Monday, June 13, 2011

HAVE WE ELECTED MEN AND WOMEN THAT LACK COURAGE?

Congress agrees that Obama is above the law

 By Lawrence Sellin  Monday, June 13, 2011
imageWhat can citizens do if their elected representatives sanction criminal activity by a President of the United States?
  • Not a natural born citizen? No problem.
  • Forged birth certificate? No problem.
  • Stolen Social Security Number? No problem.
  • Forged Selective Service registration? No problem.
One course of action is not to vote for anyone who is presently in Congress.
Am I recommending throwing the baby out with the bath water? You betcha.
Members of Congress are neither stupid nor ignorant. They are all well aware of the evidence indicating that Obama is ineligible for the Presidency and may be guilty of felonies.

By not investigating the mounting criminal evidence against Obama, members of Congress are willfully negligent as well as active participants in an ongoing conspiracy to hide their complicity in the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on the American people.
We have elections, but we no longer have representative government. Members of Congress are only interested in their own power, prestige and financial gain.
Petitioning Congress to uphold the Constitution and the rule of law has become an exercise in futility. It is like negotiating with the Russians.
Russians have a behavioral characteristic called “vranyo”, also known as the Russian fib. It is defined as telling a white lie, a semi-lie or a semi-truth. It may contain fantasy or involve the suppression of unpleasant parts of the truth.
In regard to Obama’s ineligibility and his alleged felonies, Congress expects the American people to engage in “vranyo” with them. It goes something like this:
“You know that you are lying, I know that you are lying, and you know that I know that you are lying, but we both smile and nod in agreement.”
The behavior of Congress in this matter bears all the hallmarks of political expediency. They are deeply involved in a cover-up. Investigations will expose their complicity and upend the political establishment.
Members of Congress benefit enormously by maintaining the status quo. They are willing to tolerate corruption and the destruction of the Constitution as long as they can preserve their power and privileges.
It is a degree of selfishness and dereliction of duty unprecedented in the history of The United States.
Here is an example of “vranyo” from Senator Mark Udall (D-CO) about Obama’s eligibility to be President:
“While I know that some have questioned the authenticity of President Obama’s birth certificate, which was issued when he was born in Honolulu in 1961, my understanding is that Hawaii’s state health director, Chiyome Fukino, and the registrar of vital statistics, Alvin Onaka, have affirmed that it is genuine.  Moreover, multiple lawsuits challenging President Obama’s citizenship have been dismissed.  The Constitution states, “No person except a natural born citizen…shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.”  President Obama meets all of these criteria and is therefore constitutionally eligible for the office in which he is serving.”
And here is the response from a “vranyo-resistant” constituent:
“You are grossly misinformed about Obama’s eligibility to serve as President.  Neither Fukino nor Onaka have affirmed Obama’s latest attempt to make himself eligible with his issuing yet another fraudulent birth certificate…did you know that Obama’s so-called long form birth certificate shows a “smiley face” in Alvin Onaka’s signature? Every single birth certificate Obama issued has been scrutinized to the nth degree by numerous document examiners.  Guess what, Mark?  They are not just fraudulent, but exceedingly poor fakes. And the phony birth certificate is just one document that is fraudulent!  Obama is also using a phony Social Security number that is only issued to people who live in Connecticut.  And his Selective Service Registration is phony also.”
“And as for all the numerous eligibility lawsuits which were “dismissed”, you as a lawyer know the difference between a case being heard and dismissed, and a case not being heard and dismissed (for spurious “standing” reasons or just dismissed with no comment).  There has yet to be an adjudication of the law and the facts of Obama’s credentials.  He has never been vetted and Pelosi issued two different certifications of nomination for him—one for Hawaii, and a separate one for the other 49 states.  Gosh, but that sounds like a conspiracy does it not?”
“Every single one of you is hiding behind Hawaii and false premises about Obama’s birth.  You are also hiding behind those willfully misleading Congressional Research Servicememos put out by Jack Maskell, who using the “ellipsis” method purposefully deleted pertinent information to skew his attempt to lead people away from the correct understanding of a natural born citizen.  Being willfully ignorant cannot be your defense.”
Unfortunately, willful ignorance is clearly their strategy.
We already know that Congress ignored the Constitution in regard to Obama’s ineligibility for the Presidency according to the natural born citizen clause.
Just how many laws does this Congress intend to disregard?
Obama must not be permitted to enter another election cycle without the allegations of forgery being objectively investigated.
If members of Congress are no longer willing to uphold the law, then they must be removed, the sooner the better.
And that ain’t no “vranyo

