BJ3 Comment: “Hillary’s
Deteriorating Condition”...
As
many of you noticed, we did not run many columns about Hillary’s “deteriorating”
condition. Some readers called and said, “You’re suspicious, aren’t you? Do you
think we are being played?”
Well, we were “suspicious” on
numerous fronts because, as we said, the person being dumped in the van seemed
much thinner than Hillary. Plus, that person’s hair was straight, light
blond...And, NEVER ONCE did the cameraman get even a partial shot of her
face...a no-no in their circles, especially when they did get facial shots every
other time.
The last 3 or so weeks, we feel was all
about a media frenzy with Hillary grabbing the attention of severely lowered
expectations. Even the 3 days before the debate, same story...further lowered
expectations.
That was the targeted perception.
“Everyone” was keying on Hillary...that she would look awful, was refused
“coughing breaks” and a chair due to her “feebleness”. People would project:
“When she came out on stage, how awful would she look? Would she fall?” and on
and on. Even being suspicious, we still said “poor woman”.
In football lingo, it’s basically called
“the upset special”, the set-up...And all that , for sure, was crystalized when
Lester Holt, near the end of the debate, asked one question (pre-planned), “Mr.
Trump, you had said that Mrs. Clinton does not look presidential. What did you
mean by that?” An all time gotcha if we ever heard one.
To his credit Trump had never attacked
her “deteriorating” condition and was able to say that he was referring to her
stamina. Oh, but, my goodness, how quickly she recovered
from her “pneumonia”. Either that or one of those two Hillarys was not
Hillary. For those who say Hillary won the debate, just ask them, “Oh, So you
won’t be voting Trump?”