SEE EYE AYE !!!
Previously posted ...
SHAPE SHIFTING the ALIEN PRESENCE !!!
http://conpats.blogspot.com/
Shabbat Shalom - Parasha Vayeshev (And He Lived) - Favor, Inheritance, a Grand Destiny !!!
Previously posted only via email due to copyright ...
Thanks Pastor Lee for archiving ...
FACT OF THE MATTER ... Iraq had weapons of mass destructions, see the Truth here -
Read closely ... previously posted 10/1/13 evidence ...
FOLLOW THE THE YELLOW CAKE ROAD !!! EXTENSIVE
http://conpats.blogspot.com/
★ ★ ★
FACT OF THE MATTER ... WTC was dissolved via alien technology
Thanks Pastor Lee for archiving ... previousy posted ...
THE ANNUNCIATION - WTC - MH 370 - the TRUTH !!!
http://conpats.blogspot.com/
Not seen before footage ... THE TRUTH about WTC
Dr. Wood has been a professor of mechanical engineering and she
holds several degrees in applied physics and engineering, including
a Ph.D. in Materials Engineering Science. We also need the world to
see what this technology has done. This technology was used to destroy
the World Trade Center complex on 9/11/01 and was a demonstration of a
new kind of free-energy technology in front of the entire world. As more
people around the world recognize this, the less power the controlling
interests will have. And if the entire world knows that free-energy technology
exists, individuals can openly build their own devices and share their designs
with others. It won't be a secret! Beyond the horrific tragedy of 9/11, she sees
a positive side: evidence of a breakthrough technology, which signals of the
dawn of a New Age. Dr Judy Wood speaks here, at the Breakthrough Energy
Movement Conference in Holland, held in 2012.
Dr. Judy Wood: The Dawn of a New Age; Breakthrough Energy Technology on 9/11
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
http://www.youtube.com/user/
http://www.drjudywood.com/
http://wheredidthetowersgo.
GlobalBEM - Breakthrough Energy Movement
Site - http://globalbem.com/
Videos - http://www.globalbemvoices.
Magazine - http://www.globalbemmagazine.
http://www.indiegogo.com/
Dr. Judy Wood Videos
http://www.
http://www.
Hutchinson Effect Explained
http://www.thehutchisoneffect.
http://www.hutchisoneffect.ca/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Tesla: The Race to Zero Point Free Energy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
David Brown - http://www.youtube.com/user/
http://www.
Michael Tellinger : Ancient civilizations and free energy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
✡ ✡ ✡
Yavoh ~ He is coming !
Hanukkah is coming ! Kislev 25, 5775 - December 17, 2014 !
BREAKING NEWS FROM ISRAEL
Minute by minute updates here ...
http://www.kolbonews.com/
http://www.ynetnews.com/home/
http://www.jewishworldreview.
http://www.israpundit.org/
http://pamelageller.com/
And when he had gathered all the chief priests and scribes of the people together, he demanded of them
where Christ should be born. And they said unto him, In Bethlehem of Judaea: for thus it is written by
the prophet, And thou Bethlehem, in the land of Juda, art not the least among the princes of Juda:
for out of thee shall come a Governor, that shall rule my people Israel.
Matthew 2:4-6 KJV
SEE EYE AYE !!!
Thanks A C2C - Laura J Alcorn
http://americac2c.com/?xg_
Defending the CIA
by Elise Cooper
Once again the Democrats and the Obama Administration are throwing the CIA under the bus, while Senator Dianne Feinstein is on a personal witch-hunt. With the release of the Democrats’ report on the CIA enhanced interrogation program, they seem to enjoy playing partisan politics instead of trying to keep Americans safe. Their most outrageous conclusions were that CIA officials allegedly deceived their superiors at the White House, members of Congress and even sometimes their own peers about the interrogation program, as well as that no actionable intelligence was gained. American Thinker interviewed former CIA officials to get their side of the story.
It is obvious that the mainstream media is biased, labeling it as “The Torture Report.” In looking at just the headlines the condemnation becomes obvious: “CIA Report Details Brutality, Dishonesty,” “Torture Was Ineffective,” “Ugly Truth,” “CIA Misled Public On Torture,” and “CIA Abuses A Stain On Our Values.” Unfortunately it seems that all these media outlets forgot one important point, that during the Bush administration there was not an attack on the US homeland and its embassies.
