Tuesday, June 6, 2017

CYBERALERT 06/06/2017 MSNBC, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC ALL BETTING THE FARM ON LIES AND DEMOCRAT IMAGINATIONS!

1. ABC, CBS Salivate Over Upcoming Senate Hearing With James Comey


Former FBI Director James Comey is set to speak before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Thursday after recently getting permission from Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who is now in charge of the FBI’s Russian meddling investigation. Comey is expected to field questions about a series of memos he allegedly wrote that unnamed sources claim to show that President Trump attempted to interfere with the said investigation. During their Monday evening broadcasts, ABC and CBS were eagerly awaiting the day of the hearing.

2. Desperate CBS on Trump and Russia: ‘Is There a Fire Coming?’


Democratic Senator Joe Manchin appeared on Monday’s CBS This Morning and offered some skepticism and tough questions for ex-FBI Director James Comey. Yet, the show’s hosts desperately pushed for signs that Donald Trump has done something deeply wrong. 

3. MSNBC’s Katy Tur Rails Against President Trump, Insists He Isn’t Trustworthy


MSNBC’s faulty political historian, Katy Tur filled in for Chuck Todd during MTP Daily on Monday, where she dedicated a significant portion of the show railing against President Trump and claiming he was untrustworthy. “I'm in the chair for @MeetThePress Daily. Tonight we're focusing on trust. Do Americans have it for Trump? Does Trump have it for his NSC,” she announced in a tweet before the show.

4. Sebastian Gorka to CNN: “What You've Just Spun Is Classic Fake News"


Deputy Assistant to the President Sebastian Gorka and CNN New Day co-host Chris Cuomo went head to head Monday morning. Cuomo began the interview by coming out swinging, claiming the President's executive orders on immigration were about targeting Muslims and keeping them out.

5. Kellyanne Conway Blasts NBC’s ‘One-Sided’ ‘Obsession’ With Trump Tweets


Appearing on Monday’s NBC Today, White House adviser Kellyanne Conway ripped into the network for its “one-sided” hyperbolic coverage of President Trump’s Twitter reaction to Saturday’s London terror attack, calling out the liberal media “obsession” with his tweets.

6. On MSNBC, Eichenwald Accuses Republicans of Defending 'Right-Wing Terrorists'


Appearing as a guest on Saturday's AM Joy, MSNBC contributor and Newsweek senior editor Kurt Eichenwald accused Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Republican members of Congress of defending "right-wing terrorists" during the Obama administration, as the liberal journalist tried to implicate mainstream conservatives in recent reports of hate crimes. Eichenwald: "In order to attack Obama. they said conservatives are right-wing terrorists. They told these right-wing extremists, 'You are one of us.'"

7. Behar Defends Griffin, Maher: Stop the 'Assault on Comedians!'


Monday on The View, hosts Joy Behar and Whoopi Goldberg defended and downplayed two left-wing comedians who got into hot water this past week. After Kathy Griffin posed in a photo with a bloodied, severed head of the president, and then later played the victim after being called out for the egregious display, HBO Real Time host Bill Maher caused outrage after using the “N-word” during an interview with Senator Ben Sasse on his Friday show. Despite both cases receiving bipartisan backlash, the radically liberal hosts on The View actually defended both comedians’ actions.
 
