Judge Rules: Obama Social Security Card Fraud May Finally Get Answers
It took years for Watergate to unravel fully. The controversy over Barack Hussein Obama and his past, along with fraudulent documents continues
to make headlines. Yet, the items needed to actually verify who Obama
is continue to be kept from the public eye. Well, that all may be about
to change. Attorney Orly Taitz may have just found a chink in the
federal government’s armor in protecting
Barack Obama from scrutiny, following a judge’s ruling over her Freedom
of Information Act request from the Social Security Administration.
Taitz has claimed that
Obama uses the Social Security number of Harry Bounel and has submitted
several Freedom of Information Act requests for the information from the
Social Security Administration. Each time, she has been met with
stonewalling by the Social Security Administration.
However, Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander has ruled to
give Taitz “an opportunity to file a second amended complaint and add
allegations of SSA not doing a proper search and withholding records.”
From Taitz’s Press Release:
Judge Hollander in Maryland gives Attorney Orly Taitz 21 days to file a second amended complaint and add allegations in regards to an improper withholding by the Social Security Administration of records of Harry Bounel, whose Social security number is being illegally used by Barack Obama. When Taitz filed the complaint, SSA did not respond at all. After the law suit was filed, SSA responded by fraudulently claiming that the records were not found. Taitz responded that this is a fraudulent assertion, since the records were found before and denied to another petitioner due to privacy concerns, however Social Security has no right to claim privacy as according to their own 120 year rule they have a duty to release the records. The judge stated that the plaintiff Taitz might be correct, however at this time she cannot rule in her favor as her original complaint was filed before SSA responded, so the judge gave Taitz an opportunity to refile a second amended complaint and add new allegations, stating the SSA responded but improperly hidden the records . This is a great development. This all but assures that the judge will order the SSA to release the SS-5, Social Security application of resident of CT, Harrison (Harry) Bounel, whose CT SSN 042-68-4425 was stolen by Obama and used in Obama’s 2009 tax returns, which initially were posted on WhiteHouse.gov without proper redaction, without flattening of the file. Taitz will be very careful not to be Breitbarted or Fuddied in the next 21 days.Additionally, there is an increased tampering with the web site of Orly Taitz and with her ability to send mass -emails. It seems her private server is somehow affected and Taitz is unable to send mass e-mails on two different programs.
It’s interesting that Taitz points out that she will be “careful not
to be Breitbarted or Fuddied,” indicating that she believes that both
Andrew Breitbart and Andrew Breitbart and Loretta Fuddy were
targeted by Obama for assassination.” Breitbart died on the very day
that he said he would begin vetting Obama for the 2012 elections, which
raised suspicions. Fuddy, best remembered as being instrumental in
issuing the Hawaii long-form birth certificate, was the only person to die aboard a small plane that crashed off the coast of Hawaii last week. Already, there are questions surrounding the narrative of her death.
Taitz alleged that Mr.
Bounel was born in 1890, and therefore, under
the “’120 Year Rule’ implemented by the SSA in 2010,” pertaining to
“‘extremely aged individuals,’” Bounel’s “Social Security applications
have to be released under FOIA without proof of [his] death . . . .”
The reason for the judge’s amendment seems to be a procedural one.
Taitz filed suit with the court prior to receiving word back from her
Freedom of Information Act request, which she did receive on July 29,
2013 from Dawn S. Wiggins, a Fredom of Information Officer. Wiggins
replied to Taitz:
I have enclosed a copy of the SS-5s for Mr. Tsarnaev and Ms. Dunham. . . .We were unable to find any information for Mr. Bounel based on the information you provided to us. Mr. Bounel may not have applied for a Social Security number (SSN) or may have given different information on the application for a number.
It appears that once the
amendment is submitted, this may force the Social Security
Administration to explain exactly what is going on with Barack Obama’s
Social Security number.
We should know something about the case by the second week in January 2014.
Click here to read the judge’s ruling.
Tim Brown is the Editor of Freedom Outpost.
No comments:
Post a Comment