Coalition Urges States to Actively Resist EPA's
Coercive Power Plan
December 17, 2014
Citizen
Outreach has joined a broad coalition of free-market and
conservative organizations urging state elected officials to actively
fight against the EPA's efforts to coerce them into adopting
destructive anti-energy policies under the guise of the so-called Clean
Power
Plan.
Considering
how badly Nevada got burned by its disastrous decision to implement its
own ObamaCare exchange, let's hope our elected officials think twice
before touching the hot stove once again.
Chuck Muth
President
Citizen Outreach
Dear State Legislators, Attorneys
General, and Governors:
The U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is attempting to coerce states into adopting expensive,
destructive, unlawful regulations, possibly including cap-and-trade, on
greenhouse gas emissions – under the threat of even more draconian direct
federal regulations.
We urge you to fiercely resist any
attempt to appease the EPA's demands. EPA’s so-called Clean Power Plan (CPP) is
illegitimate, an affront to both federalism and the separation of powers.
When Congress enacted and amended
the Clean Air Act, it did not authorize EPA to restructure state electricity
policies. If at any time during the past six years, a U.S. senator or
congressman had introduced legislation containing the CPP’s emission-reduction
requirements, the bill would have been dead on arrival. Indeed, even when
Democrats had a supermajority in the Senate, they chose not to consider
House-passed cap-and-trade legislation.
Moreover, the CPP is unlawful and
almost certain to be overturned. EPA stretches the pertinent statutory
authority, section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act, beyond all recognition. This obscure,
seldom-used provision was designed to set technology-based emission standards
for “particular sources,” aptly defined as “designated facilities” in EPA’s
1974-1975 implementing regulations. In the CPP, EPA illicitly treats the entire
electric power sector of a state as a “particular source,” and illicitly sets
emission standards based not on technologies specific to coal power plants but
on the agency’s wish list of ‘green’ energy policies.
The Supreme Court recently cautioned
EPA against interpreting the Clean Air Act in ways that “would bring about an
enormous and transformative expansion in EPA’s regulatory authority without
clear congressional authorization.”
Evidently, EPA still cannot control
its appetite for power.
Instead of trying to bargain with
EPA, leaders like you should send a clear message to the federal government
that if it insists on pursuing the regulatory equivalent of punitive energy
taxes, it must promulgate and implement that policy itself -- and be held
solely accountable for the disastrous consequences that will follow.
These regulations will destroy
thousands of jobs and break the household budgets of millions of American
families struggling to make ends meet -- even if states undertake their best
efforts to blunt their impacts.
There is simply no feasible or
responsible way to implement these greenhouse gas regulations without
undermining economic growth. Moreover, any attempt to do so would have
zero environmental benefit as other countries will more than offset any decrease
in U.S. emissions.
Worse, these heavy-handed
regulations will render the United States less competitive in a global economy,
sending more energy-intensive manufacturing facilities abroad in search of more
affordable electricity. American workers jobs will be lost, and businesses and
consumers will face higher prices.
You will never regret saying no and forcing the federal government to implement its own
destructive agenda. States that chose to implement their own health care
exchanges learned this the hard way, as federal bureaucrats micromanaged every
aspect of the exchanges and state-level politicians ended up being held
responsible for the program's many failures.
Resistance to these regulations is
not futile!
The 114th Congress will
undoubtedly vote to overturn them, their prospects in court are dismal, and the
next presidential election could bring an end to EPA’s war on coal.
State-implementation would entail
buy-in from state policymakers and the creation of special interests in state
capitals that would benefit from regulation at the expense of your
constituents. State actions may therefore persist even after the federal
rule is rescinded. A plan imposed by the EPA will be inherently easier to
resist and reverse.
You have a responsibility to your
constituents not to acquiesce in the face of the EPA's threats, but to fight
vigorously against them. We urge you to do so.
Sincerely,
60 Plus
Association
American
Commitment
American
Encore
American
Energy Alliance
American
Values
Americans
for Limited Government
Americans
for Prosperity
Americans
for Tax Reform
Association
of Mature American Citizens
Center for
Civic Virtue
Center for
Freedom and Prosperity
Center for
Individual Freedom
Citizen Outreach
Civitas
Institute
Club for
Growth
Committee
For A Constructive Tomorrow
Competitive
Enterprise Institute
ConservativeHQ.com
Energy
& Environmental Legal Institute
Family
Business Defense Council
Frontiers
of Freedom
Heartland
Institute
Heritage
Action for America
Independent
Women’s Forum
Independent
Women’s Voice
Institute
for Liberty
Maryland
Taxpayers Association
National
Center for Public Policy Research
National
Tax Limitation Committee
National
Taxpayers Union
Restore
America’s Voice
Restore
America’s Mission
Revive
America PAC
Rule of
Law Committee
Taxpayers
Protection Alliance
Tradition,
Family, Property, Inc.
United for
Missouri
Citizen Outreach is a
non-profit, non-partisan grassroots lobbying organization
which promotes limited-government public policies and legislation
|
Wednesday, December 17, 2014
CITIZEN OUTREACH 12/17/2014
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment