Tuesday, January 7, 2014

CHUCK KOLB 01/07/2014

MAHDI Prophecy unfolding NOW + Gnostic Blasphemy !!!

Previously posted ...
FUK U SHIMA ! C U Later !!!
http://conpats.blogspot.com/2014/01/chuck-kolb-01032013.html


The stage is being set as the mahdi prophecy is unfolding ...

The bloodiest battle of the Iraq war was fought in the city of Fallujah in 2004 when close to 100 American
soldiers were killed trying to expel al Qaeda. Well, this week, an al Qaeda affiliate has taken back Fallujah and
much of Ramadi and is flying the black al Qaeda flag in both those cities.





- here is a side study showing the blasphemy of gnosticism ...

The Great Arcanum - essence of the secret doctrine ....
THE SECRET GATE OF EDEN / Gnosis, Kabbalah and Alquimia (1:15:58)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOFNYy24I4Y
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpQrVmyGWv2d2fK6zqI9sEw
SAMAEL AUN WEOR Documentary
http://gnosticteachings.org/


Wherefore gird up the loins of your mind, be sober, and hope to the end for the grace that is to be brought
unto you at the revelation of Jesus Christ;
1 Peter 1:13 KJV


MAHDI Prophecy unfolding NOW + Gnostic Blasphemy !!!



Watch closely as the stage is being set ...
- excellent and scriptural truth on the mahdi prophecy presently unfolding ...

Babylon the great the Turkish Antichrist
Pt 1) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrGJ90d-9DY (14:22)
Pt 2) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFaYnKOrKqs (14:55)
Pt 3) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1jiYacXpGWI (14:27)
Pt 4) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCs_AuK45D0 (7:18)

Autoplay all 4 vids
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrGJ90d-9DY&feature=share&list=PLI-GrLGEPL6eLYN8GdPnoYn14Y9vKv652

http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNyGCg0gnO7DCaCpcVeCwpA
Theecountdownbackup - HenningKemner


♥†♥ ♥†♥ ♥†♥


Read closely this part of the show noting Charles Lane
TRANSCRIPT - FOX News Sunday January 5th 2014

WALLACE: Al Qaeda makes games in western Iraq, taking back territory U.S. troops fought and died for. Our Sunday panel is here to discuss what role President Obama's exit from Iraq played in all this and be sure to tell us what you think of today's segments on Facebook and share your favorite moments with other FNS fans.

(MUSIC PLAYING)

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Was the administration not interesting (inaudible) with the Iraqi government?

MARIE HARF, STATE DEPT. DEPUTY SPOKESPERSON: I’m just not going to go back down that road. I don’t.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: But the answer is yes, OK, and I don’t see why …

HARF: You want my job then, you want to answer?

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: No, but I would prefer that you don’t try to side step. I mean it’s a pretty …

HARF: I’m not trying to side step. We're focused on 2014 and where we go from here.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

WALLACE: Well, State Department Spokesperson Marie Harf facing tough questions this week about the al Qaeda advance in Iraq and whether President Obama's failure to negotiate a deal to keep U.S. troops there is part of the problem. And it's time now for our Sunday group, Brit Hume, Fox News senior political analyst, Amy Walter from the Cook Political Report, syndicated columnist George Will and Charles Lane of "The Washington Post."

The bloodiest battle of the Iraq war was fought in the city of Fallujah in 2004 when close to 100 American soldiers were killed trying to expel al Qaeda. Well, this week, an al Qaeda affiliate has taken back Fallujah and much of Ramadi and is flying the black al Qaeda flag in both those cities. George, how serious is this al Qaeda resurgence and what role do you think to ask the question that was being asked of Marie Harf? What role do you think President Obama's exit from Iraq in 2011 without signing that status of forces agreement has played in all this?

GEORGE WILL, SYNDICATED COLUMNIST: Well, this is serious in Iraq. And it's very serious here also. Because wars that end well, and we move on. Wars that don't end well live on in recrimination. And this is going to bring the recrimination pot to a rolling boil in this country. Because as you say after eight years of fighting. Twice as long as the Second World War, of the 4,486 Americans who died, the third died in Anbar Province. Now, the question is …

WALLACE: Let’s explain. That's the part of western Iraq where the Sunnis were, where al Qaeda was and that's where Ramadi and Fallujah.

WILL: There are those who say that had the president successfully negotiated a residual force to remain in Iraq, this ongoing civil war with regional overlays would not be nearly as serious. I am skeptical of that and very skeptical that the American people would have put up with it.

WALLACE: There are other factors in all this and part of it is the fact that you've got this terrible civil war in Syria and al Qaeda fighters are streaming in just across the border from Anbar Province into Syria and are establishing this foothold really across the borders both in Syria and in Iraq and, in fact, the group that has taken over Fallujah and has declared a new emirate there is called the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. On the other hand, though, Chuck, you did have the status of forces agreement, which in theory had been negotiated between President Bush and the Iraqis. President Obama was never able to complete it. And we left without leaving any trainers there, without leaving any Special Forces there.

