- United Oligarchy of Amerika !
It is stupendous as aka Obama,
Rubio, Cruz and Jindahl are all guilty
of high crimes. Even more amazing is
that there is no prosecution, exception
being We The Freedomfighters - WTF !
Previously posted ...
Oregon update ! Constitution Lesson - KrisAnne Hall !!!
http://conpats.blogspot.com/
Updates
A Recommended Honorable Exit Strategy For Ammon Bundy
https://www.oathkeepers.org/a-
A Reply to Stewart Rhode’s Recommended Honorable Exit
Strategy For Ammon Bundy From Judge Anna
http://scannedretina.com/2016/
✡ ✡ ✡
Yavoh ~ He is coming !
Yahweh - Yeshua - Ruach Ha-Kodesh
Ehyeh Asher Ehyeh אֶהְיֶה אֲשֶׁר אֶהְיֶה
BREAKING NEWS FROM ISRAEL
Minute by minute updates here ...
Watching for Yeshua Ha-Mashiach
http://www.kolbonews.com/
https://friendsoflibi.org/
http://www.ynetnews.com/home/
https://twitter.com/Conflicts
http://www.jewishworldreview.
http://www.israpundit.org/
http://www.strategic-israel.
http://www.voiceofisrael.com/
http://www.defendingzion.org/
http://www.breakingisraelnews.
http://pamelageller.com/
http://www.jihadwatch.org/
http://www.joyofkosher.com/
http://prophecyupdate.
http://www.prophecynewswatch.
http://prophecynewsdaily.com
http://www.itshallcometopass.
http://www.
http://www.whatsgoingonnews.
http://gotquestions.org/
http://hummingbird027.com/
http://www.testingtheglobe.
http://pawcreek.org/
http://ociministries.org/
http://www.thetower.org/
http://www.
http://www.mechon-mamre.org/p/
http://www.yeshua-hamashiach.
http://www.hebrew4christians.
http://www.templeinstitute.
http://universaltorah.com/
http://free.messianicbible.
Pray at the Kotel - the Western Wailing Wall
http://free.messianicbible.
Entire Media News on this Planet
click continue to use PressDisplay.com
http://www.pressdisplay.com/
Thanks beloved Christine Hummingbird
4 articles - News of the Times
http://hummingbird027.com/
Twitter Snubs Freedom Of Speech
by Cathy Hinners
... Unfortunately this is only just the beginning. Our freedom of speech is threatened like never before, then it will be our freedom of thought and expression. Our Constitution and way of life is under attack, and life goes on. Social media is the first to go, then websites that allow to write just as we have done here for 4 years. But what will you do? What if the end result is arrest for blasphemy? This is it folks, our freedoms are no longer free. See you in jail. ###
http://dailyrollcall.com/2016/
Where are the main sectarian and ethnic divides in the Middle East today?
This Just Became The Most Important Map In Geopolitics
by Tyler Durden
... In order to understand the upcoming sectarian strife and in order to fully grasp who belongs to Iran’s sphere of influence and who is loyal to the Saudis, one needs to have a working knowledge of what the Sunni-Shiite split looks like across the region. [...]
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/
Is 2016 The Year Of The Dollar Collapse?
by Tyler Durden
... But deep down we all know the truth… and where this is headed. I’ve read no shortage of apocalyptic predictions suggesting that 2016 is the year of the dollar collapse. Or the global economic collapse. Or something else that invariably ends in the word ‘collapse.’ I don’t believe that. First, no one can credibly answer the question “when?” Governments have surprised us all with their uncanny ability to kick the can down the road and delay the repercussions of their folly. But I don’t really think the question of ‘when’ is relevant. [...]
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/
https://www.sovereignman.com/
Hizballah blows up “Mossad” patrol – first of more to come
Shortly after debkafile’s forecast of a Hizballah revenge strike for the Samir Quntar assassination, a Hizballah roadside bomb blew up against an IDF patrol at the Shebaa Farms on the Hermon slopes Monday afternoon, Jan. 4. No casualties were caused. debkafile’s intelligence sources report that this attack was just the first of a continuous offensive Hizballah is planning, that will spread from the Lebanise-Israeli ceasefire lines to the Golan. The Israeli force answered Monday’s attack with tank artillery fire against the southern Lebanese town of Al-Wazzani and was answered by rocket fire from Lebanon. [...]
http://app.debka.com/n/
Be ye therefore followers of God, as dear children; And walk in love, as Christ also hath loved us, and hath given himself
for us an offering and a sacrifice to God for a sweetsmelling savour.
