Operation American Spring urges all organizations, groups, and citizens that support Founding Father principles, Declaration of Independence, U.S. Constitution, and Rights endowed by our Creator, to bring your agendas to Washington, D.C. Take advantage of the powerful vessel OAS has established on the D.C. Mall to get your worthy message in front of America and the lawless occupiers of leadership.....let us unite,unite, unite. Bring your agenda, bring your handouts, bring your flags and banners, OAS will fall in behind you and magnify your messages as we assemble in the presence of the White House, Congress, media, et al. Together we will triumph over the evil destruction political power brokers currently occupying Washington, D.C. are pursuing. The Administration “transformation of America” direction is the greatest threat our nation has ever experienced...Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan, were bumps in the road compared to the subjugation Obama is formulating and bringing rapidly on American freedom and liberty. Unity among “we the people” and our various agendas is the only solution to bringing the destructive socialist, communist leaning movement to a halt. Let there be no personal ambition, no one-upmanship, no pride of success, only a focus on elevating the US Constitution once again as the law of the land and the replacement of elements and figures that are engaged in destruction of America.
Harry Riley, COL, USA, Ret
http://www.oas2014.com/
http://calltoaction.oas2014.
OBAMA EVIL? Sheer Genius or Pathological?
Eileen Toplansky Explains...A Monster Has Claws In America
by Harry Riley
If one sets out to destroy the core pillars of a society, to incrementally break down the values of a country, and to dishearten its inhabitants, then Barack Hussein Obama has been a sterling success. He is no amateur; he is not a feckless individual who doesn't know what he is doing. His actions are deliberate, and his goals are in direct opposition to the vast majority of the American people. His so-called misdirections are calculated, and his leadership traits are not intended to support America. He knows exactly what he is doing, and far too many people still don't comprehend or want to believe the machinations of this man and his underlying political arc. Even some conservative commentators appear to be amazed at the constant replays of actions designed to hurt America. Why should they be? Obama is doing what Obama said he would do. He is transforming this country into the mold he wants – a weakened America, a demoralized American people, and a vast playground that he can ultimately demolish should he become head of the United Nations.
And he is succeeding. [...]
http://patriotsforamerica.
http://www.americanthinker.
INTEL - Soebarkah Plan to use the Military against Citizens !!!
Previously posted ...
8pm EDT 5/30 - Reactionaries Speak Radio - Special Guest Dr. James Garrow !!!
http://conpats.blogspot.com/
Sarah Palin: Obama 'blew it' on Bergdahl prisoner exchange
“The Obama administration tells America this soldier served with ‘honor and distinction,’ ” Palin wrote on Facebook, quoting words spoken by national security adviser Susan Rice on Sunday. “No, Mr. President, a soldier expressing horrid anti-American beliefs — even boldly putting them in writing and unabashedly firing off his messages while in uniform, just three days before he left his unit on foot — is not ‘honorable service.’ Unless that is your standard.” Palin, the 2008 GOP vice presidential nominee, joins a growing chorus of Republicans who criticized the deal that saw Bergdahl released by his Taliban captors Saturday. [...]
http://onpolitics.usatoday.
CIA legend lashes into Obama
Barack Obama is now getting hammered on all fronts.
Ex-CIA chief: U.S.-Tehran talks 'Chamberlain-esque'
'There is no chance that Iran is going to abide by limitations'
The man who headed America's top spy agency has just unloaded on the president for this continued practice [...]
http://www.wnd.com/2014/06/ex-
Video Report - We do NOT negotiate with terrorists, do we ?
The war on Terror is OVER !!!! - Obama has surrendered !!!!!
Mullah Omar, the reclusive head of the Taliban, has released a statement hailing the transfer of the top five
Taliban commanders from Guantanamo to Qatar. Omar says their freedom is a "great victory."
http://www.us1.me/140602/
Bob de La Tigra
US Defense Chief Defends Secrecy of Prisoner Swap Deal
U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel is defending the deal to secure the freedom of an American soldier in a swap for five Afghan insurgents, even though Congress was not notified ahead of time as required by U.S. law. Hagel said officials feared the life of Army Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl was in danger. As a result, he said congressional leaders were not given the required 30-day notice that President Barack Obama planned to release the prisoners from the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and turn them over to Qatar. Qatari officials have pledged to hold them for a year. Some opposition lawmakers in Washington have praised Bergdahl's release, but criticized the terms of the prisoner swap. One Republican critic, Congressman Mike Rogers, called the prisoner swap "a fundamental shift" in U.S. policy that would give terrorists "a greater incentive" to take Americans hostage. Bergdhal was flown Sunday to a U.S. Army base in Germany to undergo a medical checkup and initial questioning about his nearly five years in captivity at the hands of the Taliban. The circumstances surrounding his capture remain murky. [...]
http://www.hawaiireporter.com/
More sickness ...
Honolulu Pride Announces 2014 Grand Marshals
http://www.hawaiireporter.com/
So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that look for him
shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation.
Hebrews 9:28 KJV
INTEL - Soebarkah Plan to use the Military against Citizens !!!
Thanks - BoBowen ...
