Previously posted ...
BLM withdraws - FREEDOM'S WAR ends with GOD'S MILLENIAL KINGDOM !!!
http://conpats.blogspot.com/
The Bundy Ranch Blogspot
http://bundyranch.blogspot.
Thanks - Alexsandrian Librarian
I AM PROUD TO BE A DOMESTIC TERRORIST TO A PATHETIC FRAUDULENT PAID OFF CABAL GOVERNMENT WHO IS COLD-HEARTED, UN-AMERICAN, COMMUNISTIC, AND TOTALLY NARCISSTIC AND SELF-CENTERED FOR STARTERS. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH ! ~ Alex
Wal-Mart's Waltons Gaining More Active Role at First Solar
FIRST SOLAR is owned by the Walton family,
who owns Walmart. The environmental study that was done for
establishing the reserve said the cattle had to be removed.
FIRST SOLAR could not move forward until the cattle were
removed, that is why they withdrew their donation for the
reserve until the cattle were removed. BLM could not move
forward with the plants until that issue was resolved and
according to Nevada Open Range laws, the Bundy family
retained their rights only as long as they had cattle on the
land. If the cattle were removed, the land was considered
abandoned, and any rights the Bundy's had would return to
the State of Nevada [...]
http://www.thestreet.com/Is Wal-Mart Quietly Building An Organic Empire To Fuel Its Wild Oats Rollout?
by Connor Adams Sheets
Wal-Mart’s bold entry into the booming organic food market sets a lofty goal for the company: offering a wide range of products bearing the coveted USDA certified organic seal at stores across the United States. But experts say that the target may be impossible to live up to in a country where less than two percent of farms grow organic crops. “There's no way in hell that Wal-Mart is going to be able to carry a line of organic products that all bear the certified-organic USDA seal,” Darrin Duber-Smith, president of the natural and organic products strategic planning firm Green Marketing and marketing professor at Metropolitan State University of Denver, told IBTimes. “There’s a huge supply problem in organics. Demand outstrips supply by 25 percent in the industry.” [...]
http://www.ibtimes.com/wal-
Secretary Jewell BLM Announces Two Solar Projects Approved in California, Nevada
http://www.doi.gov/news/
http://www.blm.gov/wo/st/en/
The Private Attorney Generals Group
http://thepagg.weebly.com/
Entire 100 yards all here ...
BLM agents back down in stand-off with armed cowboys: BLM release cattle after they were surrounded
by militia following agreement to stop targeting rancher in modern-day 'range war'
http://beforeitsnews.com/
From: Travis B From Australia... Bundy the Patriot is now a "Domestic Terrorist"?!
Lawbreaking Rancher Cliven Bundy Wins Victory That Will Embolden Domestic Terrorists
by Keith Brekhus
http://www.politicususa.com/
Thanks - Dear Born Barb
password protected file ... pony up to see this one
Is the Surrender of the BLM a Strategic De-escalation?
posted by Laura J Alcorn National Director - Ac2c
Was the surrender of the Bureau of Land Management too good to be true? Should the Bundy
family be on the look-out for a pre-dawn SWAT team raid?
Doug Hagmann of The Hagmann and Hagmann Report believes so.
The following correspondence was posted as an alert on SteveQuayle.com:
To put it bluntly, the people are being hoodwinked into believing ...
To: Steve Quayle - From Doug Hagmann
At 1750 hours ET, I was contacted by my
source within the Department of Homeland Security regarding
the current situation at the Bundy Ranch. To put it bluntly,
the people are being hoodwinked into believing that the
situation is being resolved. It is not. It is a strategic
de-escalation to fool the public. This source stated that
the retreat of the BLM agents and the release of the cattle
was actually crafted as a potential plan yesterday
(Friday, 11 April 2014) based on the following:http://americac2c.com/forum/
Also here - http://www.thedailysheeple.
Complete post here without password - http://www.stevequayle.com/
Who actually “owns” America’s land? A deeper look at the Bundy Ranch crisis
http://www.thedailysheeple.
Bobby Powell has an excellent video ...
http://bobpowell.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
Excellent ... Thanks - DonHank
Are Federal Land Acquisition Procedures Constitutional ?
by Jim Tenney
http://www.citizensalliance.
