Monday DigestTHE FOUNDATION"Sometimes it is said that man can not be trusted with government of himself. Can he, then, be trusted with the government of others?" --Thomas JeffersonGOVERNMENT AND POLITICSSpending Deal Swamped by Senate
No one can accuse Senate
Democrats of merely rejecting House proposals for restarting the
government. The government will reach its debt limit Thursday, and for
some reason Democrats think that's a good reason to increase
spending. Over the weekend, they demanded that debt ceiling negotiations
begin at pre-sequester funding levels. But the Senate couldn't even
pass a bipartisan proposal from not-exactly-Tea-Party-extremist Susan
Collins to maintain current spending levels until March with a
debt limit increase good through January. House Republicans, meanwhile,
weren't at all pleased that Senate Republicans were trying to cut them
out of a deal, but they also backed off many of their demands,
especially regarding ObamaCare, only to have Barack Obama reject a deal.
Of course, the end game for Obama and Senate Leader Harry Reid isn't
to avert "default" or end the shutdown -- it's to hang blame around
Republicans' necks.
As for "default," Senate
Democrat Whip Dick Durbin warned, "For the United States to default on
its national debt for the first time in history would be catastrophic."
But according to The Wall Street Journal,
"The Treasury says that on Thursday it will be left with $30 billion in
cash to pay the government's bills, an amount that could run out in a
week or two." Moody's Investors Service,
one of the nation's most watched credit raters, says that Democrat
rhetoric about the U.S. credit rating collapsing is hyperbole. If
Congress fails to lift the debt ceiling, Moody's indicates that the
Treasury Department would most certainly continue to pay interest on the
U.S. debt. All government revenue -- of which there is still a large
amount -- should be first allocated for debt service, but with Obama in
charge of what checks are written, all bets are off.
As the Senate produced
nothing during its Sunday session, Sens. Ted Cruz and Mike Lee, along
with 2008 vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin, joined a crowd of
veterans and others to remove the Barackades at the World War II
Memorial and take them to the White House. Unfortunately, the White House wasted no time in returning them to the Memorial.
Comment |
Share
ECONOMYRegulatory Commissars: EPA to Scale Back Ethanol Mandate?
Last Friday, we reported
that two senators are seeking to more strictly enforce the ethanol
mandate, part of the Renewable Fuel Standard. But that doesn't mean all
is going according to plan. In fact, Reuters reports,
"The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is considering a
proposal that would set next year's target for use of renewable fuels at
15.21 billion gallons, less than the 18.15-billion gallon 2014 target
established in the law." Scaling back on a federal regulation? Paint us
gold and call us Oscar.
Indeed, the EPA has gone so far as to punish oil companies for failing to use biofuels that weren't even available. But as Hot Air's Erika Johnsen writes,
"The EPA has been heretofore undeterred in continually raising the
requirements, but I suppose it must be getting harder to ignore that
nobody but nobody except agribusiness and their associated Big
Ethanol lobbyists are fans of ethanol -- not oil companies, not
environmentalists (and how often do those two groups unite?!), and
certainly not American consumers paying higher food and gasoline prices
as a consequence."
About those Big Ethanol
lobbyists: They're not going to go quietly. The EPA reassured them that
nothing is final and it's only a "draft proposal." But Tom Buis, CEO of
Growth Energy, called for "an immediate investigation by the Justice
Department and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to determine if
this was an attempt to manipulate markets such as corn futures, ethanol
futures and/or RINS markets." In other words, despite all the damage
ethanol does to engines and food markets, the ethanol lobby isn't about
to let their sweet deal run out of gas.
Comment |
Share
NATIONAL SECURITYImmigration Front: California Makes Its Own Rules
California Democrat Gov.
Jerry Brown signed a series of bills that will make his state a haven
for illegal aliens. The so-called "Trust Act" will ban state law
enforcement from transferring detained illegals into federal custody for
deportation unless the detainees have committed serious crimes.
California law enforcement has long since given up arresting illegals
based on their residency status, so the only reason they would be
arrested in the first place is because they committed another crime.
Just how serious that crime has to be for Governor Moonbeam to allow
federal officials to do their job remains unclear.
