Tuesday, December 7, 2021

Archbishop will NOT be silenced - The DOD has violated the informed consent rights of thousands of military members

 Submitted by: BobJen

: Archbishop will NOT be silenced - The DOD has violated the informed consent rights of thousands of military members
 

Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano released another video this weekend where he again stands up against the New World Order and the insane and immoral actions taking place around the world.

Here is Archbishop Vigano’s message:

Dear Friends,

Allow me to address you as you denounce the most controversial and disturbing aspects of the experimental gene serum with great and commendable commitment. Your battle for scientific truth, coupled with increasingly coordinated action by countless scientists and doctors around the world, is opening the eyes of many people who have allowed themselves to be misled by the false promises of health authorities, by the discordant opinions of experts and by media propaganda.

I will not go into the merits of the health issue in itself, as you are much better informed than I am. Allow me to bring to your attention some reflections, observing the entirety of what is happening without focusing on specific details.

It now seems clear to me that the main purpose of this grotesque health charade is the imposition of a control system for individuals, implemented through the so-called green pass. We know that the health passport had been designed years ago, but that in order to make it mandatory it was necessary to create a pandemic emergency and force the population – through blackmail or the threat of sanctions – to allow themselves to be injected with an experimental drug for which the producer, the State, and whoever administers it do not assume any responsibility, pouring it instead onto the patient. Just yesterday, the FDA decided to make public the reasons for approving the Pfizer vaccine only in 2076: this gives ample proof of the criminal mind behind the screen of public health.

We see therefore that we have an elite of criminals, gathered together in the World Economic Forum to conceive the Great Reset and in the United Nations to implement the Agenda2030, who have decided to decimate the population of the planet through some “scenarios” described in detail. They destroy national economies, cause poverty and unemployment, create discrimination and violations of fundamental rights with the sole purpose of controlling survivors, tracing their movements, modifying their lives, deciding their thinking, and establishing their health regime. This work includes the collaboration of rulers, public officials, doctors, magistrates, law enforcement agencies, the media and – as if that weren’t enough – even religious leaders. Calling it a “conspiracy theory” is an understatement: it is a coup d’état pursued with a clear mind and determination, a crime against humanity. Its purpose is precisely to control us: to make us slaves and customers of a system that is about to implode, in which those who have made the most profits in the past creating the crisis, are now preparing to carry out the “fourth industrial revolution” – as Klaus Schwab calls it – to continue accumulating power and money.

The imposition of the health passport and the so-called vaccination are part of this project. It matters little that the Constitutions of the States and the most elementary principles of law are violated with impunity in the name of an emergency that was artfully provoked; it matters little that eminent personalities of the world of medicine denounce the serious side effects of the gene serum and the criminal management of the pandemic; it matters little that the macroscopic conflicts of interest existing between pharmaceutical companies, medical staff, health officials and mainstream information are well known: their narrative does not contemplate refutations, does not accept criticism, does not tolerate the evidence of the facts.

But if an elite has managed to corrupt the rulers and carry out a real coup against the citizens, we cannot respond locally: if the aggression is global, the action of opposition and resistance must likewise be global. I therefore also renew my invitation to you, who as scientists understand very clearly the danger of the experimental drug, asking you to join an Anti-globalist Alliance, in order to be able to counter this undeclared – but no less ruthless and violent – world war in a unitary and coordinated way.

Our enemy is not the virus, but the insanity of those who betray their duties to the detriment of the community, of those who believe they can impose the Chinese totalitarian model and social credit in our nations, in the name of a communist collectivism that takes away identity and freedom to each of us.

This global betrayal must be stopped: let’s respond to corruption with honesty, to lies with truth, to self-interest with generous dedication to public affairs, to the desire for power and money with selfless service and a sense of duty.

We reject not only the pandemic delirium, but the entire castle of horrors of the globalist ideology: the culture of death of abortion and euthanasia, gender theory, the indoctrination of our children, the “cancel culture,” uncontrolled immigration, the demolition of the natural family, the reduction of the protection and wages of workers, the persecution of small businesses. Let’s go back to being proud defenders of traditional values: God, Nation and Family. Let’s return to praying to the Lord, recognizing him as King not only of individuals, but of all nations and societies. Only understanding the war in progress, identifying the opponents and their criminal aims will allow us to resist and win.