24 comments:

  1. This is an excellent example of why Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck and Bill O'Reilly all call birthers crazy. Also, not one of the seven current Republican presidential candidates believes that Obama was born outside of Hawaii or that his birth certificate was forged. In contrast, a birther claimed to have gone to Kenya and came back with a "Kenyan birth certificate" that was proven to be forged in about 33 minutes (and the guy never even proved that he had gone to Kenya).

    ReplyDelete
  2. Re: "We already know that Congress ignored the Constitution in regard to Obama’s ineligibility for the Presidency according to the natural born citizen clause."

    The above is NOT true. The US Congress followed these definitions of Natural Born Citizen:

    “Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are "natural born citizens" eligible to serve as President ..."---- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]

    “Natural born citizen. Persons who are born within the jurisdiction of a national government, i.e. in its territorial limits, or those born of citizens temporarily residing abroad.” — Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition

    “What is a natural born citizen? Clearly, someone born within the United States or one of its territories is a natural born citizen.” (Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on OCTOBER 5, 2004)--Senator Orrin G. Hatch (R-UT).

    "Prior to the adoption of the constitution, the people inhabiting the different states might be divided into two classes: natural born citizens, or those born within the state, and aliens, or such as were born out of it. The first, by their birth-right, became entitled to all the privileges of citizens; the second, were entitled to none, but such as were held out and given by the laws of the respective states prior to their emigration. ...St. George Tucker, BLACKSTONE'S COMMENTARIES: WITH NOTES OF REFERENCE TO THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA. (1803)

    "Therefore every person born within the United States, its territories or districts, whether the parents are citizens or aliens, is a natural born citizen in the sense of the Constitution, and entitled to all the rights and privileges appertaining to that capacity."---William Rawle, A VIEW OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 2d ed. (1829)

    ReplyDelete
  3. It is blatantly clear that the person(s)making the comments above are not really knowledgeable on facts. Even if Obama had been born in Hawaii BOTH of his parents HAD to be citizens of the U.S.A. as dictated by Congress is 2008! It appears as if Obama's supporters are in a hurry to oversee the complete ruination of America;s Economic system and see it diminished in the eyes of the world! Pastor Lee

    ReplyDelete
  4. Re: "BOTH of his parents HAD to be citizens of the U.S.A. as dictated by Congress is 2008."

    The US Congress did NOT "dictate" in 2008 that a person had to have two citizen parents to be eligible to become president. In fact, in 2009 the US Congress confirmed Obamas' election UNANIMOUSLY, meaning that not one of the 535 members thought that Obama had to have two US citizen parents to be eligible.

    And neither did Edwin Meese, Ronald Reagan's attorney general:


    “Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are "natural born citizens" eligible to serve as President ..."---- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]

    ReplyDelete
  5. YES CONGRESS DID! To boot, Obama VOTED YES! Look it up! This birth, absent TWO PARENTS being Citizens foregoes NATURALIZATION! Face facts for once in your life! Pastor Lee

    ReplyDelete
  6. No Congress didn't. No congress didn't. The US Congress has TWO houses, the US Senate and the US House of Representatives.

    You are referring to the US Senate, and the US Senate alone. The resolution of the US Senate alone does not have even the force of law, much less a Constitutional amendment.

    And, all that the resolution you refer to did was to state that it was its opinion that the criteria of John McCain, birth at a US naval base to US citizen parents, made McCain eligible.

