NSA and Cellphone
Gate: Framing the issue correctly
by Don
Hank
There
is little danger that the spy agencies will be defunded as a
result of the NSA’s excessive spying on allies, despite the warnings of zealous
conservative commentators, who fear that spying, an important part of national
security, may be suspended altogether as a result of what they consider nitpicking criticism of what
the Germans call Cellphone-Gate (Handygate in German) as reported in Bild am
Sonntag.
However,
of all the commentaries I have seen, none mention the following critical part of the Bild am Sonntag
report (my translation):
“The
White House later ordered a comprehensive dossier on the Chancellor at the NSA.
Indeed, according to the senior NSA man, Obama did not trust Merkel, and wanted
to know everything about the German lady, saying: “Just who is this woman?”
The
relationship between the first black US president and the first woman in the
chancellery was deemed difficult from the outset. Merkel initially denied in
2008 the then presidential candidate’s request to give a speech at the
Brandenburg gate. Then when Obama became president, he gave Berlin a wide
berth.”
Nor
have I seen any of the media include the above critical part of the report in
their reports and commentaries. The fact that Obama used the NSA as part of his
personal vendetta against Merkel for
her refusal to aid him in his 2008 campaign is extremely significant but no one
mentioned it.
So
was this part
“But
it was not only Merkel. Her predecessor Gerhard Schröder was also targeted by
the US spies. The secret spying program against Schröder was started under
President George W. Bush. The
trigger was the SPD Chancellor’s resolute ‘nein’ to Bundeswehr participation in
the Iraq war in election year 2002. Concerned White House officials then
wondered : “‘Where
do the Germans stand? Can we trust Schröder?’ ”
As
the above-referenced conservative writers contend, the fact that US presidents
had ordered the bugging of allies may not be all that big a deal. Spies will be
spies. But the part that should give us pause is the fact that US presidents are
ordering this as an infringement on the sovereignty of our allies and, worse,
sometimes as part of a personal vendetta. Public funds may never be used by the
White House for personal reasons.
Now
when the White House wants to invade a Middle Eastern country—suspending
disbelief and assuming such intervention were always justifiable under the
Constitution—we expect that our government will put some pressure on allies to
come to our aid militarily. We expect them to do this by diplomacy, not by
extortion.
However,
particularly in Obama’s case, the White House was apparently using the NSA to
dig up dirt on a national leader who had, in his view, sullied him personally
and this before he even became president. His exaggerated spy efforts had
nothing whatsoever to do with the security of our country and, at best, were a
waste of tax payer money. Worse, by pulling out all stops to bug Chancellor
Merkel’s cell phone, he was inadvertently undermining our relations with a vital
ally, relations that may take years to rebuild. But it wasn’t just Germany. He
showed the entire world what a mean,
petty little man is sitting in our White House and in so doing, undermined our
national prestige.
Ultimately,
Dubbya was doing the same thing, though arguably to a lesser degree, since one
might say that his efforts were not necessarily personal. Let me be clear: I do
not excuse him for this.
The
point is, these mean irascible attacks on our own allies are not even remotely
related to the raison d’être of our spy agencies or their Constitutional basis.
And they are done in violation of allied nations’
sovereignty.
So
let us focus on the real issue here, which is not whether spy agencies have the right
to spy on an ally. There might certainly be justification for this if there
were, for example, reason to believe that an ally was acting directly against
our national interest, particularly in violation of international
law.
But
Cellphone-Gate is not about whether we may spy or not, it is about whether a
petty control freak in the White House should use a public agency to further his
own personal interests.
Here
is my translation of the Bild am Sonntag series on
Cellphone-Gate:
#
Cellphone Gate Obama wanted to know everything
about
Merkel
►
U.S. President knew for 3 years ► He personally authorized espionage against
Merkel ► Even Schroeder was bugged
•
by Michael Backhaus and Kayhan Ozgenc
This
report by Bild am Sonntag must be denied by the White House: The US president
explicitly approved the eavesdropping attack against the chancellor !
Until
last Wednesday it was inconceivable that US intelligence agencies were targeting
the German chancellor. Now, three days later, there is no longer any doubt.
Berlin
is still debating vigorously whether president Barack Obama was informed of the
NSA eavesdropping on Angela Merkel's cell phone.
According
to a report in the “Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung," Obama assured the
Chancellor on Wednesday afternoon in a personal telephone conversation that he
had no knowledge of it. If the report proves to be true, then it was at the very
least a diplomatic white lie. Indeed, according to information in Bild am
Sonntag, from US intelligence circles, the president was personally informed by
NSA chief Keith Alexander about the covert operation against Merkel in 2008.
"Obama
did not stop the action against Merkel, but continued to operate," one of the
NSA intelligence officials familiar with the operation told Bild am Sonntag.
•
Interior Minister Friedrich: “Wiretapping is a crime"
by
Angelica Helleman
The
German federal government raised its tone against the US in the Cellphone-Gate
Affair and wants to take legal action against possible spies. “If the Americans
have tapped phones in Germany, they have broken German law on German soil --
that violates our sovereignty and
is unacceptable. Wiretapping is a crime and those responsible must be held
accountable, “Interior Minister Hans-Peter Friedrich (CSU) told Bild am
Sonntag.
He
demanded “complete information on all charges." Friedrich: “the US must answer
as to where and to what extent they have intercepted communications of citizens
and the state.” And further: “Trust in the US ally is shaken.”