 
1

ABC, CBS Salivate Over Upcoming Senate Hearing With James Comey

By Nicholas Fondacaro

Former FBI Director James Comey is set to speak before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Thursday after recently getting permission from Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who is now in charge of the FBI’s Russian meddling investigation. Comey is expected to field questions about a series of memos he allegedly wrote that unnamed sources claim to show that President Trump attempted to interfere with the said investigation. During their Monday evening broadcasts, ABC and CBS were eagerly awaiting the day of the hearing.
“Former FBI Director James Comey set to testify Thursday about his meetings with President Trump and the memos he kept about the meeting before he was fired,” hyped ABC Anchor David Muir as he led into the segment on World News Tonight. He added speculation to the story, asking: “Will President Trump try to stop him, invoking executive privilege,” even though he already knew the answer was no.
ABC’s Mary Bruce was the reporter behind the segment. “Tonight, that blockbuster testimony from the fired FBI director is moving forward. The White House now says definitely President Trump won't try to block him,” she announced in a dramatic tone. She followed that up with a clip of Deputy Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders plainly stating that fact. Bruce also rattled off a series of questions many hoped would spell doom for Trump:
Lawmakers are eager to know: Did President Trump ask Comey to pledge his loyalty? Did the President pressure Comey to drop his investigation into fired National Security Adviser Michael Flynn? And did Comey tell the President he wasn't under investigation, as Trump claims? Hanging over the hearing, the biggest question of all. Is there any evidence of collusion between the Trump team and the Russians?
She ended her report with a clip of Democratic Senator Mark Warner gleefully talking about how much smoke he sees. “There's a lot of smoke. We have no smoking gun at this point. But there is a lot of smoke,” he said.
Meanwhile, on CBS Evening News, they were looking forward to Thursday as well. “[The Senate Intelligence Committee] is investigating Russian meddling in the election and whether anyone in the Trump campaign was involved,” noted Anchor Scott Pelley as he handed it off to Nancy Cordes.
Cordes kicked off her report by calling into question why the Trump administration would not invoke executive privilege. She pitted the claims of Huckabee Sanders, who said the reason was “in order to facilitate a swift and thorough examination of the facts sought by the Senate Intelligence Committee;” up against Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, who claimed that “if the President were to say he shouldn't testify, that would be very incriminating for the President.”
And it wasn’t just the Comey hearing that had CBS’s mouth watering, there was another high-profile hearing happening the day before Comey’s. “Two other top intelligence officials, including the head of the NSA, were also pushed by the President to downplay the Russia investigation. They'll testify on Wednesday,” she reported, leaning on more anonymous claims. “Scott, Senators are trying to determine whether all of this was just presidential banter or if it amounts to obstruction of justice.”
In contrast, NBC Nightly News ran a mere 20 seconds long brief for the story. It’s still early in the week so there is time for their excitement to grow. After their segments on the hearing, both ABC and CBS announced that they will be broadcasting the Comey hearing live for their audiences at 10 o’clock in the morning. The anticipation is that Comey’s testimony will damage Trump’s presidency. It would be interesting to see if their assumptions were proven false.
Transcript below:
ABC
World News Tonight
June 5, 2017
6:41:55 PM Eastern
DAVID MUIR: Next to Capitol Hill. Congress back to work tonight after a break with that major showdown looming. Former FBI Director James Comey set to testify Thursday about his meetings with President Trump and the memos he kept about the meeting before he was fired. Will President Trump try to stop him, invoking executive privilege? Well, tonight, we have an answer on that from the White House. And ABC's Mary Bruce on the hill.
[Cuts to video]
MARY BRUCE: Tonight, that blockbuster testimony from the fired FBI director is moving forward. The White House now says definitely President Trump won't try to block him.
SARAH HUCKABEE SANDERS: President Trump will not assert executive privilege regarding James Comey's scheduled testimony.
BRUCE: Sources close to Comey say he's angry after being fired with no warning. On Thursday, he'll get to tell his side of the story. Front and center will be his private conversations with the President. He's preparing to answer questions about those memos he wrote detailing their encounters.
What's your one key question for him?
MARCO RUBIO: We've seen these reports that are been attributed to Comey. And the questions are going to be about whether that's how it happened. No one has heard from him directly.
BRUCE: Lawmakers are eager to know: Did President Trump ask Comey to pledge his loyalty? Did the President pressure Comey to drop his investigation into fired National Security Adviser Michael Flynn? And did Comey tell the President he wasn't under investigation, as Trump claims? Hanging over the hearing, the biggest question of all. Is there any evidence of collusion between the Trump team and the Russians?
MARK WERNER: There's a lot of smoke. We have no smoking gun at this point. But there is a lot of smoke.
[Cuts back to live]
MUIR: So let's get to Mary Bruce, live on the hill again tonight. The committee has requested those memos as you reported there, Mary. But lot of questions about whether or not the public will ever see them.
BRUCE: David, lawmakers remain hopeful but no clear answer yet on when we might see those memos. Regardless, lawmakers I talk with are confident that Comey will be discussing those private conversations with the President.
MUIR: We know you’ll be right there on the hill for us Mary, thank you.
...
CBS Evening News
June 5, 2017
6:33:52 PM Eastern
SCOTT PELLEY: The White House said today that the President will not invoke executive privilege to keep fired FBI Director James Comey from testifying to the Senate Intelligence Committee. That panel is investigating Russian meddling in the election and whether anyone in the Trump campaign was involved. Nancy Cordes is on Capitol Hill.
[Cuts to video]
NANCY CORDES: The deputy white house press secretary said today the President has the right to block Comey's testimony but won't. Why?
SARAH HUCKABEE SANDERS: In order to facilitate a swift and thorough examination of the facts sought by the Senate Intelligence Committee.
CORDES: Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi argued the President had no choice.
NANCY PELOSI: I think if the President were to say he shouldn't testify, that would be very incriminating for the President.
CORDES: Democrats and Republicans want to know more about the memos Comey kept outlining the president's alleged request that he drop his investigation into fired National Security Adviser Michael Flynn.
SUSAN COLLINS: The tone, the exact words that were spoken, and the context are so important.
CORDES: On Face the Nation, intelligence committee members Susan Collins and Mark Warner described the questions they'll have for Comey on Thursday.
MARK WERNER: And two, I want to know what kind of pressure, appropriate, inappropriate, how many conversations he had with the President about this topic.
CORDES: Committee Chair Richard Burr does not expect the FBI will hand over Comey's memo before the Thursday hearing, but...
RICHARD BURR: Oh, I think eventually nothing in Washington stays locked up forever.
[Cuts back to live]
CORDES: Two other top intelligence officials, including the head of the NSA, were also pushed by the President to downplay the Russia investigation. They'll testify on Wednesday. Scott, Senators are trying to determine whether all of this was just presidential banter or if it amounts to obstruction of justice.
PELLEY: Nancy Cordes on Capitol Hill. Thank you, Nancy.
2

Desperate CBS on Trump and Russia: ‘Is There a Fire Coming?’

