Monday, February 24, 2020

DEMOCRATS JOINED BY REPUBLICAN LIARS TRYING FOR BULK AMNESTY (Like Reagan was lied to!)

Submitted by: Terry Payne

DEMOCRATS JOINED BY REPUBLICAN LIARS TRYING FOR BULK AMNESTY (Like Reagan was lied to!)

https://www.conservativereview.com/news/horowitz-senate-republicans-looking-
repeat-1986-amnesty-seeking-president-trumps-support/

CONSERVATIVE REVIEW

....the usual liars pretending to be Trump supporters culprits here-Sen.
Lindsey Grahamnesty R-SC), Sen Tillis R-NC and Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.
Orwellian-named Farm Workforce Modernization Act (H.R. 5038
<http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2019/roll674.xml> ). Throw in Mike Lee R-Utah-
Architect Behind Anti-American Immigration Bill-for good measure who wants
to expand H-1B Visas S-386 Bill to aliens keep his tech companies donors
happy.

 These Chamber of Commerce, Business Roundtable, Koch Brothers and big tech
sycophants want to support same destructive policies as the George Soros
Open Society Foundation.  Open borders and Sanctuary Cities. Rather than
protect American workers, keep wages high, prosecute "Sanctuary Cities,"
protect our borders and pass mandatory E-Verify they want to appease their
big donor class. 

This bill if passed would make at least 2.2 million
illegals who say they have worked in Agriculture industry democrat voting
citizens. Illegals do not vote GOP. Amnesty only attracts more illegals-not
isolates! Tell Trump to pull support from these weasels if they continue to
push bills that undermine his agenda-our agenda!

Remember when Thom Tillis suddenly got religion and introduced a bill
<https://www.conservativereview.com/news/give-americans-right-sue-pants-off-
sanctuary-jurisdictions/
>  to allow victims of criminal aliens to sue
sanctuary cities? Although that bill was flawed, the idea behind it was
good. The reason he introduced it was because he had a primary challenger
with money. The minute Tillis secured Trump's endorsement
<https://www.politico.com/story/2019/06/25/trump-endorses-tillis-1554721>
as being "tough on the border," he had no need to push that bill any more,
which is why you don't see it coming up for a vote. 

Instead, it's back to amnesty. The same dynamic played out with Lindsey Graham, who avoided a serious primary challenge by getting tough on illegal immigration for a few
months.

How many more times will we be fooled?
**************************************************************

Horowitz: Senate Republicans looking to repeat 1986 amnesty, seeking President Trump's support

Daniel Horowitz <https://www.conservativereview.com/news/author/dhorowitz/>
* February 17, 2020 


Senator Thom Tillis and other liberal Republicans are hell-bent on turning
our rural communities into pipelines for cartel drug trafficking and
criminal aliens!
<https://www.conservativereview.com/news/big-ag-harming-rural-america-hugely

 Rather than holding vote after vote on ridding our communities of
sanctuary cities and dangerous criminal alien gangs and drug traffickers,
liberal Republicans like Thom Tillis are working on, amazingly, more amnesty
for illegal aliens. The North Carolina senator evidently doesn't think that
the Tar Heel State is turning blue like Virginia as quickly as he would
like. He also believes that now that he lied about being tough on illegal
immigration <https://www.conservativereview.com/news/successful-second-term-trump-will-need-new-strategy-senate-primaries/>  in order get Trump's endorsement and
scare away a primary challenger
<https://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/02/thom-tillis-primary-challenger-dro
ps-out-074774
> , he can go back to screwing his voters.


Two GOP staffers have informed me that Sen. Tillis, along with Sens. James
Lankford (R-Okla.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), began working this Wednesday
on an effort to get Trump's support for a mass amnesty bill that passed the
House last year. Rosemary Jenks, government relations director of Numbers
USA, which is opposing the bill
<https://www.numbersusa.com/sites/default/files/public/hr5038_facts.pdf> ,
confirmed to me that those are the three leaders of the potential bill in
the Senate. Conservative HQ, a publication run by legendary conservative
Richard Viguerie, reports
<http://www.conservativehq.com/article/31936-gop-joining-democrat-illegal-al
ien-amnesty-through-new-farm-bill
>  that Tillis is expected to be the lead
Senate sponsor and that Vice President Pence's PAC is rumored to be
supporting this bill. I've heard the same from my sources in the Senate as
well.

