“Poised for a Breakout”–from Obamaism
President Obama must have been cruising Amazon.com this weekend. Or at least so it would seem from his remarks to the Wall Street Journal yesterday.
“In a lot of ways, America is poised for a breakout,”
he said. “We are in a good position to compete around the world in the
21st century. The question is, are we going to realize that potential?”
If you’re a regular reader
of this newsletter, that idea will sound very familiar. It is the
argument I have been making since last spring, and the subject of my new
book, Breakout.
The President is right that
America is poised for a breakout. Advances in science, engineering, and
technology offer incredible opportunities in learning, health, energy
production, transportation, and many other fields. These breakthroughs
could mean we are on the edge of a dramatically better world in which
many of our current problems simply disappear.
President Obama is also
correct that the big political question facing Americans is whether “we
are going to realize that potential”--whether we will choose to break
out.
But what the President
apparently doesn’t see is that he represents breakdown--the greatest
threat to our potential future. That government as bloated as our
current one will inevitably break down may be the chief lesson of
Obamaism.
There is a breakdown of big
government bureaucracy, a breakdown of competence, a breakdown of
common sense and defined purpose in government, and a breakdown of the
rule of law.
Practically every day we
are reminded that the government is simply incompetent to do all the
tasks it has assumed to itself. The disasterous launch of Healthcare.gov
is just the latest example. Even with three and a half years to build
the website, the key people in charge failed for a variety of
reasons--some legal, some bureaucratic, many political--and rather than
admitting their failure, they foisted the broken system on the country
anyway.
The same breakdown in competence extends across the federal government. It’s the reason 20 to 25 percent of Earned Income Tax Credit payments by the IRS are improper. It’s how the same agency managed to send “a total of 655 tax refunds to a single address in Lithuania, and 343 refunds...to a lone address in Shanghai.”
In the private-sector, we have systems to fight this level of
incompetence. In the broken down big government bureaucracy, the failure
is simply expected, and it continues year after year.
In some respects, the
problem is bipartisan. We saw it in federal response to Hurricane
Katrina under the last administration. Yet only one party believes we
should increase Americans’ reliance on broken systems.
Beyond the breakdown in
competence, there is a breakdown of common sense in the federal
government. Programs continue decades after they have outlived their
usefulness, like the national “raisin reserve” on which the Washington Post reported recently.
It requires raisin farmers to hand over large portions of their annual
harvests to “a farm program created to solve a problem during the Truman
administration, and never turned off.” There are hundreds of similarly
pointless programs hidden in the bureaucracy.
Finally, there is a
breakdown in the rule of law, as we have seen over and over under the
Obama presidency--from the IRS targeting conservative organizations, to
EPA officials releasing personal information on thousands of farmers to
environmental activist groups, to the Justice Department conducting
criminal investigations of journalists, to the President’s unilateral
suspensions of parts of immigration law, welfare law, and even his own
health care law.
As the champion of
bureaucratic, centralized, and often extralegal solutions, President
Obama is the leading representative of the breakdown that could prevent
America from seeing a breakout like the one he predicted yesterday.
As I argue in Breakout,
I do believe life could soon be much better for all Americans, if we
can overcome the prison guards of the past keeping us trapped in
bureaucracy, over-regulation, and restriction of innovation and
entrepreneurship.
There is enormous potential
for learning science and e-learning, personalized and regenerative
medicine, American energy production, breakthroughs in transportation
such as self-driving cars, and even a private space industry.
But this will require big
changes in how we organize government--changes that President Obama
certainly will not make. In fact, he’ll take us further in the wrong
direction. That’s why we won’t know the answer to his question--”Are we
going to realize that potential?”--until the elections of 2014 and 2016.
Your Friend,
Newt
P.S. Callista's new children's book, Yankee Doodle Dandy,
is now available! Join Ellis the Elephant as he discovers the American
Revolution and how America became a free and independent nation in the
third installment of this New York Times bestselling series. Order now>>
|
Thursday, November 21, 2013
OBAMA PLAGIARIZES NEWT GINGRICH
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment