Lone Wolf Survival vs Community Collectivism....Tough Choices Ahead
Friends and Associates:
Soon
we will have to face some hard choices as America transforms into a
globalist / U.N. controlled third world country. Pandora's Box has been
opened and we must decide how we will (either) behave ourselves, or
fight till the end. The globalists have pulled-out all the stops and
progressing at an amazing pace.... likely because (1) the masses are
waking-up and (2) Donald Trump is on our side against the New
World Order.
Cleveland
Police are said to be following recent recommendations from other war
zones, i.e., San Jose riots, and telling their officers to "stand down,"
while an estimated 10,000 anti-Trump activists descend on Cleveland
this weekend. "Ohio is an open carry state and both sides are expected
to be armed."
How America
turns out after November is mostly in (our) hands, a time in our history
where the cross-roads are staring at us with vengeance.
This
is a great time to be alive, because we are witnesses, players and
survivors, ready to deal with a world that is on the brink of all out
Communism. Regardless of the outcome, we will survive (for most), but
how we survive will be critical and life changing.
Our
human tribal instinct limits us to "groups of no more than 200," and
survival might require (us) to drop off the grid entirely.
Brandon
Smith discusses the mental attitude of a world in chaos and how we must
decide which route to take....(Read full story below)
Communism vs. Fascism
"This
is a classic ploy by the globalists to divide a culture against itself
and initiate a calamity that can be used as leverage for greater
centralization down the road. If you have any doubts about fascism and
communism being engineered, I highly suggest you look into the very well
documented analysis of Antony Sutton. I do not have the space here to
do his investigations justice."
READ FULL REPORT BELOW.....................
From The Desk of Capt. Dave Bertrand (Ret.)
Int'l Freight Captain, DC-3, BE-1900, DC-8, & B-727 Ratings / U.S.
Army Veteran Vietnam era (Korea) Military Police Communications
Sergeant, Artillery FADAC Computer Specialist, Law Enforcement
trained, Int'l Aircraft Repo Agent, U.S. Customs Undercover (C.I.),
Dept. of Correction Adult & Juvenile Detention Youth Care, Bail
Bondsman / Fugitive Recovery Agent, DHS/HWW (Commercial Driver)
Counter-Terrorism Instructor, Media Relations Director MCDC, Political
Activist, Border Security Expert, Ranch Security & Off-the-Grid from
AZ to MT. Basic Rural Survivalist & Prepper that believes in God
and Country.
Documentaries: "Southern Exposure," "Undocumented the Movie" & "Global Mighty Freight Dog"
Opinions
and discussion of today's hard hitting topics. If you wish to be
removed....reply within, or enlighten someone else by forwarding. I have
no sponsors and I sell nothing, no editor, but plenty on my mind. I
encourage everyone to network your thoughts and comments and don't worry
about grammar, especially mine. Those that bark the loudest, usually
have nothing more to say....
This article was written by Brandon Smith and originally published at his Alt-Market.com website.
Editor’s
Note: There is every sense that things are accelerating rapidly towards
a sad state of total control, where virtually every form of freedom is
regulated, taxed and surveilled. But the truth is that this power is
illusory, and “they” will never be able to control everything. The very
quest to grasp onto all the pieces makes failure certain to succeed, at
least in small doses and cases of individuals standing up or walking
away from the game.
Brandon
Smith argues here that resistance will naturally pop up and exploit the
weak links, even in the carefully crafted plot for the future grid. It
is good motivation to never give up, and never assume that they actually
are in control, even as they grip the reigns of power. Perhaps, there
something inevitably futile about the system that they are constructing.
Let’s hope so.
The Reasons Why The Globalists Are Destined To Lose
by Brandon Smith
Under
the surface of almost every sociopolitical and economic event in the
world there burns an ever-raging, but often unseen, war. This war, for
now, is fought with fiction and with truth, with journalistic combat and
with quiet individual deeds. It is defined by two sides which could not
be more philosophically or spiritually separate.
On
one side is a pervasive network of corporate moguls and elites, banking
entities, international financial consortiums, think tanks and
political puppets. They work tirelessly to reshape public psychology and
society as a whole into something they sometimes call the “New World
Order;” a completely and scientifically centralized planet in which they
control every aspect of government, trade, life and even moral compass.
I often refer to them simply as the “Globalists,” which is how they at
times refer to themselves.
On the other side is
a movement that has developed organically and instinctively, growing
without direct top-down “leadership,” but still guided through example
by various teachers and activists, driven by a concrete set of
principles based in natural law. It is composed of the religious, the
agnostic and even some atheists. It is soldiered by people of all
ethnic and financial backgrounds. These groups are tied together by a
singular and resounding belief in the one vital thing they can all agree
upon — the inherent and inborn rights of freedom. I call them the
“Liberty Movement.”