Tillis has already publicly praised
<https://www.agri-pulse.com/articles/12794-ag-labor-reforms-face-house-test-
uncertain-senate-future
>  the bill, and according to my sources, has met
with Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue, along with several other GOP
senators, to plan support for the bill. Notably, nobody from the DHS was
present at the meeting to offer the border security perspective on the bill.
On December 11, House Democrats passed
<http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2019/roll674.xml>  the Orwellian-named Farm
Workforce Modernization Act (H.R. 5038
<http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2019/roll674.xml> ). In plain English, it grants
amnesty to every illegal alien in this country who claims to have worked at
least part-time for agriculture and creates an unlimited agriculture guest
worker program for the future to bring in millions of low-skilled workers.
The cultural
<https://www.conservativereview.com/news/big-ag-harming-rural-america-hugely
/>  and fiscal
<https://www.conservativereview.com/news/just-one-years-flow-illegal-immigra
tion-will-cost-150-billion/
>  costs are never factored in. It permanently
tethers green cards for people coming in on these H-2 visas to the condition
of working in agriculture for 10 years, creating an indentured servant model
that, as Mark Krikorian observes
<https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/farming-like-its-1699/> , will
prevent farms from ever modernizing and mechanizing their process because of
the boundless flow of cheap labor.
What is so offensive about this bill is that the very reason these people
are in the country to begin with is because we were lied to, including by
some of the very same members of Congress who were there in 1986. Back then,
they gave amnesty to 2.7 million illegal aliens, including 1.1 million who
worked in agriculture, on the promise that future illegal immigration would
be choked off by prohibiting illegal alien work in America. They pocketed
the amnesty and then turned around and downright blocked enforcement of any
of the laws and today are openly criminalizing enforcement in sanctuary
states
<https://www.conservativereview.com/news/surprise-left-now-screaming-enforci
ng-terms-1986-amnesty/
>  while encouraging illegal alien employment
<https://www.conservativereview.com/news/first-person-stand-sovereignty-laws
-sanctuary-policies-democrat/
> .
One would think that even Democrats, and certainly Republicans, wouldn't
have the chutzpah to show their faces before implementing our side of the
deal from the last broken promise. Yet as if we are Charlie Brown with the
football, they come with the same amnesty bill designed to reap the rewards
of their insidious disobedience against the terms of the first amnesty.
In December, 34 Republicans <http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2019/roll674.xml>
supported that bill in the House, along with all but three Democrats.
Undoubtedly, many more agree with the idea but were inclined to vote no as a
minority party.
Curiously, the White House has been silent
<https://thehill.com/latino/474210-house-passes-bill-that-would-give-legal-s
tatus-to-thousands-of-undocumented
> . Typically, such a transformative and
consequential bill that passes the House would be met by what's known as a
Statement of Administrative Policy (SAP), expressing the president's support
or threat to veto. One would think Trump would veto an amnesty in a
heartbeat, right? This bill was sponsored by Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.),
one of the House impeachment managers!
Well, if conservatives remain silent, that might not be the case. We already
know that the president has permanently retreated from cutting the numbers
<https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/02/06/immigration-trump-s
ays-he-wants-more-legal-migrants-u-s/2792732002/
>  of legal immigrants and
from mandatory E-Verify
<https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/feb/12/trump-retreat-e-verify-cal
led-takeover-immigration/
> , which was taken out of this year's budget
proposal. As with many issues, there are clearly competing voices within the
administration, and if conservatives don't get to the president first, the
swamp will.
Remember when Thom Tillis suddenly got religion and introduced a bill
<https://www.conservativereview.com/news/give-americans-right-sue-pants-off-
sanctuary-jurisdictions/
>  to allow victims of criminal aliens to sue
sanctuary cities? Although that bill was flawed, the idea behind it was
good. The reason he introduced it was because he had a primary challenger
with money. The minute Tillis secured Trump's endorsement
<https://www.politico.com/story/2019/06/25/trump-endorses-tillis-1554721>
as being "tough on the border," he had no need to push that bill any more,
which is why you don't see it coming up for a vote. Instead, it's back to
amnesty. The same dynamic played out with Lindsey Graham, who avoided a
serious primary challenge by getting tough on illegal immigration for a few
months.
How many more times will we be fooled?
The push by a North Carolina senator is especially jarring. I've reported on
numerous cases of illegal alien sex offenders in North Carolina. According
to the Epoch Times
<https://www.theepochtimes.com/illegal-immigrants-drive-child-sex-crime-char
ges-in-north-carolina-2_3006558.html
> , one citizen in North Carolina
collated criminal data from just 30 percent of North Carolina counties and
found that in just the past 18 months, "more than 331 illegal aliens have
been charged with 1,172 child rapes and child sexual assaults."
Jobs in agriculture are the very magnet that was supposed to be shut off in
exchange for the last amnesty. Why won't Tillis ever consider the cultural,
drug trafficking, and other criminal problems alongside the quest for
cheaper labor? Why such a narrow focus?
The lesson for conservatives is we need to get to Trump before the swamp
does. Otherwise, what is waiting for us on the other side of a victorious
November election won't be very victorious for the people who most ardently
support the president.
Author: Daniel Horowitz
Daniel Horowitz is a senior editor of Conservative Review. Follow him on
Twitter @RMConservative <http://www.twitter.com/RMConservative> .
  <http://www.twitter.com/RMConservative>

No comments:

Post a Comment