Thanks - JanTana
Leaked Memo Uncovers Obama Administration Land Grab
Senator Jim DeMint took to the pages of the
Washington Post this morning to raise the alarm about a
planned, 10 million acre Western land grab by the Obama
administration. A secret administration memo has surfaced
revealing plans for the federal government to seize more
than 10 million acres from Montana to New Mexico, halting
job- creating activities like ranching, forestry, mining and
energy development. Worse, this land grab would dry up tax
revenue that’s essential for funding schools, firehouses and
community centers. [...]
http://cofarmbureaublog.You Don't Know Me
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
http://www.youtube.com/user/
The Manning Report - http://www.atlah.org
Dr. James David Manning speaks about the million meals
he feed and his continued service to the community.
Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord. Everybody sing Hosana - Hallelujah - Hosana to the King !
For all have
sinned, and come short of the glory of God; Being
justified freely by his grace through the redemption
that is in Christ Jesus:
Romans 3:23-24 KJV
HOLY WEEK !
WOE UNTO YOU... HYPOCRITES !!!
that is in Christ Jesus:
Romans 3:23-24 KJV
HOLY WEEK !
WOE UNTO YOU... HYPOCRITES !!!
Matthew 21-23;
John 12:1-8
BURIAL ANOINTING
"Then Jesus six days before the
passover came to Bethany, where Lazarus was which had been
dead, whom he raised from the dead. There they made him a
supper; and Martha served: but Lazarus was one of them
that sat at the table with him. (John 12:1-2)BURIAL ANOINTING
When Matthew, Mark and Luke recorded their gospels, Lazarus was probably still living, and was in threat of being killed to remove the proof of Christ's miracle in his behalf. This is likely why John, whose gospel was written much later, was the only one to record the miracle of Lazarus being raised from the dead. (Farrar, p. 511, quoted in McConkie, p. 334).
"Then took Mary a
pound of ointment of spikenard, very costly, and
anointed the feet of Jesus,
and wiped his feet with her hair: and the house was filled with the odour of the ointment." (John 12:3)
and wiped his feet with her hair: and the house was filled with the odour of the ointment." (John 12:3)
According to Harper-Collins, the Roman
pound was about 12 ounces or 340 grams.
The perfumed ointment mentioned was imported from the Himalayas.
The perfumed ointment mentioned was imported from the Himalayas.
"To anoint the head of a guest with ordinary oil was to do him honor; to anoint his feet also was to show unusual and signal regard; but the anointing of head and feet with spikenard, and in such abundance, was an act of reverential homage rarely rendered even to kings" (Talmadge, p. 512).
"The sense may be that this anointing of Jesus foreshadows his impending death. Jewish burial customs included anointing the body with perfumed oil (Harper-Collins, p. 2037). Judas Iscariot complained about this "wastefulness." I couldn't get any kind of consensus from all the sources I looked at as to how much money the oil really would cost today, or how it compared with the 30 pieces of silver for which Judas sold Jesus, but it is obvious that it was fairly expensive. It was evidence that Mary recognized the great worth of Jesus and honored him, and he appreciated it as such. Judas was the perfect example of a hypocrite, he who sold Jesus for the price of an injured slave (Harper-Collins).
NOTE ON THE
TRIUMPHAL ENTRY
Jesus came riding into Jerusalem on a
donkey. This was appropriate for a Hebrew king coming in
peace. A Hebrew king coming for battle would have ridden
a horse. In the Roman culture, a king would only have
come riding a horse. Since Jesus rode on a donkey, he
presented himself as the King of the Jews, yet posed no
threat to the Romans. "He came riding on an ass, in token of peace, acclaimed by the Hosanna shouts of multitudes; not on a caparisoned steed with the panoply of combat and the accompaniment of bugle blasts and fanfare of trumpets. That the joyous occasion was in no sense suggestive of physical hostility or of seditious disturbance is sufficiently demonstrated by the indulgent unconcern with which it was viewed by the Roman officials, who were usually prompt to send their legionaries swooping down from the fortress of Antonia at the first evidence of an outbreak; and they were particularly vigilant in suppressing all Messianic pretenders, for false Messiahs had arisen already, and much blood had been shed in the forcible dispelling of their delusive claims...The ass has been designated in literature as 'the ancient symbol of Jewish royalty,' and one riding upon an ass as the type of peaceful progress" (Talmadge, p. 516-517).
"And the multitudes that went before and that followed, cried, saying, Hosanna to the Son of David: Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord; Hosanna in the highest...and the children of the kingdom [cried] in the temple...saying, Hosanna to the Son of David..." (Matt. 21:9, 15).