The
SPD calls for a parliamentary investigation of the wiretapping scandal. Faction
leader Thomas Oppermann to Bild am Sonntag : “An investigating committee on the
NSA scandal is inevitable. Only an investigation can restore the severely shaken
confidence in the protection of privacy. It would be best if all four factions
in the Bundestag were to agree on this. To the extent possible, such a committee
should meet in public.”
In
the spying affair, Edward Snowden should also be heard as a witness in Germany.
Oppermann: “Snowden’s information appears to be credible, while the US
government has clearly lied to us in this matter. Snowden therefore can be a
valuable witness, even in the elucidation of eavesdropping against the
chancellor.”
And
not only that, the White House later ordered a comprehensive dossier on the
Chancellor at the NSA. Indeed, according to the senior NSA man, Obama did not
trust Merkel, and wanted to know everything about the German lady, saying: “Just
who is this woman?”
The
relationship between the first black US president and the first woman in the
chancellery was deemed difficult from the outset. Merkel initially denied in
2008 the then presidential candidate’s request to give a speech at the
Brandenburg gate. Then when Obama became president, he gave Berlin a wide
berth.
•
Can it be so easy to spy on the Chancellor ?
Martin
Esienlauer
I'm
shocked. Not because the Chancellor’s phone was bugged. But because the
intercept was so easy. Angela Merkel speaking and texting with a cell phone that
you can buy in any media market. It uses a cellular network, which includes 30
million other German phones, and encrypts their calls over a program developed
by a private company.
It's
as if the padlock combination to the Federal Chancellery were hanging from a
sign on a hardware store. For years, it has been common knowledge that phone
calls and text messages can be relatively easily hacked. And you’re telling me
that the woman who governs our country had no inkling of it?
How
naive can you be as Chancellor?
Should
Mr. Merkel have to know all the technical details? No! But she must deal with
people who can deal with them. And they have to take care that the anti-spy
protection of the Federal Chancellor is done by professionals and not left up to
digital amateurs.
Otherwise,
this “new territory” that Merkel once spoke of is a really hazardous area - not
just for Mrs. Merkel, but for all of Germany.
In
addition, there were the personal and substantive differences. Obama openly
criticized Merkel's course in the euro crisis. Washington was also irritated by
the German rejection of the Libya mission.
On
Obama's initiative, the NSA eavesdropping activities against the Chancellor were
stepped up. They were not confined to the CDU party leader’s cell phone.
According to the information, the Americans also hacked the new, supposedly
bug-proof, phone that Merkel received just this summer. This evidence shows that
the eavesdropping attack against Merkel continued until very recently.
The
content of their text messages and her phone calls - nothing was hidden from the
eavesdroppers. Only the most secure land line in her office in the Chancellery,
over which she usually speaks with other leaders, was not tapped by the
NSA.
Obama’s
keen interest in eavesdropping results is also demonstrated by the fact that the
findings of the NSA specialists went not first to the intelligence headquarters
at Fort Meade, Maryland, as it usually would, but directly to the White House in
Washington. The information about Merkel was collected on the fourth floor of
the US Embassy at the Brandenburg Gate. There, the secret service worked with
the latest technology, which recorded everything that went through Merkel’s cell
phone.
18
NSA agents are currently stationed in Berlin.
•
76 Percent of Germans call for Obama apology
Berlin
- in the opinion of 76 percent of Germans, US president Barack Obama should
apologize to German Chancellor Angela Merkel (CDU) for the interception of her
cellphone by the NSA. this poll result was supplied by a representative Emnid
survey commissioned by Bild am Sonntag. 17 percent think an apology is not
necessary.
60
percent of Germans believe the eavesdropping scandal greatly or very greatly
mars German-american relations - 36 per cent believe the relationship suffers
little or not at all. Nevertheless, the US remains a good ally for 53 percent of
Germans. For 39 percent, it is not.
A
suspension of the ongoing negotiations with the US, such as the free trade
agreement, is deemed unnecessary by 66 percent while 29 percent are in favor of
stopping negotiations.
Germans
gave the German federal government a bad grade in the eavesdropping scandal: 60
percent are of the opinion that it has failed in its investigation in recent
months. Only 28 percent did not agree.
But
it was not only Merkel. Her predecessor Gerhard Schröder was also targeted by
the US spies. The secret spying program against Schröder was started under
President George W. Bush. The
trigger was the SPD Chancellor’s resolute ‘nein’ to Bundeswehr participation in
the Iraq war in election year 2002. Concerned White House officials then
wondered : “Where do the Germans stand? Can we trust Schröder?” apparently the Chancellor’s friendly
relations with Russian President Vladimir Putin was also seen as troubling.
According to information from the New York Times,” the wiretap in Berlin was
started a decade ago.
Schröder
himself was aware that he had greatly upset Bush with his course of action on
the Iraq war. in intimate circle’s he openly asserted his conviction that he was
being spied on by US intelligence.
NSA
spy affair
NSA
report: this is how Obama's spy service operates
After
2005, when the new Chancellor took over, the spying program simply continued as
before. Obama couldn’t bring himself to tell that to the Chancellor last
Wednesday. And therefore there will be no official confirmation of the
information from the NSA. However, the German federal government’s request for
an explanation will only reinforce this information. In the ranks of the NSA,
there is already growing anger over the White House, which is creating the
impression that overzealous agents had overshot the target in spying on
Merkel.
No comments:
Post a Comment