    That simply added McCain to Obama. The reason that there was not a similar action for Obama was, duh, that nobody thought that it was necessary. Obama CLEARLY fell under the Meese definition of a Natural Born Citizen:

    “Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are "natural born citizens" eligible to serve as President ..."---- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]

    ReplyDelete
  7. So, you are admitting that it passed the Senate with Obama's voting for it! Meese 2005 doe not apply as it PREDATES the 2008 Senate vote! Try again. Pastor Lee

    ReplyDelete
  8. A resolution by one house of Congress has NO legal effect. It is not a law. A law requires the approval of both houses of Congress and the signature of the US president.

    The resolution that you refer to simply added John McCain's qualifications to Obama's. Obama's already existed. The McCain resolution (and his name is right in the name of the legislation) simply expressed the opinion of the US senate that McCain, like Obama, was eligible.

    It did NOT take away any existing definition. It did not say that Americans who were born in the USA whose parents were not citizens were not eligible. So, the Meese definition still applies.

    The original definition of Natural Born Citizen still applies. And, what was that?

    Here is an example of how the phrase was used at about the time the US Constitution was written:

    ""Prior to the adoption of the constitution, the people inhabiting the different states might be divided into two classes: natural born citizens, or those born within the state, and aliens, or such as were born out of it. The first, by their birth-right, became entitled to all the privileges of citizens; the second, were entitled to none, but such as were held out and given by the laws of the respective states prior to their emigration. ...St. George Tucker, BLACKSTONE'S COMMENTARIES: WITH NOTES OF REFERENCE TO THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA. (1803)"

    As you can see, the definition referred ONLY to the place of birth. It did not include the parents. The McCain resolution added McCain's criteria but it did not take away the existing criteria.

    That is why the US Electoral College gave Obama every single vote that he won in the general election. Birthers and two-fers tried to get the electors to change their votes, but not one of them did. The same applied to the US Congress. Birthers and two-fers tried to get the 535 members of Congress to change their votes, but not one of them did. They voted to confirm Obama's election unanimously. The Chief Justice of the United States swore Obama in, and the US Supreme Court has refused to hear any birther cases.

    Wonder why all this happened? Because Meese is right, and you are wrong:

    “Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are "natural born citizens" eligible to serve as President ..."---- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]

    ReplyDelete
  9. The fact remains, Obama voted for the Bill that requires BOTH PARENTS to be citizens! Spin all you want but facts do not change! Nuff said. Pastor Lee

    ReplyDelete
  10. The bill did not require both parents to be citizens. It simply stated that McCain had both parents who were citizens and that he was born on a US naval base.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Apparently you do not follow Bills closely! There were arguments on the Floor that clearly defined EXACTLY what was meant. Now, either accept facts or deny them but what the truths is points out to massive fraud. Please read all the postings and get informed. Pastor Lee

    ReplyDelete
  12. No, the bill was simply to express the OPINION that McCain was eligible. And it said that he was eligible because he was born on a US naval base and both his parents were US citizens.

    This does not have the force of law because it was not even passed as a law, much less a Constitutional amendment. And, while it tried to add McCain's criteria for eligibility to existing criteria, it did NOT remove existing criteria. It never said that a person born in the USA with one or no US parents is not a Natural Born citizen.

    That is why Obama and the Democrats voted for it. And, it has absolutely no effect on Obama's eligibility because (1) It did not even try to affect Obama's eligibility and (2) It is not a law and hence has no effect.

    ReplyDelete
  13. DENY ALL YOU WANT BUT THE FACT REMAINS, Obama had to submit a phony Birth Certificate and that should concern every American alive! SCOTUS knows it...Congress does as well! If you cannot face TRUTH then you are one of the MINORITY! Wake up as your FREEDOM is at stake. The only thing holding revelation back is the fear of a Black uprising! This is YOUR COUNTRY under attack and you continue to attempt to defend an UNTENABLE POSITION! Wake up! Pastor Lee

    ReplyDelete
  14. Obama has shown his official birth certificate of Hawaii twice. First the short-form COLB, which is now the one that everyone in Hawaii uses to get their US passports and the facts on which were confirmed by three Republican officials. Then, the long form birth certificate that the director of health of Hawaii stated in writing she had seen being copied and that the copy was accurate.