If we limit ourselves to looking only at the efficacy of the gene serum, or the reliability of the test swabs, or the response that a single country has given to the spread of the infection, we will never get out.

Remember: if the attack is global, the counteroffensive must also be global. And may God assist and protect us.

+ Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop
Former Nuncio to the United States of America


VIDEO







‘It is NOT a vaccine’ -Heart attacks, clots, limbs removed from the clots…stillborn babies… Brave Nurse speaks…

https://twitter.com/i/status/1467727887033778178





A Frenchman did the science Fauci didn't: Omicron is no delta

Exclusive: Joel S. Hirschhorn spotlights the low transmissibility of new COVID variant

Joel S. HirschhornBy Joel S. Hirschhorn
Published December 3, 2021 at 7:36pm




So much talk about omicron; so much fear mongering; so much talk about science. Most is nonsense. The best research has received little attention. It comes from esteemed senior French scientist Dr. Jacques Fantini, professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology at the University of Aix-Marseille.

You are about to learn what senior people in the public health establishment need to use, especially Anthony Fauci, who claims he speaks for and represents "science." If he knows the French research, he is not sharing it with the public, nor are the mainstream media.

The key scientific achievement by Fantini is the calculation of one key parameter he calls the index of transmissibility (T) of a COVID variant. The key work was published in June 2021 with the title "Structural dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 variants: A health monitoring strategy for anticipating COVID-19 outbreaks." This research is very sophisticated, detailed and challenging. Genomic sequence data are used in the analyses of variants.

The molecular details of variants are analyzed to calculate T values for COVID variants. Originally, T values for known variants or strains of the COVID virus were determined. The T value for the delta variant done in early 2021 accurately predicted the surge of delta throughout the world, making it the dominant variant in many countries, including the U.S.

The T value accurately describes to what extent a variant is or is not transmissible. The higher the value of T, the greater is the ease at which a variant is spread from one person to another. The higher the value, the more contagious is the variant. Fantini explained how T values could serve a critical need: "T-index can be used as a health monitoring strategy to anticipate future COVID-19 outbreaks." At this moment, the question is: "Is the T value for omicron of concern?"

Now look at the following table that gives T values for the original five variants published by Fantini, plus what he has just released for the new omicron variant.

Delta stands out for having an extremely high T value compared to previous variants. No surprise that it quickly became the dominant variant globally.

And equally impressive is the relatively low T value for omicron, just 37% of the Delta value. Omicron should not be of high concern. It is in line with most pre-delta variants. It is not exceptional. There is no scientific basis for all the hysteria over omicron. As shown below, most people assessed with omicron were vaccinated and got breakthrough infections, showing vaccines offer little protection.

Additional observations

Note that the higher the T value, the less effective current vaccines are in defending against the variant and protecting people from it (as real-world data given below show). However, the higher T value does not imply greater lethality. As is known by virologists, variants are smart enough to not kill their victims, which would also kill them and prevent them from spreading. Thus, high T value variants spread easily, can cause health impacts but do not necessarily kill people at a high rate than other variants.

Fantini said: "For omicron, the mutations go in all directions, without any particular logic, some annihilating each other. The mutational profiles … suggest that neutralizing antibodies [from vaccine immunity] will have very low activity on this variant. … This analysis of the omicron variant suggests that this variant will not supplant delta." In other words, with far less spreading potential, omicron is not likely to replace the much more transmissible delta prevalent globally.

Worth remembering is that all the current COVID vaccines were designed to address the earliest COVID virus molecule. Thus, they do not protect very well against later variants that have considerable mutations. Is protection zero? No. Current vaccines offer limited defense against variants because they only aim at a small fraction of the virus molecule components.