Jose Rodriquez Jr., the former Director of the CIA's National Clandestine Service, told American Thinker, that the enhanced interrogation techniques included sleep deprivation, stress techniques, facial holds, insult slaps with an open hand, and waterboarding of three terrorists. “Our objective was not to inflict pain, but to instill a sense of hopelessness and despair. It is more about psychological manipulation than anything else. After being captured, the terrorists eventually will conclude that they have no control over their situation and we are the ones who control their fate. You may be surprised, but I agree with those people who say torture does not work. That is because our program was not torture and it did work. We made sure that we vetted information. Everything was based on legality, a training manual, strict procedures, and guidelines. The bottom line is that the program was very well managed and what was written in the Democratic report is widely exaggerated or never happened.”
All those interviewed regard the Democrats as being highly hypocritical. They push back that in the wake of the 9/11 attacks Congress urged the CIA to do everything possible to prevent another attack, debilitate, and destroy al-Qaeda. Congress was briefed throughout, a number of times. Either members of Congress are lying to the American people or they have selective memories while now taking the moral high ground. For example, Democratic Senator John D. Rockefeller, a high ranking member of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, said in March 2003 about Khalid Sheikh Mohammed being turned over to a third country that permits torture, “But I wouldn’t rule it out. I wouldn’t take anything off the table where he is concerned, because this is the man who has killed hundreds and hundreds of Americans over the last ten years.” Then there is the famous Nancy Pelosi news conference where she said she was never briefed; yet there are detailed documents supporting the CIA’s position that members of Congress knew about and were briefed continuously on the enhanced interrogation methods.
President Obama also weighs in on the moral issue, recently stating, “The report documents a troubling program involving enhanced interrogation techniques on terrorism suspects in secret facilities outside the United States, and it reinforces my long-held view that these harsh methods were not only inconsistent with our values as a nation, they did not serve our broader counterterrorism efforts or our national security interests.” Yet, he has authorized the outright killing of a number of terrorists with drones, including Americans who have not been given due process.
Rodriguez Jr. noted, “It is highly irresponsible for the President of the US to say we tortured some folks. He says it’s against our values, but does not seem to have a problem killing people. I don't understand how this administration and most of the media do not see the contradiction that exists between basically killing and capture, even though some have been subjected to intense interrogation techniques. I will never understand that one. Worse yet, dead men don't talk. Interrogation is a key tool in protecting this country. You never know what crisis is going to come up for which we will need to interrogate again. Giving it up unilaterally in such a political way does damage to our country. This administration does not capture people and take prisoners.”
A former operative wonders if the Commander-In-Chief understands the training process those in the military must endure. The waterboarding and other techniques were based on the training of the SEALs, Air Force pilots, and Special Forces. He noted, “The CIA got it right, and it was an incredible accomplishment. It led to the capture of senior al Qaeda operatives, thereby removing them from the battlefield. Anytime you are putting a human being under duress it is nasty. Even non-physical interrogation is not a pretty thing to watch. You have to understand that he (the operative) is attempting to get someone to give up something he doesn’t want to give up to save American lives.”
Regarding the claims the EIT program did not prevent any future attacks those interviewed explicitly say ‘not true.’ They refer to the quotes of President Obama’s CIA directors. Leon Panetta stated in his book, “The CIA got important, even critical intelligence from individuals subjected to these enhanced interrogation techniques.”
John Brennan who was a senior officer at the agency at the time of the EIT program and is the current CIA Director commented in the CIA response, “The program did produce intelligence that helped thwart attack plans, capture terrorists, and save lives. Yet, despite common ground with some of the findings of the Committee’s Study, we part ways with the Committee on some key points. Our review indicates that interrogations of detainees on whom EITs were used did produce intelligence that helped thwart attack plans, capture terrorists, and save lives. The intelligence gained from the program was critical to our understanding of al-Qaida and continues to inform our counterterrorism efforts to this day.”
Rodriguez Jr. told American Thinker that everyone felt there was a ticking time bomb that could be heard but not seen. To prevent a second wave of attacks the detention and interrogation program was formulated. There were reports that bin Laden had met with Pakistani nuclear scientists, there were attempts to smuggle nuclear weapons into New York City, and al Qaeda was trying to manufacture anthrax. “This program led to the disruption of terrorist plots that saved American lives. It contributed to helping us learn more about al Qaeda including the best way on how to attack, thwart, and degrade it. Information provided by Zubaydah through the interrogation program led to the capture in 2002 of KSM associate and post-9/11 plotter Ramzi Bin al-Shibh. Information from both Zubaydah and al-Shibh led us to KSM. KSM then led us to Riduan Isamuddin, aka Hambali, East Asia’s chief al Qaeda ally and the perpetrator of the 2002 Bali bombing in Indonesia, in which more than 200 people perished.”