By Scott Whitlock

Democratic Senator Joe Manchin appeared on Monday’s CBS This Morningand offered some skepticism and tough questions for ex-FBI Director James Comey. Yet, the show’s hosts desperately pushed for signs that Donald Trump has done something deeply wrong. 
After Charlie Rose admitted that Senator Mark Warner sees no “smoking gun” on the President and Russia, fellow co-host Gayle King pressed Manchin, “Didn't your mom say if there’s a lot of smoke, there must be fire? Is there a fire coming?” 
In other words, let’s just assume guilt? 
Earlier, co-host Norah O’Donnell tossed Manchin a softball on what he wanted to ask Comey. Manchin surprised the hosts with skepticism on the ex-FBI head: “The question that's being asked by West Virginians is if you knew or thought there was obstruction of justice, why didn't you act on it?”  
Manchin added: 
[Comey] was suspicious that he came back from that meeting and took all these notes and filed everything properly. What were his concerns? If there was deeper concerns, why wasn't something done at that time? 
Maybe not the questions the CBS journalists were looking for. 
A transcript is below:  
CBS This Morning 
6/5/17
8:05:52 to 8:11:27
NORAH O’DONNELL: Democratic senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia is also on the intelligence committee. Good morning. 
SENATOR JOE MANCHIN: Good morning, Norah. 
O’DONNELL: What's the big question you have for the FBI director? 
JOE MANCHIN: The question that’s being asked by West Virginians is, if you knew or thought there was obstruction of justice, why didn't you act on it? 
O’DONNELL: And what should the FBI director have done? 
MANCHIN: We're anxious to hear this. How in depth— He was suspicious that he came back from that meeting and took all these notes and filed everything properly. What were his concerns? If there was deeper concerns, why wasn't something done at that time? 
O’DONNELL: You were talking about what happened on Valentine's Day. 
MANCHIN: Correct. 
O’DONNELL: Inside the Oval Office, there’s the Attorney General, the Vice President of the United States and the FBI Director. The President of the United States asked the Attorney General and the Vice President to leave and then reportedly says to the FBI director, “I hope you can let this go,” meaning the whole Russia investigation. Does that raise questions? 
MANCHIN: It does raise questions. We want to know what Comey was thinking at that time, if he thought it had risen to the level of obstruction. If it had, why hadn’t been something been done? Why didn’t he act on it? He was still FBI director. If not, was that concerned filed away for what purpose? 
CHARLIE ROSE: Is Director Comey going to be, either by himself or others, any restrictions as to what he can say? 
MANCHIN: No. He will not go above an open source, basically what you’re saying and what’s being reported in the public. He's not going, as I understand it, into a classified intel. We'll do sometimes an open meeting, such as what you'll see Thursday. Then we go into another classified setting which is pretty secure. 
ROSE: Is the President trying to get executive privilege for him, and if he is, will it be successful? 
MANCHIN: I don't think so. We have not heard that whatsoever. It hasn't been brought to the committee as far as I know. I know it's been reported that that might be done. 
GAYLE KING: If he tried that, what would be your reaction? 
MANCHIN: I think it would be wrong. Absolutely wrong. 
KING: I want to go back to the memos you say your constituents raised. Because we know that he took copious notes. Have you or anyone on the committee seen the memos and how important are they to this hearing on Thursday? 
MANCHIN: I haven't seen those memos yet. 
KING: Do you want to? 
MANCHIN: Yes. We do. I want to see all the memos. I will say this: Our intelligence committee is made up of 17 of, I think, truly Americans. Not Democrats, Republicans, Americans that will make decisions based on the Intel. We have been told and always believe that the Intel will take you to the facts, the facts will take you to the truth. Then you will make your decision. I don't think any person, whether it's a homeless person or a person at the highest level of government, such as the President, is going to be spared if something is wrong. That’s the rule of law. 
ROSE: Senator Mark Warner said there's a lot of smoke, but he’s seen no smoking gun. Is that your position? 
MANCHIN: True. 
KING: Didn't your mom say if there’s a lot of smoke, there must be fire? Is there a fire coming? 
MANCHIN: There's a lot of smoke signals. There's a lot of people we know who are involved and had some sort of contact or relationships with Russians. The Russians are not our ally. They're not in this to make a better America. They want people to distrust their government, not to have confidence. That's what their intentions are, through their news media, propaganda, everything they do. 
KING: Are you convinced we will get to the bottom of it, Senator? Listen, Vladimir Putin did an interview over the weekend with another network. 
MANCHIN: I saw that. 
KING: He said this is nonsense, foolishness, something along those lines. “You all are, really,  making all this up. It didn't happen the way you're saying.” Do you think we'll ever get to the bottom of this? 
MANCHIN: Well, the intel is very pointed and direct that they have gotten more involved, they became more involved and did everything to become more involved than ever before. We've been going back in this charade for the last 30, 40, 50 years. 
ROSE: Why do you think the President refuses to acknowledge that? 
MANCHIN: That, I cannot answer. That could be the $64,000 question. We have to find out. I want to make sure this gets behind us. I said this, whether it be to Michael Flynn, who we knew when I was on armed services, “Help us prove your innocence. Don't make us pull out you're guilty.” 
ROSE: The President has an agenda that has to do with health care. It has to do with immigration. It has to do with tax reform. It has to do with infrastructure, all of that. Is he going to get any of that passed before the 2018 election? 
MANCHIN: I would sure hope so. This country needs us. It counts on all of us. The Democrats and Republicans have become so siloed that if you have a D by your name or an R by your name, you’re on the other side and you’re the enemy. I don’t think that’s the oath we all take. And we all take the same oath. Why can’t we get together and find out how can we have a tax reform that really works, gets rid of $20 trillion of debt, starts paying that debt down and secures the country. 
O’DONNELL: What did you tell the President about health care in West Virginia?
          