Ephesians 5:1-2 KJV
Natural Born Test Results !!!
- United Oligarchy of Amerika !
The Difference Between a U.S. Citizen and a Natural Born Citizen
by Lawrence Sellin, PhD - January 7, 2016
Many members of the political-media establishment are either deliberately misrepresenting facts for political reasons or they are simply ignorant of those facts, that is, the manner in which one becomes a citizen as opposed to the concept of natural born citizenship.
Those who equate "citizen" with "natural born citizen" often misinterpret Constitutional law and statute law, the latter meaning that Congress may pass laws only defining the manner in which one becomes a citizen, either citizen by birth or a naturalized citizen, not the Constitutional concept of natural born citizenship.
In addition, many people mistakenly cite English Common Law as the origin of the natural born citizen concept, which, in that regard, the Founders rejected; rather than its true origin, the codification of natural law described by Emerich de Vattel in his 1758 book "The Law of Nations."
Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 states:
"No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."
Recognizing the Constitutional nature of the natural born citizen concept, there have been numerous attempts, in recent years, both by Democrats and Republicans, to amend the Article II "natural born citizen" clause, including:
January 14, 1975 - Democrat House Rep. Jonathon B. Bingham, [NY-22] introduced a constitutional amendment under H.J.R. 33: which called for the outright removal of the natural-born requirement for president found in Article II of the U.S. Constitution - "Provides that a citizen of the United States otherwise eligible to hold the Office of President shall not be ineligible because such citizen is not a natural born citizen."
June 11, 2003 - Democrat House member Vic Snyder [AR-2] introduced H.J.R 59: in the 108th Congress - "Constitutional Amendment - Makes a person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 35 years and who has been a resident within the United States for at least 14 years eligible to hold the office of President or Vice President."
September 3, 2003 - Democrat Rep. John Conyers [MI] introduced H.J.R. 67: - "Constitutional Amendment - Makes a person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 20 years eligible to hold the office of President."
September 15, 2004 - Republican Rep. Dana Rohrabacher [CA-46] introduced H.J.R. 104: - "Constitutional Amendment - "Makes eligible for the Office of the President non-native born persons who have held U.S. citizenship for at least 20 years and who are otherwise eligible to hold such Office."
According to Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the U. S. Constitution, a candidate for the Presidency must be a "natural born citizen," that is, a second generation American, a U.S. citizen, whose parents were also U.S. citizens at the time of the candidate's birth.
That there is a difference http://www.art2superpac.com/
A first draft of what would become Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, submitted by Alexander Hamilton to the Constitutional Convention on June 18, 1787 stated:
"No person shall be eligible to the office of President of the United States unless he be now a Citizen of one of the States, or hereafter be born a Citizen of the United States."
Fearing foreign influence on the President and Commander in Chief of the American military, the future first U.S. Supreme Court Justice, John Jay, on July 25, 1787, asked the convention presiding officer George Washington to strengthen the requirements for the Presidency:
"Permit me to hint, whether it would be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Command in Chief of the American army shall not be given to nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen."
The term "or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution" referred to loyal Americans who lived in the thirteen colonies at the time of the Revolutionary War, thus establishing the first generation of United States "citizens," upon which future "natural born" citizens would be created. The Founders, under Article II, allowed these original U.S. citizens to be eligible for the Presidency.
As understood by the Founders and as applied to the U.S. Constitution, the term "natural born citizen" derived its meaning less from English Common Law, than from Vattel's "The Law of Nations."
They knew from reading Vattel that a "natural born citizen" had a different standard from just "citizen," for he or she was a child born in the country to two citizen parents (Vattel, Section 212 in original French and English translation).
That is the definition of a "natural born citizen," as recognized by numerous U.S. Supreme Court and lower court decisions (The Venus, 12U.S. 253(1814), Shanks v. Dupont, 28 U.S. 242 (1830), Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1856), Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875) , Ex parte Reynolds, 20 F. Cas. 582 (C.C.W.D. Ark 1879), United States v. Ward, 42 F. 320 (1890); Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), Ludlam, Excutrix, & c., v. Ludlam, 26 N.Y. 356 (1863) and more) and the framers of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, the 14th Amendment, the Naturalization Act of 1795, 1798, 1802, 1885, and our modern 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1401.