Inside the Ring: Memo outlines Obama’s plan to use the military against citizens
by Bill Gertz - The Washington Times
A
2010 Pentagon directive
on military support to civilian authorities details
what critics say is a troubling policy that envisions
the Obama
administration’s
potential use of military force against Americans.
The
directive contains noncontroversial provisions on
support to civilian fire and emergency services,
special events and the domestic use of the Army Corps
of Engineers.
The
troubling aspect of the directive outlines
presidential authority for the use of military arms
and forces, including unarmed drones, in operations
against domestic unrest.
“This
appears to be the latest step in the administration’s
decision to use force within the United States against
its citizens,” said a defense official opposed to the
directive.
Directive
No. 3025.18, “Defense Support of Civil Authorities,”
was issued Dec. 29, 2010, and states that U.S.
commanders “are provided emergency authority under
this directive.”
“Federal
military forces shall not be used to quell civil
disturbances unless specifically authorized by the
president in accordance with applicable law or
permitted under emergency authority,” the directive
states.
“In
these circumstances, those federal military commanders
have the authority, in extraordinary emergency
circumstances where prior authorization by the
president is impossible and duly constituted local
authorities are unable to control the situation, to
engage temporarily in activities that are necessary to
quell large-scale, unexpected civil disturbances”
under two conditions.
The
conditions include military support needed “to prevent
significant loss of life or wanton destruction of
property and are necessary to restore governmental
function and public order.”
A
second use is when federal, state and local
authorities “are unable or decline to provide adequate
protection for federal property or federal
governmental functions.”
“Federal
action, including the use of federal military forces,
is authorized when necessary to protect the federal
property or functions,” the directive states.
The
directive states clearly that it is for engaging
civilians during times of unrest.
A
U.S. official said the Obama
administration considered
but rejected deploying military force under the
directive during the recent standoff with Nevada
rancher Cliven
Bundy and
his armed supporters.
Mr.
Bundy is
engaged in a legal battle with the federal Bureau of
Land Management over unpaid grazing fees. Along with a
group of protesters, Mr.
Bundy in
April confronted federal and local authorities in a
standoff that ended when the authorities backed down.
The Pentagon directive
authorizes the secretary of defense to approve the use
of unarmed drones in domestic unrest. But it bans the
use of missile-firing unmanned aircraft.
“Use of
armed [unmanned aircraft systems] is not authorized,”
the directive says.
The
directive was signed by then-Deputy Defense Secretary William J.
Lynn.
A
copy can be found on the Pentagon website:
http://www.dtic.mil/whs/
Defense
analysts say there has been a buildup of military
units within non-security-related federal agencies,
notably the creation of Special Weapons and Tactics
(SWAT) teams. The buildup has raised questions about
whether the Obama
administration is
undermining civil liberties under the guise of
counterterrorism and counternarcotics efforts.
Other
agencies with SWAT teams reportedly include the
Department of Agriculture, the Railroad Retirement
Board, the Tennessee Valley Authority, the Office of
Personnel Management, the Consumer Product Safety
Commission, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the
Education Department.
The
militarization of federal agencies, under little-known
statues that permit deputization of security
officials, comes as the White House has launched
verbal attacks on private citizens’ ownership of
firearms despite the fact that most gun owners are
law-abiding citizens.
A
White House National Security Council spokeswoman
declined to comment.
President
Obama stated
at the National Defense University a year ago: “I do
not believe it would be constitutional for the
government to target and kill any U.S. citizen — with
a drone or with a shotgun — without due process, nor
should any president deploy armed drones over U.S.
soil.”
A Pentagon official
who defended the directive said it was signed in
December 2010 after four years of thorough
consultations within the Pentagon and
with other federal agencies The 2010 directive
replaced several previously published directives in
1980, 1991, and 1993.
The
last time military forces were used to quell civil
unrest was 1906 following the San Francisco earthquake
to protect the federal mint and restore order in the
city.
The
official said: “I suppose that in a very extreme case,
one can imagine a combination of natural and man-made
disasters that result in the cascading failure of
communication infrastructure, or some electro-magnetic
pulse that shuts down all electronic communication.”
“In
the event that it should happen in today’s day and
age, we would want our senior military leaders in the
field to do all they can to assist their fellow
Americans to prevent significant loss of life or
malicious destruction of property and to protect
federal property or federal governmental functions,”
the official said.
HOUSE
HITS ONA DOWNGRADE
The
House defense authorization bill passed last week
calls for adding $10 million to the Pentagon’s
future warfare think tank and for codifying the Office
of Net Assessment (ONA) as a semi-independent unit.
The
provision is being called the Andrew
Marshall amendment
after the ONA’s longtime director and reflects
congressional support for the 92-year-old manager and
his staying power through numerous administrations,
Republican and Democratic.
Mr.
Marshall’s opponents within the Pentagon and
the Obama
administration persuaded
Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel this year
to downgrade the ONA by cutting its budget and placing
it under the control of the undersecretary of defense
for policy. The ONA currently is a separate entity
within the Office of the Secretary of Defense.