MANCHIN: I told the President — I said, Mr. President, there's 180,000-some that received health care for the first time. 
O’DONNELL: Under the Affordable Care Act. 
MANCHIN: Under the Affordable Care Act. They don’t know how they got it. They don’t know it was a Democratic initiative . They voted overwhelmingly for you, Mr. President. They don't know how they got it. They know they’re going to lose it and they know who took it away from them. Be very careful where you're going. Don't use the word repeal. 
KING: What was his response to that? 
MANCHIN: He listened. He listened. We're hoping he'll work on that and act with us. You can't repeal where we're agreeing, 50 percent, pre-existing conditions, caps, senior doughnut hole being filled, children keeping — we believe in so many things. Why would you throw that out and start over. We can't get 60 votes. 
ROSE: But it looks like a conflict. Do you believe, yes or no, that conflict can be solved before the 2018 election? 
MANCHIN: I believe it has to be solved. If it doesn't, god help America. We can't continue down this road and you can't go back to what we had which is nothing. 
3

MSNBC’s Katy Tur Rails Against President Trump, Insists He Isn’t Trustworthy

By Nicholas Fondacaro

MSNBC’s faulty political historian, Katy Tur filled in for Chuck Todd during MTP Dailyon Monday, where she dedicated a significant portion of the show to railing against President Trump and claiming he was untrustworthy. “I'm in the chair for @MeetThePress Daily. Tonight we're focusing on trust. Do Americans have it for Trump? Does Trump have it for his NSC,” she announced in a tweet before the show.
During her opening monologue, she glorified a smear of Trump from the Associated Press. “The Associated Press had a brutal lead in their piece fact-checking the President,” she hyped as she began to read the AP article. “'President Donald Trump can't be counted on to give accurate information to Americans when violent acts are unfolding abroad.’” “So what happens if there is an attack here at home,” she then wondered aloud.
As Tur was bringing on the first guest of the night, Juan Zarate, President George W. Bush’s Deputy National Security Adviser, she told him: “I really do want to focus on the issue of trust. And that AP lead really got down to it.
One of her main gripes with the President was that on the night of the London Bridge terror attack, Trump had retweeted a Drudge Report tweet that said: “Fear of new terror attack after van ‘mows down 20 people’ on London Bride…” “If the President is tweeting out unverified reports from Drudge in the moments after a terror attack … do you trust the President if he comes out and statement on Twitter,” she pestered Zarate.
And it’s not only Tur that whines about Trump retweeting Drudge, but her employer too. NBC itself took the time to rebuke the President while details of the attack were still unfolding. Neither Tur nor NBC ever explained what was specifically wrong with what Drudge reported, especially when it turned out to be true. So it’s clear that they’re opposed to Trump retweeting Drudge just because it’s Drudge.
Throughout her discussion with Zarate, Tur badgered him with ridiculous questions about his level of trust in the President. “Is he trying to capitalize politically by tweeting out scare tactics? … Juan, can Americans trust the President? … Do you trust the President, Juan?
Tur posed similar questions to her panel a little later on in the show. When she asked for the opinion of Politico’s Azi Paybarah, he unleashed a flood of disdain for Trump. “I'm just speechless. This has gone beyond lunacy,” he exclaimed before comparing Trump to a mental patient. “And when a person has, when you can't trust a person and they can't control what come out of their mouth, they usually get help. And the person in the White House is not getting that help in anyway shape or form.
I just don't know how you can live with yourself,” he chastised Trump supports who continued to back the President despite his tweets against the mayor of London.
You need accurate information so people know what's going on,” Paybarah whined. “So to have the President tweet out stories with anonymous sources when he’s trashed anonymous sources, after he calls on supporters, that reporters are the enemy of the people…” After hearing that, Tur asked him if he couldn’t believe a word Trump said if a terrorist attack happened in the United States. “Absolutely,” he responded in the negative.
The speculation about a terrorist attack happening in the U.S. and questioning Trump’s ability to inform the public didn’t sit well with former Senate Aide Amy Holmes. She spoke her mind and called out MSNBC for their own lunacy in reporting:
I don’t like these theoreticals because I live in this city too. And I lived in Washington DC on 9/11. And I think these theoreticals can be irresponsible when we’re just discussing them and batting them around and suggesting the President is “provoking” a terrorist attack, which happened yesterday in media discussions. And I thought was totally irresponsible.
