Here is the premiere primer to this post ...
11-25-13 Hummingbird027's Updates on End-Time and Prophetic News (1:02:02)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2wW-zsDLZA
extensive research links in each vid description
Since the inception of the Islamic Revolution in 1979, Iran has displayed an absolute
hatred for the West. Coupled with an extremist ideology, this regime has terrorized
the world at large and attacked the interests of America and its allies for over thirty years.
They continue to do so today.
Now, Iran is on the cusp of crossing the nuclear threshold, an event that will change
the balance of power across the Middle East, poses an existential threat to the State
of Israel, and threatens America as well.
We are at a critical juncture in efforts to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons.
The United States and the international community must act now to prevent the regime
from acquiring such a capability. Failure to do so may have devastating consequences.
Sanctions on Iran are biting but are not crippling. And according to all major intelligence
estimates, they have not managed to halt Iran's nuclear ambitions. Crippling sanctions,
including embargos on oil exports and refined petroleum imports could have a profound
impact in cutting off the funds that fuel Iran's nuclear program, and could force the hostile
regime in Tehran to its knees.
At the same time, Iran must feel that the threat of severe military action is a real one,
should all other means fail to deter Iran from continuing on the path toward nuclear
weapons. As my elected official, I ask that you place the issue of Iran's nuclear program
at the very top of your priority list, and act now to implement crippling sanctions on Iran.
Stopping Iran today is better the alternatives.
Must see this short ...
Beloved Henry - Dr. Makow writes ...
Hope you're having a great day !
Betsy McGee has made a brilliant video from my article.
Don't Be the CIA's Next Patsy - A 10-Step Program (4:57)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FDiiF7EUuR0 (Preview)
https://www.youtube.com/user/BetsyLeeMcGee
With all the dangers and possible pitfalls of modern life, none is so worrisome as possibly being
selected to be the shadow government's next patsy. This short video should help with finding
the warning signs, and what to look for when avoiding this potentially dangerous situation ...
Article written by Henry Makow, Ph.D. - Used with permission. Edited for video by "Betsy McGee"
This article at http://henrymakow.com/2013/05/How-to-avoid-becoming-a-patsy.html
http://henrymakow.com/archives.html
FEMA drill info - 32 page pdf
http://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/20130726-1917-25045-1645/cert_drill_1.pdf
Witness Disputes Police Account of Tamerlan Tsarnaev Shootout
An eyewitness to the shootout between police and the Tsarnaev brothers late at night
on April 18, told Boston's WEEI 93.7 FM that it was a police SUV, and not the stolen SUV
driven by Dzokhar Tsarnaev, that ran over Tamerlan. The woman, only identified by her
first name, Linda, told radio talk show hosts that police opened fire on Tamerlan Tsarnaev
in the street right in front of the Dexter Street house in Watertown where she was staying
with her boyfriend. She told the radio station that she found it hard to believe that Tamerlan
had survived the barrage of bullet fire, and she said she was convinced he was dead when
he was put in an ambulance moments later. She also reported police dragging neighbors
out of their homes at gunpoint after the shootout had ended. [...]
http://larouchepac.com/node/26388
And whatsoever ye do in word or deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God and the Father by Him.
Colossians 3:17 KJV
IRANIUM RADIUM - the NEXT WAR !!!
Iran has the ability to wipe out the entire power grid of the
United States of America with one small nuclear bomb.
Iran - The Greatest Threat to Western Civilization (3:18)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0DC-5EIYscY
https://www.youtube.com/user/ClarionProductions
Clarion Project
The Clarion Project (formerly Clarion Fund), the producer of Iranium, educates people about the
inherent dangers of Islamic extremism while providing a platform for moderate Muslim voices.
WATCH THE IRANIUM DOCUMENTARY HERE
http://www.iraniumthemovie.com/clarion-project-company-profile/
http://www.clarionproject.org/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4IDy-0CJbE (56:54)
http://www.iraniumthemovie.com/
'Iranium' or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the 'Military Option'
by ELI CLIFTON and ALI GHARIB
The film opens with a history lesson that begins in 1978 with the first signs of the widespread unrest that would eventually
topple the Shah. Iran's despotic dictator is presented as "a long-time ally of the United States," as the film's narrator,
Iranian actor Shoreh Aghdashloo, explains.
Then comes the Islamic Revolution, and the film places the blame squarely on the fecklessness of President Jimmy Carter.
