(REPOST)....OBAMA'S ELIGIBILITY TRIAL IN GEORGIA

ELIGIBILITY RULING SET FOR AFTER FEBRUARY 5, 2012

Obama & his Attorney fail to appear for Trial -- 2 Hour Hearing provides strong evidence that Obama is not qualified for Ballot

Thursday, 26 January 2012 12:15

William M. Windsor

President Barack Obama and his attorney refused to appear for a trial in Atlanta , Georgia on January 26, 2012 despite subpoenas requiring his attendance and documents as well as a letter from the Georgia Secretary of State saying their failure to appear would be at their peril. 

Judge Michael Malihi presided over the two-hour hearing in which significant evidence was presented to show that Obama is not eligibile to be President of the United States .

I was there in the media group with videographer Lydia Swain, and the entire hearing was videotaped ....

A 'SIMPLY MUST READ' - OBAMA COMPARED TO CASTRO

What others see plainly, we often ignore.

I remember asking dad about Castro when I was about 9 years old. I asked, "Is Castro a good guy or bad?"
Dad said...he couldn't tell!! This was about 1955. We were living in Louisiana ...at the time. Dad was in the Army there.
Cuba was fairly close and in the news a lot. The Cubans were asking the same question!
Ike was president.

He continued, "We were all shocked as the government just continued to grab more power. First they said the revolution is over, so please turn in your guns. We all complied."
I remember my uncle saying after it started;  Castro will only nationalize some of the big industries. He will never come and take our family hardware store!!  But that is exactly what happened. Castro started with the sugar mills and the large industries, but they eventually came and knocked on the door of our family hardware store. My family had run this store for generations. They said we now own the hardware store, you work for us. And that nice, large four-bedroom home you own...it is now our property also, and...you can move yourself and five children into two rooms of the house, because others are moving in with you."
The lesson learned from this discussion, is a lesson most Americans refuse to hear. Political leaders can lie about their agenda and once in office...they can take totally unexpected turns.

If you had asked us three years ago if we thought General Motors would be nationalized, we would have never believed it.. We could never contemplate a country where the rule of law, the most fundamental building block of a justice society...would be evaporating, just like it did in Castro's Cuba in the early 1960's.
But the news of injustice keeps increasing. Black Panthers are not charged with wrong doing by the U.S. Department of Justice...because their crimes are against whites. The bondholders of GM are stripped of their assets...without due process by the government! Governmental leaders are bribed in full daylight...only to have all investigation of the crimes stifled...by the Attorney General.

The U.S. borders are over run with crime and illegal activity, and the leaders in D.C. act as if it is important to protect the lawbreakers....while the innocent are killed and over run. When local communities attempt to enforce the law, they are ridiculed...and threatened as racists and bigots. They are sued by the very administration...entrusted with enforcing the law.
Without the rule of law, the U.S. Constitution is a sham!! Without the rule of law, our beloved America is swiftly becoming a country where only the well connected and politically powerful will be safe. As Michelle Malkin has so eloquently explained in her recent book...a culture of corruption has replaced honest government.
The only way this problem will be fixed, is by massive citizen action. All honest citizens that want to be treated equally, must come together...and demand that the favoritism, the bribes, the uneven enforcement of law...end now!! And yes, it can happen here.

And...may God save the United States of America !

*...the least you can do is forward this email. 6 million plus Jews didn't believe it would happen in Germany either!!! If you're a Christian in these United States of America , you're next on the list. The real problem here is, the boy from Cuba did manage to make it to the U.S.We will not have any place to escape to...except death!

POLITICAL DIGEST 01/31/2012 CONSERVATIVE

Tuesday is the Florida Primary, so last chance for Mitt supporters to help Obama by blasting Newt and Newt supporters to help Obama by blasting Mitt. Tell me why your guy would win and be a good president, not why some magnified and stretched flaw or mistake of the other guy disqualifies him. ~Bob.

Why the Pilot Programs Failed By John Goodman

http://healthblog.ncpa.org/why-the-pilot-programs-failed/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=HA#more-23671

Excerpt: Just about everybody in the health policy blogosphere has noted with disappointment the failure of Medicare’s demonstration projects to reduce the costs of care. Recall that these are critical to President Obama’s challenge “To find out what works and then go do it.” If nothing works, the fallback weapon in Obama Care is to reduce fees paid to doctors and hospitals. Yet the Medicare actuaries tell us that squeezing the providers in this way will put one in seven hospitals out of business in the next eight years, as Medicare fees fall below Medicaid’s. Under this scenario, senior citizens may be forced to line up behind welfare mothers, seeking care at community health centers and in the emergency rooms of safety net hospitals.

SOROS" "THERE IS LITTLE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ROMNEY AND OBAMA"

Submitted by: Nathan Huckaby

 

THINK BEFORE YOU GO INTO THE VOTING BOOTH!

 

http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/SorosObama-RomneyNotMuchDifference/2012/01/28/id/425830?s=al&promo_code=E100-1

LOOK WHAT OBAMA HAS DONE! FIRE HIM NOW!!!

FIRE OBAMA

SELECT HERE TO HELP US FUND THE FIRE OBAMA BILLBOARD & GET YOUR FREE STICKERS!

Obama blamed Bush four years ago saying: "The problem is, is that the way Bush has done it over the last eight years is to take out a credit card from the Bank of China in the name of our children...So that we now have over $9 trillion of debt that we are going to have to pay back -- $30,000 for every man, woman and child. That's irresponsible. It's unpatriotic."
By election day, Barack Obama will have raised the debt 6 TRILLION DOLLARS in four years to $50,000 per person. Now that's irresponsible and outrageous! If he's re-elected, the debt each one of us owes the government will be over $70,000!

ROMNEY IS NOT CONSERVATIVE AND LIES AS MUCH AS OBAMA!

Submitted by: Gregg Jackson

Before you even consider voting for Romney view this!

http://www.mittsbloodmoney.com/

MUTH'S TRUTHS 01/29/2012

Fact checking Romney's attacks on Gingrichby Anthony Martin
Conservative Examiner
January 29, 2012
 
In a series of television ads and speeches in Florida in the run up to the state's Republican primary on Tuesday, Mitt Romney has launched a series of serious attacks against Newt Gingrich that have had a definite impact on the race. Gingrich's nine point lead has evaporated, and Romney is now in the lead by 11 percentage points, according to several polls released over the weekend.

Romney used the very same tactic in Iowa to obliterate Gingrich's lead.an in depth report on the matter in the Washington Examiner. At issue was a college course Gingrich had developed and taught at two Georgia colleges from 1993 to 1995. The course was funded by a tax-exempt organization called the 'Progress and Freedom Foundation.'

Gingrich maintained that the course was a legitimate educational enterprise. Apparently so did the colleges involved, given their approval of adding the courses to their curricula.

But a highly partisan Democrat who had run an unsuccessful campaign against Gingrich in Georgia brought the ethics complaint as soon as he was beaten in 1994, contending that the college course had no educational value and was designed to do nothing more than to spread the Gingrich political propaganda, using a tax-exempt organization to pay the bills.

So hamstrung were Gingrich and House Republicans by the massive amount negative publicity generated by the complaint that Gingrich agreed to admit to limited guilt "just to get the matter over with and move on." But Democrats wanted a criminal investigation as well--an idea that went nowhere. Then, they demanded an IRS investigation.

That investigation took three years. And in spite of the fact that Gingrich had admitted limited guilt in the case, the IRS determined at the completion of its exhaustive investigation that he had done nothing wrong whatsoever. Nothing. The IRS had thoroughly delved into practically everything Gingrich had said in his college course, in addition to interviewing actual students who sat in his classes. Again, the IRS found that the course was a legitimate educational enterprise and that no wrongdoing had been committed.

These findings were announced by the IRS in 1999, the year Gingrich voluntarily resigned, not in disgrace but as an innocent man who had been the victim of highly politically motivated charges--bogus charges.

Second, Romney has repeatedly made the charge that Gingrich was "fined $300,000 for his ethics violations."

The charge is false.

It has already been established that Gingrich committed no ethics violations, as determined by the IRS. The so-called 'fine' of $300,000 was actually a voluntary contribution of Gingrich to the House to cover the costs of the investigation initiated by Democrats who had obvious ulterior political motives. When the Speaker agreed to admit to limited guilt in order to get the matter settled, he also stated that he would cover the costs of the investigation against him out of his own pocket--personal funds and not campaign funds. His $300,000 payment to the House was issued before the IRS concluded that he was not guilty.

That can hardly be considered a 'fine.'

Thus, the fine was not really a fine. The ethics violations turned out to be no violations. The charges at the time, in the 1990s, were false, and the charges presently being made by Mitt Romney are also false.

NEW JERSEY LEGISLATION WANTS TO BAN AMMO! INFRINGE ON 2nd AMENDMENT RIGHTS

Submitted by: Nancy Battle

 

Tomorrow New Jersey is going to ask for a ban on ammo........please watch this video !!!!!!!!...Nancy

                   

 

                http://patriotsforamerica.ning.com/forum/topic/show?id=2734278%3ATopic%3A325579&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_topic

ROMNEY AND KERRY - SAME, SAME - NEITHER CONSERVATIVE

Faux Conservative

by Steve Baldwin

For all his assertions that he is “pro-family” and “believe marriage should be between a man and a woman,” Willard “Mitt” Romney shows remarkably strong support for the anti-family, anti-marriage gay agenda. In fact, as recently as earlier this month, he was bragging about his support of “gay rights.”
Since he now campaigns as a conservative, I find that this reeks of hypocrisy. Both in 2003 and 2004 Romney issued proclamations to commemorate “gay pride” week. The intent of gay pride week was clearly to encourage children to become homosexual, bisexual or transsexual.