Hello, regarding the overturn of R vs W; I agree with you about the hiding of abortion stats/ infertility reason. Additionally I think part of the motivation for that ruling is focused upon the jabbed women who are still able to bear children; some of the babies are coming out weird, like black eyed, prematurely strong little aliens. So perhaps "they" don't want these babies aborted because they are being studied as part of an ongoing science experiment.
Submitted by: Robert Bowen
ROWE V WADE OVERTURNED TO COVER UP CLOT SHOT STERILIZATIONS
Why have pesky abortion stats prove the clotshot sterilized over half the women? There is a report on what is happening to Rowe V Wade HERE.
MY COMMENT: THE SUPREME COURT IS MAKING DESPERATE STABS AT LEGITIMACY AFTER ENABLING AND ABETTING THE THEFT OF THE ELECTION, AND THIS IS AN EXTREME EXAMPLE. THIS WAS ALSO DONE TO COVER UP HOW MANY WOMEN WERE RENDERED STERILE BY THE CLOT SHOT, THEY CANNOT HAVE THAT SHOW UP IN THE ABORTION STATS. You can assume the court has nothing good at play here and that they did this to fake legitimacy and do a coverup. They will probably let the states decide also. They probably figure they have the population they want destroyed adequately wiped out by the vax and since virtually all the women who were vaxxed are now sterile, who needs Rowe V Wade?? The mission has been accomplished.
No comments:
Post a Comment