Washington making gun ownership illegal. So far, so good, right? Then the vast majority of police departments across the country refuse to do more than accept weapons that are turned in and, of course, very few citizens actually hand over their weapons. At this point, D.C. would have no choice other than to accept that gun confiscation is impossible, which would be the most likely outcome.
Or, alternately, D.C. could hire goon squads in local communities to go house to house to confiscate weapons. Yes, people would be killed in conflicts with the police and goon squads that come to take their guns. Liberals would cheer. They would not be cheering when police chiefs, officers, and goon squad members who carry out these orders are assassinated at their homes by armed people from their own communities.
Since many Americans would assume, probably correctly, that gun confiscation would be a prelude to government violence against civilians, the assassins would be openly cheered as patriots by tens of millions of Americans. Messages supporting them would show up on social media; talk show hosts would call them heroes and others would encourage them to go further. This would enrage liberals who would demand more use of force against not just the assassins, but the people supporting them. These comments would likely harden positions on both sides, and if the attempts at gun confiscation continued (and they probably wouldn’t), things would get even more violent. Police chiefs, politicians, and anti-gun activists would probably be assassinated and millions would cheer on their killers. The government response would become ever more violent. There would be calls to get the military involved except the people making those calls would soon find our troops just as split as the rest of the country. A majority would likely refuse to go into action against their fellow citizens and some might even openly join them. By that point, the potential for a genuine civil war would be quite real.
The response to this from liberals would probably be something like, “Well, that certainly didn’t happen in Australia.” Very true, but what most liberals believe Australia did and what it actually did are very different.
Australia made it extremely difficult to buy a new gun as it instituted a completely voluntary gun buyback. This means that in 1996, there were 17.5 guns per hundred people and in 2016, the number was only down to 13.7 per hundred people. So Australia’s big accomplishment was to decrease the number of guns in its nation by 22 percent. How much of a difference would that make in America where there are 101 guns for every 100 citizens and open borders that would allow illegal weapons to stream in if there were ever a large-scale demand for them?
To get rid of guns on a scale widespread enough to matter in the United States, you’d need to go house to house and search because most people would claim their weapons were stolen or lost. Doing that with millions of up-to-that-point law-abiding citizens would be considered tyrannical and it would produce a violent backlash that hasn’t been seen in this country since the Civil War. If you want to turn ordinary American citizens into “freedom fighters” against an abusive government, try to take their guns and it will work about as well as anything else you can imagine.
END
******************************
Today's Featured Video
Hannity: Discusses double standard allowing Hillary a pass on campaign fraud and Steele Dossier
The Right Media: The truth about Trey Gowdy
Trey Gowdy Just Sent Donald Trump A Message
******************************
******************************
******************************
******************************
******************************
******************************
Stories contributed by John Rolls
******************************
From The Desk of Capt. Dave Bertrand (Ret.) Int'l Airline Freight Captain (DC-8 & B-727 & First Officer DC-10), Veteran U.S. Army S. Korea (Military Police Comms Chief) Vietnam era Sergeant, State Law Enforcement Background, Int'l Aircraft Repo/Recovery, Bondsman Fugitive Recovery, DHS Trained (Former) Counter-Terrorism Instructor, Political Analyst and Activist to help "Make America Great Again.
My mission is to slice through the propaganda, encourage everyone to write and share important news among our network of patriots, military, law enforcement and selected news media sources (we trust). We are the pulse of America and we will prevail.
No comments:
Post a Comment