Sunday, October 25, 2020

JUST WHO WAS FAUCI CONSPIRING WITH AND HOW MUCH DID HE 'RAKE IN' IN THE PANDEMIC?

 Submitted by: Ebau

From: lyle@lylerapacki.com
Sent: 10/24/2020 2:59:05 AM Eastern Standard Time
Subject: New Fauci Emails On China, WHO >

SENTINEL INTELLIGENCE SERVICES, LLC
                                LYLE J. RAPACKI, Ph.D.
                                          ____________
 
Friday – October the 23rd, 2020 -- 2335Hrs; P.S.T. (CA)
____________
 
FOR YOUR ANALYSIS AND CONSIDERATION:
 
 
 
Fauci Emails Show His Approval of China’s Initial Response to Coronavirus
 
In breaking news, we just received 300 pages
 
 
of Fauci emails, including his approval of a press release supportive of China’s response to the 2019 novel coronavirus. He is Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. The emails were released by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
 
On January 27, 2020, the World Health Organization/World Bank convened the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board
 
 
(GPMB). The following day, the GPMB Secretariat wrote an email
 
 
with the subject line “TIME SENSITIVE Message from GPMB Co-Chairs: review of draft GPMB Statement on 2019-novel coronavirus:”
 
There was consensus for the GPMB to issue a statement supportive of countries’ (especially China) and WHO response efforts, and to call for urgent actions to further strengthen global preparedness and response to this outbreak.
 
Please find attached a draft GPMB Statement.
 
On January 29, Fauci responds:
 
Looks fine. Please see my comments in attached document. Thanks, Tony
__
 
The emails were produced in response to our Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit
 
 
filed May 4, 2020, on behalf of the Daily Caller News Foundation (Daily Caller News Foundation v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
 
 
(No. 1:20-cv-01149)). We sued here in DC after HHS failed to respond to an April 1, 2020, FOIA request from the DCNF asking for:
 
  *  Communications between Dr. Fauci and Deputy Director Lane and World Health Organization officials concerning the novel coronavirus.
  *  Communications of Dr. Fauci and Deputy Director Lane concerning WHO, WHO official Bruce Aylward, WHO Director General Tedros Anhanom, and China.
The time period for the request is January 1, 2020 to April 1, 2020.
 
Many of the emails consist of missives to large groups of recipients, including Fauci, from Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, which describes itself as “an independent monitoring and accountability body to ensure preparedness for global health crises” convened by the World Health Organization and the World Bank.
 
  *  On January 28, 2020, in an effort to organize a joint statement among international organizations on “sharing research data and findings relevant to the novel coronavirus (nCoV),” GPMB’s Jeremy Farrar emails
 
 
upwards of three dozen, mostly redacted recipients, including the director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Francis Collins, and cc’ing Fauci, sending them all a proposed joint statement, which is completely redacted in the documents provided by HHS, for their review and approval. Shortly thereafter, Collins responds: “NIH is happy to endorse the joint statement.” That same day, Professor Stewart Cole, President of the Institut Pasteur emails Farrar: “Thanks for the initiative. Pasteur is on board and fully supportive.” A subsequent statement
 
 
which was published two days later on January 30, says:
The Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (GPMB) convened on 27 January 2020 to discuss the current outbreak of 2019-nCoV, which was first detected in Wuhan, China, and is now quickly spreading internationally. The Board commends the speed of the response so far by countries and the World Health Organization (WHO), the transparency of China in sharing information and the genome sequence of the virus, and the strong collaboration between China and affected countries and with WHO.
 
  *  On February 1, 2020, the chief scientist at the WHO emailed
 
 
Fauci to let him know the WHO was organizing a global research partners forum on February 11 and to ask him to attend, also suggesting he might think about funding and/or undertaking research on this “new viral outbreak:”
As the head of an agency that would play an important role in addressing this new viral outbreak, either by undertaking or funding research, or both, I take great pleasure in inviting you to this meeting.
 
