CIA Whistleblower faces the ire of an angry Justice Department over Benghazi questions
http://canadafreepress.com/
Longtime former CIA field operative turned whistleblower Robert “Tosh”
Plumlee is currently in the crosshairs of a very angry Holder Justice
Department for publicly posting 11 “questions” about Benghazi and the
illegal weapons running operations being conducted by criminal elements
within the U.S. government. Mr. Plumlee is no ordinary CIA
whistleblower, however.
Because of his extensive history and knowledge of the criminal
infiltration into the U.S. government, their methods and operations, Mr.
Plumlee has become one of the most dangerous men to the criminal cabal
operating at the highest levels of the U.S. government. The Holder
Justice Department and the criminal “gatekeepers” within the CIA and
other government agencies desperately want him silenced—and they
absolutely intend to do just that.
Against the advice of many people, from his own attorney to those who
care about his welfare in the face of direct and subtle threats, and
under the reported threat of subpoena by U.S. Attorney General Holder
himself, Mr. Plumlee laid it all out in stunning detail on the
Wednesday, April 30, 2014 edition of The Hagmann & Hagmann Report. Based
on information from his deep cover sources, the questions Mr. Plumlee
formulated about Benghazi leave no doubt that criminal elements that
exist within the highest levels of the U.S. government were engaged in a
massive weapons smuggling operation based out of Benghazi and other
locations in Libya.
His disclosures, in the form of 11 questions, validate the information I
provided in nearly four dozen separate reports since the 2012 attacks.
They expose that the operations of the criminal cabal that were
operating under diplomatic cover are in direct violation of U.S. and
international law. They are, in large part, responsible for the
quarter-of-a-million deaths of men, women and children in Syria and the
millions of refugees. Those numbers are still climbing, and the path
being laid is taking us and the world to World War III.
Through their “gatekeepers,” a cover-up of unprecedented magnitude about
what the takeover of Libya and the attack in Benghazi is really about
continues. Under the direction and with the imprimatur of the highest
levels of government, facilitated by the infiltrated and fully captured
corporate media, the American people are being lied to, misinformed and
misdirected about criminal actions that have global implications that
are orchestrating a war to which we did not sign on.
The disclosures by Mr. Plumlee represent a very serious threat to the
plans of the globalist war machine, and this criminal cabal is actively
trying to cover it up and keep it secret from the American public and
the world. This operation is, by orders of magnitude far greater than
anything we have seen to date, including the operations known as
Iran-Contra. Mr. Plumlee should know, for he admits and has testified
before congress to transporting some 40 tons of cocaine into the U.S.,
while transporting tons of weapons, including automatic weapons and
grenade launchers out of the U.S. into the hands of “rebels” during the
Iran-Contra era.
At that time, Mr. Plumlee was told that the drug shipments coming into
the U.S. were part of a drug interdiction program in the government’s
war on drugs. When he learned that he was being used as a pawn in a much
larger game of criminal geopolitical chess, he did what our laws
required him to do; he testified about his actions and knowledge before
a Congressional committee, and turned over his log books, maps and other
supporting documentation so that the criminal enterprise could be
exposed and stopped.
Once he provided his testimony, much of the information was immediately
classified and he was gagged from talking about what he knew.
Incredibly, his own testimony exceeded his security classification,
which denied him access to his own records and testimony. That is one of
the ways they are able to silence and bury the truth of a world that few
Americans know exist.
The current plight of whistleblower Robert “Tosh” Plumlee began last
October, when he posted 11 “questions” about Benghazi and the illegal
arms running operations on Facebook. As quickly as they appeared in the
social media stream, the CIA and the Department of Justice instructed
him to remove those questions from the public domain and remain forever
silent about the covert and highly illegal weapons running operations
being conducted. Despite his classification as a photojournalist with
Salem-News that provided him the legitimacy to report on Benghazi, he
complied.
When certain revelations about Benghazi were recently made public, Mr.
Plumlee knew that remaining silent was not an option. The deaths of four
Americans weighed heavily on his conscious, and his own character and
integrity would not allow him to be silenced, regardless of the threats
to him. Accordingly, Mr. Plumlee decided to republish the 11 questions
that provide insight into the activities being covertly performed by the
U.S. government. His actions quickly caught the attention of the
government “gatekeepers,” who are now reportedly coming at him with a
vengeance to silence him and all further discussion about Benghazi.
Earlier this week, Mr. Plumlee was told by two high-level sources that a
subpoena was being prepared by the Holder Justice Department, and would
be soon served upon him. The purpose of such a subpoena is twofold.
