Submitted by: Nancy Battle
MORE PERSECUTION of American soldiers by the Obama Regime
If
the fact that the Obama Administration has blocked aging veterans from
visiting the World War II memorial and denied death gratuity benefits
for fallen warriors doesn’t expose blatant contempt for our military,
how about this? Army First Lieutenant Clint Lorance, a 28-year-old
combat leader in the 82d Airborne Division from Celeste, TX, was
recently found guilty of two counts of murder in Afghanistan and
sentenced to 20 years in Ft. Leavenworth.
Washington Times by Allen West (h/t Maria J) The story of First Lieutenant Lorance has not been covered by a single major media source.
In July 2012, Lorance was ordered to
take command of a platoon in the southern Afghanistan province of
Kandahar, a region where I also spent two and a half years training and
advising the Afghan National Army. The platoon Lorance now commanded had
lost its previous leader to enemy attack.
During a patrol in enemy territory,
Lorance ordered a marksman to engage two unarmed Taliban fighters on a
motorcycle operating as scout spotters.
In Afghanistan and Iraq, a common
enemy tactic is for unarmed fighters on motorcycles with cell phones to
track unit movements. In fact, enemy combatants had previously used the
tactics against this same platoon. Lorance,
who was operating in a combat zone, saw the scout spotters and assessed
them as a threat to his platoon. Aerial surveillance later backed up
Lorance’s on-the-ground assessment.
It seems obvious that enemy scouts
reporting a unit position and movements in order to facilitate an ambush
would define “hostile intent.” But not according to the watered-down
Rules of Engagement with which our warriors must contend.
In little more than a year, First
Lieutenant Lorance was tried and sentenced to prison. Swift justice to
be sure, but why then did it take four years to try and convict Nidal
Malik Hasan, who fatally shot 13 and wounded more than 30 during his
2009 rampage at Ft Hood Texas?
The irony of the dilemma currently
facing our troops, those who have volunteered to protect and defend our
freedoms, is appalling. Shall they fight and kill the enemy but then
risk imprisonment because of insidious rules by lawyers? Or
shall they be killed and denied their rightful benefits for their
families, because of insidious declarations by lawyers and politicians?
We are sending the wrong message to
our enemies, and we are clearly sending the wrong message to those who
would sacrifice their lives for our nation.
No comments:
Post a Comment