Holmes also diagnosed that the reason people trust Trump with ISIS was because they couldn’t trust Obama with them. “Why do arguments in trust of this president always devolve into how you couldn't trust the last president,” Tur complained. “Because I think you're asking a question of trust that involves a number of things including trusting someone's judgment in terms of their political priorities. And I think President Trump prioritizes national security in a way that can be trusted,” Holmes responded.
It’s extremely irrational for Tur to bemoan Trump’s trustworthiness, particularly when she works for the same network that has a show hosted by serial liar Brain Williams. Tur herself has a long history of making up facts live on air as she argues with Republican members of Congress. MSNBC is also the home of Rachel Maddow, a personality that literally made up a scandal about Trump based on her opinion about how much his inauguration cost.
Transcript below:
MSNBC
MTP Daily
June 5, 2017
5:04:32 PM Eastern
KATY TUR: These statements are arguably going to make it more difficult for the administration's lawyers, as they argue their case in court. But here's the bottom line: The President mischaracterized the London mayor, undermined his own staff, turned a terror attack into a political talking the point and disseminated information about the unfolding tragedy using a Drudge Report headline!
This comes after the president recently called an incident in the Philippines terror attack. But authorities later said it was likely a robbery attempt. The Associated Press had a brutal lead in their piece fact-checking the President. “President Donald Trump can't be counted on to give accurate information to Americans when violent acts are unfolding abroad.” So what happens if there I an attack here at home?
(…)
TUR: I really do want to focus on the issue of trust. And that AP lead really got down to it. If the President is tweeting out unverified reports from Drudge in the moments after a terror attack, before the UK even comes out and blames it on that. If he's talking about the Philippines and calling on it terror, when the Philippines later says it was likely a robbery attack, do you trust the President if he comes out and statement on Twitter?
(…)
TUR: Is he trying to capitalize politically by tweeting out scare tactics?
(…)
TUR: Juan, can Americans trust the President?
JUAN ZARATE: I think we need to. And I think we need President to succeed. He is our president after all. I think--
TUR [Cutting him off]: Do you trust the President, Juan?
(…)
5:11:19 PM Eastern
AMY HOLMES: On the question of trust, I would say there are a lot of voters who do trust that President Trump realizes what is the threat that is facing the United States of America. And the previous president called ISIS JV. ISIS grew under his watch and there are a lot of people didn't trust the judgment of the previous president when it came to this severe national security threat.
TUR: Why do arguments in trust of this president always devolve into how you couldn't trust the last president?
HOLMES: Because I think you're asking a question of trust that involves a number of things including trusting someone's judgment in terms of their political priorities. And I think President Trump prioritizes national security in a way that can be trusted.
TUR: Azi, what is your take?
AZI PAYBARAH: I'm just speechless. This has gone beyond lunacy. And when a person has, when you can't trust a person and they can't control what come out of their mouth, they usually get help. And the person in the White House is not getting that help in anyway shape or form. And when you have a city that's attacked, to misrepresent the mayor of that city's remarks is reprehensible and disgusting. And anyone who stands and defends that, I just don't know how you can live with yourself.
And when people say the President should be trusted and that he voters trust him, look what he's done. Look what he said. This is—I live in a city like any number of people. And there are times we have to go and report immediately, whether it is a Times Square car accident, that we don't know if it is a terrorist attack, or it’s a cop that gets injured and your at the hospital and you're hearing Mayor deBlasio sort of explain what's going on. You need accurate information so people know what's going on. So to have the President tweet out stories with anonymous sources when he’s trashed anonymous sources, after he calls on supporters, that reporters are the enemy of the people…
TUR: It sounds like, if he were to come out and say something after a terrorist attack here, Azi, you would have a hard time trusting what he said.
PAYBARAH: Absolutely.
HOLMES: I don’t think we should be discussing if we had a terrorist attack here. It’s almost as if we’re suggesting
[Crosstalk]
HOLMES: It’s almost as if there is some goating going on. “If we had a terrorist attack.” No one should wish.
TUR: No one is wishing for that.
HOLMES: Well, there was discussion yesterday that Donald Trump was provoking a terrorist attack.
[Crosstalk]
HOLMES: I don’t like these theoreticals because I live in this city too. And I lived in Washington DC on 9/11. And I think these theoreticals can be irresponsible when we’re just discussing them and batting them around and suggesting the President is “provoking” a terrorist attack, which happened yesterday in media discussions. And I thought was totally irresponsible.
(…)
4

