Kidnapped Italian journalists expose truth about Syrian “rebels”
by
Don Hank
Journalist
Pierre Piccinin created a
furor
lately, testifying in a videotaped interview that, while kidnapped, he had overheard
conversations indicating that it was not Assad but the rebels themselves who
had released nerve gas in Damascus killing over 1,000 people. Several Italian
publications expand on that story, and the last one translated below suggests
that while Piccinin was, strictly speaking, telling the truth, he omitted important
details. All in all, however, it is understandable that these two captives
might want to depict their captors in the worst possible light. We must
remember that the official story in Europe is that the Obama administration’s
conclusion that Assad is guilty is generally accepted without question.
Naturally, Quirino, who derives his livelihood from journalism, would be hesitant
to tweak the powers that be.
Nonetheless,
note well that Quirino does not imply that it was Assad who used the nerve gas. He simply says he and Piccinin
had no way of knowing one way or the other.
The
take-away from these two men’s stories is that the “Syrian revolution” is not
the secular one originally portrayed in the world press but is now firmly in
the hands of Islamists who are violently opposed to the West and to
Christianity, despite receiving financial support from the West.
These
reports show that, regardless of whoever released the deadly gas in Damascus,
these “rebels” are not people who deserve to receive arms or any kind of
support from the West. Nor do they deserve to have us fight their battles for
them. In fact, in light of these men’s stories, and considering that, in
international law, war is to be waged only when the aggressor attacks or
threatens your country or your ally (Italian journalists, for example), the
West would be on a surer footing if it declared war on the “rebels” in Syria.
Here
is more to the story from ImolaOggi (my translation from the Italian):
Domenico Quirico, an Italian journalist captured and imprisoned together with Pierre Piccinin, was quoted by his newspaper La Stampa.Piccinin: Islamist kidnappers very violent, anti-Western and anti-Christian9 Sept. – While kidnapped in Syria, Domenico Quirico underwent “two feigned executions” as revealed by Pierre Piccinin, the Belgian teacher freed on Sunday together with the Stampa correspondent after 5 months in prison.“We were subjected to very hard physical violence,” he stated to the radio station Bel Rtl, explaining that he and Quirico had succeeded twice in escaping but were recaptured and punished. According to Piccinin’s story, this resulted in weeks of hell at the hands of “very violent, very anti-Western and anti-Christian Islamist groups.”“Domenic underwent two feigned executions at pistol point and at one point we thought they would kill us because they told us we had become a problem for them and they would be rid of us,” said Piccinin. A dramatic situation from which the two of them, who had “managed to stay alive,” had tried twice to tried to escape.” “We took advantage of the prayer [probably referring to the Muslim prayers]. We had taken 2 kalashnikovs and had left the building. For 2 days, we traveled around the countryside before being recaptured and severely punished for the attempted escape.”
My translation:
According to the following story at the site Giornalettissimo, Quirico, who was captured and imprisoned, together with Piccinin, says they had no knowledge of the nerve gas attack at the time it occurred, indicating that Piccinin’s story, though based on fact, was somewhat tendentious at best:In good health, he told La Stampa he was not treated well by his captors. “I had tried to tell the story of the Syrian Revolution,” he said, “but you could say this revolution betrayed me. It’s no longer the secularist revolution of Aleppo. It’s turned into something else.”
My translation again:
In Mattinata, Italian-Belgian teacher Pierre Piccinin had stated
that he and Domenico Quirica knew that the chemical weapons attack in Syria was
not perpetrated by Assad’s men but by the rebels. Quirico, in a conference with
La Stampa, denies all of this and downsizes the scope of Piccinin’s statements.
DOMENICO QUIRICO AND
PIERRE PICCININ – on the premises of
his newspaper, Stampa foreign correspondent Domenico Quirico regarding the use
of gas in Syria, states “We were in the dark about what had happened. Through a
closed door, we had overheard a conversation…” La Stampa writes “There is no
element to say whether it is based on actual fact or whether it was chatter. “It
is folly to say that I know it was not Assad who used the gas.”
[omission of irrelevant portion]
THE STORY ABOUT THE SKYPE CONVERSATION – He [Quirico] and the historian Pierre
Piccinin, with whom he had been sequestered in a room blindfolded, knew nothing
about what was happening on a daily basis in Syria, including the gas attack in
Damascus. Only one day, taking advantage of a half-closed door, the two
hostages overheard a conversation in English via Skype between 3 people who
were saying that the gas attack in the two areas of Damascus was the work of
the rebels as a provocation to prompt the West to intervene militarily.
No comments:
Post a Comment