PROJECT VERITAS

 

Dear Conservatives, Something truly remarkable happened today. After Project Veritas released a video last night that exposed Dr. Fauci’s involvement in sponsoring Gain-of-Function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Fauci HIMSELF addressed the story when questioned by Senator Roger Marshall. You can watch the video by clicking HERE. Senator Roger Marshall: Dr. Fauci, you previously told this committee under oath that NIH and NIAID have never funded Gain-of-Function research with the EcoHealth Alliance. However, a report from the Department of Defense Inspector General released yesterday states that EcoHealth Alliance approached DARPA in 2018 seeking funding to conduct Gain-of-Function research on bat-borne coronaviruses. This proposal named Project Diffuse was rejected by DARPA because the project didn't address the current research's potential to violate the Gain-of-Function moratorium. The proposal does not mention or assess potential risk of Gain-of-Function research, a direct quote from the DARPA rejection letter. The same proposal rejected by DARPA for Gain-of-Function potential was not rejected by NIAID under your leadership. You funded Project Diffuse and its research that took place at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Why did you tell the committee that your agency has never funded Gain-of-Function research? Why did your agency award this grant? Despite it being rejected by DARPA, due to its concerns about violating the moratorium that was in place. And finally, will you commit today to releasing all records fully unredacted by the end of this week? So the American people can know the truth about NIH’s role and the origins of COVID 19? Dr. Anthony Fauci: So again, Senator, it really pains me to have to point out to the American public how absolutely incorrect you are. What came out last night on Project Veritas was a grant that was submitted to DARPA. Then it distorted and said, we funded the grant. We have never seen that grant and we have never funded that grant. So once again, you are completely and unequivocally incorrect -- the DARPA proposal was a grant that we never saw and we did not fund. So, you are incorrect. Senator Marshall: Our social media will have all the supporting documents and we'll be supporting these -- Dr. Fauci: You are backing down on this? Why don't we go and look at the very top statement that we're talking about, a grant that was submitted to DARPA -- Senator Marshall: Are you saying this was not -- are you saying that this was not viral Gain-of-Function research? … Dr. Fauci: To respond, Senator, we know the misinformation – the guiderails for what can be done or not were not established by me. They were established by a three-year process led by the office of Science and Technology policy of the White House and decided -- Senator Marshall: By you in a secret meeting at the White House in December of 2019. Dr. Fauci: Senator, that is incorrect. And this refers exactly to what I was talking about in response to Senator Rand Paul, you are incorrect completely. And every time I try to explain -- Senator Marshall: You keep saying, “you're incorrect,” but the facts are on my side. Senator Marshall’s arguments are corroborated in large part by the documents Project Veritas released last night. You can see for yourself: From: Commandant of the Marine Corps Fellow, DARPA To: Inspector General Subj: SARS-CoV-2 Origins Investigation with US Government Program Undisclosed Document Analysis 1. SARS-CoV-2 is an American-created recombinant bat vaccine, or its precursor virus. It was created by an EcoHealth Alliance program at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), as suggested by the reporting surrounding the lab leak hypothesis. The details of this program have been concealed since the pandemic began. These details can be found in the EcoHealth Alliance proposal response to the DARPA PREEMPT program Broad Agency Announcement (BAA), dated March 2018 – a document not yet publicly disclosed. DARPA rejected the proposal because the work was too close to violating the gain-of-function (GoF) moratorium, despite what Peter Daszak says in the proposal (that the work would not). As is known, Dr. Fauci with NIAID did not reject the proposal. The work took place at the WIV and at several sites in the US, identified in detail in the proposal. The EcoHealth Alliance response to the PREEMPT BAA is placed along with other proposal documents in the PREEMPT folder on the DARPA Biological Technologies Office JWICS (top secret) share drive, address: Network/filer/BTO/CI Folder/PREEMPT 2. SARS-CoV-2, hereafter referred to as SARSr-CoV-WIV, is a synthetic spike protein chimera engineered to attach to human ACE2 receptors and inserted into a recombinant bat SARSr-CoV backbone. It is likely a live vaccine not yet engineered to a more attenuated state that the program sought to create with its final version. It leaked and spread rapidly because it was aerosolized so it could efficiently infect bats in caves, but it was not ready to infect bats yet, which is why it does not appear to infect bats. The reason the disease is so confusing is because it is less a virus than it is engineered spike proteins hitch-hiking a ride on a SARSr-CoV quasispecies swarm. The closer it is to the final live attenuated vaccine form, the more likely that it has been deattenuating since initial escape in August 2019. Ivermectin (identified as curative in April 2020) works throughout all phases of illness because it both inhibits viral replication and modulates the immune response. Of note, chloroquine phosphate (Hydroxychloroquine, identified April 2020 as curative) is identified in the proposal as a SARSr-CoV inhibitor, as is interferon (identified May 2020 as curative). The gene-encoded, or “mRNA,” vaccines work poorly because they are synthetic replications of the already synthetic SARSr-CoV-WIV spike proteins and possess no other epitopes. The mRNA instructs the cells to produce synthetic copies of the SARSr-CoV-WIV synthetic spike protein directly into the bloodstream, wherein they spread and produce the same ACE2 immune storm that the recombinant vaccine does. Many doctors in the country have identified that the symptoms of vaccine reactions mirror the symptoms of the disease, which corroborates with the similar synthetic nature and function of the respective spike proteins. The vaccine recipient has no defense against the bloodstream entry, but their nose protects them from the recombinant spike protein quasispecies during “natural infection” (better termed as aerosolized inoculation). 4. I will inevitably be asked how I figured this out and how I discovered the documents. The pandemic response became the predominant focus of my fellowship efforts. DARPA worked a number of pandemic innovations and much of its team was familiar with biodefense. I had the opportunity to “sit in the back row” per se and observe and listen-in on the government’s efforts. My obligation-light fellowship also allowed me to observe and read the field. This observation grew in scope to the point that it became a series of reports, like a military scout would prepare when tasked to investigate a problem. A technological challenge as difficult as inoculating bats in China would be tried at DARPA first. The massive, “Manhattan Project”-level of information suppression executed by the government and the Trusted News Initiative indicates that it would be covered-up if something bad happened. The lab-leak hypothesis and squabbling between Senator Paul and Dr. Fauci indicated that the cover up was more localized. Further, an actual cover-up would be more disciplined with its paperwork. So I presumed that unclassified files would be concealed on a higher network and found them where I expected them to be. I understood what they were and their content, pushed the files off-site, and compiled this report. In summary, these military documents state that EcoHealth Alliance approached DARPA in March 2018 seeking funding to conduct Gain-of-Function research of bat borne coronaviruses. The proposal, named Project Defuse, was rejected by DARPA over safety concerns and the notion that it violates the Gain-of-Function research moratorium. FAUCI WENT ALONG WITH IT ANYWAY, COMPLETELY DISREGARDING THE DANGERS OF INCREASING A VIRUS’ POTENCY. Fauci still has a lot of explaining to do. The American people want answers, and they want them now. Be Brave, James