ISIS DANGERS
Posted by Elise Cooper
July 26, 2016
A Conversation with Michael Flynn
By Elise Cooper
Democrats
and mainstream media criticized Donald Trump’s acceptance speech as
Doom and Gloom, but anyone looking at the recent events would call it
reality. Within the last few weeks five police officers died in Dallas,
three in Baton Rogue; there have been jihadist terrorist attacks with
over 80 dead in Nice, France, including Americans, an axe attack by a
migrant Afghan in Munich, and recently a terrorist attack at a mall in
Munich leaving at least nine dead. If that is not doom and gloom, then
what is?
The Field of Fight by Lt. General Michael Flynn delves into the world of ISIS. American Thinker had the privilege of interviewing him.
Having
been at the Republican convention, the general told of his dismay at
those who concentrated on Melania Trump’s speech while there are so many
important matters occurring in today’s world. He noted to American
Thinker, “This shows you how petty the media will go to discredit Donald
Trump. Since I was the next speaker, as I waited in the wings, I heard a
woman who spoke from the heart about her love for this country and her
husband. With all the complexities, threats, and challenges that the
U.S. faces, for the media to harp on that is just ridiculous.”
The
Democrats and media criticism emphasized the importance of words spoken
in a certain context. Yet, President Obama will never utter the words
Islamic Extremist or Radical Islam. Flynn points out the hypocrisy, “The
president should clearly and unambiguously define the enemy that we
face and the threat to our way of life. It is radical Islam... ISIS is a
very determined enemy who wants to establish a global Caliphate. This
political correctness of not naming our enemy is dangerous for the
country. I am confident Americans can take the truth.”
Political
correctness has also interfered in the way the U.S. conducts the war
against terrorism. According to Flynn, “Using drones is a narrow
strategy. We have to be able to capture guys and learn from them by
getting the intelligence we need. We are not capturing anyone any more.
Beyond that, apprehending individuals allows us to expose them instead
of turning them into a martyr after being killed. By doing this we can
show how their ideology is a disease that must by excised. The
information warfare component of battle must discredit them. We show
them as cowards and weak.” Exposure does seem to work if people think of
how imbedded in their memory are the pictures of Khalid Sheik Mohammed
and Saddam Hussein after their capture.
Flynn
also debunks Democrats and some Republican pundits who say ISIS is
being defeated. They point to the terrorist groups loss of land and that
these recent attacks are acts of desperation. He strongly disagrees
with “those people because that is actually false. We excised them from
some village in Iraq like Fallujah, yet they are able to attack the
international community in San Bernardino, Orlando, France, Germany,
Bangladesh, and Turkey, all of these in recent months. The reason for
this is that the enemy has doubled in size and grown in a global
geographic footprint in the last six or so years.”
The
blame lies squarely in the hands of the Obama administration, including
Hillary Clinton. In the book, Flynn gives high marks to President Bush
while lambasting President Obama, “He (Bush) realized the war was going
badly, that we were losing, and our entire strategy needed to change.
The mere fact that he recognized this and proceeded to make the
difficult decisions he eventually made is a leadership characteristic
our current president lacks.”
Directly
commenting, “There is no enemy that is unbeatable. Even though
President Bush was at the end of his administration he brought in the
fresh leadership of General David Petraeus and Robert Gates. We were
able to reverse the strategy and come up with a new one to win. Now we
are at the end of President Obama’s term; yet, when 99% of President
Obama’s advisors told him to keep 10,000 troops in Iraq to stop the rise
of radical terrorism; he did not listen. He made a political decision
rather than a decision for our national security. This is a weakness in
his leadership style. His problem is that he refuses to recognize this
strategy is not working and the enemy has grown in capacity.”
One
of the problems is that the current president wants to be surrounded by
yes men. In the book Flynn reconts how he was fired in 2014 because he
went before Congress and spoke of how to keep America safe. When asked
about this, he responded, “I was appointed by President Obama twice, as
Assistant Director of National Intelligence and the head of the Defense
Intelligence Agency. I never met with the president once; imagine that.