Sebastian Gorka to CNN: “What You've Just Spun Is Classic Fake News"

By Alex Xenos

Deputy Assistant to the President Sebastian Gorka and CNN New Day co-host Chris Cuomo went head to head Monday morning. Cuomo began the interview by coming out swinging, claiming the President's executive orders on immigration were about targeting Muslims and keeping them out.
Gorka pointed out that neither the largest Muslim nation (Indonesia) nor the largest Arab nation (Egypt) are included in the ban. He questioned how it could be a Muslim ban with these characteristics:
So if this had anything, and I mean anything, to do with race or religion, why would those two nations, the most populous Muslim nations, and the most populous Arab nation not be included on the executive order? Explain that logic to me, because this is where your spin fails. This is where the fake news propaganda collapses, because if we had some dark dread ulterior motive, then those are the first two first nations you would put on the list, not the seven nations that the Obama White House identified as the greatest concern. Please answer that question.
Cuomo never did answer that question despite his insistence that he did (see transcript below). When Gorka called him out on this fact, he first claimed that the administration was masking its intention to ban Muslims. He then pivoted, claiming that Trump's actions send an ugly message to our Muslim community here in the United States.
Gorka responded: "Well, unfortunately, what you've just spun is classic fake news."
Cuomo said that Trump's language proves that his current intent is to ban all Muslims. Gorka correctly pointed out, That's not proof.
Cuomo then doubled down, stating that his intention is clear. I was unaware that Cuomo had the ability to read minds. Using something that Trump said and then walked back on the campaign trail is not sufficient to make that claim. This is especially true considering that claim was walked back and because the ban excludes the largest Muslim populations.
Gorka later brought up that the Obama administration refused to properly vet foreigners applying for Visas:
We're here to protect Americans. So answer me this question. When the last administration forbade the State Department from looking at the public postings on the Facebook pages of foreigners applying for Visas to America, do you think that was a good move?
Cuomo, like any good Democratic operative, refused to criticize the move, and then when pressed, actually defended the move after attempting to pivot again:
CUOMO: Well, look, it's not for me to opine on an administration's good or bad nature.
GORKA: While you're opining the whole time about the Trump administration--
CUOMO: There are questions about the intentions—
GORKA: Chris. Be honest. You're opining the whole time. Your show is opining.
(...)
GORKA: So it's a good idea not to look at Facebook postings? So it’s a good idea?
CUOMO: Well, it wasn't just Facebook postings. It was instant messaging which isn't public so it would have been going into her private communications.
GORKA: Don't change the subject.
CUOMO: No that's a fact. I'm adding a fact to what you're putting out there.
GORKA: But you're not answering the question. They were forbidden from looking at public Facebook postings, is that smart when it’s protecting Americans?
CUOMO: We have concerns here about privacy. It’s an evolving dialogue with the American people.
GORKA: Facebook is not private, Chris. Facebook is not private. You know that, right? Twitter is not private.
Cuomo seems to think foreigners have constitutional rights that come before the safety of American citizens. But, as Gorka correctly points out, they are public profiles anyway. This so-called journalist bends over backwards to defend his hero Obama, but will stop at nothing to take down President Trump. But in the eyes of Cuomo, he is doing the work of the people. Towards the end of the interview Cuomo proclaimed: “I think I'm giving them exactly what they need, which is the information and analysis about the heart and mind of the president – ”
Maybe I am missing something here, but how does he know what is in the “heart and mind of the president,” and if he is a journalist, why is he sharing his “analysis?”
Gorka responded to this ridiculous statement, asserting: “You're not analyzing the facts.”
See the transcript of the June 5 heated exchange below:
8:09 AM ET
CHRIS CUOMO: However, the facts are not your friend here, because that move with the executive order from the Obama administration was about travel to those countries. It was about who's coming in and out and why. Your order is about Muslims. About targeting Muslims and keeping them out.
SEBASTIAN GORKA: Chris, let's stop that.
CUOMO: And allowing those who are not Muslim a carve out to come in. Very different.
GORKA: Let's do a little bit of a 101, let’s do a little trivial pursuit. What is the most populous Muslim nation in the world, Chris?
CUOMO: You tell me. These are your answers.
GORKA: No no, you tell me what is the biggest Muslim nation in the world. Massive population.
CUOMO: You tell me. I want to give you the opportunity to lay it out.
GORKA: Oh, you don't know.
CUOMO: Assume I know nothing. Go ahead.
GORKA: It's Indonesia.
CUOMO: Right.
GORKA: I will assume you know nothing. What is the largest Arab nation in the world?
CUOMO: You tell me.
GORKA: Egypt, okay. So if this had anything, and I mean anything, to do with race or religion, why would those two nations, the most populous Muslim nations, and the most populous Arab nation not be included on the executive order? Explain that logic to me, because this is where your spin fails. This is where the fake news propaganda collapses, because if we had some dark dread ulterior motive, then those are the first two first nations you would put on the list, not the seven nation that the Obama White House identified as the greatest concern. So please answer that question.
CUOMO: I will, I will. First, what the Obama administration did was target travel from places that were known as hubs for terror, and that's different than what you're doing, because you're targeting nationality. You could add Saudi Arabia to your list. 15 of the hijackers came from there. They're not on your list. There's speculation as to why. But instead of looking who you didn't involve, you must look for legal and policy purposes at who you did involve, and those countries are all Muslim majority. You did a carve out for non-Muslims, and that's why it got struck down originally, allegedly recognized as being overreaching by people like you, which is why you drafted a second one, which the president said he authorized and approved of, and is now before the courts for scrutiny. So the intention is clear, that you wanted to target Muslims from those places. I see that you're a little slow to want to own that.
GORKA: No, I'm still waiting for you to answer why would you not include Indonesia and Egypt. You still have not answered the question. If it was about what you said it was about, then those would be the logical nations to include but we didn't. So how do you explain that, Chris?
CUOMO: I explain it by you wanting to go with the original model to make it easier to pass because you were mimicking what Obama did and therefore masking your true intention was to not make it about travel, make it about Muslims and as you well know not just in your own rhetoric but the president, he has said time and again that he thinks there's a problem with Islam. And that he thinks that the Muslims may have a problem with us and as you know, with what we're seeing in the U.K. right now, attachment to the community of Muslims is so important and the concern is that a move like this, trumpeted by the president in the midst of crisis in the U.K. sends an ugly message to our Muslim community here in the United States.
