LACK OF CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT,
FEC FAILURES LET FOREIGNERS
RUN FOR US PRESIDENT
FEC FAILURES LET FOREIGNERS
RUN FOR US PRESIDENT
Guyana born Abdul Hassan receives FEC permission to run for
United States President – setting an UNCONSTITUTIONAL precedent
which would allow ANY foreign born person to run for U.S. President
United States President – setting an UNCONSTITUTIONAL precedent
which would allow ANY foreign born person to run for U.S. President
The federal government's cowardice in confronting Barack Obama's all-but-certain ineligibility to constitutionally serve as President of the United States has opened the door wide for other ineligible candidates to run for the office.
The Federal Election Committee has granted Abdul Hassan, born in Guyana, South America, approval to run for President of the United States, even though the FEC acknowledges his clear foreign born status. In its response to Hassan, the FEC – the Federal government agency charged with enforcement of Federal election law – stated that Hassan's foreign born status will simply prevent him from qualifying or receiving Federal matching campaign dollars, but nowhere indicates that Hassan's non-natural born, non-native status makes him ineligible for the office he seeks under the U.S. Constitution and precludes him from lawfully seeking the Presidency.The U.S. Constitution provides: "No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President." Art II, Sec. 1.
Hassan's own campaign website also acknowledges his legal ineligibility for office, but goes on to insist that preventing him from running for President is akin to slavery.
That's right, slavery. In the Obama era, the race card has been played to the point of absurdity, diminishing the challenge of confronting and extirpating real racism. But Hassan's attempt to co-opt America's deep commitment to human equality, debase that into a vulgar racialist ploy, and torture that into our abandoning the Constitution's guarantee of a natural-born American citizen to serve us as our President would be laughable if it were not so tragic.America's Natural Born Citizen clause was established to ensure that the President of the United States would have allegiance ONLY to his fellow citizens of the greatest nation on earth – the USA – and to be free of entangling attachment to any foreign land.
So first we must contend with Barack Hussein Obama, whose actions these past 3 years clearly reveal his allegiance never has been, and never will be, to America, her people, or her Constitution. Any questions regarding Obama's eligibility and even his policies are consistently met with false charges of racism. Now we have Abdul Hassan, shown in a recent picture, (above), proudly sporting a Guyana national flag lapel pin, who is clearly not eligible to run or to serve as U.S. President, and whose allegiance clearly is not with a constitutional America, yet he, too, charges racism in any who oppose him.
The federal courts have refused time and again to hear evidence on the merits regarding Obama's eligibility. The Supreme Court thus far has refused to act on the question of Obama's eligibility, and the Congress has been completely craven in the face of this constitutional crisis. Now the circle of constitutional violations widen. Will no one entrusted with Federal office and power of authority uphold our Constitution?
Once again it is time for the States to act where Congress has abdicated its responsibility. The FEC's refusal to properly certify Barack Obama indicates capitulation if not out-right collusion with the Obama eligibility cover-up. Now, by allowing yet another candidate to run for U.S. President who cannot demonstrate constitutional eligibility – and in this case is a proudly-proclaimed foreigner – the FEC is further enshrining de facto legal precedent which throws the United States Constitution out the window along with any and all constitutionally mandated presidential eligibility requirements. This in turn would allow anyone, even El Jefe Fidel Castro, or maybe Hugo Chavez, the Venezuelan dictator, to run for United States President. Why not?
Abdul Hassan's own website baldly states he is constitutionally ineligible for office – but in Obama's America, hey – who cares?
OUR ONLY HOPE NOW LIES WITH THE STATES.
We must now actively petition our State Attorneys General and Legislatures and INSIST that NO Presidential candidate, not Barack Obama, not Abdul Hassan nor any other person who is not a Natural Born Citizen be allowed on any State's Presidential Ballot.
The stakes are huge and time is very short. WE MUST NOT ALLOW THE POWERS INTENT ON DESTROYING AMERICA TO SUBVERT OUR CONSTITUTION!
WE MUST INSIST OUR STATES ACT TODAY!
If you prefer to send a check, please mail to:
Americans United for Freedom
National Processing Center
PO Box 131728
Houston, TX 77219-1728
Re: "Guyana born Abdul Hassan receives FEC permission to run for United States President – setting an UNCONSTITUTIONAL precedent which would allow ANY foreign born person to run for U.S. President..."
ReplyDeleteShocking. Re-read the Constitution Article II. It says that only a Natural Born US citizen can BE president. It does not say that a foreigner, a corporation, a cartoon character--or in fact anyone cannot RUN for president.
There is a difference between running for president and actually becoming president. The FEC said that it would allow the guy to run, but he was not eligible for any government support, and in the highly unlikely case that he won--which is absurd--it is up to the Electoral College and to the US Congress (which must confirm every election) not to seat him as president.
You know, if some nut wants to spend his own money running for a job he cannot win, and would not be eligible to fill in the laughably low possibility that he did--why should we keep the nut from wasting his money and making a fool of himself???
