A Cry for HELP from Senate GOP
How
many of you would feel comfortable dropping off your kids in a school
that encouraged faculty cross-dressing? At least three Senate
Republicans would. Today, those leaders -- Sens. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.),
Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), and Lisa Murkowski (R-Ak.) -- threw their support
behind a bill that would force sexual confusion on almost every
classroom, day care, and summer camp in America. Insisting the
legislation is just a harmless little "anti-prejudice" bill, the Senate
Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee voted 15-7 to
make employees' bedroom habits a preeminent consideration in hiring,
firing, and promotion decisions.
The Employment
Non-Discrimination Act (or ENDA) has been debated in Congress for years,
but it's never had this kind of backing from liberals, who -- just two
years ago -- had so many reservations about the policy that it never
made it to the Senate floor. Once Democrats realized that schools and
other employers could be forced as part of the bill to hire
transgenders, they removed their support altogether. Now, under the
guise of ending "workplace discrimination," ENDA has new life, thanks in
large part to a handful of Republicans who seem eager to sacrifice
religious freedom and common sense on the altar of political
correctness.
If the bill passes, employers
everywhere would face a very familiar dilemma: violate your conscience
or pay the price. For those not concerned with religious freedom, there
are the practical implications to consider like dress codes and lost
profits. Just a few years ago,
a completely secular clothing company, American Eagle, fired a man who
dressed like a woman because his appearance was driving away business in
its store. But according to the state's anti-discrimination law, the
company's bottom line didn't matter nearly as much as this man's hurt
feelings.
As part of a private settlement,
American Eagle was forced to hire cross-dressers no matter how
uncomfortable it makes customers or employees! Some New Yorkers were
surprised. After all, shouldn't companies be free to enforce a dress
code? Not under this law. "The ENDA bill is going to mean a lot to me,"
said transgender and ex-Navy SEAL "Kristen" Beck, "Just for the pure
fact that I can show up for work in a dress..." If not, homosexual and
transgender activists will be able to use ENDA to sue employers into
submission on an agenda that could cost them millions of dollars in lost
business and costly litigation.
As FRC's Peter Sprigg explained
on CNN, employers will be staring down serial lawsuits from disgruntled
workers whose dismissal may have had nothing to do with their sexual
behavior! They could sue "for 'discrimination' over a characteristic or
sexual preference which is not even visible and of which the employer
may have been unaware. In the case of public employers, such laws at the
local and state level have led to large settlements being paid at
taxpayers' expense."
What's worse, this version of
the bill offers absolutely no protection for religious nonprofits or
business owners. Unlike past mark-ups, the HELP committee didn't offer a
single religious freedom exemption for non-church entities. That didn't
seem to bother the members of the committee, who spent just minutes
discussing the measure before it was passed. Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.),
who became the object of intense liberal lobbying, ultimately voted no
on the bill because of the vulnerability of religious liberty. "I am
concerned that the ENDA bill would go beyond our existing laws
protecting individuals' employment rights and would impose new burdens
and legal uncertainties regarding the exercise of religious liberties."
Of course, the irony of all this is that if anyone needs workplace
protections these days, it's conservative Christians. Under ENDA, their
nightmares will only intensify. To see where all of this is leading,
click over to our website, FightENDA.org,
to witness what life without religious freedom would look like and to
order our powerful documentary so you can spread the word. Most
importantly, contact your senators and strongly urge them to vote no on
an ENDA bill that would fundamentally change America -- forever.You Have the Wright to Remain Silent
Unfortunately for our troops, many are already adjusting to a workplace without religious freedom. Yesterday, our coalition of 14 organizations determined to change that. In a Capitol Hill press conference, FRC's Lt. Gen. Jerry Boykin and I joined congressmen and allies from across the conservative and military spectrum to draw a line in the sand for the religious rights of U.S. service members, whose faith is being smothered by an intolerant Pentagon.
"Today is the 237th
anniversary of General George Washington's general order establishing
the Chaplaincy," Rep. Jim Bridenstine (R-Okla.) told the crowd. "In that
general order, he stated, 'The General hopes and trusts, that every
officer and man, will endeavor so to live, and act as becomes a
Christian Soldier defending the dearest Rights and Liberties of his
country.' Unlike General George Washington, nobody here is suggesting
that every soldier be Christian or that every soldier live and act like
Christians. But we are suggesting that the President allow Christian
soldiers to have the right to live and act like Christians...or whatever
faith."
In response to a letter from Congressman Doug Lamborn (R-Colo.), Air Force Under Secretary Eric Fanning, the homosexual activist now managing the Air Force, brushed off Congress's concerns about the myriad examples
of the branch trampling troops' faith. To the question about Mikey
Weinstein's involvement in setting secular policy, Fanning shrugs off
the Military Religious Freedom Foundation's obvious influence. "Neither
MRFF," he writes,
"nor [its founder] Mr. Weinstein serves as or has served as an official
consultant of the Air Force regarding the Service's free exercise of
religion policy."
Whether or not Weinstein serves
in an "official" capacity is irrelevant. The reality is, the Air Force
produced an entire booklet of anti-faith regulations at Mikey's request. From the Washington Post: "After demands from Weinstein,
the Air Forced published, but has yet to distribute, a 27- page
document, which includes a cover sheet that states: "COMPLIANCE WITH
THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY. 'Leaders at all levels,' the document
says, 'must avoid the actual or apparent use of their position to
promote their personal religious beliefs to their subordinates or to
extend preferential treatment for any religion.' It even suggested that
noncompliance could result in court-martial."
Likewise, Jessica Wright, Acting
Under Secretary of Defense, refused to answer the specific questions of
70 members of Congress and instead regurgitated the same old talking
points about the DOD placing a high value on religious exercise. In four very dismissive paragraphs,
Wright waved away the elected leaders her agency is answerable to --
and in the process, showed the same contempt for congressional oversight
as her commander-in-chief often does.
Fortunately for our brave
service men and women, the Pentagon will find it a lot harder to bypass
Congress if Rep. John Fleming's (R-La.) military conscience rights
amendment passes as part of the Defense Authorization bill. Make sure
your representative is on board by calling the office and urging their support!
Legislating Mortality
Do
elections have consequences? You bet. It took 140 years for Republicans
to win back control of the North Carolina legislature in 2010 -- and
their hard work is finally paying off in the form of solid pro-life
legislation. Just before the Fourth of July, the Tarheel Senate gave its
approval to a proposal that would protect more women from a Kermit
Gosnell-type clinic, where safety is secondary to profit. Under the
bill, abortion clinics would have to meet the same standards as other
surgical centers -- which would protect women and could help shut down
some of the state's two dozen abortion mills.
Meanwhile, in Texas, the state
House once again gave its blessing to a set of sweeping pro-life
legislation -- including the ban on abortion after 20 weeks, when babies
can feel pain. After a rowdy crowd of liberals derailed Texas's first
crack at the bill, Governor Rick Perry (R-Texas) convened a special
session, vowing his state would finish the pro-life business it started.
The vote, 98-49, came after several hours of emotional testimony and
debate. By law, the state house has to pass the proposal for a second
time (a formality) before it heads to the Texas Senate.
We continue to applaud the brave
state leaders -- including Governor Perry -- who refuse to back down,
even in the face of intense pressure and harassment. Someday soon, our
movement looks forward to welcoming Texas into the proud coalition of
states that are helping to end the suffering of women and innocent
children.
No comments:
Post a Comment