There
are those who think they do not have a dog in this fight, those who
ignore it and those who are completely oblivious to it. However,
EVERYONE can and will be affected by it, no exceptions. This war is for
the future of the human race. Its consequences will determine if
the next generation will choose the conditions of their environment and
maintain the ability to reach their true potential as individuals or if
every aspect of their lives will be micromanaged for them by a faceless,
soulless bureaucracy that does not have their best interests at heart.
As
you can probably tell, I am not unbiased in my examination of these two
sides. While some of the more “academically minded” cynics out there do
attempt to marginalize the entire conflict by accusing both sides of
simply trying to impose “their ideology” on the rest of humanity, I
would say that such people are generally ignorant of what is at stake.
There
is in fact an elemental force behind this war. I would even call it a
conflagration between good and evil. For a more in-depth analysis on the
evil behind globalism, read my article “Are Globalists Evil Or Just Misunderstood.”
Some
people don’t adhere to such absolutes or they think good and evil are
fantasies created by religion to keep society in check. I have no
intention of trying to convince them otherwise. All I can say is, I have
seen and experienced these absolutes first hand and, therefore, I have
no choice but to remain a believer.
I would
also point out that the general experience of most men and women is that
the act of organized and legitimate oppression is inherently evil and
such actions in the name of satisfying delusional elitist narcissism are
even more evil. While these experiences are subjective, they are also
universal, regardless of the culture, place or time in history. Most of
us feel the same horror and the same defiance when presented with rising
tyranny. We can’t necessarily explain why, but we all know.
While
I am firmly on the side of liberty and am willing to fight and trade my
life to stop the “New World Order” the globalists are so obsessed with,
I will not turn this examination of their tactics into a blind or one
sided farce. I will point out where the elites are effective just as I
will point out where they are ineffective. It would do more harm than
good to portray the globalists as “stupid” or bumbling in their efforts.
They are not stupid. They are actually astonishingly clever and should
not be underestimated.
They are indeed
conniving and industrious, but, they are not wise. For if they were
wise, they would be able to see the ultimate futility of their goal and
the world would be saved decades of tragedy and loss. Their cultism has
dulled their senses to reality and they have abandoned truth in the name
of control. Here are some of the primary strategies that the globalists
are using to gain power and work towards total centralization and why
their own mindset has doomed them to failure.
Globalism vs. “Populism”
The
globalists have used the method of false dichotomies for centuries to
divide nations and peoples against each other in order to derive
opportunity from chaos. That said, the above dichotomy is about as close
to real as they have ever promoted. As I explained in my article, “Globalists Are Now Openly Demanding New World Order Centralization,”
the recent passage of the Brexit referendum in the U.K. has triggered a
surge of new propaganda from establishment media outlets. The thrust
of this propaganda is the notion that “populists” are behind the fight
against globalization and these populists are going to foster the ruin
of nations and the global economy. That is to say — globalism good,
populism bad.
There is a real fight between globalists and
those who desire a free, decentralized and voluntary society. They have
just changed some of the labels and the language. We have yet to see
how effective this strategy will be for the elites, but it is very
useful for them in certain respects.
The
wielding of the term “populist” is about as sterilized and distant from
“freedom and liberty” as you can get. It denotes not just “nationalism,”
but selfish nationalism. And the association people are supposed to
make in their minds is that selfish nationalism leads to destructive
fascism (i.e. Nazis). Therefore, when you hear the term “populist,” the
globalists hope you will think “Nazi.”
Also,
keep in mind that the narrative of the rise of populism coincides with
grave warnings from the elites that such movements will cause global
economic collapse if they continue to grow. Of course, the elites have
been fermenting an economic collapse for years. We have been
experiencing many of the effects of it for some time. In a brilliant
maneuver, the elites have attempted to re-label the liberty movement as
“populist” (Nazis), and use liberty activists as a scapegoat for the
fiscal time bomb THEY created.
Will the masses
buy it? I don’t know. I think that depends on how effectively we
expose the strategy before the breakdown becomes too entrenched. The
economic collapse itself has been handled masterfully by the elites,
though. There is simply no solution that can prevent it from continuing.
Even if every criminal globalist was hanging from a lamp post tomorrow
and honest leadership was restored to government, the math cannot be
changed and decades of struggle will be required before national
economies can be made prosperous again.
Communism vs. Fascism
This
is a classic ploy by the globalists to divide a culture against itself
and initiate a calamity that can be used as leverage for greater
centralization down the road. If you have any doubts about fascism and
communism being engineered, I highly suggest you look into the very well
documented analysis of Antony Sutton. I do not have the space here to
do his investigations justice.
