September 9, 2013
THE FOUNDATION
"A fondness for power is implanted, in most men, and it is natural to abuse it, when acquired." --Alexander HamiltonNATIONAL SECURITY
Spies Like Us
The all-seeing eye |
New revelations about the extent of the NSA's surveillance program aren't exactly shocking -- now that we know they spy on everyone, the "how" is just details.
It came to light that the NSA
can crack pretty much all standard encryption -- bank systems, medical
records, emails, chats and phone calls are all readily available. The
NSA can easily hack smartphones, as well, revealing data usage and even
location information on where the user was. To some extent, such code cracking is their job description, but according to The New York Times,
"Beginning in 2000, as encryption tools were gradually blanketing the
Web, the N.S.A. invested billions of dollars in a clandestine campaign
to preserve its ability to eavesdrop. Having lost a public battle in the
1990s to insert its own 'back door' in all encryption, it set out to
accomplish the same goal by stealth." Forcing tech companies to
cooperate is also part of the ball game.
Meanwhile, The Washington Post reports,
"The Obama administration secretly won permission from a surveillance
court in 2011 to reverse restrictions on the National Security Agency's
use of intercepted phone calls and e-mails, permitting the agency to
search deliberately for Americans' communications in its massive
databases."
Barack Obama told Jay Leno last month, "We don't have a domestic spying program."
But the truth is, Obama has expanded the NSA's enormous apparatus,
which is being used to spy on everyone -- including American citizens
with no ties whatsoever to terrorism -- and the agency is pulling in far more comprehensive data than at first thought. The ramifications for privacy and Liberty are numerous and extremely unsettling.
Post Your OpinionGOVERNMENT AND POLITICS
Congress Returns to Budget Battle
Congress is returning from
recess today, and obviously the most pressing issue is Barack Obama's
misadventure in Syria. Once that's settled (the vote is almost sure to
go against the president), Congress will turn to the 2014 budget and the
debt ceiling. House Republicans plan to vote this week on another
continuing resolution to fund the government after Sept. 30, when the
2103 budget year ends. The GOP proposal delays $20 billion in sequester
cuts, largely targeting the Pentagon, until January. The resolution
would keep things running until Dec. 15 at current levels of funding
while Republicans and Democrats work out their differences.
One of those differences could
be funding the Unaffordable Care Act, a.k.a. ObamaCare. Republicans are
considering defunding the unpopular health care law, which is, of
course, risky given that Democrats control the Senate, and Obama would
never defund his signature "achievement." Such a move by Republicans
would increase the odds of a government shutdown, which House Speaker
John Boehner (R-OH) doesn't seem keen to do. It will be interesting to
see how the GOP handles this budget and debt ceiling showdown at the
same time that the president's desired action in Syria requires their
attention. Two big fights at one time could be problematic.
Post Your OpinionECONOMY
The Newest Energy Exporter
One wouldn't know it by the philosophy of the current occupant of the White House and his efforts to put an end to the Keystone XL pipeline plans, but over the last three years America has quietly almost doubled its exports of petroleum products to more than 100 million barrels a month. That's not Saudi Arabia territory yet, but our nation has been blessed with abundant reserves and now has the technology to tap into them.This surge in production is now being credited for increasing the second quarter GDP estimate from an anemic 1.7% to a more palatable 2.5% annual clip. Naturally, the administration is falling all over itself to take credit, with economic advisers Jason Furman and Gene Sperling posting on the White House website, "This is yet another reminder that the President's focus on increasing America's energy independence is not just a critical national security strategy, it is also part of an economic plan to create jobs, expand growth, and cut the trade deficit."
The truth, however, is that the American energy boom is being realized despite the best efforts of Barack Obama.
True kudos go to the ingenuity and entrepreneurship of American
businessmen and the good fortune of having much of the oil shale
suitable for exploitation via fracking on private and state land, where
it's beyond the reach of the long regulatory arm of the Obama
administration. And there's an even bigger export prize waiting with
increased export of natural gas -- nearly two dozen companies are
seeking permission from the federal government to export to countries
outside those with which we have free-trade agreements.The potential is there to restore America to the economic powerhouse it was before OPEC brought us to our knees 40 years ago. The question is whether we have the political will to do it.
Post Your Opinion
CULTURE
Climate Change This Week: Of Dung Beetles and Ice Pack
Finally, a climate solution we've all been looking for. According to a report from National Geographic's Jennifer S. Holland, "[T]he dung beetle, with its sordid habit of laying eggs in and eating cow poo, might just be a weapon in the battle against global warming." We'll spare the details of the dung-digger's process, but a University of Helsinki study revealed that cow patties containing the insect "released nearly 40 percent less methane over a summer period than beetle-free cowpats did." But the dung beetle is in decline -- thanks, of course, to evil humans artificially spreading anti-parasitic chemicals in pastures. The article, naturally, fails to even mention the fact that global warming -- conveniently changed to "climate change" to fit uniformly with recent natural trends -- has plateaued.
If this sounds hugely contrary to previous prognostications, that's because it is. Consider this report by the BBC
from December 2007: "Scientists in the US have presented one of the
most dramatic forecasts yet for the disappearance of Arctic sea ice.
Their latest modeling studies indicate northern polar waters could be
ice-free in summers within just 5-6 years." In other words, we should
have had an ice-free Arctic by this summer. Yet, here we are, and
environmentalists are left once again scratching their heads for an
explanation of what went wrong with their manufactured crisis. Before
you know it, they'll be blaming the Syrian conflict on global warming. Oh, wait...