Members
of the House Committee on Armed Services objected and
added the $10 million to the administration’s
$8.9 million request, along with a legal provision
that would codify ONA’s current status as separate
from the policy undersecretary shop.
The
committee was concerned Mr. Hagel’s downgrade would
“limit the ability and flexibility of ONA to conduct
long-range comparative assessments,” the report on the
authorization bill states.
“The
office has a long history of providing alternative
analyses and strategies that challenge the ‘group
think’ that can often pervade the Department of
Defense,” the report says, noting an increasing demand
for unconventional thinking about space warfare
capabilities by China and Russia.
In
addition to adding funds, the bill language requires
the ONA to study alternative U.S. defense and
deterrence strategies related to the space warfare
programs of both countries.
China
is developing advanced missiles capable of shooting
down satellites in low and high earth orbits. It also
is building lasers and electronic jammers to disrupt
satellites, a key U.S. strategic military advantage.
Russia is said to be working on anti-satellite
missiles and other space weapons.
“The
committee believes the office must remain an
independent organization within the department,
reporting directly to the secretary,” the report said.
Mr.
Marshall, sometimes referred to as the Pentagon’s
“Yoda,” after the Star Wars character, has come under
fire from opponents in the administration,
who say he is too independent and not aligned with the administration’s
soft-line defense policies.
The
ONA is known for its extensive use of contractors and
lack of producing specific overall net assessments of
future warfare challenges, as required by the office’s
charter.
One
example of the ONA’s unconventional thinking was the
recent contractor report “China: The Three Warfares,”
which revealed Beijing’s extensive use of political
warfare against the United States, including
psychological warfare, media warfare and legal
warfare.
“‘The
Three Warfares’ is a dynamic, three-dimensional,
war-fighting process that constitutes war by other
means,” the report says.
NO
DENNIS RODMAN DEFENSE
Navy
Adm. James A.
“Sandy” Winnefeld, Vice Chairman
of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Wednesday that the Pentagon is
deploying more and higher-quality missile defenses to
counter potential nuclear attacks from North Korea and
Iran.
“This
is about ensuring we can deny the objectives of any
insecure authoritarian state that believes acquisition
of deliverable weapons of mass destruction is key to
the preservation of its regime,” Adm. Winnefeld said
in a speech to the Atlantic Council. “The number of
states trying to achieve that capability is growing,
not shrinking, with our principal current concern
being North Korea, because they are closest in terms
of capability, followed by Iran.”
He
added that missile defenses are needed “because we’re
not betting on Dennis
Rodman as our
deterrent against a future North Korean ICBM threat.”
He
was referring to the heavily tattooed and pierced
former NBA star, who has traveled to North Korea as a
guest of leader Kim
Jong-un. Mr. Rodman calls the
dictator his “friend.”
“A
robust and capable missile defense is our best bet to
defend the United States from
such an attack and is, in my view, our No. 1 missile defense priority,” Adm. Winnefeld said.
such an attack and is, in my view, our No. 1 missile defense priority,” Adm. Winnefeld said.
North
Korea is continuing to develop long-range missiles and
nuclear weapons. It recently threatened to conduct a
fourth nuclear
test, and analysts say signs from the closed communist state suggest the North Koreans may test a missile warhead.
http://www.washingtontimes.
test, and analysts say signs from the closed communist state suggest the North Koreans may test a missile warhead.
http://www.washingtontimes.
Bill Gertz is a national security
columnist
for The Washington Times and senior editor at The Washington Free Beacon http://freebeacon.com/
He has been with The Times since 1985. He is the author of six books, four of them national best-sellers. His latest book, "The Failure Factory," on government bureaucracy and national security, was published in September 2008. Mr. Gertz also writes a weekly column called Inside the Ring, a weekly column that chronicles the U.S. national security bureaucracy. Mr. Gertz has been a guest lecturer at the FBI National Academy in Quantico, Va.; the Central Intelligence Agency in Virginia; the National Defense University at Fort McNair in Washington; and the Brookings Institution in Washington. He has participated in the National Security Studies Program at the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies and Syracuse University Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs. He studied English literature at Washington College in Chestertown, Md., and journalism at George Washington University. He is married and has two daughters.
http://www.washingtontimes.
for The Washington Times and senior editor at The Washington Free Beacon http://freebeacon.com/
He has been with The Times since 1985. He is the author of six books, four of them national best-sellers. His latest book, "The Failure Factory," on government bureaucracy and national security, was published in September 2008. Mr. Gertz also writes a weekly column called Inside the Ring, a weekly column that chronicles the U.S. national security bureaucracy. Mr. Gertz has been a guest lecturer at the FBI National Academy in Quantico, Va.; the Central Intelligence Agency in Virginia; the National Defense University at Fort McNair in Washington; and the Brookings Institution in Washington. He has participated in the National Security Studies Program at the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies and Syracuse University Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs. He studied English literature at Washington College in Chestertown, Md., and journalism at George Washington University. He is married and has two daughters.
http://www.washingtontimes.
F.P.
The
quickest way to get it over with is to
go
get the bastards who started it.
The
quicker they are whipped, the quicker we can go
home.
No comments:
Post a Comment