Saturday, January 18, 2014

MEXICAN GOVERNMENT TRIES TO DISARM PRIVATE CITIZENS FIGHTING CARTELS!

Submitted by: Donald Hank

Scott Shackford|Jan. 16, 2014 12:15 pm
Fusion TVIn the face of kidnappings and extortion from cartels and a lack of reliable protection from the police and military, groups of Mexican citizens are taking matters (and weapons) into their own hands and protecting themselves. In Antúnez, Mexico, the military's efforts to restore order - or really, to restore the primacy of their own authority - by disarming the vigilantes ended in the deaths of two civilians. The New York Times notes:

Word spread quickly: The army was coming to disarm the vigilante fighters whom residents viewed as conquering heroes after they swept in and drove out a drug gang that had stolen property, extorted money and threatened to kill them. They even had to leave flowers and other offerings at a shrine to the gang's messianic leader.
Farmers locked arms with vigilantes to block the dusty two-lane road leading here. The soldiers demanded to be let in; people begged them to leave. Tempers flared, and rocks were thrown. The soldiers fired into the air, and then, residents said, into a crowd. At least two people were killed on Tuesday, officials and residents said.
"He was just a farmer, and now he died for a cause," one resident, Luis Sánchez, said of Mario Torres, 48, a lime picker who was not part of the vigilante group but was among the two buried on Wednesday as mourners cried out against the government and the soldiers.
The Times notes that following the resistance from citizen in Antúnez, officials appear to have backed down.
Fusion, a new cable network targeting American Latino millennials who speak English, produced a video report back in December interviewing several of these vigilantes talking openly about their peacekeeping efforts. Watch it here, and note the early statistic that the Mexican police solve only about 5 percent of reported crimes.
In one of these towns the vigilantes are led by a community doctor, pushed toward his activism after seeing young girls brought to him after being kidnapped and raped by cartel members. He took a dim view of the Army's efforts, telling Fusion's reporter, "They don't come here to dismantle criminal organizations. Their only mission is to protect federal roads."
Mexico has extremely strict private gun ownership laws, which is why part of the news coverage seems focused on "disarming" the vigilantes. That the military is unable to even disarm its own law-abiding citizenry (other than the gun laws anyway), and that armed citizens appear to be a better choice to keep cartels at bay (they actually have a stake in the outcome) may indicate an important shift for Mexicans in fighting the violence in their country. The New York Times frets these vigilante leaders may have ties to other criminal gangs, but there's little to indicate in either their story nor Fusion's that they are victimizing these communities further or worse than what they had been living under.
A final reminder for people in Austin, Texas, interested in Mexican drug war reporting: Reason's documentary, America's Longest War, will be screened tonight at the Alamo Drafthouse Village. Reason's Jacob Sullum will be there! More information here.

4 comments:

  1. Comment of Donald Hank's Friend: This article is a reminder to all those who think that the 2nd Amendment is an anachronism ..

    What the Obama Presidency has confirmed is that ANYONE who voted for him twice is disqualified from weighing in on any serious policy considerations as regards the health and welfare of the citizenry ...

    In other words, there is unimpeachable evidence that the Obamanites should not be given any credence .It's too bad that literacy tests are no longer required to vote ..

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm from Mexico but I live in the US, you will never see this on national TV (mexican or american), the mexican goverment is always disarming the people because they are afraid.
    My granpa told me that guns used to be legal or at least they were ok with them, the goverment started banning guns during or after the 1960's (Che guevara, Cuba etc..) because they were afraid of people taking over the goverment.

    SO INSTEAD OF POSTING A LONG COMMENT HERE ARE SOME OF MY POINTS.

    1. The Mexican goverment fears the MEXICAN PEOPLE

    2. The Mexican goverment protects the cartels

    3. The Mexican goverment is asking the people in Michoacan to disarm themselves and let the police and mexican army do its job. This is an insult and a slap to the face.

    4. The Mexican army has been trading gift cards, cash, computers or food for GUNS.

    5. The Mexican army does not want the mexican people to arm themselves.

    6. Mexican constitution allows mexicans to own firearms, the Mexican politicos wipe their ass with the constitution.

    Go to your nearest mexican consulate and ask them these questions (they represent the mexican goverment in US soil).

    1. Why does the mexican goverment denies protection to mexican citizens

    2. Following number 1, seeing that the mexican goverment wont protect its citizens, then why do you deny your citizens the right to protect them selves.

    now questions for the current US president, why do you feel so offended when chemicals weapons were used (if they were) by an arab president or leader, Syria is so far away yet you want to start a war with them, sending soldiers to die to a an ugly desert in a different continent.

    the narcos in Mexico kill women and children everyday, with the weapons your buddy sent to them, instead of arming the mexican people, why are you arming the enemy, the devil, the men chopping head offs .


    Thank you.... I was just passing by.... I'm coming from a google search... you will never hear of me again but the mexican goverment knows that they can't control the internet.

    Twitter, facebook, social media, emails, IRC networks, Voip services, blogs are guns they can't control.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for an honest reply with no spinning! I am of the thought that Operation Fast and Furious was not for, 'tracking guns,' but rfor the arming of drug cartel by the Obama Administration. Any thoughts on this? Pastor Lee

      Delete
  3. Ok I had to get back!

    First of all Thank You for approving my comment

    Second, I'm using a laptop with microsoft windows set for Spanish, It changed government to goverment. (I type long texts in word in case I close the browser).

    Third, SORRY If I make long comments, but the people need to know.

    I think operation FAF was really a cover up for something bigger than that, how many weapons were sent? nobody really knows, and they are not going to tell the truth.

    Did you hear about the deals between federal agencies with the richest and most powerful drug dealer "el chapo" Guzman? This was on the news about 2 weeks ago.
    And how do you track a gun? did they put a GPS chip and then send over the drone? whats the point of tracking a gun? the Mexican army is sold to the narcos, who is going to receive and tracked-gun-location and ACT ? Nobody!,

    The autodefensas movement is armed with old rifles and asault rifles taken from drug cartels. They need guns and intelligence, they are the only ones doing something about the "drug on wars", because they live inside the war on drugs.

    The current US administration needs to start doing the same operation but instead of arming the evil scum narcs they should be supplying guns to autodefensas.

    If you aren't that busy please take a look at this short videos,

    Ex Mexican General sends message the military and People
    http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=f02_1388963864

    Former Mexican Army General calls for revolution
    http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c82_1388823006


    Quote from a forbes article (published less than 24 hours as I type this).
    http://www.forbes.com/sites/nathanielparishflannery/2014/01/27/why-are-u-s-citizens-fighting-cartel-gunmen-in-mexico/
    ============================
    “The movement’s top leader, surgeon Jose Manuel Mireles, lived for several years in Sacramento and worked for the Red Cross. Since he was injured in a plane crash earlier this month, much of the movement’s military leadership has fallen to a 34-year-old El Paso car salesman named Luis Antonio Torres Gonzalez, known as ‘El Americano’ because he was born in the States.”

    end quote
    ==================

    So now you see Pastor Lee, the question is , how will Mexicans and even Mexican-Americans react to the "Plan of San Luis" document of the new century? We are keeping a eye on twitter, non-narco-gov TV channels and the internet, on both sides of the border.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plan_of_San_Luis_Potosi (20 second read).


    MY FAITH IS STRONGER THAN MY FEAR.

    ReplyDelete