Vaccine problems

In a more recent article, Fantini and an associate said that there is a "progressive loss of immunity induced by the two doses of vaccines directed against the spike protein" because current vaccines are not designed to defend against recent variants, including delta and omicron. Moreover, "the third vaccine [booster] dose can have serious long-term side effects due to the 'ADE' phenomenon (Antibody-dependent enhancement: facilitation of infection by antibodies). The benefit/risk ratio would be unfavorable." In other words, like other researchers, they see the negative impact of current COVID vaccines that reduce protection offered by a person's immune system. What is being said is that antibodies not only offer little protection but, instead, facilitate viral infection and promote release of new mutations or variants. This is consistent with considerable data showing correlations between higher vaccination rates and higher death rates at the nation level.

This, too, was noted: "The immune response to SARS-CoV-2, whether natural or vaccine-induced, produces antibodies directed against the spike protein. In the case of mRNA vaccines, the only molecular target is the spike protein. In the case of natural infection with the virus, the immune response [natural immunity] is directed against several viral proteins, including the spike protein. In all cases, the spike protein is therefore crucial. However, SARS-CoV-2 is an RNA virus that mutates a lot, and many mutations affect the spike protein, which disturbs its recognition by antibodies." The bottom line is that vaccine immunity is inferior to natural immunity because the former was designed for the earliest strain and only targets a small fraction of the complex COVID molecule.

The forecast by Fantini about omicron is consistent with information flowing in. Specifically, vaccines will have little impact on omicron transmission or infectivity. For example, Reuters reported: "Four people in southern Germany have tested positive for the omicron COVID-19 variant even though they were fully vaccinated against the coronavirus said officials." Moreover, "All four showed moderate symptoms."

Previously it was highlighted, according to the Botswana government, the omicron variant was first detected in four people who were fully vaccinated. And information from South Africa is that omicron caused mild symptoms and no patients needed hospitalization, and that the European Union's public health body said that they've found 44 cases containing the omicron variant in 10 of their member countries, all of which had mild or asymptomatic illness."

Also reported was that "Two quarantined travelers in Hong Kong who have tested positive for the variant were vaccinated with the Pfizer jab." All three initial confirmed and suspected cases reported from Israel occurred among fully vaccinated individuals. And an Israeli doctor revealed that he had been infected with omicron despite being triple vaccinated and wearing a mask.

In Australia, "New South Wales state authorities reported that two travelers from South Africa to Sydney had become Australia's first omicron cases. Both were fully vaccinated, showed no symptoms." A person in San Francisco was reported to have traveled from South Africa, had mild symptoms and had been vaccinated. Interestingly, officials said they had contacted everyone who had close contact with the person, and they had all tested negative.

Meanwhile, everything Fauci has said is completely inconsistent with actual data as well as what Fantini has forecast. Everything he has said seems clearly aimed at instilling fear about omicron so that invasive, authoritarian government actions and continued push for vaccines could be justified.

Conclusions

A review of studies found unequivocally that COVID vaccines do not stop viral transmission, with no difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated people. So, all real-world evidence is that omicron cannot be effectively addressed by COVID vaccines. Together with Fantini's work, the proper conclusion it that omicron will not be very transmissible nor be more infective than delta.

Because mutations will continue to produce variants, it is critically important to use the work of Fantini to accurately assess whether or not a new variant should evoke the fears and government responses that have sprung up so quickly for omicron.










ARMY CALLED JAN. 6 ´LIARS´

REPORT HITS LEADERS AS ´STALINIST, NORTH KOREA´ PROPAGANDISTS

https://justthenews.com/government/security/former-dc-national-guard-official-says-generals-lied-congress-about-january-6

Former D.C. National Guard official says generals lied to Congress about Jan. 6

Col. Earl Matthews calls military leaders "absolute liars" over their accounts of riot

A former member of the D.C. National Guard has accused two Army leaders of perjuring themselves before Congress in an attempt to rewrite the history of the military's response to the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.

Col. Earl Matthews, a high-level Pentagon official during the Trump administration, has authored a 36-page report criticizing the Pentagon's inspector general for what he believes is an error-riddled account created in order to protect a top Army official who argued against sending the National Guard to the Capitol, according to Politico.

In the memo, Matthews calls Gen. Charles Flynn and Lt. Gen. Walter Piatt "absolute and unmitigated liars" for their description of the events of Jan. 6. On the day of the riot, Matthews was serving as the top attorney for Maj. Gen. William Walker, then the commanding general of the D.C. National Guard. Walker is now the House sergeant at arms.

