The Worst Female Killer in History
Discussion Started by Robert M
At a Wednesday campaign appearance in Nebraska alongside Warren Buffet, Hillary Clinton jokingly asked her supporters to assure Republicans, “I don’t have horns.”
Of
course, Hillary doesn’t have horns! Even the Devil knows cankles and
cloven hooves are a more workable combination than horns and a wig.
But we needn’t tear the candidate’s accessories off to verify. Horns,
hooves, whatever – the marks of Satan cover our gal president wannabe
top to bottom.
On Sunday last, Donald Trump put the matter plain, telling Fox News interviewer Chris Wallace that Clinton “killed hundreds of thousands of people with her stupidity.”
Trump
added, “If you look at what she did with Libya, what she did with
Syria. Look at Egypt, what happened with Egypt, a total mess. She was
truly – if not the – one of the worst secretaries of state in the
history of the country.”
Despite
the media’s trumpeting every contrary Trump pronouncement, this
particular Donald zinger wasn’t so much as allowed a seat in the parlor.
There was no media follow-on anywhere. Not even a sighting or a hearing
of liberal outrage.
But
the Dems know that drawing any attention whatsoever to the appalling
results of their candidate’s previous stewardship of U.S. foreign policy
would be most unwise. But the Republicans? One would think they’d
appreciate the Donald’s tidy summation of Madam’s diplomatic career.
But, no. Other than Trump himself and Rand Paul, every Republican
presidential candidate is a warmonger.
Once
again, the stupid party has shot itself in the foot. Republican
candidates have left themselves no ground from which they might attack
their near certain opponent’s greatest weakness, i.e. responsibility for
the death and displacement of millions and the ruin of numerous
countries that never threatened the United States for even a nanosecond
at a cost to taxpayers of many trillions. Consequently, nearly the
entire Republican bestiary has nothing to say other than that Hillary
didn’t kill enough people.
As
was, the Libyan free-for-all was the consequence of a scheming woman’s
vainglory and the “smart power” of the vanguard of the coming hagiocracy
should Hillary’s forty plus-year hobby of getting herself elected POTUS
by riding the coattails of her errant husband finally pay off. I am
referring here to Samantha Power, Susan Rice, Cheryl Mills, Suzanne
Nossel, and Victoria Nuland. (My sympathies, gentlemen.)
In
such circumstances, it’s no surprise that the legacy media’s focus is
on the minutia of Hillary’s private server and email caper while serving
as Obama’s Secretary of State. By lasering in on the mind-numbing
details of her defiance of Department of State rules regarding
restricted documents and government property (employees’ email
communications,) the public is understandably confused and bored to
distraction. (For informed comment on Hillary’s emails, see here.)
The
big picture is never addressed. No discussion of the candidate’s
b***led gun-running that led to the deaths of three Americans or the
rise of an indirectly US-armed ISIS via Hillary-promoted and -approved
weapons sales to Qatar. Not a whisper of the aforementioned looting of
Moammar Gaddafi’s remaining armory on ISIS’s behalf and from which the
unhappy indigenous now trapped in a years-long civil war are still
suffering. I suppose it’s considered vulgar to discuss Hillary’s
establishment and operation of a shadow Department of State under her
sole control since no one in the lamestream media will take up the
subject. No mention either of the innovations hidden here and there,
whose development several George Soros-funded enterprises aided and
abetted.
Whenever
Hillary mounts her fatuous argument that her election will be a victory
for women everywhere, it’s impossible not to cringe. Such an argument
coming from a person, who is, to date, the most successful female widow maker and orphan manufacturer in all of recorded history is
but another funhouse mirror on our political carnival’s concourse. Even
if Salvador Dali, the master of the surreal, were still living, the
artist could not get all the candidate’s lies and hypocrisy into one
painting. Not even a triptych would do. Nothing less than a Monet-like
obsession with painting water lilies would be required to capture the
full gamut of Hillary’s crimes of empire.
The
thought that in a little over a year Hillary might control the U.S.’s
nuclear arsenal is sobering. Taking into account that her personal bête noir,
Vladimir Putin, would be standing directly in front of her already
smoking pistol is even more troubling, as if that were possible. Putin,
the leader of a nuclearized world power whose smash-up has long been the
globalists’ penultimate goal before the expected hogtying of China, and
who enjoys the nearly unanimous support of the Russian people, is a man
whom Secretary Hillary likened to Adolph Hitler. Upon his first year in
office, Senator Clinton chirped mindlessly – ex cathedra – that President Putin is a man who has “no soul,” being as he is a former intelligence officer.