He also responded to those critics who said that all the CIA had to do was release the videotapes to prove their points, but that is no longer possible since the tapes were destroyed. “People under my command and their families were at risk once their faces would have been shown. Make no mistake those tapes would have been made public. No one is reporting that there is a written record of what was on the tapes, a documentation from the lawyers who reviewed the tapes before they were destroyed.”
The other finding by this Democratic report is that the CIA systematically and intentionally misled each of these audiences on the effectiveness of the program. The media is reporting that Michael Hayden, when he was CIA Director, misinformed Congress regarding the number of detainees. It appears that it was not Hayden doing the misleading but the Democrats on the committee who formulated the report. It is very interesting how they never spoke to anyone who ran the program or was in charge of the CIA, having cherry picked the information. Hayden noted, “Maybe if the committee had talked to real people and accessed their notes we wouldn’t have to have this conversation. This is an example of committee methodology. Take a stray ‘fact’ and claim its meaning to fit the desired narrative, creating a mass deception.” Do Americans even care if the amount of terrorists detained was the number supposedly reported by Hayden, 100, or the committee’s number of 119? What does it matter considering they were high value targets that should never be released?
Ultimately, Americans should thank those at the CIA, and hope that the final outcome of this report is not going to create an agency that is timid and risk-averse. These men and women who serve in the intelligence agency never get the heroic welcome or thanks they so rightly deserve for the risks they take. Their names will never be known and they will never receive the public gratitude so many others get. The Democrats and mainstream media need to understand that most Americans feel making terrorists uncomfortable is worth the price of saving American lives. As Jose Rodriguez Jr. summarized, “We need to protect our intelligence organizations, mentor them, and support them. I hope Americans will see the facts by going to our website, http://www.ciasaveslives.com/.
Article URL - http://www.americanthinker.
Archives - http://www.americanthinker.
★ ★ ★
Excellent ...
w vid Cheney defends CIA interrogation techniques, calls Senate report 'deeply flawed'
WASHINGTON – Former Vice President Dick Cheney slammed the recently released Senate report on CIA interrogation techniques Wednesday, calling it “full of crap,” and a “terrible piece of work” that was “deeply flawed.” Cheney, speaking on Fox News' “Special Report with Bret Baier,” said some of the controversial techniques used on militants had been previously tested and the interrogations produced results. [...]
http://www.foxnews.com/
Excelent ... 525 page pdf
The report, from the Senate intelligence committee, claimed the interrogation techniques used were "brutal and far worse" than the CIA represented to lawmakers. Further, the report claimed the tactics were not effective and the spy agency gave "inaccurate" information about it to Congress and the White House.
http://www.intelligence.
w vids Dick Cheney On Senate Torture Investigation: 'The Report Is Full Of Crap'
"The report is full of crap." That's what former Vice President Dick Cheney told Fox News in an interview about a Senate investigation http://www.npr.org/blogs/
http://www.npr.org/blogs/
★ ★ ★
Brennan defends CIA interrogation program, challenges Senate report
CIA Director John Brennan on Thursday delivered a lengthy and detailed defense of his agency's post-9/11 interrogation techniques, reminding the nation that agents used the tactics in pursuit of a single goal -- preventing another devastating terror attack.
"[CIA officers] did what they were asked to do in the service of our nation," Brennan said, in his first public response to a controversial report issued earlier this week by Senate Democrats.
The director, who was a top official within the spy agency under the George W. Bush administration when the interrogation tactics were used, disputed key findings in the report -- which claimed the "enhanced" tactics were not effective and accused the agency of misleading Congress.
Brennan claimed that detainees subjected to harsh methods produced "very useful, valuable intelligence." Whether that information could have been obtained with other methods, he said, is "unknowable."
He also said "the record simply does not support" the suggestion the agency intentionally misled officials about the program.
Further, Brennan said one of the most "frustrating" aspects of the report is it paints a picture of CIA officers as "untrustworthy."
"This in no way comports with my experience in the CIA," he said, during a rare press conference.
Brennan's response comes after several former Bush administration officials -- including ex-CIA Director Michael Hayden and former Vice President Dick Cheney -- have blasted the report as biased and inaccurate. In an interview Wednesday with Fox News, Cheney called it "deeply flawed."