Today, we see elites like George Soros funding and aiding the latest incarnation of the communist hordes
— namely social justice groups like Black Lives Matter. The
collectivist psychosis and Orwellian behavior exhibited by race junkies
like BLM and third-wave feminists is thoroughly pissing off
conservatives who are tired of being told what to think and how to act
every second of every day. And this is the point…
If
you want to get a picture of America in 2016, look back at Europe
during the 1930’s. Communist provocateurs, some real and some fabricated
by the establishment itself, ran rampant in Europe creating labor
disintegration and fiscal turmoil. The elites then funded and elevated
fascism as the “solution” to communism. Normally even-handed
conservatives were so enraged by the communist spitting and ankle biting
that they became something just as evil in response.
The
U.S. may be on the same path if we are not careful. The latest
shootings in Texas will make hay for the globalists. Think about this
for a moment — on one side you have Obama telling the liberals that the
answer to police brutality is to federalize law enforcement even more
that it already is. On the other side, you have some Republicans arguing
that a more militarized police presence will help prevent groups like
BLM from causing more trouble. Notice that the only solution we are
being offered here is more federal presence on our streets?
I
do see, though, a rather large weakness in the plan to ignite a
communist vs. fascist meltdown in the U.S., and that weakness is the
existence of the Liberty Movement itself. The movement has grown rather
sophisticated in its media presence and prevalent in influence. It does
have enough sway now to diffuse some aspects of a rise to fascism in
the political Right. The only option the elites have is to find a way to
co-opt us. If they can manipulate the liberty movement into supporting a
fascist system, then they would be very close to winning the entire
fight. This would be highly unlikely given the stubbornness of liberty
proponents when adhering to their principles.
The
elites might be able to get a large part of the public to take sides in
their false paradigm, but if they can’t con the millions that make up
the liberty movement into the fold, then their job becomes much harder.
Moral Compass vs. Moral Relativism
Moral
relativism is perhaps the pinnacle goal of the globalists. Why? Because
if you can convince an entire society that their inherent conscience
should be ignored and that their inborn feelings of morality are “open
to interpretation,” then eventually ANY evil action can be rationalized.
When evil becomes “good,” and good becomes evil, evil men will reign
supreme.
The problem is, conscience is an
inborn psychological product, a result of inherent archetypal dualities
universal to almost all people. It is ingrained in our DNA, or our very
souls if you believe in such a thing. It cannot be erased easily.
Moral
relativism requires a person to treat every scenario as a “gray area.”
This is not practical. Conscience dictates that we treat every
situation as potentially unique and act according to what we feel in our
hearts is right given the circumstances. This does not mean, though,
that there is no black and white; or that there are no concrete rules.
There is almost always a black and white side to any situation dealing
with right and wrong. Moral “dilemmas” are exceedingly rare. In fact, I
don’t think I have ever encountered a real moral dilemma in history or
in personal experience. The only time I ever see moral dilemmas is in
movies and television.
Only in television
fantasy is moral relativism ever the “only way” to solve a problem. And
despite the preponderance of moral relativism in our popular culture,
the ideology is still having trouble taking hold. If it was so easy to
undermine conscience, then the NWO would have already achieved complete
pacification. We are still far from pacification. Whoever hard-wired our
conscience should be applauded.
Collectivism vs. Individualism
The
very core of globalism and the NWO is the position that sovereignty and
individualism must be sacrificed for the “good of the group”; in other
words, they promote collectivism. Of course, groups by their very
nature are abstractions; they only exist as long as the individuals
within them recognize them as viable. Unfortunately, collectivists do
not accept this fact because it would mean that the group, not matter
how utopian, is not the pinnacle of human existence – rather, the
individual is and always will be the pinnacle of human existence.
The
elites MUST convince people that individualism is dangerous and that
collectivism is the only way to prevent the tragedies wrought by those
who wish to be separate. Of course, most of the tragedies we experience
on a national or global scale are actually engineered by the elites,
not by wild individuals or sovereign nations looking for trouble. They
then blame the very concept of sovereignty as a barbaric ritual from the
past that must be abolished for the sake of all.
In
order for the globalists to reinforce the need for collectivism,
though, they must engage people on an individual psychological level.
Most human beings have an inherent desire to interact with their fellow
man, but they also have an inherent identity and drive to pursue their
own development without interference. We like to be a part of a group
as long as our participation is healthy and voluntary and our
associations are a matter of choice.
Human
beings are instinctively tribal, but we have psychological and
biological limits to the size of the tribe we prefer to be a part of.
Robin Dunbar, a professor of evolutionary psychology prevalent in the
1990’s, found that there is a cognitive limit to the number of
individuals any one person can maintain stable relationships with.
Dunbar found this number to be between 100 – 200 people. A limitation
also extends to the size of effective groups versus ineffective groups.
He found that effective tribes and communities tend to remain between
500 – 2500 people.
