NEW MANTRA TO DENY ISLAMIC TERROR: 'MENTAL ILLNESS'Governments, media 'trying to obscure motives' of attackersLEO HOHMANN
Are all jihadists, such as Jihadi John, who beheaded U.S. journalist James Foley, clinically insane?
Is “mental illness” the new cover for jihadist attacks on the West?
It certainly seems that way, says a noted expert on jihad.
The
latest “mentally unstable” young man to launch a seemingly random
attack on unarmed civilians was Zakaria Bulhan, a 19-year-old Somali
Muslim who had been resettled in Norway at the age of 5. Bulhan singled
out an American woman in London and stabbed her to death Wednesday on a busy square filled with tourists, then injured five others in a stabbing spree before being apprehended.
“Authorities
have ascribed jihad terror to mental illness on numerous occasions,”
said Robert Spencer, including the Orlando, San Bernardino and
Chattanooga attacks in the United States. Sometimes it sticks, but
usually, days, weeks or even months later, when few people are still
paying attention, the police will retract their earlier statements and
admit it was a terrorist attack.
In
the case of the Chattanooga attack it took the FBI five months to
decide that Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez was indeed a jihadist and not
simply a mentally disturbed young man who suddenly snapped before
shooting to death five unarmed U.S. servicemen.
“What
could account for this global outbreak of mental illness that always
manifests itself in similar ways?” Spencer told WND in an email.
“Authorities should start asking themselves why so many mentally ill
people embrace Islamic jihad violence. What are Obama and European
leaders doing about this curious epidemic of mental illness among
Muslims?”
A
profile on a book-rating website in the Norwegian Somali’s name showed
an interest in Islamic theology, listing a biography of the Prophet
Mohamed and a book of Quran verses and hadiths as recent reads, the Independent reported.
Yet
British police remain baffled. They said they continue to “investigate
the motives” for the attack, which left 64-year-old Diane Horton
bleeding to death on London’s Russell Square. The others injured were an
American man, Australian man and woman, an Israeli woman and British
man.
Scotland Yard’s first impulse Wednesday
was to say the unnamed attacker was “mentally unstable,” a story that
was widely reported throughout Europe and on every major TV network in
the United States. By the time British authorities released Bulhan’s
name on Friday
along with the fact that he was a Muslim, the media attention was
turned onto other topics of interest, such as the opening of the Olympic
Games and Donald Trump’s latest campaign snafus.
And not only was Bulhan a Muslim but a “devout” Muslim, according to his neighbor, who knew him for seven years and told the Daily Mail he saw no evidence of mental illness.
The
neighbor, Parmjit Singh, a BBC radio host, said “His mental health
problems are a scapegoat. They said he had mental health issues but that
was not the boy I knew.”
Even
after the attacker was identified as a Somali Muslim whose family had
been resettled in Norway when he was 5 years old, there was still a
concerted effort by the British authorities and media to blur any ties
to Islam.
Scotland
Yard said no evidence has been found of radicalization or anything to
suggest the attack was “in any way motivated by terrorism,” the
Independent reported.
London knife attacker Zakaria Buhlan was born in Somalia and resettled with his family in Norway at the age of 5.
The same reason, mental instability, was given for the attack on the Pulse nightclub in Orlando on June 12 by Omar Mateen, a Muslim born in the U.S. of Afghan immigrants.
And
the recent attack by a female Somali refugee in Lawrenceville, Georgia,
in which the refugee beat a woman with her own American flag, well, you
guessed it, she was mentally ill too, the FBI told WND.
The
pattern of blaming jihad attacks on mental illness is taking shape
throughout the West and involves a concerted effort by globalist
politicians and their corrupt media allies, says Spencer, author of JihadWatch blog and author of many books on Sharia and jihad.
Watch Robert Spencer’s short film about the preponderance of “mental illness” among Muslims:
Where does ‘radical Islam’ end and ‘mental illness’ begin?
David Kupelian, author of “The Marketing of Evil, “How Evil Works” and his latest, “The Snapp... asks a poignant question of the British and American authorities.
“In
all these cases of jihad-type massacres that the authorities label
‘mental illness,’ we need to ask: Where does ‘radical Islam’ end and
‘mental illness’ begin? And what if they are the same thing?”
For
more than 150 years, the most enduring legal standard for claiming
innocence by reason of insanity has been the M’Naghten rule – that the
perpetrator did not know that his criminal actions were wrong at the
time he committed them, Kupelian noted.
“But
by that definition, every Islamic terrorist in the world is innocent,
since his religious delusions persuade him that not only is it right and
moral to massacre innocent men, women and children, but it is
mandatory, required by their god as a prerequisite for salvation,” he
said.
“As I explore in ‘How Evil Works,’ the
Western world is currently in the grip of a massive case of Stockholm
syndrome, whereby governments and journalists have essentially
befriended the enemy sworn to destroy them,” Kupelian said. “One
manifestation of this syndrome is these reflexive, almost comical,
efforts by Western authorities to eliminate jihad as a motive, no matter
how obvious the truth is to everyone else.”