First, the government needs to legally silence him, which becomes
automatic once he is under subpoena. Secondly, the government is
desperately seeking the identity of his source(s) who provided him
specific information about Benghazi. Mr. Plumlee knows what to expect as
he has traveled this road during Iran-Contra. Unlike Iran-Contra,
however, the stakes today are much greater, the crimes much more
egregious, the death toll exponentially higher, and the political
ramifications exceedingly greater than at any other time in history.
It is the sole objective of Mr. Plumlee to tell Americans, and the
world, what he knows without any political spin. He wants us to know
exactly what is going on under the direction of the criminal elements
that exist within our government and a rogue element within the CIA
operating under their authority. Before he could be served with a
subpoena that is reportedly being prepared that would make it impossible
for him to talk without facing prison, for this is how the government
now treats whistleblowers, he laid it all out in his 90-minute interview.
For his candor and hours after the interview, he confided to me that he
was informed by at least one highly placed government source that his
public interview on our show was heard and documented by the Department
of Justice. He was informed, as I was, that his disclosures angered the
Department of Justice as well as some in the CIA hierarchy and other
government offices, and that he had no “right” to discuss such matters.
This, despite the inconvenient fact that he would be guilty of a felony
by not disclosing illegal government operations to authorities. But when
the authorities, or those we have elected to oversee and stop such
egregiously illegal actions fail to do anything other than respond by
asking for campaign contributions via form letters, he felt he had to go
public. And so he did, with a clear conscious and without regard to the
peril he now faces.
The corporate media, from MSNBC to Fox, have treated the issue of
Benghazi as the “third rail” of subjects. They call it a scandal, but
it’s not. It’s a crime, as is its cover-up. They have failed the
American people by not holding government accountable for their illegal
actions, which are only escalating as a result. MSNBC considers Benghazi
a “myth” trumped up by a right-wing political agenda, while Fox
considers the topic just too “edgy.” Meanwhile, the American public is
being thrust into a covert war without our approval yet in our name, and
the flagrant violations of U.S. and international law are being
conducted with impunity. Continuing the cover-up will merely embolden
the criminals and criminal element within our government and will cost
more lives in the process. It is also leading us headlong into World War
III.
We must continue to demand full disclosure by those we elected, and
demand accountability by those in the media. We are running out of time.
The questions asked by Mr. Plumlee that the government wants so badly to
censor remain, at least for now, on his Facebook page. They are
reprinted here for your review. I suggest that everyone reading this
demands answers, if not for the sake and future of Mr. Plumlee, then for
the sake of our future.
Is the United States secretly arming and supporting various factions
of the Syrian Rebels with high caliber impact weapons from The United
States arsenals?
Is the United States little known Direct Commercial Sales Program,
also known as ʻ‘The Blue Lantern Report”, being used as a ʻ‘cutoutʼ’ to
secretly aid both sides of a Middle Eastern civil war?
Is America again playing both sides against the middle for corporate
gain as previously demonstrated by the Cuban Project of the fifties and
sixties, as well as the Iran Contra fiasco of the eighties and the South
American—Mexican Drug Wars of the nineties?
It has been established via some field reports from the Middle East
and some isolated media reports that the Direct Commercial Sales Program
(DCSP) an American international program, which legally allows the
United States to sell weapons to a host of foreign countries without
monitoring those weapons after leaving our arsenals, stockpiles, and
jurisdiction, has shipped High Impact weapons to Syrian Rebels during
the last two years.
I have to ask. What happens to those weapons after legally being
sold via this program and they leave our control?
Are they being monitored, traced, certified, and inventoried after
arriving in other countries?
Will our troops one day again face these American made weapons on
some foreign battlefield?
Is this Direct Commercial Sales program a secret cash cow for many
US Corporations, International arms merchants, its insiders, or affiliates?
Is it possible this could be another ʻ‘off-‐‑the-‐‑booksʼ’ secret
covert operation ran by the CIAʼ’s Special Tactical Unit, similar to the
Iran-‐‑Contra operations of the eighties and the old Cuban projects of
the fifties and sixties, where we supplied both sides weapons and
escalated the conflict for personal and corporate gain?
Could we be selling and supplying dangerous high impact weapons,
while aiding and financing both sides of a Civil War in Syria?
Could we be escalating the Middle East conflict either knowingly or
unintentionally providing weapons to both sides of the Syrian conflict?
These are simple questions. I’m just asking:
Did our Ambassador and others, weeks before they were murdered,
notify our State Department and CIA that Syrian Rebels had obtained US
Weapons, including “Stinger missiles’ from Jordan, Turkey, Pakistan,
shipped from CIA safe houses?
Were they told to “Stand Down?
No comments:
Post a Comment