GORKA: Well, unfortunately, what you've just spun is classic fake news.
CUOMO: What is fake about what I said? What is factually inaccurate?
GORKA: There are no facts there. You are saying we used an Obama era analysis to quote –
CUOMO: No, you used his executive order. You duped the same country –
GORKA: To cloak our intention.
CUOMO: Right.
GORKA: Can you give me one piece of evidence for that?
CUOMO: Yes, the language. You picked the same countries, was that a coincidence?
GORKA: No, because that's what government does. Government looks at analysis.
CUOMO: [INTERUPTING] Right, you picked the same countries. That's a fact.
GORKA: What is your proof we had another intent? Give me just one piece of proof.
CUOMO: Well, the language from the president –
GORKA: That's not proof.
CUOMO: The same thing district courts have seized upon was that he clearly wants to keep Muslims out of the country, right or wrong, the people voted for Donald Trump in part on that issue, but his intention is clear.
GORKA: So that must be the intention of the Obama order as well. To keep Muslims out of the nation.
CUOMO: Again, the language is obviously different which is why it wasn't challenged in the courts the same way. It was about who is traveling in and out of there, and the potential for those governments to let or even harbor bad guys.
GORKA: Your selective choice of facts is really quite telling, because you do know that we did this with Iraq under the Obama administration and the administration didn't even tell anybody. Why is that?
CUOMO: I don't know exactly about their not telling people –
GORKA: Then why are you defending Obama?
CUOMO: But what I do know is that the United States administration worked very closely with Iraq in particular to build up its vetting capabilities, because of the unique nature of the threat there, and that's why there was concern when you guys included Iraq, and then you took Iraq off the list, which then raised questions about security intentions because obviously you have more concerns of people coming out of Iraq than the other countries.
GORKA: Let's get beyond your spin, let's talk about facts –
CUOMO: I don't think it's spin. I think it's a little bit of logic that you're having a tough time dealing with this in light of what the president said this morning.
GORKA: We’re here to do one thing. We're not here to discuss your spin. We're here to protect Americans. So answer me this question. When the last administration forbade the state department looking at the public postings on the Facebook pages of foreigners applying for Visas to America, do you think that was a good move?
CUOMO: I think that you have to judge the administration by how safe –
GORKA: Yes or no?
CUOMO: Well, look, it's not for me to opine on an administration's good or bad nature –
GORKA: While you're opining the whole time about the Trump administration,
CUOMO: There are questions about the intentions –
GORKA: Chris. Be honest. You're opining the whole time. Your show is opining.
CUOMO: I am not opining. I'm asking you questions and pushing back on your own arguments and you're good at making them. The word forbade that you use is not the one that I would have use, and when you look –
GORKA: So it's a good idea not to look at Facebook postings? So it’s a good idea?
CUOMO: Well, it wasn't just Facebook postings. It was instant messaging which isn't public so it would have been going into her private communications.
GORKA: Don't change the subject.
CUOMO: No that's a fact. I'm adding a fact to what you're putting out there.
GORKA: But you're not answering the question. They were forbidden from looking at public Facebook postings, is that smart when it’s protecting Americans?
CUOMO: We have concerns here about privacy. It’s an evolving dialogue with the American people.
GORKA: Facebook is not private, Chris. Facebook is not private. You know that, right? Twitter is not private.
CUOMO: Instant messaging –
GORKA: I'm not talking about instant messaging.
CUOMO: Yeah I know, but that's where the information was contained with the wife in San Bernardino.
GORKA: I'm asking about the regulations.
CUOMO: It's easy to over-talk when you don't like the answer.
GORKA: You won't answer the question, Chris, it's really telling.
CUOMO: I just did.
GORKA: No you changed it, you pivoted to messaging.
CUOMO: No, because I'm including the salient fact for you, Sebastian –
GORKA: But you're not answering my question.
CUOMO: It's not about her Facebook public posts. It's the private instant messaging.
GORKA: So that's a good policy?
CUOMO: It's a good debate to have about your policy as is banning Muslims. Is that what you want? It’s a policy consideration.
GORKA: I think it's fascinating that you will go to any degree not to criticize the last administration but you will opine in conspiracies –
CUOMO: I don't think that's true or fair at all.
(…)
CUOMO: Sebastian, I just want to get this straight, because you’re a smart guy. I want to make sure everyone understands your point. The President of the United States decides multiple times to tell the entire world what he wants our travel policy to be with respect to these Muslim countries, and you're saying ignore it, because it's a tweet, and not a piece of paper that says executive order on it. That's what you're saying?
GORKA: Now you're arguing from extremists and it's again disappointing. Did I say ignore? No I said don't obsess about it. We're now 20 minutes into this and this is clearly an obsession, Chris. Let's talk about the executive order and what that says, because I would love to discuss the substance of that, because that's what we're doing to protect Americans. But if you want to keep talking about the tweet, then you're not serving your audience well or the American public.
CUOMO: I think I'm giving them exactly what they need, which is the information and analysis about the heart and mind of the president –
GORKA: You're not analyzing the facts.
CUOMO: On an issue – listen, the fact is that he took the opportunity in the wake of London to say this is why I want the travel ban, and the original one.
GORKA: You're doing it again.
CUOMO: The one that targets Muslim majority populations. That's what he wants, Sebastian. You may not like it. It may be inconvenient for but--
GORKA: That's a lie, Chris, I work for the president.
CUOMO: It’s a lie?!
GORKA: It’s a lie.
CUOMO: He didn't tweet those things? He didn’t tweet those thing?
GORKA: That we are targeting people based upon religion, if we were Indonesia and Egypt would be on the executive order.
 CUOMO: They are all Muslim majority.
GORKA: Chris, it’s a lie.
CUOMO: But look, the fact you did not make it worse does not defend what you made it originally.
GORKA: No, it makes your argument collapse.
CUOMO: The fact that each of these countries is a Muslim majority is a fact and you made a carve-out for non-Muslims, that's a fact, and you should own those facts. The president is.
GORKA: Chris, you're doing a disservice to your viewers and to America, and security of this nation. The president is interested in one thing, making sure that terrorism doesn't happen in America. That's what the executive order is about, but if you want to keep talking about a tweet, then you're not serving that purpose either. But as somebody on the outside, it’s your responsibility as well.
(…)
5