There are historical arguments http://puzo1.blogspot.fi/2009/
Legal precedent and interpretation leave no doubt regarding the meaning of "natural born citizen."
The Venus, 12 U.S. 8 Cranch 253 253 (1814)
"The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives or indigenes are those born in the country of parents who are citizens."
Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857)
"The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens."
John Bingham, father of the 14th Amendment, which gave citizenship to American slaves after the Civil War, stated on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives in 1862:
"All from other lands, who by the terms of [congressional] laws and a compliance with their provisions become naturalized, are adopted citizens of the United States; all other persons born within the Republic, of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty, are natural born citizens."
In 1866, Bingham also stated on the House floor:
"Every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen."
Minor v. Happersett , 88 U.S. 162 (1875)
"The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first."
United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)
"At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children, born in a country of parents who were its citizens, became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners."
As recently as September 2008, in a Michigan Law Review article entitled "Originalism and the Natural Born Citizen Clause," Lawrence B. Solum, then John E. Cribbet Professor of Law at the University of Illinois College of Law, wrote:
"What was the original public meaning of the phrase that establishes the eligibility for the office of President of the United States? There is general agreement on the core of its meaning. Anyone born on American soil whose parents are citizens of the United States is a natural born citizen."
Citizen parents, plural.
Just as the Presidential oath of office is unique "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution," the eligibility requirements for President are equally unique, to ensure allegiance and prevent foreign influence at the highest levels of government.
I think the Founders had anticipated the mess in which we find ourselves today.
http://www.
Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is a retired colonel with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. Colonel Sellin is the author of "Restoring the Republic: Arguments for a Second American Revolution ". He receives email at lawrence.sellin@gmail.com
♥†♥ ♥†♥ ♥†♥
Served: Ineligible Presidential Candidates Challenged Over Article II Natural Born Citizen Requirement
Presidential candidates challenged in the state of Vermont over lack of Article II eligibility.
Excerpt via CDR Kerchner (Ret):
Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio Constitutional Eligibility Challenged in VT
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.
Vermont ballot eligibility challenge filed – Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, and Bobby Jindal are NOT “natural born Citizens” – H. Brooke Paige vs State of Vermont Secretary of State James Condos – Complaint filed December 9, 2015. Neither of these two active candidates and the candidate in suspension were at birth born to two U.S. Citizen parents in the USA and thus are not a “natural born Citizen” of the United States with sole allegiance at birth to only the USA. Each of the above were born with citizenship in more than one country. No matter what you think of their politics, like them or not, they are NOT constitutionally eligible for the office they seek. Obama has shown us what one can get when one puts a person with divided allegiances via birth into the Oval Office. We must defend the Constitution no matter which political party seeks to subvert it.
Read about the challenge and comment here:
http://citizenwells.com/tag/
FULL CHALLENGE:
H. Brooke Paige v State of Vermont Secretary of State James Condos
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
by Citizen Wells
Article URL - http://www.birtherreport.com/
♥†♥ ♥†♥ ♥†♥
P&E Editor Rips Washington Post Over Criminal Investigation Revealing Obama Birth Certificate Forgery
Sharon Rondeau of The Post & Email rips WaPo over lies about Obama's purported Hawaii birth certificate.
FLASHBACK:
Democratic Party Of Hawaii Would Not Certify Obama Was Constitutionally Eligible To Be President
2000/2004/2008 Democratic Party of Hawaii Certifications of Nomination for Presidential Candidates
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
- by ObamaRelease YourRecords
Article URL - http://www.birtherreport.com/
http://www.thepostemail.com/
♥†♥ ♥†♥ ♥†♥
Headline:
Hawaii Won't Name Any Places Honoring Their Purported Native Son Barack Obama
Things that make you go hmmm ...
Inquiring minds would like to know why Hawaii won't honor Barry Soetoro...
Headlines from around the Interwebs:
http://amestrib.com/news/
http://www.newsmax.com/
http://www.newsbusters.org/
https://www.washingtonpost.
REMINDER:
Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio: Obama's Hawaii Birth Certificate Fake!
http://www.birtherreport.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment