Submitted by Darla Dawald at Patriot Action Network Jerusalem: 4000 Years in 5 Minutes | |
Video link: Jerusalem: 4000 Years in 5 Minutes | |
Sunday, June 5, 2011
HISTORY OF JERUSALEM
MUTH'S TRUTHS 06/04/2011
REPUBLICANS WHO (ARE ABOUT TO) VOTE BADLY
Before Republican legislators in the Assembly vote on the 2011 budget deal, probably later today, those who were in the Legislature for the 2009 session ought to do some serious soul-searching before they end up with a Kerry-like record on tax hikes; being against the sunsets before they were for them.
Fourteen of the fifteen Republicans in the Assembly in 2009 voted AGAINST the tax-hike package which is scheduled to expire at the end of the month – the lone exception being John Carpenter who apparently had a burning bush outside Carlin tell him to vote for higher taxes. So at least he had a good excuse.
Of the 14 Assembly Republicans who voted against the $600 million worth of tax hikes in 2009, ten of them are still serving in the Legislature: Ed Goedhart, Pete Goichochea, Tom Grady, John Hambrick, Richard McArthur, Joe Hardy (now in the Senate), James Settelmeyer (now in the Senate), Don Gustavson (now in the Senate), Lynn Stewart and MelissaWoodbury.
ISLAM AT WAR WITH SWEDEN? WILL AMERICA BE NEXT?
Submitted by: Kurt J Fitsch
Bill Gawthrop
SWEDEN: Christians and Muslims headed for civil war?
http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/2011/02/23/sweden-christians-and-muslims
-headed-for-civil-war/
Sweden's famous 'welfare state' has attracted hordes of Muslim immigrants
from third world countries and native Swedes are getting sick of paying
their way and getting nothing but soaring rape and crime rates in return for
their famous Swedish hospitality.
MSNBC <http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41534380/ns/world_news-europe/> -MALMO,
Sweden - The bullet exploded through the mosque's window, sending glass
splinters hurtling into the office worker's neck. Frantically abandoning
their New Year's Eve chatter and coffee cups, worshippers rushed to the
bloodied victim's aid. The bullet had missed his head by inches; the
sniper's target would survive.
Bill Gawthrop
SWEDEN: Christians and Muslims headed for civil war?
http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/2011/02/23/sweden-christians-and-muslims
-headed-for-civil-war/
Sweden's famous 'welfare state' has attracted hordes of Muslim immigrants
from third world countries and native Swedes are getting sick of paying
their way and getting nothing but soaring rape and crime rates in return for
their famous Swedish hospitality.
MSNBC <http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41534380/ns/world_news-europe/> -MALMO,
Sweden - The bullet exploded through the mosque's window, sending glass
splinters hurtling into the office worker's neck. Frantically abandoning
their New Year's Eve chatter and coffee cups, worshippers rushed to the
bloodied victim's aid. The bullet had missed his head by inches; the
sniper's target would survive.
SO-CALLED 'BIRTHERS' ARE NOT RACISTS AS THEY ARE SEEKING TRUTH!
The Post & Email has posted a new item, ''
State Senator Lashes Out at Citizens, Claiming Racism
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/06/04/state-senator-lashes-out-at-citizens-claiming-racism/
BUT WHAT ABOUT THE TREASON?
June 5, 2011
[/caption]
Dear Editor:
Recently several citizens contacted state representatives and senators as well
as members of the U.S. Congress through a contact system set up by entrepreneur
Arnie Rosner regarding the ineligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to serve as
president.
The following response was received from Nebraska State Senator Brenda Council:
Subject: RE: [...]
State Senator Lashes Out at Citizens, Claiming Racism
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/06/04/state-senator-lashes-out-at-citizens-claiming-racism/
BUT WHAT ABOUT THE TREASON?
June 5, 2011
[/caption]
Dear Editor:
Recently several citizens contacted state representatives and senators as well
as members of the U.S. Congress through a contact system set up by entrepreneur
Arnie Rosner regarding the ineligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to serve as
president.
The following response was received from Nebraska State Senator Brenda Council:
Subject: RE: [...]
THE HEAD PUPPETMASTER OUT TO DESTROY AMERICA'S ECONOMY
Submitted by: Robert Cooper
Soros would like to destroy the U.S. economy
George Soros' would like to create a New World Economy that is based on removing the U.S. dollar as the global reserve currency.
This would lead to an economic collapse in the United States!
Soros' plan to dismantle the U.S. economy was unveiled at the Mount Washington Hotel in Bretton Woods, N.H. - symbolic for Soros, because it's the same location where delegates from 44 nations met in 1944 to regulate international finance by creating the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund.
Not so ironic, the summit was sponsored by the Soros-funded Institute for New Economic Thinking, an outfit that was funded last year with $50 million from Soros. The pretentious summit, whose real purpose was to plot how to dump the U.S. dollar as the world's reserve currency, was planned and orchestrated by Soros and his Canadian counterpart, Blackberry Smartphone billionaire Jim Balsillie.
OBAMA INTENDS TO DELUGE AMERICA WITH MUSLIMS THAT WELFARE ELIGIBLE!
Submitted by: Robert Cooper
Obama to Allow 80,000 (Muslim) Refugees in 2011
http://www.uncoverage.net/2010/10/obama-to-allow-80000-muslim-refugees-in-2011/
President Barack Hussein Obama, in a determination letter to Congress, has announced that he will allow an additional 80,000 immigrants – – mostly from Islamic countries – – to resettle in the United States during fiscal year 2011.
Mr. Obama says that the increase in Muslim immigrants “is justified by humanitarian concerns or is otherwise in the national interest.”
The following “goals” for new immigrants has been set as follows:
Obama to Allow 80,000 (Muslim) Refugees in 2011
http://www.uncoverage.net/2010/10/obama-to-allow-80000-muslim-refugees-in-2011/
BY PAUL L. WILLIAMS, PH.D. “THE LAST CRUSADE”
President Barack Hussein Obama, in a determination letter to Congress, has announced that he will allow an additional 80,000 immigrants – – mostly from Islamic countries – – to resettle in the United States during fiscal year 2011.
Mr. Obama says that the increase in Muslim immigrants “is justified by humanitarian concerns or is otherwise in the national interest.”
The following “goals” for new immigrants has been set as follows:
MUSLIMS ARE TAUGHT TO HATE US!
Submitted by: Nancy Battle
Police: Woman Stabs 2 Outside Bloomington Library
JUNE 2, 2011 5:46 PM
Reporting Rachel Slavik
BLOOMINGTON, Minn. (WCCO): Two people were stabbed in a seemingly random attack at a Twin Cities library.
After the incident Wednesday night at the Oxboro Library in Bloomington, 35-year-old Samira Abdalla Salim was arrested.
Salim was no stranger to the Oxboro Library. She had a reputation for handing out the Koran and talking religion outside the building.
“They had some issues with her harassing other patrons,” said Bloomington Police Commander Mark Stehlik.
But it’s what investigators say she did on Wednesday night that surprised everyone.
POLITICAL DIGEST 06/05/2011
I post articles because I think they are of interest. Doing so doesn’t mean that I necessarily agree (or disagree) with every—or any—opinion in the posted article. Help your friends and relatives stay informed by passing the digest on.
The Coming Collapse of the American Republic
Info about my book. All royalties go to wounded veterans. Please forward and post where possible.
Best older posts for new blog readers
Book Recommendation: Islamic Imperialism
Excerpt: I wish I could buy a copy for every member of Congress, the President and the Secretary of State--and get them to read it. Required reading for an understanding of this aspect of the challenges facing us. Islamic Imperialism is well written and well researched. It starts with the advent of Islamic conquests of other peoples and brings it forward to the struggles in our current day. It also reveals how many "Islamic" leaders used Islam as a handy rallying point and cover for their personal ambitions. We must find an answer to the Islamist threat if we are to survive. Israel and Europe may be lost, and America is in the balance
Only fooled the rubes. Unfortunately, that's a solid majority. ~Bob. Excerpt: The documents produced as a result of CEI’s FOIA request show GM coordinating PR strategy with the Obama Administration more than three weeks before launching the campaign. Starting on March 30, 2010, in advance of the GM’s planned launch of its campaign to announce that they had supposedly repaid taxpayers, Brian Deese from the Executive Office of the President and numerous Treasury Department officials began exchanging emails related to the announcement. (See pages 55-59;97-102.) These emails included draft schedules, draft remarks to be given by GM Chairman and CEO Ed Whitacre, and draft press releases from both GM and the Treasury Department. See pp. 9-14; 18-24; 36-39; 83-96. The Treasury Department saw the misleading advertisements GM was planning to make in advance. GM’s marketing strategy was laid out for Treasury Department officials, who had the opportunity to object, but raised no objections to these misleading claims.
Saturday, June 4, 2011
THE DEATH (line by line) of THE U.S. CONSTITUTION
Submitted by: Edward Moore
The Changing Face of the Police and the Death of the Fourth Amendment
By John W. Whitehead
5/23/2011
http://www.rutherford.org/articles_db/commentary.asp?record_id=712
“Now, one of the most essential branches of English liberty is the
freedom of one’s house. A man’s house is his castle; and while he is
quiet, he is as well guarded as a prince in his castle. This writ, if it
should be declared legal, would totally annihilate this privilege.
Customhouse officers may enter our houses when they please; we are
commanded to permit their entry. Their menial servants may enter, may
break locks, bars, and everything in their way; and whether they break
through malice or revenge, no man, no court can inquire. Bare suspicion
without oath is sufficient.”—James Otis
In early America, citizens were considered equals with law enforcement
officials. Authorities were rarely permitted to enter one’s home without
permission or in a deceitful manner. And it was not uncommon for police
officers to be held personally liable for trespass when they wrongfully
invaded a citizen’s home. Unlike today, early Americans could resist
arrest when a police officer tried to restrain them without proper
justification or a warrant—which the police had to allow citizens to
read before arresting them. (Daring to dispute a warrant with a police
official today who is armed with high-tech military weapons and tasers
would be nothing short of suicidal.) This clear demand for a right to
privacy was not a byproduct of simpler times. Much like today, early
Americans dealt with problems such as petty thievery, murder and attacks
by foreign enemies. Rather, the demand for privacy stemmed from a
harbored suspicion of law enforcement officials and the unbridled
discretion they could abuse.
The Fourth Amendment, which assures that “the right of the people to be
secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against
unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,” was included
in the Bill of Rights in response to the oppressive way British soldiers
treated American colonists through their use of “Writs of Assistance.”
These were court orders that authorized British agents to conduct
general searches of premises for contraband. The exact nature of the
materials being sought did not have to be detailed, nor did their
locations. The powerful new court orders enabled government officials to
inspect not only shops and warehouses, but also private homes. These
searches resulted in the violation of many of the colonists’ rights and
the destruction of much of the colonists’ personal property. It quickly
became apparent to many colonists that their homes were no longer their
castles.
Revolutionary patriot James Otis was Advocate-General when the legality
of these warrants came under question by the colonists. Called upon to
defend that legality, he promptly resigned his office. After living
through an age of oppressive policies under the British Empire, those of
the founding generation, such as Otis, wanted to ensure that Americans
would never have to face intrusive government measures again.
The Changing Face of the Police and the Death of the Fourth Amendment
By John W. Whitehead
5/23/2011
http://www.rutherford.org/articles_db/commentary.asp?record_id=712
“Now, one of the most essential branches of English liberty is the
freedom of one’s house. A man’s house is his castle; and while he is
quiet, he is as well guarded as a prince in his castle. This writ, if it
should be declared legal, would totally annihilate this privilege.
Customhouse officers may enter our houses when they please; we are
commanded to permit their entry. Their menial servants may enter, may
break locks, bars, and everything in their way; and whether they break
through malice or revenge, no man, no court can inquire. Bare suspicion
without oath is sufficient.”—James Otis
In early America, citizens were considered equals with law enforcement
officials. Authorities were rarely permitted to enter one’s home without
permission or in a deceitful manner. And it was not uncommon for police
officers to be held personally liable for trespass when they wrongfully
invaded a citizen’s home. Unlike today, early Americans could resist
arrest when a police officer tried to restrain them without proper
justification or a warrant—which the police had to allow citizens to
read before arresting them. (Daring to dispute a warrant with a police
official today who is armed with high-tech military weapons and tasers
would be nothing short of suicidal.) This clear demand for a right to
privacy was not a byproduct of simpler times. Much like today, early
Americans dealt with problems such as petty thievery, murder and attacks
by foreign enemies. Rather, the demand for privacy stemmed from a
harbored suspicion of law enforcement officials and the unbridled
discretion they could abuse.
The Fourth Amendment, which assures that “the right of the people to be
secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against
unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,” was included
in the Bill of Rights in response to the oppressive way British soldiers
treated American colonists through their use of “Writs of Assistance.”
These were court orders that authorized British agents to conduct
general searches of premises for contraband. The exact nature of the
materials being sought did not have to be detailed, nor did their
locations. The powerful new court orders enabled government officials to
inspect not only shops and warehouses, but also private homes. These
searches resulted in the violation of many of the colonists’ rights and
the destruction of much of the colonists’ personal property. It quickly
became apparent to many colonists that their homes were no longer their
castles.
Revolutionary patriot James Otis was Advocate-General when the legality
of these warrants came under question by the colonists. Called upon to
defend that legality, he promptly resigned his office. After living
through an age of oppressive policies under the British Empire, those of
the founding generation, such as Otis, wanted to ensure that Americans
would never have to face intrusive government measures again.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)