Former
Minnesota Congresswoman Michele Bachmann also believes this trend, if
continued, will ultimately lead to total defeat of Western civilization.
“For
some time, the knee jerk reactive explanations for jihadist acts of war
has been the mental illness defense by government official
spokespeople. These people see their role as Islamic apologists,”
Bachmann told WND.
“On
what basis are these spokespeople so confident in their psychiatric
diagnosis? Since when did communications specialists become on-the-spot
psychiatrists?” she added. “Somehow, they always rule out the obvious
Islamic motivation for terror.
“These
fallacious comments have nothing to do with truth. But they have
everything to do with keeping the one world globalist order coming
through the front door of western Christendom, geared to ensure its
certain destruction.”
A ‘brainwashed multicultural West’
G.M. Davis, a documentary filmmaker and author of “House of War: Islam’s Jihad Against the World,”
said mental illness is an easy crutch to explain away acts of
religious-based violence that modern multicultural societies cannot
understand because they themselves have been guzzling the Kool -Aid of
insanity.
“When
confronted with the acts of violence we have witnessed across Europe
throughout the summer of 2016, it is easy to take refuge in the idea
that the perpetrators are irrational monsters who cannot possibly have
any connection with the real world except a desire to destroy it,” Davis
told WND.
Mental illness is such a refuge, “i.e., they must all be crazy!” Davis said.
Surely
rushing into a crowd armed with a bomb or a gun or a knife and
screaming “God is great” is madness to the Western mind. The reason that
the insanity defense is so appealing in a brainwashed multicultural
West is that the multicultural worldview cannot accept the existence of
other worldviews that do not have “tolerance” as their creed, Davis
said.
“In
a way, it may be considered a form of projection: the insane accusing
the other of insanity,” he said. “It makes no sense that a rational
person should give up his life in this world for some fantasy world in
the next; that ‘for the price’ of their lives and properties ‘theirs
shall be the Paradise’ such that ‘they fight in Allah’s cause, so they
kill and are killed.'” (Quran 9:111)
Just
as Western societies have for years attempted to come to grips with the
root causes of poverty, crime, and other social maladies, so it is
necessary to come to grips with the root causes of jihadist violence,
Davis said.
“While
it is certainly true that the subjective state of mind of an individual
is critical as to why he commits an act of terrorism, at least as
important are the objective factors that may be commonly known, namely,
the violence dogmas of Islam itself,” he said.
From
Thomas Jefferson and John Adams to Alexis de Tocqueville and Winston
Churchill to numerous modern authors both Muslim and non-Muslim, the
violent nature of Islam has been common knowledge until the
multicultural prohibition against asking candid questions and giving
straight answers destroyed meaningful public discourse in the West, he
said.
“No
politically-correct formulation for explaining jihadist violence may be
allowed to touch on Islam itself. ‘Mental illness’ is a way of
pretending to shed light on the apparently inexplicable while soothing
the multicultural conscience.”
Double standard used for Dylann Roof
Author
and pastor Carl Gallups says that with the tag of mental illness the
globalists believe they can convince the American public that this is
not really Islamic jihad at work.
Yet, the broad brush of mental illness doesn’t apply for non-Muslims who conduct mass shootings.
“I
seem to recall a man by the name of Dylann Roof who committed a heinous
church massacre in Charleston,” Gallups said. “A large portion of the
media quickly tagged him as simply a white supremacist who hated blacks,
and one who had committed a bonafide act of terror.”
Gallups added, “Pundit after pundit ignored the fact that Roof might also have been a truly ‘mentally disturbed’ person.”
In
fact, it was finally revealed that Roof was at the time of his arrest
carrying Suboxone, a powerful narcotic commonly used to treat opiate
dependence and has been linked with sudden outbursts of violence, IBTimes reported.
“But,
alas, with this latest radical Islamic terror attack in France the
media all over the world are quickly telling us things like, ‘This was
absolutely not a terrorist attack.'”
Gallups said the reason for the mental-health crutch is simple. Evangelist Franklin Graham hinted at it earlier, when he said “The world is at war. It is most certainly a war of religion.”
Graham
refuted Pope Francis, who also said the “world is at war,” but was
quick to add that in his opinion this war had nothing to do with
religion.
Gallups
said if the war was being caused by continuous acts of global violence
launched in the name of Christianity, the media would have no problem
pointing out and naming the enemy, labeling each attack as an act of
terrorism regardless of whether or not its perpetrators had
mental-health issues.
He
said basic logic should compel the media to ask questions like, ‘Why
are so many mentally ill people embracing Islamic jihad violence?’ And,
if this is so, what does this say about radical Islamic jihad as a
whole? The answer is obvious. Apparently the globalist-leftist media has
not thought this through.”
List of terror attacks blamed on mental illness:
Laura J Alcorn
Let's
Invite More to our social network.
Send these post to your email groups and friends. Like us on
Facebook
|
Tuesday, August 9, 2016
MURDERERS OR 'JUST' NUTS ACTING OUT? ISLAMIC TERRORISTS OWN MSM!
Submitted by: Conservative 2 Conservative
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment