AGENDA 21 MUST BE STOPPED. ALL PROVISIONS DEALING WITH AGENDA 21 MUST BE STOPPED IMMEDIATELY.
OBSTRUCTS OUR CONSTITUTION. PROTECT AND DEFEND OUR CONSTITUTION.....STOP BETRAYING AND COMMITTING CRIMINAL OFFENSES BY YOUR CONSISTENT BETRAYAL TOWARDS YOUR COUNTRY, YOUR FELLOW AMERICANS AND OUR TREASURED CONSTITUTION.
IS THIS HOW YOU REALLY WANT
TO LIVE AND RAISE A FAMILY???
The Government-assigned Concrete Block Apartments
An
American diplomat who flew over communist Romania during Ceausescu’s
reign of terror asked the innocent question, where are the farmers and
their homes, I see nothing but fields of green everywhere?
The
accompanying hosts looked at each other embarrassed and nobody answered
the question. It was too undiplomatic and dangerous to explain to this
westerner coming from the land of freedom and private property that the
farmers’ land had been confiscated, collectivized, and the former owners
moved by force to government assigned concrete block apartments ranging
in size from 200-400 square feet.
These
apartments were located in blocks with 2-4 entrances depending on
whether they were five or nine stories high. The five-story buildings
did not have elevators; the nine-story buildings had lifts that could
safely carry two individuals at a time and were seldom operational.
Renters of various ages and physical abilities had the joy of climbing
stairs every day.
Social
engineers had decided that land was better used in co-operative farms
owned by the communist government. Private homes located on farm land
were bulldozed and people were moved either in a compact village
attached to the collective farm, with little room between single homes,
or in the densely populated cities with grey concrete apartments
mushrooming overnight.
The
communist party elites had decided that having too much private space
was bourgeois, the socialist men needed just enough space to eat and
sleep, the rest of the time had to be spent at work.
This
brings me to the current trend in the U.S. to reduce Americans’ living
space to as little as possible by changing zoning laws without their
consent, using visioning committees composed of local agreeable
supervisors and outside non-governmental organizations (NGOs) with lots
of available grant money from HUD and other government agencies.
U.N. Agenda 21 is
behind zoning, regionalism, land and water use, Sustainable
Development, global warming, wealth redistribution, social engineering,
Smart Growth, Green Growth, cap and trade, Smart Grid, Smart Meters,
global citizens, IB World schools, Common Core standards, biofuels, the
Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST), gun control, just to name a few.
Nationally
syndicated talk show hosts have finally started speaking against U.N.
Agenda 21 elements. I have connected all the parts in my best-selling
book, “U.N. Agenda 21: Environmental Piracy”.
U.N. environmental regionalist Seven50 plans for Florida
A political refuge appealed to the St. Lucie County Commissioners in Florida at
a meeting about the U.N. environmental regionalist Seven50 plans for
Florida. “I do not come here to lose my freedom; I beg you – get out of
Seven50. Do not destroy our Freedom.”
A
long line of citizens vociferously opposed such regionalism and pleaded
with “local elected officials to reject the takeover of Florida’s
private property.” “
“I am opposed to Seven50… to the loss of our property rights by U.N. Agenda 21, the new world order communist Marxist project.”
Large
grants from HUD and this administration have divided our country into
11 nationwide regions, including the east coast of Florida.
The
Seven50 Regionalism Plan has already been adopted in the Gore triangle
counties south of St. Lucie and Indian River counties.
Vero
Beach, IRC rejected the plan based on a “vertical authority flow chart”
controlled by unelected federal bureaucrats influenced by globalist
non-governmental organizations (NGOs) who plan to “stack-and-pack
200-foot dwelling spaces” and move citizens off their private property.
Stack-and-pack living quarters in the 200 square foot aPodments
Suzanne
Eovaldi describes the typical stack-and-pack living quarters in the 200
square foot aPodments building in Sammamish, Washington. Resident Judy Green “shares
the kitchen with seven other tenants on the second floor.” To get to
her loft cubicle, she must climb six flights of stairs in the absence of
elevators. Cars are not allowed on account of global warming.
The micro-units are the size of a hotel room and rent for $600-900 per month. The micro-housing units increase the population density of the area tremendously.
The
government will impose its best practices of “Sustainable Urbanism”
which will force areas to adopt “sustainable development” and “equitable
communities,” changing the counties’ desired low density character and
scale to high-density crime-ridden slums.
The American Coalition 4 Property Rights explains
on its website why the Seven50 Regional Plan must be stopped with its
Sustainable Urbanism and the Smart Code solution to urban sprawl.
Regionalism will fundamentally alter the make-up of our society and of
our property rights or lack thereof.
“Social
engineering is on the verge of being imposed on entire neighborhoods,
adults, and children alike.” The Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) will dismantle local zoning and force people to move
into certain areas in order to achieve what they consider “racial,
economic, and ethnic diversity.” This is “nationalizing neighborhoods”
on a grand scale. This is done for our “own good and to achieve utopia.”
By obliterating zoning regulations, we will have neighborhoods by
government quota. (Rush Limbaugh monologue, September 12, 2013)
Rush
Limbaugh pointed out that “HUD’s power grab is based on the mistaken
belief that zoning and discrimination are the same, zoning is disguised
discrimination.” Introducing 200 square feet pods between single family
homes is “social justice.”
The American Planning Association issued a HUD Smart Growth document, a blueprint of goals to replace single family housing.
The
76-page study by APA’s Planning Advisory Service, report number 548,
published on July 2007, had the “objective to examine, on a pilot basis,
whether zoning impedes the development of higher-density, multifamily
housing in growing metropolitan areas.”
The
study presumed multifamily housing to be the most affordable type of
housing yet it did not evaluate this presumption in the study.
“High-density residential development is not always affordable, and low
density development is not always costly. Ample high-density and
multi-family zoning is neither necessary nor sufficient to produce
affordable housing.”(p. iv) Why then destroy suburbia and why dictate to
other people how they should live?
The
authors identified other factors besides zoning that can limit
multifamily housing stock such as market conditions, land availability,
parcelization, provision of public services, planning goals such as
protecting open spaces or rural areas, and existing land-use patterns.
The APA study recommends:
- Support the Regional collection and integration of land use regulatory data (maintain comprehensive data on zoning and other regulatory restraints)
- Encourage state and Regional governments to provide oversight of local land-use policies.
- Focus state and Regional oversight policies on quantitative performance measures.
- Continue to develop better measures of zoning barriers and support additional research on the effects of barriers on housing markets.
For
these authors, “the critical question now is not whether regulatory
barriers to affordable housing exist in some communities, but whether it
is possible to identify such communities and craft an appropriate
policy response.”
In
my December 23, 2013 interview with Brian Lilley of Sun News Network in
Canada, I explained the “affordable housing” fight in Fairfax County, Virginia,
where almost all members of the Board of Supervisors and the Planning
Commission are crafting a plan to place Lilliputian slum dwellings in
every area of the county.
These are called Residential Studio Units (RSUs) with a total surface of 220-320 square feet.
Each
high-rise would contain 75 such units and one parking space per unit.
Such units would reduce property values, change neighborhoods, increase
population density, cause more traffic congestion, and increase crime in
the name of “affordable housing” for the poor, low wage workers, and
“diversity.”
No comments:
Post a Comment