Facing An All New
Constitutional Concept Regarding Grand Juries
Ron Branson writes:
http://nationallibertyalliance.org/
Basically, I am in favor of anything promoting or relating to the People's Grand Jury. Unfortunately, the People has been sweet-talked out of retaining their power in the Grand Jury system. The mental state of People today by-in-large today is that Grand Juries are nothing but an arm of government, specifically government prosecutors. Add on top of that the fact that judges select who they want to sit on every County Grand Jury throughout this nation.
I have been harping about the Grand Jury going back to 1981. The People have not listened, but rather have placed their efforts on other matters such as fighting the IRS, etc. I am slowly seeing the subject of Grand Juries starting to seep into People's brains.
As you perhaps know, I am the author/founder of the new constitutional concept of a Special Grand Jury system, which concept was developed in 1995. The goal of this Special Grand Jury concept is to allow the system to work in the way of which it was supposed to work, but when the system manifests that it does not work, or refuses to work, then the People have a fall back system to the Special Grand Jury, which narrows the playing field merely to unlawful conduct of judges. All matters for adjudication ultimately are determined by the courts, but the judicial system has manifested that it does not work. Therefore, the People's first objective must be to fix the broken judicial system.
J.A.I.L. opens a new door of access to the Grand Jury by allowing the People to lodge a complaint directly against a judge to the prosecutor, and then sets a time limit in which the prosecutor must began the prosecution. As it is currently, a prosecutor will not prosecute a sitting judge, who incidentally was likely a former prosecutor in their own prosecutor's office. When the time limit expires to began the prosecution against a judge, and no action has been taken, then the People may take the matter directly to the Special Grand Jury. Thus, a complainant, in this way may do an end round failing prosecutor and County Grand Jury, and gain direct access to the Special Grand Jury.
The SGJs can then indict the judge and assign their own personal Special Prosecutor to take on the case against the offending judge complained of. It will only take one or two convictions of judges performed by this manor to greatly embarrass both the prosecutor and the County Grand Jurors into action.
Every prosecutor wants to be re-elected to his office as District Attorney, but this mark on his record will certainly dictate that he should not be re-elected to office, which is what every politician fears. Just think of how his competitor for his office will use this record to his own advantage. Ouch!
As to your question regarding my thoughts on this Common Law Grand Jury effort, we need to be wise with our time and efforts. Instead of placing mega efforts into reinventing the wheel of composing an additional 3141 County Grand Juries, one for each County in the nation, we can reduce our effort by composing only one Special Grand Jury for each state. We already have 3141 County County Grand Juries in this nation, one for every county, therefore, we only need to get these present existing County Grand Juries busy doing their job. It appears that
http://nationallibertyalliance.org/ desires to reinventing the wheel by creating another 3141 County Grand Juries in addition to the 3141 County Grand Juries we already have in existence.
On the other hand, the Special Grand Jury system will streamline the http://nationallibertyalliance.org/ objective greatly. Once we establish even one Special Grand Jury anywhere in this nation, things will move like a house a fire! State after state will be forced to enact their own Special Grand Jury for their state. The time ramifications is two years in which we can ignite the Special Grand Jury flame that will burn through this entire nation with the authority of the People seeking redress to this Special Grand Jury. The government will panic at the prospect and go into overdrive to try to stop the People regaining their freedom.
The concept of a Special Grand Jury really should have been propose back in 1789 in our original Constitution. The Special Grand Jury concept is not an option, but a necessity. It closes a gaping hole that clearly exists within our present form of government.
People must have the last and final word in all concepts of government. That philosophy is merely a dream today, but the with the future existence of the People's Special Grand Jury system, it will be reality.
There is no higher concept among men than that they themselves should have direct and personal control over their public servants. Thank you for asking my thoughts on Grand Juries. God bless you, Keith.
Ron Branson
VictoryUSA@jail4judges.org
No comments:
Post a Comment