The human mind does not
adapt well to a vast tribal groups, and recoils from the idea of a
“global tribe”. The truth is, human beings function far better in
smaller groups and they do not like to be forced into participating in
any group, let alone larger groups. This may account for the feeling of
isolation that is common among people who live in metropolitan areas.
They are surrounded by millions of neighbors and perhaps hundreds of
associates yet they still feel alone because they do not have a
functioning tribe of acceptable size.
Vast
numbers of people can be tied together by an ideal that resonates with
them, which is the only purpose for nations to form (to protect that
ideal), but that is as far as the voluntary association goes. Globalist
collectivism is simply unnatural. People know it unconsciously, they
know it is an act of force and oppression, and will invariably move to
sabotage its false tribalism as they begin to see its true colors.
Total Control vs. Reality
This
is where the globalists philosophy really begins to break down. The
elitist pursuit of total information awareness and total social control
is truly perverse and insane, and insanity breeds delusion and
weakness. The fact is, they will NEVER complete the goal of complete
micro-control. It is mathematically and psychologically impossible.
First,
in any system, and in complex systems most of all, there are always
elements that cannot be quantified or predicted. To understand this
issue, I recommend studying the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. To
summarize, the uncertainty principle dictates that anyone observing a
system in action, even from a distance, can still affect the behavior of
that system indirectly or unconsciously in ways they could never
predict. They are also limited by their ability to objectively perceive
all available elements of what they observe. Unknown quantities
result, predictability goes out the window and total control of that
system becomes unattainable.
This principle
also applies to human psychology, as numerous psychoanalysts have
discovered when treating patients. The doctor, or the observer, is never
able to observe their patient without indirectly affecting the behavior
of their patient in unpredictable ways. Therefore, a completely
objective analysis of that patient can never be obtained.
What
the elites seek is a system by which they can observe and influence all
of us in minute detail without triggering a reaction that they wouldn’t
expect. The laws of physics and psychology derail this level of
control. There will always be unknown quantities, free radicals, wild
cards, etc. Even a seemingly perfect utopia can be brought down by a
single unknown.
To break this down even further
to the level of pure mathematics, I recommend study into Kurt Godel and
his Incompleteness Proof. This, I believe is the ultimate example of
the elites struggling against the fact of unknown quantities and
failing.
Godel’s work revolved around either
proving or disproving the idea that mathematicians could define
“infinity” in mathematical terms. For, if infinity can be defined, then
it can be understood in base mathematical axioms, and if infinity can be
understood, then the universe in its entirety can be understood. Godel
discovered the opposite — his incompleteness proof established once and
for all that infinity is a self inclusive paradox that CANNOT be defined
through mathematics. Keep in mind that a proof is a set of mathematical
laws that can never be broken. Two plus two will always equal four; it
will never equal anything else.
Well known
globalist Bertrand Russell worked tirelessly to show that the entirety
of the universe could be broken down into numbers, writing a three
volume monstrosity called the Principia Mathematica. Russell’s efforts
were fruitless and Godel’s proof later crushed his theory. Russell
railed against Godel’s proof, but to no avail.
Now,
why was an elitist like Russell who openly championed scientific
dictatorship so concerned by Godel? Well, because Godel, in mathematical
terms, destroyed the very core of the globalist ideology. He proved
that the globalist aspirations of godhood would never be realized. There
are limits to the knowledge of man, and limits to what he can control.
This is not something globalists can ever accept, for if they did,
every effort they have made for decades if not centuries would be
pointless.
As mentioned earlier, the issue is
one of unknown quantities. Can human society ever be fully dominated?
Or, is the act of rebellion against stagnating and oppressive systems a
part of nature? Is it possible that the more the elites wrap the world
in a cage, the more they inspire unpredictable reactions that could
undermine their authority?
This might explain the establishment’s constant attention to the idea of the “lone wolf” and the damage one person acting outside the dictates of the system can do. This is what the elites fear most:
the possibility that despite all their efforts of surveillance and
manipulation, individuals and groups may one day be struck by an
unpredictable urge to pick up a rifle and put the the globalists out of
everyone’s misery. No chatter, no electronic trail, no warning.
This
is why they are destined to lose. They can never know all the unknowns.
They can never control all the free radicals. There will always be
rebellion. There will always be a liberty movement. The entirety
of their utopian schematic revolves around the need to remove unknowns.
They refuse to acknowledge that control at these levels is so frail it
becomes useless and mortally dangerous. In their arrogance, they have
ignored the warnings of the very sciences they worship and have set
their eventual end in stone. While they may leave a considerable path of
destruction in their wake, it is already written; they will not win.
This article was written by Brandon Smith. Please visit his independent site Alt-Market.com to read more and support his work.
No comments:
Post a Comment