“How,”
Peter Lavelle, the host of RT’s always lively Crosstalk broadcast,
wondered some months ago, “do you sit down and talk with someone after
their having said that?”
Good question, but I would suggest “slowly and very, very carefully.”
(An aside: The Kremlin was careful to keep our stumpy La Brigada out
of Putin’s line of sight, leaving her as Foreign Minister Sergei
Lavrov’s special burden to bear. Okay, okay. This may have been, but
probably wasn’t, on the basis of aesthetics.)
Though one might long to see the forceful and athletic Putin drag Hillary across the floor by her hair in a reprisal of la danse Apache,
which was once long ago an erotic fashion not unlike the tango in the
Parisian underworld’s smoky cafes and basement bars, Vladimir Putin is a
gentleman, a man of intelligence, accomplishment and discipline. As
such and nonetheless, Putin is sure to deal with a President Hillary
appropriately, and the spectacle just might be civilization’s last
entertainment before lights out.
No
surprise then at Trump’s exclamation to Chris Wallace after Hillary’s
attempted Twitter smack-down in response to the Donald’s call for a
temporary pause in Muslim immigration, “And she calls me ‘dangerous’?”
Fortunately
there is an excellent new tool to counter both the media’s selective
Trumpery and its near universal neglect of Hillary Clinton’s
subterranean orchestration of massive crimes against the people of the
Middle East, North Africa, Europe, Ukraine and Russia, all committed in
the name of the American people and on their dime.
I refer to Diana Johnstone’s magnificent The Queen of Chaos: The Misadventures of Hillary Clinton. This recently released book is, in fact, more than a book. It is a public service. While other talented authors (hereand here)
have written up Hillary’s influence peddling, dodgy financial
empowerment, and her and her husband’s war on Bubba’s sexual victims, no
one has heretofore focused solely on Hillary’s foreign policy career.
With
a brisk yet thorough economy, Ms. Johnstone doesn’t miss a stitch while
weaving Hillary’s contribution into the historical tapestry of
America’s murderous, nearly three decades-long global re-design. It’s
all there; the expansion of Nato, the rise of think tanks as the
personal power loci of the very rich along with that of the
repellent, Israeli-first neocons, America’s fraudulent “humanitarian
interventions,” the abuse and persecution of whistleblowers, and the
still-evolving, liberty-sucking, corporatist Trans-Atlantic Free Trade
Area (TAFTA.) From Bill Clinton’s championing of a Muslim Bosnia in the
heart of what was a Christian Europe with a gut-wrenching attack on what
was Yugoslavia, Josip Tito’s hard-won, post-World War II Balkan
miracle, followed by the debilitating occupation of Serbia, to Honduras,
Rwanda, Iraq, Libya, Syria and Ukraine, the most pertinent elements of
each story can be found in Queen. (For a more detailed review click here.)
I personally found Ms. Johnstone’s chapter, The Taming by the Shrew,
particularly rewarding. Invoking the awful legacy of the truly terrible
and slightly absurd “tough gal” Madelaine Albright, the author swiftly
outlines the rise of Hillary’s Team of Harpies, and the subsequent
subsuming of what traditionally has been the quiet and maximally polite
world of diplomacy into one of cheap and ill-informed personal insults
directed at foreign counterparties. If we’re lucky, this ugly,
unnecessary and unproductive syndrome may prove to be Hillary’s one
policy legacy. That could at least be corrected. (Couldn’t State scrap
happy hour and just contract with a local Ladies’ Auxillary to organize a
year’s worth of Thursday afternoon high teas in the diplomats’ lounge?)
The only fallout from Hillary’s reign of terror the author doesn’t address is the weaponizing of migrants into
Europe from those countries the U.S. has assaulted militarily,
particularly Libya, today a smuggler’s paradise, and a besieged Syria,
home of Libyan (and CIA-supported Turkish) smugglers’ most desperate
client pool. It’s a pity but last summer’s events, which clarified the
miserable migrants’ intended role in
America’s planetary re-design, had not yet occurred when the author’s
manuscript was sent to the printer’s. (Readers can catch up at the
links above.)
Hat’s
off to Ms. Johnstone, a seasoned and super-informed, hardworking
journalist, who in the course of just doing her job and doing it well
has provided all of us who support liberty and decency and want only peace and prosperity with an overflowing tool box for use in the task before us.
And what task is that?
What is the bottom line here?
No comments:
Post a Comment