Daily Digest for Wednesday
THE FOUNDATION
"A feeble executive implies
a feeble execution of the government. A feeble execution is but another
phrase for a bad execution; and a government ill executed, whatever may
be its theory, must, in practice, be a bad government." --Joseph Story,
Commentaries on the Constitution, 1833
Editor's Note
If you're like most
Americans, you didn't sit through another round of Obama's statist State
of the Union rhetoric. So Mark Alexander did the dirty work for you.
Don't miss his succinct analysis of the more egregious deceptions from
the teleprompters -- 2014 SOTU: The MO BO Show.
TOP 5 RIGHT HOOKS
SOTU Quick Hits
Here are a couple of
teasers to kick things off. Barack Obama said last night, "I'm committed
to making Washington work better, and rebuilding the trust of the
people who sent us here." (This from a proven -- and pathological --
liar, the most disingenuous executive branch occupant in our nation's
history.) He also said, "Wherever and whenever I can take steps without
legislation to expand opportunity for more American families, that's
what I'm going to do. ... Citizenship means standing up for the lives
that gun violence steals from us each day. ... I intend to keep trying,
with or without Congress ..." (This was a thinly veiled threat to use
executive orders to overstep the Second Amendment proscription on
government interference with "the right of the people to keep and bear
arms.")
The Narcissist's SOTU
Benjamin Franklin once said, "Here comes the orator! With his flood of words, and his drop of reason." Case in point, last night's State of the Union address was all about one person: Barack Obama. The narcissist in chief referred to himself a whopping 74 times during the speech ("I" x 50, "my" x 11, "me" x 11," and "as president" twice). Obama's inability to shove his entire agenda through Congress has only elevated his plan of ruling by executive decree when he can't get his way -- a governing more reminiscent of a king or a dictator. Some "man of the people."State of Disunion
Just in time for last night's State of the Union address, a new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll found that the "union" isn't so unified. A whopping 71% of Americans aren't satisfied with the economy, though this isn't surprising given the sorry state of Obama's "recovery." Only 31% think the country is better off than when Obama took office in 2009, and just 28% think we're headed in the right direction. It's going to take a lot more than a teleprompted speech to fix all of that.Pelosi on GOP Opposition
Nancy Pelosi registered her
complaint about how mean Republicans are to dare to oppose Barack
Obama's leftist agenda. She swears that such opposition is new and
different: "We did not treat President Bush this way," she said. "We
thought we had a responsibility to work with the president to get a job
done for the American people and we did. This obstruction to President
Obama is something quite stunning. It's something quite different." It's
laughable to think that Democrats treated Bush with anything
approaching respect, but what's also "quite different" is just how far
Left Democrats have taken us.
Coburn Loses Doctor
Sen. Tom Coburn, who is
retiring at the end of his term this year, signed up for ObamaCare to
show that he's not exempting himself from a law forced on the rest of
us. However, the change means that he lost his oncologist while he's
fighting cancer. Coburn remains upbeat, saying, "I'm doing well from a
health standpoint, got great docs. Fortunately -- even though my new
coverage won't cover my specialist -- I'm going to have great care and I
have a great prognosis." That's because he's going to pay out of pocket
to keep the doctor he likes. Once again, so much for Obama's promises.
For more, visit Right Hooks.
RIGHT ANALYSIS
Plowing the Farm Bill
Time for another farm bill. |
Lost in the arguments over
the budget and debt ceiling in the last few months was another
disagreement over the fate of a wide-ranging 959-page farm bill formally
called the Agriculture Act of 2014. At one time House Republicans
crowed about two major accomplishments in reauthorizing the spending: a
separation of the actual farming portion of the bill from food stamps
that account for the bulk of the spending, and then cutting $40 billion
from food stamps over a 10-year period. The federal food stamp program
is known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP.
But yet again we're not
surprised that House negotiators wimped out when push came to shove. The
bills were reunited in conference, thereby making the food stamp
program, which is rapidly becoming a staple of middle-class life for working-age Americans,
the largest part of the farm bill for years to come. They also
ratcheted down the promised $4 billion in annual spending-growth cuts to
a paltry $800 million. Moreover, while the House successfully ended the
$5 billion direct payment program, they didn't eliminate other
subsidies, including a sugar subsidy that, for one thing, has driven a
significant portion of our candy manufacturing to other countries. All
told, the new farm bill reduces spending growth by a paltry $1.6 billion
annually -- a total that could easily be wiped out if a modest
additional increase in SNAP occurs.
While reversing the trend toward making farmers wards of the
government by eliminating all risk was perhaps too lofty of a goal --
one farm-state Republicans reject outright anyway -- the modest cuts
announced by the House Agriculture Committee are little more than a
rounding error in overall spending while maintaining an unsustainable
status quo.
