In the real estate profession “You’re Only as Good as Your Next Deal”. In the securities business it is “Past Performance is no Guarantee of Future Results.”
In
fact, the best fund managers pick companies, among other factors, based
on the past performance of managing executives who made “good deals.”
Both mantras prove that We, Americans, had to fight for our real estate the same as Israelis fight for theirs, the same as Americans today have to fight again to reconstitute the Republic for which, We, The People, once stood.
Both mantras prove that We, Americans, had to fight for our real estate the same as Israelis fight for theirs, the same as Americans today have to fight again to reconstitute the Republic for which, We, The People, once stood.
Among progressives character, or the lack of it; and corruption and the overwhelming evidence of it, never mattered. Therefore the progressive ignores the past performance of the leading opposition who employs 35,000 people and has spent a life of resounding success managing large enterprise; and also ignores the disastrous record of their favorite candidate’s complicity in the deaths of 350,000 human beings while she denied having had any complicity in it. Shortcomings matter more concerning the progressives’ enemies, and never for their own which is in most cases, many times larger.
Given this history one can almost posit that it is the lack of character that attracts the progressive to his idol…the lack of character that the progressive evidently shares with his idol.
Take the billionaire who threatens the status quo, whom allegedly went broke when he actually never had; and his opponent who claimed to be broke herself, when in fact she never was. This sort of a lack of character appears most glaringly when a president who has never built anything but a path to the nearest welfare office pointed his forefinger at the “broke” billionaire who has built everything imaginable, including skating rinks.
CLICK ON LINK TO READ THE REST
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~
SAY, YOU WANT THIS PAIR BACK IN THE WHITE HOUSE?
BILL & HILLARY CLINTON'S WAR ON WOMEN
The GRIFTER Presidential Candidate - Western Free Press - by Andrew Benjamin
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
EXAMINER: Is America getting tired of Clinton’s gun control obsession yet?
THE HILL
Clinton storms Connecticut with gun-control message
Still, surveys suggest the majority of Democrats support gun control, some doubt that the issue will be a difference-maker for voters. Only 3 percent of likely Democratic voters in Connecticut listed gun policy as the most import issue when deciding whom to vote for, according to a recent Quinnipiac poll. Voters said they were more concerned with the state of the economy and employment and Sandra Flukes' condom factory.
In other words, 3% of what is important to Democrats is Hillary's primary agenda;
and 250 troops sent to Syria is Obama's answer to 50,000 ISIL fighters
whose primary agenda is to destroy the west. Does anybody wonder which
side this man is on?
Me neither.
Hillary Clinton said that gun violence (code
for gun control, or in fact restricting the rights of legal gun owners
and nothing about dealing with criminals who use guns illegally)
will be the primary agenda of her campaign. She added for impact in the
same speech, that "Republicans are trying to take people's rights." No
one should remind her the Bill of Rights of the US Constitution state
the 2nd Amendment are the "people's rights," and the 2nd amendment also states: "the people's right to bear arms shall not be infringed." It specifies the Fedral government cannot infringe on that right.
What part of that language Hillary not understand?
What part of that language Hillary not understand?
No comments:
Post a Comment