Tuesday, March 2, 2021

SCOTUS UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF A NO GOOD JUDGE!

 Submitted by: W.G.E.N.

As long as John (TRAITOR) Roberts occupies the seat of Chief Justice - we shall never get any JUSTICE - only the controlled ruling to maintain the take down of America.

I don't know what has to happen to remove Roberts from his lofty position but it needs to happen if at all possible.  Sure makes me wonder WHAT is it the *controllers* hold over his head.

"Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!"   Isaiah 5:20

Jackie Juntti

WGEN  idzrus@earthlink.net

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/breaking-fraud-will-stand-supreme-court-rejects-sidney-powells-election-fraud-cases-without-comment/

BREAKING: THE FRAUD WILL STAND – Supreme Court Rejects Sidney Powell’s Election Fraud Cases without Comment


Last Monday the United States Supreme Court refused to review the Pennsylvania 2020 Election cases.

The court made the announcement on Monday morning.

Justices Alito, Gorsuch, and Thomas dissented from the denial.

On Monday, following their inaction last week, the US Supreme Court rejected without comment or explanation, lingering 2020 election challenges by Attorney Sidney Powell in Arizona and Wisconsin.

TRENDING: BREAKING: THE FRAUD WILL STAND - Supreme Court Rejects Sidney Powell's Election Fraud Cases without Comment

Far left Law and Crime reported:

The Supreme Court rejected two mandamus petitions that Sidney Powell and other “Kraken”-aligned lawyers filed in late December. Those cases were stylized as In re Tyler Bowyer, et al. and In Re William Feehan. The cases took issue with the election results in Arizona and Wisconsin, where Trump lost to Joe Biden.

“The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied,” the court said Monday. That’s it, that’s the order.

The matter-of-factness and brevity stands in stark contrast to the urgency and “public importance” that the lawyers communicated in the since-dismissed petitions.

“A submission directly to this Court seeking an extraordinary writ of mandamus is unusual, but it has its foundation. While such relief is rare, this Court will grant it ‘where a question of public importance is involved, or where the question is of such a nature that it is peculiarly appropriate that such action by this Court should be taken,’” each of the mandamus petitions said.

No comments:

Post a Comment