Why not ask to speak with me about our differences of opinion and my
suggestions? To me, this is very disturbing.”
He
suspects he was fired because “our agency was very brutally honest
about our findings. I am not, nor have I ever been the type of person
that will state what the boss wants to hear. I am always very blunt and
say what I feel, including offering solutions. I was fired partially due
to my honesty about the enemy we are facing, radical Islam. In complete
contrast to the president who called ISIS the JV team, I told Congress
they were dangerous and growing. Intelligence is about truth to power.”
Although he outlines extensive solutions, he summarized it for American Thinker,
“In order to beat this enemy we need to discredit the ideology. Muslims
need to take a more public international stand. To do it they will have
to be helped, prompted, and pushed by the U.S., something we are not
doing now. We need to depend on Middle East allies like Israel, Jordan,
and Egypt. Finally, something that I have been criticized for is to get
Russia involved. They should assume responsibility and pressure Iran to
stop their proxy wars. As I show in the book the ties between the
Iranian regime and al Qaeda have been a well-established fact.”
Since
ISIS is a byproduct of al Qaeda does that mean Iran has ties to them as
well? Flynn responded, “Dig deep down into the intelligence and you
will find ‘the enemy of my enemy is my friend.’ There are these funny
relationships that exist. We have clearly seen with Iran and al Qaeda
that a Shiite state nation and a Sunni organization have worked
together. They do this because at the end of the day they hate the U.S.
more than they hate each other.”
Americans
should take solace in knowing that Lt. General Flynn is one of Donald
Trump’s top foreign policy advisors. Obviously, Mr. Trump is not
surrounding himself with yes people, but those who would not sit quietly
back if he believes a “president” Trump has the wrong strategy.
When
asked if he will be the next secretary of defense, and what type of
leader would he be, Flynn commented, “I am confident in what I know but
also what I do not know. I am willing to listen and learn. I believe we
should never get involved in wars unless we have a clear unambiguous
goal to win. America has forgotten how to win wars. I am not answering
the question of my employment right now. Republicans must win many more
battles before the war is won.”
The author writes for American Thinker.
She has done book reviews, author interviews, and has written a number
of national security, political, and foreign policy articles.
Democrats
and mainstream media criticized Donald Trump’s acceptance speech as
Doom and Gloom, but anyone looking at the recent events would call it
reality. Within the last few weeks five police officers died in Dallas,
three in Baton Rogue; there have been jihadist terrorist attacks with
over 80 dead in Nice, France, including Americans, an axe attack by a
migrant Afghan in Munich, and recently a terrorist attack at a mall in
Munich leaving at least nine dead. If that is not doom and gloom, then
what is?
The Field of Fight by Lt. General Michael Flynn delves into the world of ISIS. American Thinker had the privilege of interviewing him.
Having
been at the Republican convention, the general told of his dismay at
those who concentrated on Melania Trump’s speech while there are so many
important matters occurring in today’s world. He noted to American
Thinker, “This shows you how petty the media will go to discredit Donald
Trump. Since I was the next speaker, as I waited in the wings, I heard a
woman who spoke from the heart about her love for this country and her
husband. With all the complexities, threats, and challenges that the
U.S. faces, for the media to harp on that is just ridiculous.”
The
Democrats and media criticism emphasized the importance of words spoken
in a certain context. Yet, President Obama will never utter the words
Islamic Extremist or Radical Islam. Flynn points out the hypocrisy, “The
president should clearly and unambiguously define the enemy that we
face and the threat to our way of life. It is radical Islam... ISIS is a
very determined enemy who wants to establish a global Caliphate. This
political correctness of not naming our enemy is dangerous for the
country. I am confident Americans can take the truth.”
Political
correctness has also interfered in the way the U.S. conducts the war
against terrorism. According to Flynn, “Using drones is a narrow
strategy. We have to be able to capture guys and learn from them by
getting the intelligence we need. We are not capturing anyone any more.
