Submitted by: P McMillan
Gun Control:
Will We ‘Burn Another Witch’ to ‘Stop’ Armed Murder?
There was a time when children cried so we burned witches.
· Today, we have some twenty-three-thousand-gun control regulations.
· We pass new regulations each time a celebrity gets shot or some white kids get attacked.
We’ve burned that witch before.
Each gun regulation is sold to us in glowing terms as it’s being debated.
Each new regulation is breathlessly described as-
urgently needed…lifesaving…essential reform…violence prevention…common sense…crime control…limit armed terrorists…controlling dangerous weapons…firearms safety…controlling unprecedented weapons of war…public safety legislation…
urgently needed…lifesaving…essential reform…violence prevention…common sense…crime control…limit armed terrorists…controlling dangerous weapons…firearms safety…controlling unprecedented weapons of war…public safety legislation…
…and it sounds so wonderful.
You have to ask yourself some questions if you don’t believe the overhyped press briefing.
If each of the twenty-three-thousand gun control regulations were all that we were told, then why do these regulations fail every few minutes and we have another violent crime? I thought all those earlier laws fixed that.
· Gun control laws don’t stop criminals because criminals don’t obey our laws. (We can document that obvious point if you need.)
· Gun control fails because we don’t prosecute criminals with the laws we already have.
· Gun control fails because background checks look backwards at a person’s history.
· That gives criminals and crazies one free mass murder before they become prohibited persons.
At best, gun control isn’t much of a solution.
We’ve looked very hard at the data.
Gun control does nothing to reduce violent crimes like mass murder, armed murder, armed robbery and aggravated assault. (And here, here too.)
Some data says that gun control disarms the honest people so crime actually goes up after gun control is passed.
And before you ask, the police collect crime information, mostly for insurance purposes. The police rarely stop violent crimes in progress.
If the stacks and stacks of gun control legislation failed before, then why do we expect the next bit of legislative-ink-on-paper to stop the next violent criminal?
The truth is, we don’t. Neither do the politicians who pass these laws.
Why do politicians keep calling for more gun control when it is such an obvious failure?
That is an important question.
We have to ask what gun control actually accomplishes in order to answer it.
Violence is both complicated and simple. Unfortunately, armed criminal violence gets further complicated by politics and personal agendas.
It turns out that the important work of passing gun control isn’t about stopping violent crime at all.
• Gun control legislation makes us feel safer and in control.
We might notice that there are violent people in the world…but a few well-chosen words on paper will fix that so we can go back to watching videos on our cell phone..
• Gun control provides personal absolution.
We can pretend to change the world rather than change ourselves.
We don’t have to protect our children, lock our doors, or treat the mentally ill.
All we have to do is regulate a piece of metal and plastic.
• Gun control lets politicians appear competent and capable of controlling violence.
That is why politicians keep saying, “We have to do something.”
The something they have to do is to appear relevant and electable.
• Gun control lets the politicians distract us from his real political failures that actually produce violence in society.
You’ll notice that long term Democrat control almost always results in a violent city.
That isn’t an accident.
Violence is strongly associated with fatherlessness, unemployment, gangs and addiction.
• Gun control lets preachers sell compassion.
Lots of activists make money by selling gun control.
Come virtue-signal, and join today! All major credit cards accepted.
• Gun control lets newscaster sell soap. (News editors love a disaster because it means we’ll watch more news.)
If the media really wanted to stop violent mass murder, then they wouldn’t turn the murderer into a celebrity.
The media wouldn’t name the murderer and would not put his face on the television for days on end.
This matters a lot. There were over seventy copycat crimes after the Columbine High School murders…and they were preventable.
• Gun control lets socialist billionaires expand big government.
1. They want us disarmed.
2. That is for their benefit, not ours.
3. And they are willing to pay tens of millions of dollars to get what they want.
Those are very powerful forces at work. No wonder we try the same failed idea time after time.
Until we are willing to dig past the headlines, we simply burn another witch and pass another gun control law. After all, it made us feel better last time.
I don’t have all the answers. I’m not even sure which will come first.
1. Will we stop distracting ourselves with gun control, and then look at the real causes and solutions to public violence?
2. Will we implement a few effective measures and then stop wasting time with gun control legislation?
3. Either would be fine, and not a minute too soon.
There is no difference between communism and socialism, except in the means of achieving the same ultimate end:
communism proposes to enslave men by force, socialism—by vote.
It is merely the difference between murder and suicide.
—Ayn Rand
Frank p
No comments:
Post a Comment