"The fact that Jimmy Carter did not support the Shah in his time of difficulties actually signaled to the Iranian people that the
Shah's rule was over," says Harold Rhode, a disciple of Bernard Lewis (who also appears in the film) and a former Pentagon
analyst involved in Douglas Feith and his Office of Special Plans' activities building a public case for war with Iraq.
Rhode's comment hints at themes that keep reemerging throughout the documentary: The belief that Middle Easterners respond
only to shows of strength, and that, while Jimmy Carter and Barack Obama have been weak on Iran, Ronald Reagan's supposed
strength was respected in the region (with the exception, of course, of his withdrawal from Lebanon after the U.S. Embassy and
Marine barracks there were bombed in 1983). [...]
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/tehranbureau/2011/01/iranium.html
‘Historic mistake’: Netanyahu says world is ‘more dangerous place’ after Iran deal
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has slammed the international deal over Iran's nuclear program, branding it a
“historic mistake.” He accused the P5+1 of allowing Tehran a step further “towards obtaining the world's most dangerous
weapon.” Netanyahu condemned the deal at a cabinet meeting on Sunday and said the world has become a more dangerous place.
“What was achieved last night in Geneva is not a historic agreement, it was a historic mistake,” Netanyahu told his cabinet.
“Today the world has become a much more dangerous place because the most dangerous regime in the world took a
significant step towards obtaining the world’s most dangerous weapon.”
“Israel is not committed by this agreement,” Netanyahu told his Cabinet. “The regime in Iran is committed to destroying
Israel. [But] Israel has the right and obligation to defend itself from any threat, [and] will not allow Iran to develop a
military nuclear capability.” [...]
http://www.pakalertpress.com/2013/11/25/historic-mistake-netanyahu-says-world-is-more-dangerous-place-after-iran-deal
President Obama welcomes Iran nuclear deal
US President Barack Obama has welcomed a historic nuclear deal between Iran and six major powers as “an important first step
toward a comprehensive solution.” In a nationally televised address, Obama said the deal was an "initial, six-month"
agreement that includes "substantial limitations.” [...]
http://www.pakalertpress.com/2013/11/25/president-obama-welcomes-iran-nuclear-deal
Iran nuclear deal: 5 things to know
The USA and other world powers announced today an agreement they describe as a "first step"
toward preventing Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons.
1. Uranium enrichment: Iran agrees to stop producing medium enriched uranium, which represents 90% of the effort to produce weapons
grade material, and stop developing new fuel production machines, called centrifuges, which can produce fuel for a nuclear weapon.
2. Heavy water reactor in Arak: Iran agrees not to install critical components or fuel at its heavy water reactor in Arak, which could
produce enough plutonium for two nuclear weapons a year.
3. Stockpiles: Iran agrees to neutralize its medium enriched nuclear fuel. Iran cannot expand its stockpile of low enriched uranium,
which is now enough to produce at least four nuclear weapons.
4. Safeguards: The deal provides for daily visits by international inspectors to Iran’s uranium enrichment sites in Natanz and Fordow.
5. Sanctions: In return, Western powers have agreed not to impose new nuclear-related sanctions for six months, if Iran abides by its commitments, and to give Iran about $7 billion in relief on oil, gold, auto exports and educational cash reserves.
with SCRIBD fact sheet from White House press secretary ...
http://www.pakalertpress.com/2013/11/25/iran-nuclear-deal-5-things-to-know
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/11/23/iran-deal-five-things/3685621/
Seven loopholes favoring a nuclear Iran in deal signed by the world powers
DEBKAfile Exclusive Analysis
The first preliminary nuclear deal the six world powers (US, Russia, China, UK, France and German) signed with Iran before
dawn Sunday, Nov. 24, at the end of a four-day marathon, failed to address the most questionable aspects of Iran’s nuclear
program, i.e. its clandestine military dimensions. The accord confined itself to aspects of uranium enrichment and stockpiles.
UN inspections were expanded – but not applied, for instance, to Iran’s concealed nuclear sites - or even the Parchin military
base where Iran is suspected of having tested nuclear-related explosions.
Israel, the Gulf States and others are therefore highly dubious of the deal’s capacity for freezing Iran’s nuclear program
where it stands today, least of all roll it back, as President Barack Obama claimed.
debkafile’s intelligence and military sources list seven of the most glaring loopholes in the first-step accord:
1. Parchin: This long-suspected facility remains out of UN oversight. President Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry
boasted after the signing that daily IAEA inspections will take place at Fordo and Natanz. However, cameras are already fixed
at both those facilities without an agreement, whereas Tehran’s consistent denial of IAEA access to Parchin is not addrfessed.