"'Hosannah' is a Greek form of the Hebrew expression for 'Save us now,' or 'Save, we pray,' which occurs in the original of Psalm 118:25. It occurs nowhere in the English Bible except in [the verses noted above]" (Talmadge, p. 523). In the Jewish tradition, it was a cry meant only for Jehovah, the great God of the Old Testament.
THE CURSING OF
THE FIG TREE
"Now in the morning as he returned
into the city, he hungered. And when he saw a fig tree in
the way, he came to it, and found nothing theron, but
leaves only, and said unto it, Let no fruit grow on thee
henceforward for ever. And presently the fig tree withered
away" (Matt. 21:18-19).
Why did the God
of Creation destroy a helpless little fig tree?
To teach through an unforgettable live-action parable.
The fig tree is deciduous, or in other words, has leaves
that fall off in the winter. In the spring, the fruit
appears before the leaves. Also, there is generally a
little fruit left from the previous season that is still
edible. It was not time yet for either fruit or leaves, but
this tree had leaves--an advertisement that it was bearing
fruit. Although the other trees had no figs, they had no
leaves either. This fig tree was cursed, not simply for
being fruitless, but for being a hypocrite.To teach through an unforgettable live-action parable.
"The leafy, fruitless tree was a symbol of Judaism, which loudly proclaimed itself as the only true religion of the age, and condescendingly invited all the world to come and partake of its rich ripe fruit; when in truth it was but an unnatural growth of leaves, with no fruit of the season, not even an edible bulb held over from earlier years, for such as it had of former fruitage was dried to worthlessness and made repulsive in its worm-eaten decay...The fig tree was a favorite [symbol among the rabbis for] the Jewish race" (Talmadge, p. 527).
In addition, the cursing of the fig tree showed that Christ had power to destroy, as well as power to heal and save. In a few days, as Christ suffered and died, those who saw the cursing of the fig tree would know that Christ could have destroyed the entire Roman legion and the Jewish leaders had he desired. He went to his death, not helplessly, but willingly, exercising self-control as he suffered without retaliating.
He also used this miracle to
demonstrate the power of faith to his disciples (verses
21-22).
Rather than simply show off his great power, he made it available to all who would develop their faith.
Rather than simply show off his great power, he made it available to all who would develop their faith.
QUESTIONS FROM
THE DELEGATIONS
As you go over the various trick questions that were asked
of Christ, fill in the first four columns of the table
below. Save the last column ("Ask Yourself") for the end of
the discussion. Or you can cut and paste the chart into a
Word document, and then stretch the borders of the chart to
make it fit the page better, and give it as a handout. You
could leave the last column blank, and have class members
fill in the questions to ask themselves.
One by one, delegations from four
powerful groups asked Jesus a premeditated question,
hoping to convict him by trickery.
The Chief Priests (Matt. 21:23-27)
"By what authority doest thou these things? and who gave thee this authority?"
Who were the chief priests? The leaders of the church,
those who, of all, should be hailing Christ as king, if they
hadn't been leading the church for their own aggrandizement
instead. (Imagine Boyd K. Packer not recognizing Christ!)The Chief Priests (Matt. 21:23-27)
"By what authority doest thou these things? and who gave thee this authority?"
Three years of miracles and teachings could answer their question and tell them Christ's authority. It was obvious they were not seeking the real answer. So Christ returned their answer with a question that absolutely stymied their attempts to trick him. By asking what John the Baptist's authority was, they were completely flummoxed. Everyone knew that John the Baptist had the appropriate authority from God. He was fully "in the system" with the scribes and Pharisees. His father had been a priest. He held the priesthood. To say that John the Baptist had no authority from God would be to say that they also had no authority from God. Yet, to say that John the Baptist did have authority from God would be to admit that they had not believed one of known authority. Therefore, they could not answer without convicting themselves one way or the other.
The church leadership was not schooled
to ever say, "I don't know." Obviously, they were
completely
desperate or they would not have given such a humiliating answer.
Jesus was a genius.
Herodians (Matt. 22:15-22)
"Is it lawful to give tribute unto Caesar or not?"
Who were the Herodians? They were the upper class, the
well-to-do, those concerned with upholding the power of the
Herod family in order to maintain their own privileged
positions. The Herods got their power from the Romans, so
supporting the Herods meant supporting the Romans. To the
lower class and the practicing Jews, however, the paying of
tribute to the Romans was the most offensive of the
requirements placed upon them.desperate or they would not have given such a humiliating answer.
Jesus was a genius.
Herodians (Matt. 22:15-22)
"Is it lawful to give tribute unto Caesar or not?"