As agribusiness has
consolidated from a patchwork quilt of more than six million mainly
small family farms during the Great Depression to a far smaller segment
of the population, the goal of farm subsidies has evolved from helping
to feed the family and having a little left over to sell to making
millions from government assistance. The "farm" portion of the bill is
now little more than corporate welfare that artificially props up the
price of food. And then we use food stamps to pay consumers to buy the food. That way Democrats and Republicans both get all the pork they want. No wonder costs are exploding.
GOP Prepares for 2016
All politics may be local,
but the process of selecting the 2016 Republican presidential nominee
just got a national tweak. The Republican National Committee (RNC) this
week voted 153-9 to modify the primary rules, protecting the cherished
early-primary voting of some states (Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina
and Nevada), while creating disincentives for early voting in other
states. As The Hill reports,
"The four designated early states will be required to hold their
contests in February. States that vote between March 1 and March 14 will
be required to award their delegates proportionally, weakening their
impact, while states with primaries after that will assign their
delegates in a winner-take-all contest, making them much more
consequential in the delegate count and adding an incentive to wait."
Rule-breaking states will be penalized by netting far fewer delegates
at the nominating convention. In other words, the cold shoulder Florida
received in 2012 for holding an early primary could turn into a much
worse penalty in 2016. The new rules -- combined with the RNC's plan for
an earlier national convention -- could mean an earlier finalization of
the Republican nominee.
The jury is still out on
whether this will prove beneficial for the GOP in 2016. But many in the
party blame the brutal primary process in 2012 for weakening Mitt
Romney, thereby aiding Barack Obama's re-election effort. Romney's loss
is far more complicated than that, however, which leaves us wondering:
Did the GOP learn any lessons?
For more, visit Right Analysis.TOP 5 RIGHT OPINION COLUMNS
- Michelle Malkin: Standing Up Against Wealth-Shaming
- John Stossel: Re-State of the Union
- Jacob Sullum: Let 50 Cannabis Flowers Bloom
- Arnold Ahlert: Clinton 'Regrets' Benghazi
- Jonah Goldberg: Hollywood, Propaganda and Liberal Politics
OPINION IN BRIEF
Economist Walter E.
Williams: "Though sports and Hollywood personalities earn multiples of
CEO salaries, you'll never find leftists and progressives picketing and
criticizing them. Why? The strategy for want-to-be tyrants is to
demonize people whose power they want to usurp. That's the typical way
tyrants gain power. They give the masses someone to hate. ... [T]here is
no way that politicians could usurp the roles of Drew Brees, Kobe
Bryant, Robert Downey Jr. and Oprah Winfrey. That means celebrities can
make any amount of money they want and it matters not one iota
politically. Do you think President Barack Obama would stoke the fires
of hate and envy by remarking that he thinks that 'at a certain point,
you've made enough money' ... in regard to the salaries of Winfrey,
Brees and Hollywood celebrities?"
Columnist Terence Jeffrey:
"Americans may look back in a few decades and see that 2007 was the year
that production of electricity peaked in the United States and our
nation began powering down. This may make many on the environmentalist
left ... very happy. But it will not make life better for you, your
children or your grandchildren. ... John P. Holdren, director of the
White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, joined in 1995 with
Paul Ehrlich ... and Gretchen Daily ... to co-author a chapter in a
book published by the World Bank. The chapter was entitled, 'The Meaning
of Sustainability: Biogeophysical Aspects.' ... As President Obama
moves forward with his plans for America's future energy production and
economic well-being, Americans should remember that Obama's science and
technology adviser declared 19 years ago that 'a world of zero net
physical growth' was something that 'needs to be faced up to
eventually.'"
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749-1832): "Let everyone sweep in front of his own door, and the whole world will be clean."
Sen. Mike Lee:
"Government-driven inequality is the reason why, as hard-working
families across the country struggle to make ends meet, six of the 10
wealthiest counties in America are now suburbs of Washington, DC.
Throughout the last five years, President Obama has promised an economy
for the middle class; but all he's delivered is an economy for the
middle-men."
Humorist Frank J. Fleming:
"Worst part of SOTU was where Obama said, 'Freedom, religion, and the
sun must be destroyed for my plan to work.' ... Obama's idea to decrease
the deficit by increasing spending on Opposite Day doesn't sound like a
great plan. ... The part where Obama tried to get the Republicans to
sing 'Imagine' along with him was really awkward."
Semper Vigilo, Fortis, Paratus et Fidelis!
Nate Jackson for The Patriot Post Editorial Team
Nate Jackson for The Patriot Post Editorial Team
Join us in daily prayer for
our Patriots in uniform -- Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines and Coast
Guardsmen -- standing in harm's way in defense of Liberty, and for
their families.
No comments:
Post a Comment