Other laws Brown signed
include allowing illegals to obtain driver's licenses. Activists say
this is a first step toward "equality" for illegal aliens, but it would
appear that they've already won "equality" since Brown also signed a law
that allows illegals to practice law in California. That law grew from a
court case in which an illegal Mexican immigrant who came to the U.S.
as a baby went on to obtain a law degree in the state. It's interesting
that in all those years specializing in law he never found time to pursue citizenship or even legal status.
Sadly, Brown's work to make California a sanctuary state for illegals
may not have been necessary. The National Border Patrol Council has
revealed that agents from San Diego to the Rio Grande were ordered to
stand down and not pursue human traffickers, drug runners or other
potential security threats. This news comes as a recent Pew Research
Center survey found that the recession-induced decline in illegal
immigration has ceased and illegals are once again streaming across the
border. Pew believes the uptick is related to the increasing
availability of low-income jobs, but the perks being given by California
surely sweeten the pot.Comment | Share Happy Birthday to the U.S. NavyOn Oct. 13, 1775, the U.S. Navy was born. Be sure to wish our sailors well here.CULTUREVillage Academic Curriculum: Sex on Campus
Given the astronomical
inflation precipitating the tremendous cost of higher education, you
would think the majority of students casting themselves into long-term
debt would want to max out the value of their investment. The issue, of
course, is what students define to be valuable, as colleges are
seemingly more focused on sex education than, say, preparing pupils for a
career focused on hard work.
Take for instance the University of Maryland, host of "Sex Week."
"The event features a local D.C. sex shop called 'The Garden' whose
mission according to its website is 'commitment to body safe and
eco-friendly products,'" reports CNS News' Tim Graham. In other words, it's no ordinary sex shop -- it's eco-friendly.
It's a telling example when progressives are far more concerned with
"saving" the planet than even acknowledging an issue of cultural
degradation.
Nor is this the only example of such raunchy escapades. At Brown University, Nude Week featured
an assortment of events geared toward "confronting stigmas about the
naked body," National Review's Alec Torres explains. Evidently,
"tolerance" has no bounds -- and any arguments to the contrary are now
characterized as "stigmas." And at the State University of New York, "A
sex lecturer paid for by required student activities fees at a public
university will teach college kids masturbation techniques and give away
sex toys," reports
The Washington Free Beacon's Mary Lou Byrd. The keynote speaker at the
forum was Megan Andelloux, a former Planned Parenthood employee.
All the while, progressives promote "equality" and "tolerance," and the breakdown of the family and educational norms continues.Comment | Share BRIEF OPINIONFor the Record
National Review's Charles C.W. Cooke:
"There have been 17 shutdowns before this one, and a host of
debt-ceiling fights to boot. Some of these happened during periods of
divided government; others happened during periods of unified
government. All told, they are a bipartisan game, although it seems that
Democrats prefer to shut down things more than Republicans do. Fifteen
of America's previous funding gaps occurred when Democrats controlled
the House, and five of them came to pass while Democrats ran every single branch of government."
Essential Liberty
Columnist John Stossel:
"Government wants you to play a role in the 'shutdown' of the federal
government. Your role is to panic. ... If the public starts noticing
that life goes on as usual without all 3.4 million federal workers, we
might get dangerous ideas, like doing without so much government. ...
The federal government remains the biggest employer in the country.
President Obama says so with pride. Compare this to what happens in the
private sector in tough times: AT&T cut 40,000 workers. Sears cut
50,000. IBM: 60,000. They weren't easy decisions, but they enabled the
companies to stay profitable. With fewer workers, leaner companies found
more efficient ways to get things done. And the rest of us barely
noticed. We expect change and adaptation in free-market institutions.
But it doesn't happen in government. Government just grows. ... No
wonder politicians and bureaucrats are convinced big government is
essential to keep the economy going -- it is essential to keep them going."
Comment |
Share
Political Futures
Economist Walter E.
Williams: "Black congressmen and black public officials in general ...
always side with teachers unions in their opposition to ... measures
that would allow black parents to take their children out of failing
public schools. ... [T]hey themselves have abandoned public schools.