Beyond that, apprehending individuals allows us to expose them instead
of turning them into a martyr after being killed. By doing this we can
show how their ideology is a disease that must by excised. The
information warfare component of battle must discredit them. We show
them as cowards and weak.” Exposure does seem to work if people think of
how imbedded in their memory are the pictures of Khalid Sheik Mohammed
and Saddam Hussein after their capture.
Flynn
also debunks Democrats and some Republican pundits who say ISIS is
being defeated. They point to the terrorist groups loss of land and that
these recent attacks are acts of desperation. He strongly disagrees
with “those people because that is actually false. We excised them from
some village in Iraq like Fallujah, yet they are able to attack the
international community in San Bernardino, Orlando, France, Germany,
Bangladesh, and Turkey, all of these in recent months. The reason for
this is that the enemy has doubled in size and grown in a global
geographic footprint in the last six or so years.”
The
blame lies squarely in the hands of the Obama administration, including
Hillary Clinton. In the book, Flynn gives high marks to President Bush
while lambasting President Obama, “He (Bush) realized the war was going
badly, that we were losing, and our entire strategy needed to change.
The mere fact that he recognized this and proceeded to make the
difficult decisions he eventually made is a leadership characteristic
our current president lacks.”
Directly
commenting, “There is no enemy that is unbeatable. Even though
President Bush was at the end of his administration he brought in the
fresh leadership of General David Petraeus and Robert Gates. We were
able to reverse the strategy and come up with a new one to win. Now we
are at the end of President Obama’s term; yet, when 99% of President
Obama’s advisors told him to keep 10,000 troops in Iraq to stop the rise
of radical terrorism; he did not listen. He made a political decision
rather than a decision for our national security. This is a weakness in
his leadership style. His problem is that he refuses to recognize this
strategy is not working and the enemy has grown in capacity.”
One
of the problems is that the current president wants to be surrounded by
yes men. In the book Flynn reconts how he was fired in 2014 because he
went before Congress and spoke of how to keep America safe. When asked
about this, he responded, “I was appointed by President Obama twice, as
Assistant Director of National Intelligence and the head of the Defense
Intelligence Agency. I never met with the president once; imagine that.
Why not ask to speak with me about our differences of opinion and my
suggestions? To me, this is very disturbing.”
He
suspects he was fired because “our agency was very brutally honest
about our findings. I am not, nor have I ever been the type of person
that will state what the boss wants to hear. I am always very blunt and
say what I feel, including offering solutions. I was fired partially due
to my honesty about the enemy we are facing, radical Islam. In complete
contrast to the president who called ISIS the JV team, I told Congress
they were dangerous and growing. Intelligence is about truth to power.”
Although he outlines extensive solutions, he summarized it for American Thinker,
“In order to beat this enemy we need to discredit the ideology. Muslims
need to take a more public international stand. To do it they will have
to be helped, prompted, and pushed by the U.S., something we are not
doing now. We need to depend on Middle East allies like Israel, Jordan,
and Egypt. Finally, something that I have been criticized for is to get
Russia involved. They should assume responsibility and pressure Iran to
stop their proxy wars. As I show in the book the ties between the
Iranian regime and al Qaeda have been a well-established fact.”
Since
ISIS is a byproduct of al Qaeda does that mean Iran has ties to them as
well? Flynn responded, “Dig deep down into the intelligence and you
will find ‘the enemy of my enemy is my friend.’ There are these funny
relationships that exist. We have clearly seen with Iran and al Qaeda
that a Shiite state nation and a Sunni organization have worked
together. They do this because at the end of the day they hate the U.S.
more than they hate each other.”
Americans
should take solace in knowing that Lt. General Flynn is one of Donald
Trump’s top foreign policy advisors. Obviously, Mr. Trump is not
surrounding himself with yes people, but those who would not sit quietly
back if he believes a “president” Trump has the wrong strategy.
When
asked if he will be the next secretary of defense, and what type of
leader would he be, Flynn commented, “I am confident in what I know but
also what I do not know. I am willing to listen and learn. I believe we
should never get involved in wars unless we have a clear unambiguous
goal to win. America has forgotten how to win wars. I am not answering
the question of my employment right now. Republicans must win many more
battles before the war is won.”
No comments:
Post a Comment