“The constitutional history, the nearly unanimous consensus of legal and constitutional scholars, and the consistent, relevant case law thus indicate that every child born in and subject to the jurisdiction of the United States (that is, not children of diplomatic personnel representing a foreign nation or military troops in hostile occupation), is a native born U.S. citizen and thus a “natural born Citizen” eligible to be President under the qualifications clause of the Constitution, regardless of the nationality or citizenship of one’s parents. The legal issues regarding “natural born” citizenship and birth within the United States, without regard to lineage or ancestral bloodline, have been well settled in this country for more than a century, and such concepts date back to, and even pre-date, the founding of the nation.” .”-- Qualifications for President and the “Natural Born” Citizenship Eligibility Requirement, Jack Maskell, Congressional Research Service, November 2011.
ReplyDeleteAnon, You forget one major fact....BOTH PARENTS must be US citizens to quality! Wake up to reality and don't try to hide behind nonsense! Pastor Lee
ReplyDeleteRe: "Anon, You forget one major fact....BOTH PARENTS must be US citizens to quality!"
ReplyDeleteI think you mean qualify. Well, who told you that you need two citizen parents???
Do you think that person knows better than the US Congress, which confirmed Obama's election UNANIMOUSLY. Not one single member of Congress voted not to confirm or said that he would have voted against because of the crazy "two parent" theory. The same goes for the US Electoral College. Birthers and two-fers tried to get the electors to switch their votes to vote against Obama, but not one single one did because the vote in the Electoral College was exactly the same as in the general election. Surely if two parents really were required one elector and one member of Congress would have said something or done something.
And the same for the Chief Justice of the United States who swore in Obama. Surely if two citizen parents really were required, he would have said something or not done the swearing.
And then there are these authorities, all of who say that birth in the USA is all that is required, and in fact that Natural Born Citizen MEANS born in the USA. It comes from the common law, where Natural Born had referred to citizenship due to the place of birth for hundreds of years.
“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are "natural born citizens" eligible to serve as President ..."---- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]
Anon, In 2008 Obama VOTED FOR the Bill that explicitly stated BOTH PARENTS MUST BE CITIZENS. This has been debated and PROVEN! Why Congress has failed to act is beyond me but facts are facts! The real question is ARE YOU one that supports the US Constitution or one that believes in anarchy? Even Sheriff Joe Arpaio asked the question, "What if I prove Obama was born in Kenya, who will do anything?"
ReplyDeleteThe Courts have ruled that NO ONE has standing to question Obama's eligibility." Even one Judge ruled that although Obama is using a false SS number, that is confidential!" We are beibng taken over from within and folks like you are abetting our downfall! GET A GRIP and SEEK TRUTH! Pastor Lee
Re: “Anon, In 2008 Obama VOTED FOR the Bill that explicitly stated BOTH PARENTS MUST BE CITIZENS. “
ReplyDeleteNo. Take a look at the bill again. It did not say that two citizen parents are required. It said that two citizen parents make you eligible. The difference is because of the world OR. Have you used it before? It is a useful word.
In any case, here is how it works with regard to McCain and Obama:
The definition is this (read carefully for the OR):
“Natural born citizen. Persons who are born within the jurisdiction of a national government, i.e. in its territorial limits, or those born of citizens temporarily residing abroad.” — Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition
See the OR?
So the legislation that the Senate passed (and by the way it has no legal authority, not being even a law) said that McCain was eligible. But it DID NOT say that Obama was not eligible.
The resolution said that McCain was eligible because he fulfilled a criterion, birth to citizen parents (and it mentioned birth on a US naval base, but that is obviously not required for all of us). The resolution does not say that Obama did not fulfill a criterion. The criterion that McCain fulfilled was the second part of the definition, birth abroad to citizen parents. The criterion that Obama fulfilled was the first part of the definition, birth in the jurisdiction.
And, by the way, the reason that there was no legislation for Obama the way that there was legislation for McCain was, duh, that the members of the Senate knew that the consensus of legal scholars is OVERWHELMING that every native born US citizen (not every native born US person, but every native born US citizen) is a NATURAL BORN US CITIZEN.
Re the Social Security number. If you consider yourself a conservative you will have to remember (when I remind you) that conservatives generally hold that government agencies and bureaus are lazy and sloppy and make a lot of mistakes. Well, it turns out that they are RIGHT in the case of the Social Security Administration.
But the birthers who insist that the wrong Social Security number for Obama must be a crime seem to have forgotten this attitude. Only if the Social Security Administration is really accurate and rarely makes mistakes would a wrong Social Security number in a file, or a SS number from another state, or even multiple SS numbers indicate fraud. If there are lots of mistakes, then the number or numbers is likely to be caused by the mistakes.
And, as I said, there are MILLIONS of mistakes caused by the millions of errors made by Social Security clerks over the years
http://www.cnbc.com/id/38678753/How_Many_Social_Security_Numbers_Do_You_Have
http://www.securityworldnews.com/2010/08/12/20-million-americans-have-multiple-social-security-numbers-associated-with-their-name/
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501465_162-20013733-501465.html
The Connecticut SS number was caused by a data entry error. SS numbers were generated by the zip code of the applicant’s address. Obama’s address in Hawaii was in zip code 96814, and the zip code for Danbury, CT. is 06814.
Anon, Continue to defend Obama and live with the ruination of this great nation. NUFF Said....Pastor Lee
ReplyDelete