They see their children as too precious to be sacrificed in the name of
public education. ... According to a report by The Heritage Foundation,
'exactly 52 percent of Congressional Black Caucus members and 38 percent
of Congressional Hispanic Caucus members sent at least one child to
private school.' Overall, only 6 percent of black students attend
private school. ... I don't think anything that black politicians get
from ... others who have a vested financial interest in a failed
educational system is worth committing whole generations of black
youngsters to educational mediocrity."
Comment |
Share
For more, visit The Right Opinion. CHRONICLE QUOTESEditorial Exegesis
Investor's Business Daily:
""This year's Nobel Peace Prize has been given to the 'Organization for
the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons,' a group whose main achievement
seems to be good intentions. This award is getting ridiculous. ... It's a
$92 million United Nations-linked paper-pushing agency founded in 1997,
whose 500 bureaucrats draw salaries around $120,000. All this agency
does is ratify that nations have complied with their treaty obligations
long after the fireworks and negotiations are done, undoubtedly sending
stern letters out for non-compliance. ... It no longer goes to people
who promote actual peace. Nobel Prizes are now doled out as political
statements, encouragement for the kind of do-gooder missions that global
bureaucracies favor. Showing results, making a difference, these no
longer count."
Comment |
Share
Insight
Novelist and philosopher
Ayn Rand: "Economic power is exercised by means of a positive, by
offering men a reward, an incentive, a payment, a value; political power
is exercised by means of a negative, by the threat of punishment,
injury, imprisonment, destruction. The businessman's tool is values; the
bureaucrat's tool is fear."
Comment |
Share
Demo-gogues
Barack Obama: "The reason
we are where we are right now is because Speaker Boehner, the House
Republicans, thought that they could get leverage in budget negotiations
-- or defund the Affordable Care Act: ObamaCare -- by taking us to the
brink and essentially trying to hold the entire U.S. economy hostage.
And what I've said is, I'm happy to negotiate -- and Democrats have
shown themselves happy to negotiate -- on any issue, but you can't
threaten to shut down the government as means of getting leverage in
negotiations. ... Nobody is going to get 100% of what they want. What
Mr. Boehner has essentially said is unless I get what I want --
completely -- then I'm not going to reopen the government."
Comment |
Share
DezinformatsiaMNSBC's Joy Reid: "[Republicans] are now essentially taking hostages. But this is beyond a hostage situation. They have shot a hostage. They went ahead and shut the government down. Having done that, you cannot then go to the hostage negotiator and say, 'Why won't you talk to me? Why won't you sit down and have a conversation with me?'"Braying Jenny
Sen. Elizabeth Warren:
"When I hear the latest tirades from some of the extremists in the
House, I am struck by how vague these complaints are. The anarchy gang
is quick to malign government, but when was the last time anyone called
for regulators to go easier on companies that put lead in children's
toys, or for food inspectors to stop checking whether the meat in our
grocery stores is crawling with deadly bacteria, or for the FDA to
ignore whether morning sickness drugs will cause deformities in little
babies?"
Village IdiotsJay Carney: "What the president has been crystal clear about all along is that it is unacceptable to him that the Republican Party, driven by the Tea Party caucus, you know, try to extract ideological objectives in exchange for opening the government and raising the debt ceiling."Comment | Share From the 'Non Compos Mentis' File
Broadcaster Bob Costas:
"'Redskins' can't possibly honor a heritage or noble character trait,
nor can it possibly be considered a neutral term. It's an insult, a
slur, no matter how benign the present-day intent."
Short Cuts
Columnist Burt Prelutsky:
"Just recently, after performing a marriage service for a couple of
lesbians, [Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg] reported that 'same-sex
marriages prove the genius of the Constitution.' This is the same
Constitution about which she said not too long ago she wouldn't advise
an emerging nation to adopt as its own. So, just as it took her
husband's presidential nomination to finally make Mrs. Obama proud of
America, it took institutionalizing homosexual marriages to get this
former counsel of the ACLU to say something nice about our most sacred
document."
Semper Vigilo, Fortis, Paratus et Fidelis!
Nate Jackson for The Patriot Post Editorial Team
Join us in daily prayer
for our Patriots in uniform -- Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines and
Coast Guardsmen -- standing in harm's way in defense of Liberty, and for
their families.
|
Monday, October 14, 2013
THE PATRIOT POST 10/14/2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment