SMACKDOWN: GEORGIA JUDGEUPDATE: This past week saw Georgia Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi refuse a demand from Barack Obama's attorneys to quash a subpoena for Obama's appearance at the launch of a series of administrative hearings on January 26, and insist instead on Obama's compliance. At the hearings, Georgia state residents are challenging Obama's name on the 2012 presidential ballot, as they may under state law.
DEMANDS OBAMA APPEAR IN COURT
DEMANDS OBAMA APPEAR IN COURT
Obama's attorneys presented last week their defense for these state-level challenges to his candidacy in 2012, which argues that states have nothing to do with the eligibility of presidential candidates. "Presidential electors and Congress, not the state of Georgia, hold the constitutional responsibility for determining the qualifications of presidential candidates," Obama's lawyer argued in their motion to quash the subpoena for him to appear at the hearings in Atlanta Jan. 26.
"The election of President Obama by the presidential electors, confirmed by Congress, makes the documents and testimony sought by plaintiff irrelevant," the lawyer said.
Judge Michael M. Malihi disagreed, and ruled to uphold the subpoena.
which may be found here.
"Defendant's motion suggests that no president should be compelled to attend a court hearing. This may be correct. But defendant has failed to enlighten the court with any legal authority," the judge continued. "Specifically, defendant has failed to cite to any legal authority evidencing why his attendance is 'unreasonable or oppressive, or that the testimony … [is] irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative and unnecessary to a party's preparation or presentation at the hearing, or that basic fairness dictates that the subpoena should not be enforced.'"
In fact, Obama's attorneys' argument is specious. It is states, usually through the office of Secretary of State, that officiate elections, not the federal government. The national election is simply a compilation of the results of the individual elections within states.
The schedule for the hearings was set by Malihi of the Georgia state Office of State Administrative Hearings. In Georgia, a state law requires "every candidate for federal" office who is certified by the state executive committees of a political party or who files a notice of candidacy "shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought."
Judge Malihi determined Georgia state law also grants the Secretary of State and any "elector who is eligible to vote for a candidate" in the state the authority to raise a challenge to a candidate's qualifications. This is a breakthrough for "birthers," as the issue of "standing" to bring legal challenges to Obama's eligibility for office on Constitutional grounds has so far met insurmountable hurdles in prior cases elsewhere and in the federal courts.
Attorney Taitz believes this is only the second time in U.S. history, with 40 years between scandals, that a sitting president has been ordered to comply with a subpoena, and produce documents, which might eventually bring criminal charges to the president and a number of high-ranking individuals – the last such episode being Watergate.
THE HEAT IS ON!
OBAMA'S ELIGIBILITY CHALLENGEDUPDATE: Official Ballot challenges have been filed against Barack Obama and the Democratic Parties of two new states – Massachusetts and Obama's very own Illinois.
IN TWO NEW STATES
IN TWO NEW STATES
This week, Retired ASAR LTC William F. Reade filed an official ballot challenge with election officials, contending that Barack Obama is ineligible to appear on the Massachusetts ballot. Reade's challenge is well researched and filled with numerous legal citations to back his case.But perhaps most interesting are the similarities between LTC Reade's and Barack Obama's citizenship status. Like Obama, Reade was born in the United States. But, also like Obama whose father was a Kenyan citizen and therefore a British subject, Reade's father was also a British subject. As such, Reade correctly points out that he himself is not a "natural born citizen" as defined by the Supreme Court and therefore, like Barack Obama, Reade is also ineligible for the office of President.
Finally, inch by inch, the movement to expose the Imposter in Chief is gaining ground.
BUT WE NEED YOUR HELP DESPERATELY.
Ballot challenges in four states will not stop Barack Obama. We must compel the rest of the states to do their duty!
JUDGE SUBPOENAS OBAMAAttorney Orly Taitz' website is reporting that a Georgia Judge has issued a subpoena demanding Barack Obama appear in court January 26 AND produce his original long form birth certificate, passport records, collegeregistration records and more.
Dr. Orly Taitz, attorney for one of the plaintiffs in the Georgia eligibility cases working their way rapidly through the courts, posted a copy of what is reportedly a subpoena, issued by Judge Michael Malihi of Georgia.The subpoena demands that Barack Obama himself appear in court on January 26, and bring with him a laundry list of official documents that will prove or disprove his eligibility for office.
The list is frankly a "birther's" dream. Unlike previous cases, where only certain documents were requested or discussed, this subpoena issued by Judge Malihi includes every document that serious eligibility experts have been discussing from the beginning. The list requires Obama to produce each of the following:
- Any and all certified birth records including a long form birth certificate.
- Certified school/university registration records. Certified immigration/naturalization records.
- Certified passport records
- Redacted certified Social Security card applications for each of the aliases and other legal names used by Barack Obama, including but not limited to his legal surname when adopted by step-father Lolo Soetoro
NO MAN IS ABOVE THE LAW; GEORGIA JUDGE RULESGeorgia Judge Michael Malihi has ordered Obama's attorneys to appear in court January 26 holding that, according to state law, every federal and state candidate must prove eligibility for office – including Barack Obama.
