MUTH’S TRUTHS
Zero-for-Zero Beats False Info and Skewed Analysis Every
Day Ending in “Y"
According to a report published last week by Crop Protection News, various candy
manufacturers and sugar-substitute lobbyists recently teamed up and “accused
the government of burdening taxpayers with extra tariffs” on sugar.
CPN reports that the Sweetener Users Association (SUA)
claims U.S. sugar processors “defaulted on government loans (and) taxpayers
were left holding the bag.”
But as CPN notes, there is “little or no evidence” to back
up the SUA’s claim, and the bill the group references was actually passed in
2014, the year AFTER the supposed loan defaults occurred.
The SUA accusations also failed to note that the problem in
2013 was due to Mexico unlawfully “dumping” cheap, government-subsidized sugar
into the U.S. market in violation of established trade agreements. That situation is being addressed and
rectified.
The fact is the U.S. sugar program has cost taxpayers exactly…
Cheers.
Dr. Chuck Muth, PsD
Professor of
Psephology (homeschooled)
Publisher / Irritator-in-Chief
P.S. The talking-head
consensus on cable news was that Hillary
Clinton won Monday night’s debate with Donald
Trump.
But according to the Los
Angeles Times daily tracking poll, Trump continues to lead Clinton by almost
4 points after the debate.
Two more Clinton “wins” like this should assure us of
President Trump on November 8th!
NEWSMAX HEADLINES
- Non-Voters in Poll Highlight Clinton Turnout Challenge
- Ben Carson: Debate Rookie Trump Faces 'Learning Curve'
- Trump on Clinton Foundation: 'Follow the Money'
- NYT: Papers Backing Clinton Hit With Flood of Cancellations
- Trump: I Tried to Save Miss Universe's Job - This Is Thanks I Get
- Ted Cruz: I Endorsed Trump Because 'I Gave My Word'
- Trump Campaign Asks If He Should Bring Up Clinton Scandals
- Republicans Urge Trump to Avoid Lewinsky
- NY Times: Trump Plans to Practice for Next Debate
- Trump Asks Non-Christian Conservatives to Identify Themselves
- Trump Revives Attack on Clinton Failing DC Bar Exam in '73
- Hannity to NYT: Trump Opposed Iraq War on My Show
- Trump at Florida Rally: Clinton All Talk, No Action
- Mall Shooter Voted Illegally in US Multiple Times
- Prohibited Gun Buyers Slip Through Federal, State Lapses
- Sen. Tim Scott: Problems Don't Give Kaepernick Reason to 'Disrespect Our Flag'
- Politico: State Dept. to Bare 3,000 of Clinton Emails Before Election
- Supreme Court on Verge of Historic Shift Stuck in Limbo for Now
- Feds Shell Out Over $50K to Study Whether Undergraduates Eat Junk Food When They Drink
- Gary Johnson: I'm Having an 'Aleppo Moment' on Foreign Leaders' Names
GOVERNMENT
Congress wants to
“Protect” Contact Lenses from Free Market Competition
(Beth Johnson |
Libertarian Republic) – Once upon a time, contacts lens manufacturer
Johnson & Johnson was on top of the world. To some extent, it still is — it
still produces nearly 40 percent of the world’s contact lenses and makes a ton
of money each year. But this is nothing compared to the company’s heyday, when
it could price gouge its products and get away with it.
Unfortunately for the nation’s 41 million contact lens
users, the good old days of exploiting contact lens customers might be coming
back if the new Contact Lens Consumer Health Protection Act is passed into law.
This legislation will strip consumers of their right to choose in an effort to
further the financial interests of the billion-dollar medical lobby.
No comments:
Post a Comment