This is the first attempted coup d'etat in American history. Will the conspirators be punished?
Huge: Fired FBI Director Andrew McCabe Added The Bogus Pee Pee Story To Garbage Russia Collusion
Report Based On Obama’s Directive
Fired Former FBI Director Andrew McCabe made the decision to put what is likely the infamous pee-pee garbage story from the dossier into reports that was shared with the press based on a directive from President Obama.
This fake and disgusting piece of information they all knew was false at that time was used anyway to support their spying on candidate and President Trump.
The FBI knew in January 2017 that the Trump-Russia dossier was a crap document.
Catherine Herridge released a page from the recent FISA report that shows that Andrew McCabe gave the directive to the FBI to include all the information from the Steele dossier in their Intel assessment per a directive from Obama:
FBI leadership pushed Steele Dossier for January 2017 intel assessment. Witness told IG Horowitz “McCabe understood President Obama’s request for the ICA to require the participating agencies to share all information relevant to Russia and 2016 elections.” pg. 177 #Durham
This grotesque and now confirmed totally debunked piece of garbage known as the dossier was then ‘leaked’ to the press before President Trump was even sworn in as President.
The BBC’s reporter Paul Wood wrote an article at the BBC on January 12, 2017, discussing the pee-pee garbage in the dossier and made it sound like it was legit and the President of the US was under the thumb of Russian President Putin.
The significance of these allegations is that, if true, the president-elect of the United States would be vulnerable to blackmail by the Russians.I understand the CIA believes it is credible that the Kremlin has such kompromat – or compromising material – on the next US commander in chief. At the same time a joint taskforce, which includes the CIA and the FBI, has been investigating allegations that the Russians may have sent money to Mr Trump’s organisation or his election campaign.Claims about a Russian blackmail tape were made in one of a series of reports written by a former British intelligence agent, understood to be Christopher Steele.As a member of MI6, he had been posted to the UK’s embassy in Moscow and now runs a consultancy giving advice on doing business in Russia. He spoke to a number of his old contacts in the FSB, the successor to the KGB, paying some of them for information.They told him that Mr Trump had been filmed with a group of prostitutes in the presidential suite of Moscow’s Ritz-Carlton hotel. I know this because the Washington political research company that commissioned his report showed it to me during the final week of the election campaign.
Wood was interviewed on January 12, 2017, a few days before President Trump’s inauguration. In this interview he spewed the Democrat’s bogus talking points regarding the bogus dossier like a good MSM soldier. In his interview he said:
…The President-elect of the United States is vulnerable to blackmail. Imagine if that’s true. There are already senior Republicans like John McCain talking about hearings. There are Democrats, not just wishful thinking on their part, talking about impeachment…
Note that it was clear then that McCain was after President Trump and involved in the Russia collusion sham and the Democrats were talking about impeachment before the President was even sworn in.
Note also that the FISA report states that the “newer stuff” and “potential compromising material” was to be added to the Intel report:
McCabe added this “potential compromising material” which was the pee-pee garbage tale into the intelligence community’s
report based on Obama’s directive.
This all goes to the top. Obama knew all that was going on.
ge-exclusive-fired-fbi-
ALL THIS WAS KNOWN AT LEAST AS FAR BACK AS SEPTEMBER, 2018......
A Review of the “Intelligence Community Assessment”
2018-10-03 update: I have just noticed that the declassified ICA text was published only a few hours before the joint session of Congress that certified Trump as the next president. James Clapper spent the previous day falsely alleging that the Assessment had been done by the U.S. Intelligence Community, pushed an exaggerated version of its conclusions, and leaked parts of it to the media. In his testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee, Clapper made repeated assaults on the president-elect. When referring to Trump’s sober reaction to the alleged assessment, Clapper uttered the following: “I’ve received many expressions of concern from foreign counterparts of what has been interpreted as disparagement of the intelligence community.” The Assessment and even the published-the-next-day ICA text were still classified and hidden from the president-elect! Now that seems like a last ditch effort to prevent Trump’s inauguration. BTW, who were his ‘foreign counterparts’ and why was he so concerned about their opinions?
Attached is a review of the declassified version of the notorious Intelligence Community Assessment, published on 01/06/2017. The declassified ICA text (“the ICA text” or “the text”, referring to the public version of the alleged assessment) regurgitates the Democratic talking points and allegations that Putin ordered interference in the 2016 elections, including claims that the alleged interference was directed against electing Hillary and in favor of electing Trump as president. The latter statement was supported only by the FBI and CIA, not by the NSA. The ICA demonstrated an extreme partisan bias in favor of Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party. The ICA text contains no declassified information. It repeats the same allegations over and over either without evidence, or with evidence refuting them. A quarter of the text is devoted to proving the obvious: that RT is controlled or directed by the Russian government.
Download
Other defects of the ICA text:
- The ICA text makes outright false factual statements;
- The ICA text uses word tricks; the most significant one is the allegation of anti-Hillary coverage by RT, or anti-Hillary stance by the Russian government — RT had clearly preferred Bernie to Hillary, but the text presents this fact in a way that falsely suggests it had preferred Trump to Hillary
- The ICA text repeats DNC talking points;
- The ICA text uses claims that are unique to the discredited Steele report;
- The ICA text seems to be written by journalists or public relations agents, rather than intelligence analysts:
- It contains passages retelling recognizable pieces from the partisan media pieces;
- It obviously relies on media reports, rather than on independently collected data
- if it’s reflective of the actual assessment, the analysts seem to be unqualified in the matters they analyzed
- there is no hint at how the “Intelligence Community” arrived to conclusion that Russia was behind the hacking and publishing of the internal DNC documents in 2016; the phrasing suggests it has been the using fraudulent methodology of CrowdStrike and FireEye
- The ICA text tries hard to justify allegations that Russia interfered in 2016 elections against Hillary and in favor of Trump, but unable to find evidence;
- its factual assertions regarding non-classified information are vague; hardly any dates are mentioned; for many assertions it’s even unclear whether the timing was before the elections, after the elections, or both;
- whatever anecdotal evidence is brought is cherry picked; for example, it mentions a RT broadcast that’s critical of Hillary but fails to mention similar or larger numbers of pro-Hillary and anti-Trump broadcasts;
- it doesn’t explain how the “Intelligence Community” handled the fact that the DNC rejected help from the FBI for eight months, then refused to let the FBI access it after the DNC had acknowledged the hacking, then destroyed the remaining evidence:
- how did the “Intelligence Community” perform analysis without the evidence
- how did the FBI interpret the DNC’s refusal to let the FBI access its network, while allowing access to foreign hackers whom they thought to be Russian intelligence.
Obama’s guidance, reflected in the assessment title, has prejudiced the conclusion. Before assessing “Russian activities” in US elections, one should have ascertained that such activities had taken place.
Most of the ICA text is devoted to broadcasts and other open activities of RT America. RT America was founded in 2010 and operated from its offices in Washington, just 0.7 miles from Obama’s White House, without even being asked to register under FARA until 2017. It had on payroll several left-liberal types from media and politics, including Larry King from CNN, media personality and former Governor of Minnesota Jesse Ventura, and Ed Shultz from MSNBC. The ICA text frequently ventures into politics while failing to mention this fact, much less gives an explanation as to why RT switched its orientation from left-liberal to conservative positions.
Thus, the ICA text appears to be a political smear job by Obama/Hillary loyalists, and so does the alleged Intelligence Community Assessment, a declassified version of which it’s supposed to be.
"INSIDE EVERY PROGRESSIVE IS A TOTALITARIAN FASCIST SCREAMING TO GET OUT"
No comments:
Post a Comment