Kellyanne Conway Blasts NBC’s ‘One-Sided’ ‘Obsession’ With Trump Tweets

By Kyle Drennen

Appearing on Monday’s NBC Today, White House adviser Kellyanne Conway ripped into the network for its “one-sided” hyperbolic coverage of President Trump’s Twitter reaction to Saturday’s London terror attack, calling out the liberal media “obsession” with his tweets.
In the three-minute report [read transcript here] that immediately preceded Conway’s appearance, correspondent Peter Alexander devoted the bulk of the segment to denouncing Trump’s social media response: “The President saying he has spoken to Prime Minister Theresa May, expressing Americans’ unwavering support, but it came after a series of tweets that critics are describing as misdirected and misinformed....the President’s facing backlash for his unfiltered response hours after the violence.”
Conway hit back: “...buried in that report, that one-sided report, here’s the other side, that the President stands firm with the people of the U.K., he spoke to the prime minister of the entire country, Theresa May, that same night.” Guthrie cut her off: “Fair enough, Kellyanne but that was – wait, wait, wait...That was his first tweet – ”
Refusing to being interrupted, Conway continued:
You want to make this about something other than what it’s about. You know, I’m just not going to allow....on the day and a half after terrorists did it again, whether they’re ISIS-inspired or ISIS-directed, they’re savage murderers, it’s an evil slaughter, as the President said last night –  I’m not going to let him be seen as the perpetrator here.
The presidential counselor added: “For every time you said ‘Russia,’ imagine if you said ‘ISIS,’ every time you say ‘Twitter,’ imagine if you said ‘terrorist’....Maybe we’d have a different type of vigilance.”
Guthrie argued: “But, Kellyanne, in fairness, he’s setting the agenda, he’s the president, he speaks, the reporters cover what he says.” And in some cases, the press don’t bother with the substance of anything Trump says, but instead just hype Twitter typos.  
Later in the exchange, Conway again took journalists to task:
So we’ve got the 23rd ISIS-inspired or directed attack taking innocent lives, children in Manchester, children in Nice, and we want to know – we want to put some blame worthiness here on President Trump? I’m just not going to allow it....But you know, this obsession with covering everything he says on Twitter and very little of what he does as president...
On Saturday, as news of the attack was unfolding, NBC went after Trump for sharing news via Twitter that accurately labeled the incident as terrorism. On Sunday, MSNBC anchor Thomas Roberts even launched into a tiradeclaiming that the President was intentionally trying to “provoke a domestic terrorist attack” with his tweets.
NBC’s obsession with 140-character internet postings has fostered recklessness in its reporting.
Here is a transcript of the June 5 exchange:
7:10 AM ET
SAVANNAH GUTHRIE: And that brings us to White House Counselor Kellyanne Conway, who joins us now. Kellyanne, good morning, good to see you.
KELLYANNE CONWAY: Good morning, thank you.
GUTHRIE: Let’s start right there with the series of tweets. I mean, just a matter of taste and judgment and accuracy, does the President owe the London mayor an apology for tweeting a political attack in the hours after this terrorist incident? And also misleadingly quoting him? Was that a mistake?
CONWAY: It wasn’t a political attack, Savannah, and as you – as was buried in that report, that one-sided report, here’s the other side, that the President stands firm with the people of the U.K., he spoke to the prime minister of the entire country, Theresa May, that same night. And again, yesterday, he announced his support for the U.K. people. I was in the Ford[’s Theater] gala when he said, “We will get these people, bring them to justice, the bloodbaths have to stop.”
GUTHRIE: Fair enough, Kellyanne but that was – wait, wait, wait.
CONWAY: Let me finish, because –  
GUTHRIE: That was his first tweet –  
CONWAY: You want to make this about something other than what it’s about. You know, I’m just not going to allow –
GUTHRIE: Well, he’s the one who tweeted that.
CONWAY: I'm not going to allow – on the day and a half after terrorists did it again, whether they’re ISIS-inspired or ISIS-directed, they’re savage murderers, it’s an evil slaughter, as the President said last night –  I’m not going to let him be seen as the perpetrator here. For every time you said “Russia,” imagine if you said “ISIS,” every time you say “Twitter,” imagine if you said “terrorist.”
GUTHRIE: But, Kellyanne, in fairness...
CONWAY: Maybe we’d have a different type of vigilance.  
GUTHRIE: ...he’s setting the agenda, he’s the president, he speaks, the reporters cover what he says.
CONWAY: And what did he say to Theresa May? What did he say to Theresa May? You’re covering tweets.
GUTHRIE: He did say that to Theresa May, but most of his quotes had to do with either his own political concern, the travel ban, of which he’s been up having four more tweets about that this morning, and a misleading attack on London’s mayor. So my question to you was simply, does he owe – does he owe an apology to London’s mayor for quoting him in a misleading and inaccurate way?
CONWAY: So we’ve got the 23rd ISIS-inspired or directed attack taking innocent lives, children in Manchester, children in Nice, and we want to know – we want to put some blame worthiness here on President Trump? I’m just not going to allow it. Here’s what he’s doing as President of the United States and as commander-in-chief: standing firm because an attack on London is an attack on American values also. They are our greatest ally and we stand with them. And we will do whatever it takes to help them moving forward. The State Department, the President, everybody else involved, me now, will express our condolences and we have expressed that publicly and he has expressed it privately to Prime Minister May as well.
CRAIG MELVIN: Kellyanne, let’s –
CONWAY: But you know, this obsession with covering everything he says on Twitter and very little of what he does as president –  
MELVIN: But that’s his preferred method of communication with the American people.
CONWAY: That’s not true.
MELVIN: Well, he hasn’t given an interview in three weeks, so lately it has been his preferred method.
(...)
...

[Message clipped]  View entire message

No comments:

Post a Comment