    Hawaii provided the two copies of Obama's birth certificate to Obama's lawyer IN PAPER COPIES. It was the White House that scanned the paper documents and put them into Adobe as a way of putting them on the Web. It is normal for there to be layers in Adobe.

    Numerous document experts have said that the document was not forged:

    For example:

    Dr. Neal Krawetz (http://www.hackerfactor.com/blog/index.php?/archives/428-After-Birth.html)

    And the conservative National Review : http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/265767/pdf-l...

    And:
    http://pajamasmedia.com/tatler/2011/04/29/fox-exp...

    And:

    http://www.conservativerefocus.com/blog5.php/2011/04/29/fox-news-report-says-layered-obama-birth-certificate-legit-unlayered-certificate-would-raise-problems-huh

    ReplyDelete
  15. Your desperation is showing. Read the many words of EXPERTS and ex-FBI people that give PROOF of a fraudulent offer by Obama. Again, Obama is NOT FOR AMERICA as he is OUT TO DESTROY OUR ECONOMY as well as how the entire world view us. Pastor Lee

    ReplyDelete
  16. Obama is not a natural born citizen. Thomas Jefferson stated that plainly when he said, "in order for a person to be a natural born citizen, both of his parents had to be American citizens. If Thomas Jefferson did not know then who did.
    Any one who thinks that only one parent has to be American is living in a dream world. Personally I think everyone knows it and simply will not tell the truth or they are not being truthful to themselves.

    ReplyDelete
  17. No ex-FBI people have said anything. Not one.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Ex-FBI have said that a forgery exists in the Obama BC matter. Bonr up and read my blogs. Maybe you will learn something if you open your mind! Pastor Lee

    ReplyDelete
  19. NO ex-FBI people have said anything. Not one. If you have a former FBI person who said that a forgery exists, cite it.

    Re: ""in order for a person to be a natural born citizen, both of his parents had to be American citizens. If Thomas Jefferson did not know then who did."

    Answer: Thomas Jefferson did not say that, and neither did any of the writers of the US Constitution or any American leaders at the time.

    ReplyDelete
  20. SMR. Your desperation of furthering Obama's career of absolute lies is reflective of your Liberal bent. Why not place America ahead of this clown? Pastor Lee

    ReplyDelete
  21. The fact that you and I may dislike Obama's policies does NOT prove that he was born in Kenya or that his birth certificate was forged. There is a difference between saying "I hate his policies, and here is why" and lying about his place of birth.

    ReplyDelete
  22. If you will take the time to read the MANY POSTIBNGS on this site you may come to realize I set out facts that support any and all positions as to Obama's ineptness, narcissistic ways. Marxist bent and acts that are purposely designed to destroy this nation! I do not 'hang my hat' on one facet of his misdeeds. You, on the other hand, only respond to this one posting! I ask, who is the one with a closed mind? Pastor Lee

    ReplyDelete
  23. Re: "Obama's ineptness, narcissistic ways. Marxist bent and acts that are purposely designed to destroy this nation!"

    You are perfectly entitled to state those opinions. They are valid issues. I agree that Obama is narcissistic, but then so are most presidents. As for "Marxist," some people think that he should be more Marxist. These are issues that can be discussed.

    The claims that Obama was not born in Hawaii or that he is not a Natural Born Citizen are lies. That is different from issues. American people deserve the facts. They deserve to vote on the issues, not on loony claims that Obama was born in Kenya or that three Republican officials in Hawaii lied when they said that he was born in Hawaii.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I DO NOT CARE WHERE OBAMA WAS BORN AND HAVE MADE THIS BLATANTLY CLEAR! Also, we tore down the 'Iron Curtain' yet Progressives would capitulate to a defeated way of life! Are you one that espouses this? The PRESS has already succumbed as have the Main Stream Media. Our Constitution dictates Freedom of The Press yet Progressives choose to allow Obama to dictate what is printed and what is held secret! If that is your 'way' then I feel sorry for you and those that think like you. Pastor Lee

    ReplyDelete