Post Your OpinionBRIEF OPINION
Re: The Left
Columnist Charles Krauthammer:
"We have a problem. The president proposes attacking Syria, and his top
military officer cannot tell you the objective. Does the commander in
chief know his own objective? Why, yes. 'A shot across the bow,'
explained Barack Obama. Now, a shot across the bow is a warning. Its
purpose is to say: Cease and desist, or the next shot will sink you. But
Obama has already told the world -- and Bashar al-Assad in particular
-- that there will be no next shot. ... What then is the purpose?
Dempsey hasn't a clue, but Secretary of State John Kerry says it will
uphold and proclaim a norm and thus deter future use of chemical
weapons. With a few Tomahawk missiles? Hitting sites that, thanks to the
administration having leaked the target list, have already been
scrubbed of important military assets? This is risible. If anything, a
pinprick from which Assad emerges unscathed would simply enhance his
stature and vindicate his conduct. Deterrence depends entirely on
perception and the perception in the Middle East is universal: Obama
wants no part of Syria. ... There's no strategy, no purpose here other
than helping Obama escape self-inflicted humiliation. This is deeply
unserious."
Political Futures
Columnist William Pauwels:
"Paying people to be poor only produces more poverty. Paying people not
to work only produces more non-workers. Clearly the proliferation of
government entitlements is destroying the American work-ethic -- which
has underpinned American exceptionalism and prosperity. Perhaps the
above are reasons Obama seems to be dragging out a decision on Syria.
Ask yourself: What would he gain from that? It seems he is trying to use
the gassing of Syrian citizens as a media distraction from his many
failures -- this under-employment crisis, the Egyptian crisis, the IRS
scandal, the NSA scandal, the Benghazi massacre, the ObamaCare crisis,
etc. The longer Obama can keep the journalists and commentators
discussing his Syrian options and decision-making process, the better
for him and his Democrat colleagues, politically. If you think Obama
'never lets a crisis go to waste' you haven't been paying attention."
For the Record
Columnist Arnold Ahlert:
"Last February, a presentation by the Federal Reserve Bank of San
Francisco revealed that while the vast majority of jobs lost during the
recession were of the middle class variety, since 2010 they have been
replaced by low-wage occupations paying less than $13.83 per hour. Forty
percent of those replacement jobs have been in the food services,
retail, and employment services (such as sales clerks and office
workers) sectors of the economy. Furthermore, median incomes in the
United States have fallen 4.4 percent, since the beginning of the recovery
in 2009. ... According to the records kept by the Federal Reserve Bank
of Minneapolis, in the 10 recessions prior to this one, it took an
average of 25 months to completely recover all the jobs lost from the
peak employment that occurs just before a recession begins. Yet by April
2013, 64 months after the prior jobs peak in January 2008, the
records revealed that the nation was still down more than 2 percent, or
2.6 million jobs from its 2008 peak. ... [U]nless there is a radical
change in the administration's economic agenda, stagnation may be the
best Americans can hope for."
The Gipper
Ronald Reagan:
"What does it mean whether you hold the deed ... or the title to your
business or property if the government holds the power of life and death
over that business or property? ... Our natural, unalienable rights are
now considered to be a dispensation of government, and freedom has
never been so fragile, so close to slipping from our grasp as it is at
this moment."
For more, visit The Right Opinion.CHRONICLE QUOTES
Upright
Columnist Peggy Noonan: "There is the issue of U.S. credibility. We speak of this constantly and in public, which has the effect of reducing its power. If we bomb Syria, will the world say, 'Oh, how credible America is!' or will they say, 'They just bombed people because they think they have to prove they're credible'?"Demo-gogues
Barack Obama: "I did not put this [Syria resolution] before Congress, you know, just as a political ploy or as symbolism."
Which pretty much means that's exactly the reason.This Week's 'Braying Jackass' Award
Barack Obama: "I think that I
have a well well-deserved reputation for taking very seriously and
soberly the idea of military engagement."
BO: "I was elected to end wars, not start them."Dezinformatsia
Washington Post's Glenn Kessler gives Obama's "red line" remark a pass: "So is a bungled talking point worthy of Pinocchios? We don't try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president's apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement."Village Idiots
Former State Department adviser
William Polk: "Syria has been convulsed by civil war since climate
change came to Syria with a vengeance. Drought devastated the country
from 2006 to 2011. ... Hundreds of thousands of Syria's farmers gave up,
abandoned their farms and fled to the cities and towns in search of
almost non-existent jobs and severely short food supplies. ... And in
the desperation of the times, hostilities erupted among groups that were
competing just to survive."
Short Cuts
Columnist Geoffrey P. Hunt:
"[The White House has] been mute as Coptic Christians have been
massacred and their churches firebombed by the Muslim Brotherhood in
Egypt. Here we have President Obama AWOL while the Benghazi consulate
was bombed by terrorists. He then lied about its origin, and then
consented to his administration's stonewalling of the Congressional
investigation. He now expects us to grant him sweeping authority to
launch strikes against Damascus, whose consequences -- most likely to be
catastrophic for the region and unaffordable to us -- will lead to
unpredictable retaliation from Assad, assisted by his patrons Iran and
Russia, that we cannot control. Why should anyone support a part-time
president who will trigger a full-time war?"
Semper Vigilo, Fortis, Paratus et Fidelis!
Nate Jackson for The Patriot Post Editorial Team
Nate Jackson for The Patriot Post Editorial Team
No comments:
Post a Comment