CHARLES LANE, THE WASHINGTON POST: You know, the post-American Middle East is upon us. And I think "The New York Times" today described it very well as a place, in which no broker has the power or the will to contain the region sectarian hatreds. You know, we can say that Obama's policy of withdrawal has failed. But I’m not sure Bush's policy of intervention had succeeded either because what it seemed to have called for was a permanent American presence as the only antidote to this sectarian hatreds. We may be learning like the Middle East just is intractable. This competition between the Saudis and Iranians, which is now playing out across the entire region is slipping out of the bonds that Western powers have been trying to put on ever since the French and the British (inaudible) after World War I. It will hurt us in various ways. It will spill over into terrorism and et cetera. But it seems like we've tried at the interventionist way. And we've tried at the withdrawing way. And neither one has permanently worked.

WALLACE: The argument seems to be from this side of the table, Brit, that it didn't matter what the U.S. did and what president …

BRIT HUME, FOX NEWS SENIOR POLITICAL ANALYST: It didn't matter what the U.S. did. And the tide of that war in Iraq was turned, in part, by what was called the awakening in Anbar province and al Qaeda suffered during the surge of American troops and heightened by the Anbar awakening among the Iraqis a terrible defeat. Now they're back. They're back in no small measure because we left. Now, George is absolutely right. The American people would not be happy with a continued American presence in Iraq. The American people are never happy with foreign interventions. It is the job of a president as leader to bring people along about such things. We have stationed troops in places all over the world for decades, and the net effect in most cases has been that they have helped to keep peace. It is a role, from which this president has shrunk and the consequences of that are now becoming clear and what's happening in Iraq and what is also unfolding in Syria are but two manifestations of it.

WALLACE: Amy, I’m going to bring you in in a second. But George, I want you to respond to brother Hume.

WILL: Well, the argument is that we had significant success in Iraq that would have been preserved if we had a residual force there. The question then is, what - how can you call a big success something that is so fragile that a few years after we leave it seems to be crumbled.

HUME: George, this happens in the aftermath of conflicts regularly. It's why we leave forces in places, it’s because success is fragile. There is nothing unusual about that. This was not the complete destruction of all the nefarious forces that exist in the Middle East which are numerous and to some extent connected. It wasn't a fragile situation which is why a continued force is needed.

WILL: But the American people tolerate the American forces on the 38th parallel in Korea …

HUME: Right.

WILL: … because Korea, itself, is not engulfed in the civil war. The war is over. The war isn't over in Iraq.

WALLACE: Let me bring in Amy. And talk about this politically, because I’ve got to think that people who remember Fallujah and remember the blood and treasure that we spilled there and across Iraq over eight years, it must be disheartened to see all of it washed away and al Qaeda and their black flags triumphant. On the other hand, I can't imagine that this must taste here at home, for the idea of, gosh the one thing that we could do is to send American troops back there.

AMY WALTER, THE COOK POLITICAL REPORT: Right. And that’s going to be the constant back and forth, right, which is we spent American lives and money and blood to secure this. Now we look back and say, was it worth it? Right? There is nothing more frustrating than that. And at the same time, there is a sense to George's point that if we put troops back, it's not going to make things measurably better. They're back in the line of danger. This is not simply standing on the 38th parallel.

WALLACE: Secretary Kerry preemptively, said today, we aren't sending any American troops back.

WALTER: That’s right. I mean look - the numbers now, this is really - it's not simply that Americans don't want to get involved here, that they are so disheartened by this. The last pull out of "Washington Post" ABC noted 66 percent of Americans think that the war in Afghanistan was not worth it. Was not even worth fighting in the first place. So, the idea of saying we're going to go back to these places in the Middle East, put troops on the ground who are in harm's way, who could be killed at any moment, knowing that if we pull them back at any moment, this could all collapse again.

WALLACE: And finally, and briefly, Chuck, there is another factor in all of this, which is the Iraqi government, if Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, who I think it’s fair to say, has been a failure both politically and militarily.

LANE: Well, he was - his mission was to balance all these various sectarian interests, the Sunnis, the Shias and the rest. And his perceived tilt in favor of his own Shia confession seems to have provoked enough of the Sunnis into rejoining al Qaeda to render that province unstable. We don't know, actually, how long this occupation of Fallujah will last. There does seem to be some of these tribal militias that had sided with the United States taking on the fight now. And Maliki is trying to recapture it. So, let's not at least rule out the possibility that Iraq could contain itself in the short term. We'll have to see.


 

Iran Orders Attacks on Saudi Interests Worldwide
The Iranian leaders, furious over the Saudi intervention in Bahrain and what they call crimes against the Shiites of that
country, have openly created centers to recruit volunteers for suicide bombings against Saudi Arabia’s interests worldwide:

Several grand ayatollahs in Iran have issued a fatwa for Muslims to come to the aid of their Shiite brothers in Bahrain, who
they claim are suffering horrific crimes from their government in collaboration with the Saudi armed forces. They further
emphasized that the people of Bahrain have every right to demand freedom and their fair share from the state. [...]
http://www.bahrainviews.com/?p=2026


Saudi Arabia Plans to Acquire Nuclear Weapons - Middle East - News - Israel National News
http://defence.pk/threads/saudi-arabia-plans-to-acquire-nuclear-weapons.145293/


Does ultimatum mean Iran will invade Saudi Arabia?
http://conservativebyte.com/2011/04/does-ultimatum-mean-iran-will-invade-saudi-arabia/
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=290189
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)