The memo argues that Flynn and Piatt's testimonies to Congress were "replete with factual inaccuracies" and that the Army has attempted to create its own revisionist version of the events of the day that are "worthy of the best Stalinist or North Korea propagandist."

The memo comes after a public call from Walker for the inspector general to retract its detailed Jan. 6 report, which he called "inaccurate" and filled with "sloppy work."






















Will Jake Sullivan Be Indicted?

Will Jake Sullivan Be Indicted?

by Charles "Sam" Faddis 












There is zero medical justification for injecting children with mRNA or DNA shots. The real reason appears to build a registry of digital ids on the entire generation of children, in order to track further injections as well as all other facets of their lives as they grow up. This plan has been underway well before COVID hit in early 2020.

The feigned concern for welfare of children is dangerous beyond measure. It was Hitler who said,

“The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation.”

 ⁃ TN Editor





The Atlantic Council conferred it highest honor, the Distinguished Business Leadership Award, to Pfizer Chairman Albert Bourla. The Council is one a top-tier global elite clique whose membership has been tightly intertwined with the Trilateral Commission since 1973, leading critics to declare that global policies of the two organizations are synonymous.

Pfizer has demonstrated its character as a giant vampire squid, having no concern for public health or the individual lives that it has destroyed over the years.  ⁃ TN Editor





POSTED BY: PATRICK WOOD DECEMBER 6, 2021

On October 4, 2020, three highly-respected medical professionals wrote The Great Barrington Declaration to protest damaging COVID-19 policies, including physical and mental health impacts. Today, just 14 months later, the Declaration has attracted 870,000 signatures, including almost 60,000 from medical scientists and practitioners.

The original drafters included:

  • Dr. Martin Kulldorff, professor of medicine at Harvard University, a biostatistician, and epidemiologist with expertise in detecting and monitoring infectious disease outbreaks and vaccine safety evaluations.
  • Dr. Sunetra Gupta, professor at Oxford University, an epidemiologist with expertise in immunology, vaccine development, and mathematical modeling of infectious diseases.
  • Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor at Stanford University Medical School, a physician, epidemiologist, health economist, and public health policy expert focusing on infectious diseases and vulnerable populations.

They were joined by 43 highly-credentialed co-signers.

Since the GBD completely refutes the global Technocrat narrative of fear-mongering, lockdowns, school closings, social distancing, mask wearing, etc., it has been completely ignored by the world’s media and medical policy makers.

THE GREAT BARRINGTON DECLARATION

THE GREAT BARRINGTON DECLARATION – AS INFECTIOUS DISEASE EPIDEMIOLOGISTS AND PUBLIC HEALTH SCIENTISTS WE HAVE GRAVE CONCERNS ABOUT THE DAMAGING PHYSICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH IMPACTS OF THE PREVAILING COVID-19 POLICIES, AND RECOMMEND AN APPROACH WE CALL FOCUSED PROTECTION.

COMING FROM BOTH THE LEFT AND RIGHT, AND AROUND THE WORLD, WE HAVE DEVOTED OUR CAREERS TO PROTECTING PEOPLE. CURRENT LOCKDOWN POLICIES ARE PRODUCING DEVASTATING EFFECTS ON SHORT AND LONG-TERM PUBLIC HEALTH. THE RESULTS (TO NAME A FEW) INCLUDE LOWER CHILDHOOD VACCINATION RATES, WORSENING CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE OUTCOMES, FEWER CANCER SCREENINGS AND DETERIORATING MENTAL HEALTH – LEADING TO GREATER EXCESS MORTALITY IN YEARS TO COME, WITH THE WORKING CLASS AND YOUNGER MEMBERS OF SOCIETY CARRYING THE HEAVIEST BURDEN. KEEPING STUDENTS OUT OF SCHOOL IS A GRAVE INJUSTICE.

KEEPING THESE MEASURES IN PLACE UNTIL A VACCINE IS AVAILABLE WILL CAUSE IRREPARABLE DAMAGE, WITH THE UNDERPRIVILEGED DISPROPORTIONATELY HARMED.