2. Secret nuclear locations: Under the heading "Possible Military Dimensions," the last IAEA report noted: "Since 2002, the
Agency has become increasingly concerned about the possible existence in Iran of undisclosed nuclear related organizations,
including activities related to the development of a payload for a missile.”
The watchdog has received information indicating activities "relevant to the development of a nuclear explosive device."
This was further corroborated by new information obtained since November 2011.
Tehran’s non-cooperation for investigating these findings is not mentioned in the Geneva interim accord,
nor was it addressed in the negotiations.
3. Dirty bombs: Iran doesn’t need a full-scale nuclear bomb or missile warhead for attacking Israel. For decades,
Tehran has been working on perfecting hundreds of dirty bombs as part of its nuclear program, by adding plutonium or
enriched uranium to conventional bombs. These weapons are easy to make and easy to use. In the hands of Hizballah
or other Shiite terrorist organizations in Syria or Iraq, for instance, they could be used to strike Israel without leaving a
trail to Tehran.This peril too was ignored by the six powers in Geneva.
4. Rollback. While President Obama has presented the deal as a first step toward freezing or even rolling back
“key aspects” of Iran’s nuclear program. The fact remains that, so long as Iran is permitted to enrich uranium, even
though this is restricted to a low 5 percent grade, it is free to produce as much fissile material as it wants, whenever it wants.
This seems more like roll forward than roll back.
5. Enrichment. Obama and Kerry said the new deal does not recognize Iran’s right to enrich uranium. They were contradicted
by the Iranian president and senior negotiator as well as Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. So what is the truth? If Iran
won recognition for this right, it blows the bottom out of the Non-Proliferating Treaty because, in no time, all the signatories
may start enriching uranium with permission from the big powers. Neither is there any point in making Iran join the NPT’s
Additional Protocol for snap inspections.
6. Centrifuges. Iran has undertaken not to add new centrifuges to its enrichment facilities, according to President Obama,
but there is nothing to stop it from keeping up their production. In the six-month interregnum for negotiating a comprehensive
nuclear deal, Tehran wins time to turn out enough centrifuges to substantially expand its production of enriched uranium.
7. A leap to breakout: Far from being static or in freeze, as the Americans claim, Iran is free to step up centrifuge production
and boost its stock of 3.5 percent enriched uranium, thereby accumulating enough material to enhance its capacity for
producing enough weapons-grade uranium to break through to a nuclear bomb rapidly enough to defy detection
by the IAEA or Western intelligence until it is too late.
The first loophole appeared hours after the new accord was signed:
Iran’s lead negotiator, Deputy Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi, announced that his country’s enrichment rights had
been recognized in the negotiations, after which Iranian President Hassan Rouhani praised the supreme leader’s guidelines for
achieving world power recognition of Tehran's “nuclear rights.”
However, Secretary of State John Kerry in his first appearance after the signing denied this concession had been made.
He said: “The first step, let me be clear, does not say that Iran has a right to enrich uranium."
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov lined up solidly behind the Iranian version of the accord, confirming world recognition
had been extended for Iran's right to peaceful nuclear energy, including the right for enrichment.
Out of step with the celebratory mood in Geneva and Washington, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu warned that the deal
would not impede Iran’s capacity to gain a nuclear weapon. He challenged President Obama’s words that the deal was a historic
achievement and called it a historic mistake, which would not obligate Israel. Israel, he said stood by its right to self defense
against a regime dedicated to its destruction. As prime minister, Netanyahu pledged not to allow Iran to procure a nuclear weapon.
President Obama also announced that key aspects of Iran’s nuclear program will be “rolled back” against limited sanctions relief
and the release of deposits (nettng Iran $6-7 billion in revenue.) He said that no new centrifuges would be activated for the
enrichment process, work would stop at the Arak heavy water reactor and UN inspections expanded to daily visits at the Natanz
and Fordo enrichment plants to ensure that uranium is not enriched above the 5 percent permitted by the accord.
The core sanctions architecture will remain in place, Obama promised, pending a comprehensive
solution to be negotiated in the next six months, but no new sanctions would be imposed.
Lavrov summed up the four-day conference by saying: "Considering the whole body of circumstance, there are no losers
[in the Geneva deal], all sides are winners” - a view seriously challenged by Israel,
Saudi Arabia and most other Middle East governments.
http://www.debka.com/article/23472/Seven-loopholes-favoring-a-nuclear-Iran-in-deal-signed-by-the-world-powers
No comments:
Post a Comment