Brennan conceded Thursday that some aspects of the report were "sound and consistent" with their own findings. He said the agency was "unprepared" to launch the program and in some cases, officers used unauthorized and "abhorrent" techniques. He said he supported President Obama's decision to end "enhanced" techniques like waterboarding.
http://www.foxnews.com/
Published on Dec 11, 2014
CIA Director John Brennan News Conference on Torture Report (COMPLETE)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
https://www.youtube.com/user/
Full Statement and Press Conference: CIA Director John Brennan Defends Agency After Shocking Torture Report. Brennan: Interrogation Techniques Helped Us Get ‘Useful, Valuable Intelligence’. There’s Been ‘More than Enough Transparency’. Senate Investigators Didn’t Interview a Single CIA Employee. Bush ordered us to use 'harsh' techniques even though we had no interrogation training
(ABC News) Central Intelligence Agency Director John Brennan today addressed the revelations contained in a comprehensive report released this week about the agency’s use of enhanced interrogation methods from 2002 to 2009.
The report, written over five years by the Democratic members of the Senate Intelligence Committee, accused the CIA of using unauthorized interrogation techniques to extract information from detainees, including using power drills, mock executions, forced-feeding and threats against their families.
In his opening remarks at an unusual live news conference this afternoon, Brennan said the United States looked to the CIA to provide guidance on how to deal with al Qaeda in the chaotic days after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
“As has been the case throughout its then-54 year history, CIA was looked to for answers,” he said. “Not only to the questions on the threats we faced but also to questions about what we were going to do to stop future attacks.”
CIA Torture Report: The Most Stunning Findings
CIA Also Blamed for $40 Million Cost of Torture Report
Torture Report: Former CIA Directors Say Interrogation Program 'Saved Thousands of Lives'
Brennan said that the agency was ill-prepared for the task it was given, calling the interrogation program “uncharted territory” and adding that the agency had little experience housing and interrogating detainees.
The study asserted the torture methods did not yield information from detainees that could not have been acquired in other ways, and that the CIA misled the Bush administration about what exactly the enhanced interrogation program was.
Brennan said the question of whether enhanced interrogation techniques led to actionable intelligence was “unknowable.”
“Let me be clear: We have not concluded that it was the EITs within that program that allowed us to obtain useful information from the detainees subjected to them,” he said.
He called some of those techniques "abhorrent.
Brennan also revealed his belief that “the use of coercive methods has a strong prospect for resulting in false information because if somebody’s been subjected to coercive techniques, they may say something to have those techniques stopped.”
Most of the Republican members of the Senate Intelligence Committee signed on to a minority report that disputed many of the majority’s conclusions, saying that enhanced interrogation techniques did, in fact, lead to actionable intelligence in key terrorism cases like the capture of the mastermind of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.
Brennan would not say whether he agreed with the Obama administration’s decision to make a summary of the full Senate report public. When pressed to share his belief in the interest of transparency, Brennan responded that the level of transparency in the past days has been “over the top.”
Brennan’s defense Thursday was a reversal from comments he made at his confirmation hearing in 2013 after reading a version of the report that had not yet been released to the public. At the time, he questioned the efficacy of the CIA’s torture methods.
“Reading this report from the Committee raises serious questions about the information that I was given at the time, and the impression I had at the time,” he said. “Now I have to determine, based on that information, as well as what CIA says, what the truth is.”
Brennan, who has had a long CIA career, acknowledged today that as deputy executive director of the agency at the time the interrogation techniques were implemented, he was aware of the program and had “some visibility” into its specifics. But, he also made clear he did not have any management oversight responsibilities related to the program.
In defending the CIA’s interrogation program, Brennan has joined former CIA directors George Tenet, Porter Goss and Michael Hayden, who wrote a 2,500-word rebuttal in the Wall Street Journal this week.
Throughout the news conference, Brennan portrayed the CIA as a group professionals who tried to meet a difficult task as best they could, with little guidance from the White House or Pentagon. Brennan said the Senate committee should have interviewed CIA officers who worked in these programs because, he said, simply reviewing documents was not enough.
★ ★ ★
Jesse Ventura: You Give Me a Water Board, Dick Cheney and One Hour
Jesse Ventura Interview With Hannity On FOX May, 2009
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
https://www.youtube.com/user/
No comments:
Post a Comment