If Christ said it was lawful to pay
taxes, he would be speaking in opposition to Jewish
tradition and law.
If he said it was not lawful to pay taxes, he would be speaking in terms of sedition against the Romans.
His answer again showed his genius: Money has Caesar's image on it--give it to him. Give to God that which has God's image on it.
What has God's image and superscription? The body and soul of man.
The Sadducees (Matt. 22:23-33; Luke 20:27-28)
Who were they? The Sadducees were influenced by Greek
philosophy. They were the liberal Jewish scholars, in
comparison to the conservative Pharisees. They believed
only in the here and now, and not in any afterlife, yet they
did believe in God.If he said it was not lawful to pay taxes, he would be speaking in terms of sedition against the Romans.
His answer again showed his genius: Money has Caesar's image on it--give it to him. Give to God that which has God's image on it.
What has God's image and superscription? The body and soul of man.
The Sadducees (Matt. 22:23-33; Luke 20:27-28)
They tried to produce a complication that would be hard to sort out in the next life, to illustrate their belief that there was no next life, and to present Christ with a situation which would not work there. This same problem was often debated by the rabbis, who said that the first husband got the wife. The six younger brothers had only married her in keeping with Jewish tradition to take care of her, and to carry on the family name and line of the oldest brother. Christ said, "The children of this world marry, and are given in marriage" but in the next life, they are ministering angels (Luke 20:32). (See D&C 132:15 where it says, "If a man marry a wife in this world...they are not bound by any law when they are out of the world.")
Christ knew the question had nothing to do with marriage, eternal or otherwise, but with whether there was life after death, and he answered, "But as touching the resurrection of the dead, have ye not read that which was spoken unto you by God, saying, I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob? God is not the God of the dead, but of the living" (Matt. 22:31-32). All through their history, God had been known as the God of these great patriarchs now dead. They must still be alive somewhere for him to be their God.
The Pharisees
(Matt 22:34-40)
Who were the Pharisees? They were the extremely
conservative Jewish leaders, the "Diet Coke Police" of the
day. In order to preserve their religion when they were
taken into exile, the Pharisees sprang up, itemizing details
of the law that had not previously existed. They eventually
created a situation where there were rules and details for
every act of man, and no one need rely upon the Spirit for
guidance in what to do. They had created 613 divisions and
subdivisions of the law. Which of all these could be the
most important, they asked Jesus.The answer had been given to them by Moses, long before the addition of all these rules. "What doth the Lord require of thee, but to fear the Lord thy God, to walk in all his ways, and to love him, and to serve the Lord thy God with all thy heart and with all thy soul" (Deut. 10:12). Jesus merely restated the commandment he had already given them as Jehovah of the Old Testament.
CHRIST'S REBUKE--THE WEDDING OF THE KING'S SON
The bidden guests (bidden = had the invitation well in advance, just as the Jews had their invitation well in advanced through the Old Testament) turned away to their own material pursuits and personal affairs, valuing them above reverence or obedience to the king, showing a complete disdain of the son, the heir to the throne, their next king. The king's job was to protect his subjects, but they didn't care for his protection.
When the "bidden" guests did not come, the king invited the outcasts and underdogs. Because the king knew these guests were all poor and unprepared for a wedding, the doorman would have given them the proper attire to make them worthy of entrance. The man without the wedding garment, therefore, had obviously come in through the back. The Lord's kingdom is available to everyone, but there is only one entrance. The Lord scrutinizes every countenance--the guests are not just a sea of faces to him. There is no hiding in the crowd at the supper of the Lord.
CHRIST'S LAMENT
"O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that
killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto
thee, how often would I have gathered thy children
together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her
wings, and ye would not! Behold, your house is left unto
you desolate" (Matt. 23:37-38).The chicks huddled under the hen's wing are protected from the view of the hawk. But Jerusalem would not receive that blessing. She insisted on foolishly endangering herself, and despite the shelter available to her through Christ, there was no doubt that she would shortly meet her demise.
APPLICATION
All of these various factions--the
priests, the Herodians, the Saduccees, the Pharisees--were
Jews. We could say they were "members of the Church."
Church membership alone did not save them; in fact, not
behaving in accord with their membership cursed them as
hypocrites, just like the fig tree. We must be careful we
do not make the same mistakes. We also have been invited
to the wedding, promised shelter under Christ's wing. Let's not disregard the invitation.
Return to the
chart, and discuss what may be found in the fourth
column, "Questions to ask yourself."
Rather than being POWER HUNGRY like the chief priests, let's GIVE OUR WILL OVER TO GOD.
Rather than worrying about WEALTH like the Herodians, let's focus on INTERNALIZING THE CHARACTERISTICS OF CHRIST.
Rather than LIVING ONLY FOR TODAY like the Saduccees, let's KEEP AN ETERNAL PERSPECTIVE.
Rather than JUDGING OTHERS ON THE DETAILS OF WHAT THEY DO OR DON'T DO like the Pharisees,
let's just concern ourselves with ALWAYS ACTING IN LOVE.
Rather than having Christ look on us from a distance, lamenting that we will not allow him to help and protect us,
let's be nestled safely like a child in his lap, saying, as did the
"children of the kingdom," "Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord."
New Testament Lesson #20 "Woe unto You...Hypocrites"
http://gospeldoctrineplus. blogspot.com/2011/05/new- testament-lesson-20-woe-unto. html
Rather than being POWER HUNGRY like the chief priests, let's GIVE OUR WILL OVER TO GOD.
Rather than worrying about WEALTH like the Herodians, let's focus on INTERNALIZING THE CHARACTERISTICS OF CHRIST.
Rather than LIVING ONLY FOR TODAY like the Saduccees, let's KEEP AN ETERNAL PERSPECTIVE.
Rather than JUDGING OTHERS ON THE DETAILS OF WHAT THEY DO OR DON'T DO like the Pharisees,
let's just concern ourselves with ALWAYS ACTING IN LOVE.
Rather than having Christ look on us from a distance, lamenting that we will not allow him to help and protect us,
let's be nestled safely like a child in his lap, saying, as did the
"children of the kingdom," "Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord."
New Testament Lesson #20 "Woe unto You...Hypocrites"
http://gospeldoctrineplus.
The Triumphal Entry of Jesus Into Jerusalem (Mark 11.1-11)
When Jesus entered Jerusalem during Passover week, His entrance was far from understated. Contrary to earlier days when He withdrew from the people who wanted to make Him their king (see John 6.15), Jesus orchestrated His entry into the city on one of the busiest weeks of the year in such a way that clearly had royal implications. But to fully understand what was taking place during what is commonly referred to as “The Triumphal Entry,” we need to study the various streams of biblical prophecy, messianic expectations, historical undercurrents, and Greco-Roman culture that formed the background for this world changing event. [...]
http://www.toddpylant.com/
http://jesuscaritasest.
http://communitychristian.
http://yeppoonpalmfest.
♥†♥ ♥†♥ ♥†♥
Subject: Illegal use of copyrighted material
ReplyDeleteShalom from the Legal Department of Bibles For Israel
RE copyrighted article you are using on YOUR WEBSITE:
We are shocked that a Believer in Yeshua (Jesus) would steal copyrighted information.
OUR ARTICLE:
http://conpats.blogspot.com/2014/04/chuck-kolb-04132014.html
Your actions have financially hurt our non-profit organization, via page rank within Google Search which translates into donor support.
Besides your actions being “illegal,” you never even had the courtesy to contact our ministry to inquire if you could even use our copyrighted materials.
There are many strong warnings regarding theft in the Bible, it is one of the Ten Commandments. The Torah requires restitution for theft. However, our only demand is that you remove the URL stated above, IMMEDIATELY.
You have 24 hours to remove our copyrighted material from your website, otherwise legal action will ensue.
1. CLAIM:
You are using copyrighted information, which is against the law in all countries.
2. RESOLUTION:
You have 24 hours from the timestamp of this email correspondence to remove our copyrighted material from your website; otherwise legal action will commence immediately.
3. CONSEQUENCES:
If we do not receive a confirmation email from you with 24 hours from this timestamp regarding the removal of the URL above, AND DISCLOSURE OF ANY OTHER WRITTEN MATERIAL/ARTICLES which you may have also stolen from our ministry, we will legal action will commence.
Respectfully,
Ori Bernstein
Chief Legal Counsel
The Messianic Jewish Bible Society, Inc (Bibles For Israel/MessianicBible.com)
Legaldepartment@biblesforisrael.com
It appears as if this man has nothing to do except scan for possible defendants to unfounded lawsuits.
DeleteHi Lee,
Quite frankly, I have never seen anything quite like ...
as to publishing the Truth of our Lord and Savior.
Alas, your summation of this appearance is quite keyrect ...
Does not this child know there is but Glory to the Father in all of what we do ...
again I believe the Rabbi does not know of this.
As for my house and your house which serves the Lord ...
Hallelujah !
~ CK