Obama, Why Not Tell Black Americans to go Back to Pre-1965 Civil Rights Act?
http://wp.me/pMjbI-43 |
Since President Obama’s leftist/socialist internationalist philosophy assumes Israel's pre-1967 borderline past is a better place for Jews to live, why not tell American Blacks to return to the pre-1965 Civil Rights Act era?
That analogy is not hyperbole. It is no different from what Obama did in his his speech last Thursday by demanding Israel’s culture and existence return to the pre-1976 past when Israel was completely unprotected from those who hate Jews and want their kind extinct.
Of course, Obama did not place these demands on those committing violence in the Middle East. Instead, Obama called the violence in the Middle East and North Africa (Egyptian protests and Arab Spring) “an extraordinary thing,” because:
The people [of these Arab nations] have risen up to demand their basic human rights.
Do you mean the way Jews did after the Holocaust, when Hitler tried to exterminate an entire race of human beings? How about now, when Israel asks for peace, but Arabs refuse human rights to Jews by blowing up Israeli cafes and buses?
Those whom Obama claim want basic human rights, seek Israel and Jews extermination. These so-called human rights protesters supported Hitler’s extermination of Jews, not peace. Palestinians have not sought, nor worked, toward an era where Jews and Arabs live side-by-side in peace, Israel has. The nations Obama speaks of want Muslim Brotherhood leadership versus freedom, democracy, and peace.
Israel never took any human rights away from Muslims; Islam has done that to its own people. Most Arabs want Jews dead, and have constantly attacked Israel in an attempt to complete that process, and Obama knows this. The reason behind his rhetoric is leftist political correct appeasement toward Islam. This is why Obama calls violent protests, that perpetrated rape and murder, an “extraordinary thing.”
Obama, who loves to invoke his father’s struggle as a black African coming to America, working hard to beat the odds in an era when segregation still existed in many parts of America, doesn’t give a damn about Israel’s continuous struggle against people who have wanted Jews enslaved and murdered for the past 5,000 years. Obama treats Israel’s violent enemies as victims and Israel as the occupying bully. So his rhetoric toward Israel is not surprising; as I stated above, Obama's a socialist. His politics are pro-Islamic, not human rights. When Islam erupts in violence, Obama doesn’t care about threats to Israel. Like all leftists, Obama hopes this radical movement will continue its destructive force, eradicating Israel’s land and a military. Then the left can finally regulate those nasty Jews into Islamic leftist government intervention by-way-of imposed submission.
Obama may talk about basic human rights, but it’s just that--talk. His entire speech was a demand that Israel go backward in time to an era that lacked complete self-defense against Arabs who want Jews dead. That's not the creation of human rights, it's disaster.
Not according to Obama, who falsely claimed rioting Arab nations are part of America’s “economics,” “history and faith.” Obama did say the same of Israel-- later in the speech--but his claims that America shares the same history and faith as Arab nations is a clever tactic to make Americans feel guilty about Middle Eastern violence: blame it all on Israel’s existence and America’s actual Judeo-Christian history and faith linked with Israel and Jews.
It's easy to accomplish if one uses human rights as the tactic to blame Israel. This way we can stir up anti-Semitic emotions and tell Israel to go to hell and leave poor, violent Islam alone.
Obama knows Israel has always sought to negotiate peace treatise with Palestinian neighbors. But Obama sides with the antiSemitic/anti-West violence going on in the Middle East and North Africa. He agrees with Muslim Arab extremists beliefs—death and destruction. That's because his ideology is the left.
The tone of Obama’s speech was not accidental; it was meant to shove Israel under enemy tanks in order to apologize to Islam for Israel’s existence. As long as Israel exists, Islam has no chance fir complete takeover of the Middle East, and neither does the left.
Can one imagine going back to the Jim Crowe era where that view was imposed upon Black Americans? It's the same.
Taking the guilt and appeasement one step further, Obama’s obnoxiously compared protesting Arab nations to Rosa Parks, saying: "The people of North Africa and the Middle East are casting off their burdens of the past,” actually blaming the burden on America’s support and friendship with Israel:
and it is precisely because of that friendship, it’s important we tell the truth, because the status quo is unsustainable and Israel too must act boldly to achieve lasting peace…the dream of a Jewish and democratic state cannot be fulfilled with permanent occupation…a lasting peace will involve two states for two people—Israel as a Jewish state and a homeland for the Jewish people, and a state of Palestine as a homeland for the Palestinian people.
How this president can make such anti-Civil Rights demands, using Rosa Parks, a segregated black woman, forbidden to sit on the front seat of a bus, because of her race, as his example for the 1976 borderline, is deplorable. But then again, the status quo is always considered unstable to leftists, who want it changed to government-dominated utopia. That’s why Obama had the gall to say it is "America’s" belief that Israel must comply with the 1967 borderline demands.
Telling Israel to go back to the 1976 borderline is like telling black Americans to go back to the pre-1965 back-of-the-bus era.
What’s next, asking Israelis to re-enslave themselves to Egypt next year on Passover?
No comments:
Post a Comment