FORTUNATELY, OUR UNDERSTANDING OF THE VIRUS IS GROWING. WE KNOW THAT VULNERABILITY TO DEATH FROM COVID-19 IS MORE THAN A THOUSAND-FOLD HIGHER IN THE OLD AND INFIRM THAN THE YOUNG. INDEED, FOR CHILDREN, COVID-19 IS LESS DANGEROUS THAN MANY OTHER HARMS, INCLUDING INFLUENZA.

AS IMMUNITY BUILDS IN THE POPULATION, THE RISK OF INFECTION TO ALL – INCLUDING THE VULNERABLE – FALLS. WE KNOW THAT ALL POPULATIONS WILL EVENTUALLY REACH HERD IMMUNITY – I.E.  THE POINT AT WHICH THE RATE OF NEW INFECTIONS IS STABLE – AND THAT THIS CAN BE ASSISTED BY (BUT IS NOT DEPENDENT UPON) A VACCINE. OUR GOAL SHOULD THEREFORE BE TO MINIMIZE MORTALITY AND SOCIAL HARM UNTIL WE REACH HERD IMMUNITY.

THE MOST COMPASSIONATE APPROACH THAT BALANCES THE RISKS AND BENEFITS OF REACHING HERD IMMUNITY, IS TO ALLOW THOSE WHO ARE AT MINIMAL RISK OF DEATH TO LIVE THEIR LIVES NORMALLY TO BUILD UP IMMUNITY TO THE VIRUS THROUGH NATURAL INFECTION, WHILE BETTER PROTECTING THOSE WHO ARE AT HIGHEST RISK. WE CALL THIS FOCUSED PROTECTION.

ADOPTING MEASURES TO PROTECT THE VULNERABLE SHOULD BE THE CENTRAL AIM OF PUBLIC HEALTH RESPONSES TO COVID-19. BY WAY OF EXAMPLE, NURSING HOMES SHOULD USE STAFF WITH ACQUIRED IMMUNITY AND PERFORM FREQUENT TESTING OF OTHER STAFF AND ALL VISITORS. STAFF ROTATION SHOULD BE MINIMIZED. RETIRED PEOPLE LIVING AT HOME SHOULD HAVE GROCERIES AND OTHER ESSENTIALS DELIVERED TO THEIR HOME. WHEN POSSIBLE, THEY SHOULD MEET FAMILY MEMBERS OUTSIDE RATHER THAN INSIDE. A COMPREHENSIVE AND DETAILED LIST OF MEASURES, INCLUDING APPROACHES TO MULTI-GENERATIONAL HOUSEHOLDS, CAN BE IMPLEMENTED, AND IS WELL WITHIN THE SCOPE AND CAPABILITY OF PUBLIC HEALTH PROFESSIONALS.

THOSE WHO ARE NOT VULNERABLE SHOULD IMMEDIATELY BE ALLOWED TO RESUME LIFE AS NORMAL. SIMPLE HYGIENE MEASURES, SUCH AS HAND WASHING AND STAYING HOME WHEN SICK SHOULD BE PRACTICED BY EVERYONE TO REDUCE THE HERD IMMUNITY THRESHOLD. SCHOOLS AND UNIVERSITIES SHOULD BE OPEN FOR IN-PERSON TEACHING. EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES, SUCH AS SPORTS, SHOULD BE RESUMED. YOUNG LOW-RISK ADULTS SHOULD WORK NORMALLY, RATHER THAN FROM HOME. RESTAURANTS AND OTHER BUSINESSES SHOULD OPEN. ARTS, MUSIC, SPORT AND OTHER CULTURAL ACTIVITIES SHOULD RESUME. PEOPLE WHO ARE MORE AT RISK MAY PARTICIPATE IF THEY WISH, WHILE SOCIETY AS A WHOLE ENJOYS THE PROTECTION CONFERRED UPON THE VULNERABLE BY THOSE WHO HAVE BUILT UP HERD IMMUNITY.

READ FULL DECLARATION  HERE…







rape

Professors from Sweden’s Lund University are facing prosecution from the country’s Ministry of Education for their “ethics” behind a paper demonstrating how most rapes are committed by migrants. Professor Kristina Sundquist and her colleagues are under investigation by the Board

READ MORE →











Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)