  *  On February 4, Hilary Marston from NIH replied
 
 
to the WHO’s invitation to a coronavirus forum, begging off on behalf of Fauci: “First, as to your kind invitation to have him join the meeting, unfortunately his time is entirely consumed as central member of the US government response team and he will be unable to travel.” She went on to recommend several individuals Fauci wanted to attend the meeting in his stead.
  *  On February 13, 2020, it appears that National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Deputy Director for Clinical Research and Special Projects Dr. Cliff Lane was en route to Japan to “assist with rapid implementation of a study of the drug remdesivir as a therapeutic intervention for COVID-19, within the context of the current cases in that country.” It appears that WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros invited him instead to come to China to participate in the WHO Mission there. Fauci’s Associate Director for International Research Affairs, Gray Handley, replied
 
 
to a redacted recipient at WHO that Lane was unable to accept the WHO’s invitation to come to China: “Due to the importance of this study, Dr. Lane may not be available to participate in the WHO mission to be undertaken in China next week.”
It appears that when Fauci discovered what Handley had done, he countermanded
 
 
his decision by having HHS Director of the Office of Global Affairs Garrett Grigbsy send an email informing two individuals, apparently at WHO, that Lane would be coming to China:
 
I just talked to Dr. Fauci and there must have been some communication mix up about Cliff.
 
Cliff Lane is absolutely going to China as part of the WHO team (if invited).[Emphasis in original]
 
In one fundraising campaign, Ilona Kickbusch of GPMB sent an email
 
 
to Victor Dzau on March 3, 2020 and cc’ed Anthony Fauci along with more than two dozen other, mostly redacted recipients under the Subject Line: “Re: GPMG: COVID-19 FUNDING NOTE,” Kickbusch says:
 
Ahead of the GPMB Board call on Wednesday, I’m pleased to attach a note (on behalf of Jeremy Farrar, Victor Dzau and a small working group) setting out the urgent need for new funding for the global COVID-19 response.
 
You will have seen the strong announcement today from the World Bank of up to $12 bn to support country response, which we warmly welcome. We are asking for your feedback on the call and consideration for the GPMB to launch an “ask” this week regarding needs not likely to be covered by the World Bank announcement – this would target the leaders and policy makers of other financing institutions and G7/G20 nations…The aim of the note is to encourage an immediate and full response to the needs of the world, recognizing that many countries are not well prepared and could be left behind.
 
  *  On March 4, the GPMB group held a conference call with its board in preparation for making another $8 billion request to a group of international financial institutions. On March 5, Alex Harris, head of global policy and advocacy at Wellcome
 
 
a global charitable foundation, funded by a £26.8 billion investment portfolio that does grant funding, advocacy campaigns and partnerships to raise money for select clients (founded by the pharmaceutical entrepreneur, Sir Henry Wellcome) – emailed
 
Thank you for your input on the call yesterday regarding the COVID-19 funding request that the GPMB will be making to multilateral financing institutions and G7/G20 nations.
 
In this regard I attach:
 
An updated background note revising the ask to $8bn as a result of removing the [redacted] we had previously included for strengthening country preparedness, given the World Bank announcement
 
“The government is now ever so slowly complying with the law and letting the American people know how they did business with the WHO and China at the outset of this pandemic,” said Daily Caller News Foundation President Neil Patel. “We are grateful to Judicial Watch for helping us force the government to do its job.”
 
Let me add that these Fauci emails show how praising China was the odd priority of the WHO in the face of a novel and dangerous coronavirus. That the NIH tried to slow-roll the release of these emails and is still sitting on thousands more is a scandal.
 
 
HHS to begin processing 300 pages of emails per month beginning on October 21. In a September 21 court filing, HHS said the agency could begin producing 300 pages of responsive records to the Daily Caller News Foundation beginning on November 30, eight months after receiving the Daily Caller’s request under FOIA. The total number of responsive records is approximately 4,200, which would have pushed off the full release of the records until at least 2022. HHS also alleged that Fauci must personally review each one of his emails before they are released.
 
Until next week …
__
 
 
 
 
Judicial Watch, Inc.,  -- 425 3rd St Sw Ste 800  /  Washington, DC 20024  /  202.646.5172
 
© 2017 - 2020, All Rights Reserved
 
___________
 
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)