OBAMA MUST PROVE ELIGIBILITY!
OBAMA MUST PROVE ELIGIBILITY!
Barack Hussein Obama II, has some of the highest-rent attorneys in the country working tirelessly to keep the question of his eligibility for office out of court. And no wonder, because whether he was born in Hawaii or not, it can be compellingly argued under law that according to binding precedents laid out by the Supreme Court, Barack Hussein Obama II does not qualify as a natural born Citizen.The U.S. Constitution very clearly requires, in a unique usage and application of the term, that the president must be a "natural born Citizen" to be eligible for the nation's highest office. "Natural born Citizen" is demonstrably held by the Founders in Article II, Section 1 as distinct and different than "Citizen" and even "native born Citizen" – that is, born under jus soli, on native soil.
Documentary evidence shows that in the Founding era, the common law view was that a natural born Citizen was that person born within United States territory to parents who were themselves United States Citizens.
This finding was, and continues to be, fully consistent with U.S. history in Supreme Court case decisions, and law enacted and enforced by the United States Congress.
This time-honored historical record stands against the strenuous lying, dissembling and countless other Alinsky-esque strategies deployed to discredit the legitimacy and derail the legal efforts of all those Citizens who are raising objections to Obama's eligibility for office.By Barak Obama's own admission, his father was a native of Kenya and was NEVER a U.S. Citizen. Therefore, Barack Hussein Obama II would, under long-standing custom, common law, and Supreme Court precedent, automatically be INELIGIBLE to hold the office of President of the United States.
As we reported earlier, a number of Georgia voters filed lawsuits questioning Barack Hussein Obama's eligibility to appear on the Georgia Presidential ballot. Obama's lawyers attempted to get the case thrown out, but Georgia Judge Malihi responded with a resounding NO.
In an order written January 3, 2012, Malihi ruled that Georgia state law is very clear – any candidate for federal or state office must meet the qualifications of that office and that Georgia electors have the right to challenge those qualifications in court. As a result, Malihi flatly denied Obama's motion to dismiss and scheduled a hearing for January 26.
But we CANNOT rest now and hope the Georgia case is permitted to hear REAL evidence, and settles all large questions in this murky mess of Obama's eligibility for office. Even if Obama is ultimately kept off Georgia's presidential ballot, Obama will only lose 16 electoral votes. While this is an important precedent, and not an insignificant number, we must fight to ensure that many other states follow Georgia's lead.
WASHINGTON DC HAS SHOWN ITS COWARDICE! OUR ONLY HOPE OF SAVING AMERICA IS TO KEEP THE DUPLICITOUS AND FRAUDULENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II OFF OUR STATES' ELECTION BALLOTS!
GEORGIA SECRETARY OF STATEGeorgia becomes the first state to pursue Obama ineligibility complaints and the end result may keep Barack Obama OFF the Georgia 2012 ballot!
DEMANDS PROOF POSITIVE!
DEMANDS PROOF POSITIVE!
Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp's office is pursuing FIVE separate ineligibility complaints filed by Georgia residents. Each complaint argues that Barack Hussein Obama II is ineligible to appear on the 2012 Georgia Presidential ballot. Secretary Kemp has assigned 5 different hearings under five different judges, so that the complaints can move forward.
FAILURE TO APPEAR ON THE GEORGIA BALLOT WOULD COST OBAMA DEVASTATING MEDIA, AND 15 ELECTORAL VOTES!
As our Founding Fathers intended, it is the States which protect us from all out tyranny. The federal election in 2012 and the constitutional eligibility of the candidates is no different. In the end, OUR STATES are responsible for ensuring the eligibility of candidates and OUR STATES will protect us from the tyranny of a Presidential usurper.
America cannot survive further trampling of our right to constitutionally eligible leadership. WE MUST ACT NOW!
The White House's badly forged "birth certificate" has not ended the debate on Barack Obama's eligibility. Rather, it has opened the door for further allegations of fraud and ineligibility. Georgia resident Kevin R. Powell wrote in his complaint, "Barack Hussein Obama II has publicly admitted his father Barack Obama Sr. was a Kenyan native and a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. Barack Obama Sr. never became a U.S. citizen. Therefore, Barack Hussein Obama II is not now and never can be a natural born citizen of the United States…"
Citizen Powell is correct that the legal question of natural born citizenship is unresolved in American jurisprudence, and in the nefarious case of Barack Hussein Obama sits as a gaping wound to the Constitution's integrity, and to our ordered liberty. America is left in an abject posture of unprecedented vulnerability to our national security, sovereignty and prosperity UNLESS AND UNTIL THIS CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS IS RESOLVED!
We MUST continue the outcry to determine the truth, and restore the Constitution.
If you prefer to send a check, please mail to:
Americans United for Freedom
National Processing Center
PO Box 131728
Houston, TX 77219-1728