Columbian Christians for Life
Lisa van Riper
co-authored article: "Unborn are persons, not property"
- Greenville News, Jan.17, 1998
[ see attachment below ]
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
So why isn't SC Citizens for Life
president Lisa van Riper supporting
the SC Personhood Bills -
S.457 and
H.3584 !!!
???
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
"PERSONHOOD ACT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
"
H.3584 Introduced February 21, 2013 - Press Release
"PERSONHOOD ACT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
"
S.457 Introduced February 28, 2013 - Press Release
Audio (7:07) of Senator Lee Bright's remarks at introduction
of the "Personhood Act of SC"
"PERSONHOOD ACT OF SOUTH CAROLINA" - Text of Bill
S.457 Introduced February 28, 2013
LEGAL EXPERTS DEFENDING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF STATE-LEVEL
PERSONHOOD LEGISLATION IN SC (2001), MISS (2009), ALA (2011), OK
(2012)
- Herb Titus is a constitutional scholar, author, and
attorney, the founding Dean of the College of Law and Gov't at Regent
University;
- Liberty Counsel was founded and is chaired by Mathew Staver, the
present Dean of the School of Law at Liberty University;
- Judge Roy Moore ( the "Ten Commandments Judge" ) is
President Emeritus of the Foundation for Moral Law, and a previous
(2001-2003)
and the current (since 2013) Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme
Court
THE 1973 ROE V. WADE OPINION REVEALS THAT ESTABLISHING
PERSONHOOD FOR THE PRE-BORN
AT FERTILIZATION, WITH NO "EXCEPTIONS", IS THE KEY TO
ENDING CHILD-MURDER BY �BORTION�
[ However, Roe v. Wade itself is a fraud, denying pre-born personhood,
making a 'strawman' argument with the 14th
Amdt.]
Roe v. Wade,
410 U.S. 113 (1973) Findlaw.com.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=410&invol=113
"The appellee and certain amici argue that the fetus is a
"person" within the language and meaning of the Fourteenth
Amendment.
In support of this, they outline at length and in detail the well-known
facts of fetal development. If this suggestion of personhood
is established, the appellant's [ pro-abortion ] case,
of course, collapses, [410 U.S. 113, 157]
for the fetus' right to life
would then be guaranteed specifically by the Amendment." The
appellant conceded as much on reargument. ... "
(AUDIO)
"In Their Own Words" - U.S. Supreme Court
Actual audio excerpts of the Second Oral Argument (October 11,
1972) before the U.S. Supreme Court in the Roe v. Wade case
(Opinion published January 22, 1973) - PERSONHOOD" was
addressed by the U.S. Supreme Court Justices:
www.montanaprolifecoalition.org/approach.htm
Recognition of unborn children as �ersons�is the "KEY" to
overturning Roe v. Wade
Entire Second Oral Argument audio is at
www.oyez.org/cases [
search: Roe v. Wade ] [ Note: transcript is
flawed ]
No comments:
Post a Comment