Submitted by: Terry Payne
URL: https://www.
URL: https://parler.com/post/
General speaks Rigged Vote Program Using supercomputer called “Hammer” used by CIA/NSA for foreign surveillance & software “Scorecard” designed for voting accumulation changes
Hi Conservatives,
Great analysis below from an engineering expert friend. I have removed the address of the originator and other addressees.
From the research I’ve seen the suppositions below are right on. Snopes fact check on this issue cannot be trusted and has a record of bias judging on the liberal side of any issue!
I know for a fact that the Texas Secretary of State and his IT team rejected Dominion machines in June 2020 because they lacked basic security safeguards and were easily hacked. One IT tech use his cell phone to connect to the demo machine and downloaded all the ballot information via his USB port without needing a password or encryption key of any kind. The Dominion Voting Systems, which has been used in multiple states where fraud has been alleged in the 2020 U.S. Election, was rejected three times by data communications experts from the Texas Secretary of State and Attorney General’s Office for failing to meet basic security standards.
In GA some election staff witnessed Dominion techs/election board staff loading “patches” at the last moment prior to election day. What did these patches accomplish? Call me suspicious since so many GOP poll watchers were prevented from verifying ballots across all battleground states. The GOP dummy governor of GA, Kemp, allowed his anti-Trump Secretary of State BRAD RAFFENSPERGER to purchase the Dominion machines and Kemp himself has questionable relationship with the company because he is a buddy with Dominion’s lead lobbyist! Take a gun and shoot yourself in the foot governor!
******************************
As always, I have removed the address of the originator and other addressees.
Although this is a provocative interview with retired Lt. Gen. McInerney and the interviewer Steve Bannon is highly controversial to many, I agree with the sender. If you have any curiosity about the election, this is worth the time no matter your political bias or skepticism about the magnitude of any election fraud, great or small. You might want to listen several times as there is a lot of detail which goes by fast but you will get a feel for the origins of the system and its uses over the years.
Several of you have argued there was absolutely no fraud in this election. History suggests that is a totally naïve denial. I imagine that since the first small tribes of cave dwellers or hunter gatherers “elected” or agreed upon a leader, there have been tricks, bribes, promises or other actions impacting the outcome. The story is that in our early history, a shot of whiskey was often dispensed in exchange for a vote and even in this election, an almost 200 year old woman somehow registered and voted in MI and any number of dead persons have been shown to have voted in Philadelphia, some several times.
The depth and breadth of corruption and actual impact on results is the question There was enough new, different, changed and questionable about this election that it seems reasonable to at least listen to various viewpoints and try to separate fact from suspicion and emotion.
If you have any interest in trying to get to the facts, I suggest you research the companies, hardware and software sold to over 30 states including all five of the current “swing states”. The names “Smartmatic (Corp. or alternatively International)” which designs electronic voting systems, and “Dominion Voting Systems” selling voting machines, and a supercomputer called “Hammer” used for foreign surveillance (McInerney says it was primarily software) and “Scorecard” software designed for voting accumulation should get you going.
You will find Snopes calling this suspicion of use to change votes or even the existence of these entities all false. There seems much evidence it isn’t. The companies clearly do exist. In any case, nobody is denying the widespread use of Dominion vote counting computers and software. The question is can it be corrupted or can its software be accessed and changed. Seems it can. Was that used to corrupt the voting in this election? That is the real question.
The computer and software tallying votes in Antrim County, MI was found to be switching votes to Biden. It was detected and corrected. That this happened is now being denied by the AG of MI. There is no news about the other 47 counties using the same software or the other 30 states also using the same systems.
You might be interested in knowing that it is alleged to have been used by Chavez and Maduro in Venezuela to secure their unbelievable victories.
Stalin is supposed to have said "Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything," Even if the quote didn’t come from Stalin, who can deny the truth in it.
Lt. General Thomas McInerney, the subject of the attached interview, is a well-respected, very senior, retired AF officer speaking about election interference. During the interview, he is asked to give a brief review of his career which you may find impressive and says he is now in the “cloud” business (i.e. computers, software and remote storage of data). I don’t know him personally, but at one point knew and had briefed most of the joint chiefs and knew of him by reputation back in the day. He was thought of as a distinguished, extremely intelligent war fighter, not as a political type. Admittedly, he is now an old guy, as are many of us. But decide for yourself if he is credible and may be reporting on something of great possible significance..
Of particular note, this interview was recorded BEFORE the election and predicts exactly what actually happened election night when Trump was significantly ahead in swing states, then late at night, vote counting was temporarily halted and when resumed, Biden was suddenly ahead. For those that haven’t even heard of this, he clears up, to a degree, the Dominion hardware and Scorecard with Hammer software. Note the origins and use in 2012 in FL (also now being loudly denied) as well as the effort to use in 2016 which was somehow headed off which McInerney refuses to say much about.
If you haven’t been listening, Maria Bartiromo of Fox Business has been advancing the story with interviews with Sidney Powell, a distinguished DC litigator who also took up the Flynn case after he was bankrupted and advised to plead out by the big time law firm first defending him (which happens to have a senior partner named Eric Holder). Bartiromo also was on Sunday Morning Futures on Fox News this morning (Sunday 15 Nov.) with a long interview with Powell which repeats tonight on Fox News at 6PM.
From various contacts, it seems to me only the most hard-core anti-Trump and “progressive” are denying that there are certainly some questions and suspicious lapses or failures to take even modest precautions in verifying votes
https://parler.com/post/
Cheers,
Terry Payne
No comments:
Post a Comment